
Trump's deal with Pakistan raises a big question: Does India's arch-rival really have large oil reserves? Here's what we know
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
What did Trump announce about Pakistan?
Pakistan's current oil reserves: Modest and Overstated?
Buzz around 'massive' reserves in Pakistan
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Pakistan oil reserve: Location, geology, and optimism
Pakistan's 2024 offshore oil reserve discovery claim
A huge investment challenge
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
History of oil exploration in Pakistan
Could Pakistan really sell oil to India?
The Chinese Challenge in Pakistan
Just hours after slapping 25% tariffs on India, U.S. President Donald Trump announced a new energy deal with Pakistan on Wednesday, framing it as a joint project to tap what he called the country's 'massive oil reserves.' Trump's remarks, shared on Truth Social , included a surprising hint: that Pakistan might one day sell oil to India. The bold claim has reignited debate over Pakistan's real oil potential — a subject that remains more promise than proven reality.In a post on his social media platform, Trump said the United States and Pakistan are 'in the process of choosing the Oil Company that will lead this Partnership' aimed at developing Pakistan's oil resources. Framing the deal as a future-looking energy alliance, Trump wrote, 'Who knows, maybe they'll be selling Oil to India some day!' The timing — coming just after economic penalties on India — adds geopolitical weight to the deal.Despite Trump's grand language, Pakistan is not currently sitting on confirmed 'massive' oil reserves. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) and Worldometer data, Pakistan had 353.5 million barrels of proven oil reserves as of 2016, placing it 52nd globally and accounting for just 0.021% of the world's total reserves. At current consumption levels (about 556,000 barrels per day), these reserves would cover less than two years of domestic demand without imports or new discoveries.Daily oil production in Pakistan hovers around 88,000 barrels, far below national consumption, forcing the country to import about 85% of its oil.Trump's comment may be based on recent geological surveys in Pakistan's Offshore Indus Basin, where seismic data has pointed to potential hydrocarbon formations. A three-year survey, conducted with support from a 'friendly country,' identified large underwater structures with oil and gas signatures. Some speculative estimates suggest these could rank among the world's top four reserves, after Venezuela, Saudi Arabia, and Iran.However, these claims are not yet substantiated. No commercial drilling has confirmed the presence, size, or quality of these resources. Experts warn these are not reserves in the technical sense, as they lack development plans, proven recoverability, or commercial viability.The Indus Basin's geological structure, shaped by tectonic activity and rich in mudstone formations, does make it a promising zone for future oil and gas discovery. Seismic interpretation suggests thick source rocks and possible traps, but no successful offshore extraction has occurred in Pakistan so far. Past offshore attempts, such as the Kekra-1 well, failed to yield results.Nonetheless, the energy ministry and the state-run Oil and Gas Development Company Limited (OGDCL) are hopeful that with foreign investment and advanced exploration, this picture could change.In early 2024, Pakistan's Ministry of Energy made headlines by announcing the preliminary results of a multi-year offshore seismic survey in the Offshore Indus Basin, claiming the discovery of substantial hydrocarbon potential.Former Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority (OGRA) member Muhammad Arif and technical experts from state-run companies like OGDCL clarified that these formations cannot yet be classified as "reserves." In the petroleum industry, a resource is only considered a 'reserve' when it is discovered, commercially viable, and supported by a full development plan. In this case, no exploratory drilling has been carried out, and no oil or gas has been commercially extracted from these offshore zones.The 2024 claims are based on 2D and 3D seismic interpretations that point to promising structural traps and thick source rocks in tectonically active zones along the Murray Ridge, where the Indian and Eurasian plates meet. The geological setup includes potential source rocks from the Cretaceous to Miocene age, raising hopes among geologists about future discoveries.Developing these potential reserves isn't cheap. Experts estimate it could take $5 billion and 4–5 years just to confirm and begin development of the offshore sites. Infrastructure — pipelines, refineries, ports — would require even more capital. Pakistan's ongoing economic crisis, including a $126 billion external debt and a high energy import bill of $17.5 billion (2023), complicates matters.Refining capacity is also limited. Pakistan's existing refineries handle around 450,000 barrels per day, already strained by domestic needs.Discovered in the 1960s with ~60 million barrels in place, though only 12–15% is recoverable.Discovered in the 1980s and now contribute the bulk of Pakistan's onshore oil production.Pakistan's largest gas field, discovered in 1952, but not a source of crude oil.These legacy fields contribute to current production but are nowhere near enough to meet demand.Trump's suggestion that Pakistan might supply oil to India someday is highly speculative. Beyond the uncertain state of Pakistan's reserves, political and logistical barriers loom large. India already secures oil from the Middle East and Russia at scale. Any energy corridor from Pakistan would require improved diplomatic ties, stable cross-border infrastructure, and verified commercial production.The US entry into Pakistan's oil exploration space could also unsettle China, which has already made significant strategic and financial investments in the country, particularly through the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). Many of these projects, including energy infrastructure and port development, are concentrated in Balochistan, a province that is not only home to untapped oil and gas potential but also to a long-running insurgency and local protests against federal resource control. If the US-Pakistan oil partnership moves forward in regions like Balochistan, it could trigger geopolitical friction with Beijing, which views Pakistan as a key Belt and Road ally. Furthermore, local armed groups in Balochistan have repeatedly targeted both Chinese workers and Pakistani state infrastructure, raising questions about security, sovereignty, and the viability of any large-scale foreign-led energy project in the region.President Trump's announcement of a joint oil venture with Pakistan has put the spotlight on a country rarely discussed in global energy circles. But there's a long road between promise and production. Until exploratory drilling confirms the size and quality of these formations, Pakistan's oil future remains speculative. For now, the Trump-Pakistan deal is more about strategic positioning than proven petroleum power.As of 2016, Pakistan has 353.5 million barrels of proven oil reserves, placing it 52nd in the world.Pakistan produces approximately 88,000 barrels per day, far below its daily consumption of over 550,000 barrels.Not yet. Seismic surveys in the Offshore Indus Basin suggest potential reserves, but no commercially viable discoveries have been confirmed.Around $5 billion and 4–5 years of exploration, drilling, and infrastructure investment are required just to begin commercial development.That's highly speculative and would require confirmed reserves, production scale-up, and improved diplomatic and trade relations between the two countries.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
19 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump repeats claim he settled wars, including between India and Pakistan, with trade
US President Donald Trump on Sunday yet again took credit for stopping conflicts around the world, including the recent one between India and Pakistan. US President Donald Trump walks off Air Force One at the Lehigh Valley International Airport on August 01, 2025 in Allentown, Pennsylvania.(AFP) Since May 10, when Trump announced on social media that India and Pakistan had agreed to a 'full and immediate' ceasefire after a 'long night' of talks mediated by Washington, he has repeated his claim on several occasions. Trump's latest claim comes days after White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Trump should be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for ending several conflicts around the world including the one between India and Pakistan. On Sunday, in a post on Truth Social, Trump slammed radio host and author Charlamagne Tha God, and said he (God) knows nothing about him or what he has done, 'like just ending 5 Wars, including a 31 year bloodbath between Republic of the Congo and Rwanda, where Seven Million people have died, and there was no end in sight.' 'He didn't know that, or India and Pakistan or, wiping out Iran's nuclear capabilities, or closing the horrendous open Border, or creating the greatest economy,' Trump said. Just a day earlier, Trump said in an interview on Newsmax that he has settled a lot of wars. 'You take a look at what's happened just over the last little while. We've settled a lot of, a lot of very beautiful wars have been settled… One of the wars India, Pakistan, nuclear,' Trump said adding that he settled conflict between Thailand and Cambodia as well as Congo and Rwanda. 'I settled that up. And I settled it up with trade. I settled a lot of them with trade. I said 'listen, you guys are going to fight. You can fight all you want. I mean, just fight your hearts out. But we're not doing a trade deal'. 'All of a sudden they end up not doing a war. I settled a lot of wars. I think I settled averaging about a war a month. But, you know, we're saving millions of lives,' he said. Trump on Wednesday announced the imposition of a 25 per cent tariff on all goods coming from India starting August 1, plus an unspecified penalty for buying Russian crude oil and military equipment. The tariff for Pakistan was 19 per cent, lower than the 29 per cent announced by Trump in April. In fact, Trump on Wednesday also announced sealing a trade deal with Pakistan and said that Washington will work with Islamabad to develop what he described as the South Asian nation's 'massive oil reserves.' At a White House press briefing on Thursday, Leavitt said that Trump has 'now ended conflicts between Thailand and Cambodia, Israel and Iran, Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, India and Pakistan, Serbia and Kosovo and Egypt and Ethiopia.' She said that the president has brokered, on average, about one peace deal or ceasefire per month during his six months in office. 'It's well past time that President Trump was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize,' she said. Since May 10, Trump has repeated his claim nearly 30 times that he 'helped settle' the tensions between India and Pakistan and that he told the nuclear-armed South Asian neighbours that America will do a 'lot of trade' with them if they stopped the conflict. Prime Minister Narendra Modi said in Parliament this week that no leader of any country asked India to stop Operation Sindoor launched by India in retaliation after the April 22 terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam that killed 26 people. External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar on Wednesday categorically said there was no third-party intervention in bringing about a ceasefire with Pakistan during Operation Sindoor, asserting that the halting of the military action was also not linked to trade as claimed by Trump. Intervening in the special discussion on Operation Sindoor in the Rajya Sabha, Jaishankar said Prime Minister Modi and Trump did not have any phone calls between April 22, when the Pahalgam terror attack took place, and June 16.


Mint
19 minutes ago
- Mint
US top official signals Donald Trump's tariff rates ‘pretty much set' ahead of August 7 rollout
US President Donald Trump's global tariff policy is coming into sharper focus as his administration moves to implement revised trade measures. The updated slate of customised tariffs—ranging from 10% to 40%—is set to take effect on August 7, according to an executive order issued last week. 'These tariff rates are pretty much set,' said US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer during an appearance on CBS News. 'I expect I do have my phone blowing up... we're seeing truly the contours of the President's tariff plan right now with these rates.' Trump first unveiled a baseline 10% tariff on nearly all US imports on April 2, dubbed 'Liberation Day,' followed by a series of higher, country-specific rates. The initial announcement triggered a stock market downturn, prompting the administration to delay implementation twice to allow time for negotiations. In the weeks following 'Liberation Day,' Trump's trade team engaged in fast-track talks with numerous countries. Agreements were reportedly reached with the European Union, United Kingdom, Vietnam, Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, Indonesia, Cambodia, Thailand, and others. 'Some of these deals are announced, some are not, others depend on the level of the trade deficit or surplus we may have with the country,' Greer explained. 'There are trade ministers who want to talk more and see how they can work in a different way with the United States,' said Greer. 'But I think that we have, we're seeing truly the contours of the President's tariff plan right now with these rates.' As part of Trump's broader trade strategy, a tariff truce with China is currently in place but is set to expire on August 12. Simultaneously, the administration has given Russia until August 8 to reach a peace agreement with Ukraine. Failure to do so may lead to secondary tariffs or sanctions on countries purchasing Russian oil. The sweeping tariff moves are also facing legal scrutiny. Last Thursday, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit heard arguments related to the administration's authority to impose such tariffs. Trump invoked emergency powers to justify the measures, but legal experts have raised questions about the extent of his authority.


India Today
34 minutes ago
- India Today
Not acceptable: Top Trump aide accuses India of financing Russia's war in Ukraine
A top aide to US President Donald Trump criticised India for buying Russian oil, accusing the country of indirectly funding Russia's war in Ukraine. This comes as the Trump administration intensifies pressure on nations that continue purchasing oil from Miller, one of Trump's most influential advisors, said that Trump clearly believes India should stop buying Russian oil. "What he (Trump) said very clearly is that it is not acceptable for India to continue financing this war by purchasing oil from Russia," Miller said on Sunday Morning seemed surprised at the scale of India's oil trade with Russia. On Fox News, he said, "People will be shocked to learn that India is basically tied with China in purchasing Russian oil. That's an astonishing fact." Despite the US pressure, India has shown no sign of stopping its purchases. According to the news agency Reuters, Indian government sources said they will continue to import oil from Miller tempered his criticism by noting Trump's relationship with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, which he described as "tremendous."TRUMP SLAPS TARIFFS ON INDIAOn July 30, Donald Trump announced a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods and warned of potential penalties over India's purchase of Russian arms and oil. Immediately after the tariff announcement, Trump launched a blistering attack on New Delhi's ties with Moscow, dismissing both countries as "dead economies" and bluntly stating that he "does not care" what India does with has said he would consider imposing steep tariffs -- as high as 100% -- on imports from any country that continues to purchase oil from Russia unless Russia agrees to peace deal with TRADE WITH MOSCOW POINT OF IRRITATION: RUBIOWhile US Secretary of State Marco Rubio also criticised India's growing ties with Moscow. He called India a "strategic partner" but said its ongoing oil trade with Russia is a "point of irritation" in US-India imports of Russian oil have grown rapidly over the past few years. According to Reuters, before the Ukraine war in 2021, only 3% of India's oil came from Russia. That number has now jumped to between 35% and 40% of its total oil imports.- EndsWith inputs from Agencies Must Watch