India steel plans threaten global emissions goals: report
BANGKOK - India's plans to massively expand coal-based steel and iron production threaten global efforts to reduce the sector's carbon emissions, a key contributor to climate change, a report said on Tuesday.
The sector accounts for 11 percent of global carbon dioxide emissions, and India aims to double production by 2030.
Switching from coal-dependent blast furnaces to electric arc furnaces (EAFs), which produce significantly fewer emissions, could reduce that figure.
EAF production is projected to make up 36 percent of the sector by 2030, but that falls short of the 37 percent the International Energy Agency (IEA) says is needed to stay on track for net-zero by 2050.
"The only realistic way to meet that 37 percent goal is with a change of plans from India," said Astrid Grigsby-Schulte from the Global Energy Monitor (GEM) think tank.
That seemingly marginal one-percent difference "represents tens of millions of tonnes of CO2 generation", Grigsby-Schulte told AFP.
EAFs generally rely on melting scrap steel, a process that does not use coal. They produce significantly fewer emissions, even when they rely on electricity from coal-dependent grids.
Meeting the 2030 target is "critical", she said, "not only because of emissions immediately avoided, but also because it means we are laying the necessary groundwork for broader decarbonisation by 2050."
China currently dominates global steel production, but its sector is stagnant.
Meanwhile, India, which targets carbon neutrality only by 2070, plans to massively expand domestic capacity.
And the majority of India's announced steel development plans involve higher-emissions blast furnace production, in a country whose steel industry is already the world's most carbon intensive.
However, there is a growing gap between India's steel capacity plans and actual developments on the ground, GEM said.
Just 12 percent of its announced new capacity has come online since the country released its 2017 National Steel Policy. The comparable figure for China is 80 percent, GEM said.
That suggests India's "ambitious growth plans are more talk than action thus far," the group added.
And it "leaves a huge percentage of their development plans that could still shift to lower-emissions technologies," added Grigsby-Schulte.
Demand for steel is continuing to grow, and the iron and steel industry is expected to be one of the last to continue using coal in the IEA's 2050 net-zero pathway.
The organisation has warned that the sector needs to "accelerate significantly" to meet 2050 targets, including with innovative production methods that are currently in their infancy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
4 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
New rules mandate energy-efficient motors — a win for SA's strained power grid
As of June 2025, South Africa has activated mandatory regulations that affect a R3-billion industry and will result in annual energy savings of 840 gigawatt hours — enough to power a city the size of Polokwane or approximately 140,000 households for a year. Electric motors might not sound exciting — but they're everywhere. They power conveyor belts in factories, water pumps on farms, fans in cooling systems, and crushers in mines. And as of June 2025, every new motor sold in South Africa will have to meet higher energy efficiency standards. That's because South Africa has officially implemented its Minimum Energy Performance Standards (Meps) for electric motors, bringing the country in line with global standards. The change affects a R3-billion industry, with the goal of saving up to 10% of energy per low voltage motor — which is significant in a country where demand exceeds supply. The new rule requires that most three-phase, low-voltage electric motors sold in South Africa meet IE3 (International Efficiency) standards. Less efficient IE1 and IE2 motors will be phased out over time, as old ones reach their end of life. Regulated by the National Regulator for Compulsory Specifications, this shift applies to motors rated between 0.75 kW and 375 kW with two, four, six, or eight poles — the kind you'd find in factories, farms, and commercial buildings. According to the International Energy Agency, electric motors and motor systems are responsible for about 53% of the world's total electricity consumption. And standards like MEPs offer the potential to reduce the energy demand of motor systems by 20 to 30% with short payback periods. Fanie Steyn, Executive of the Electric Motor Division at WEG Africa, a leading motor manufacturer, said that about 250,000 IE1 motors were imported into South Africa each year, representing a R3-billion value chain. Currently, there's a 3:1 ratio of IE1 to IE3 motors entering the country. 'From now, that's all about to change,' said Steyn. Those motors now need to be replaced with IE3 models, which are typically 4 to 10% more efficient. This might not sound like much — but considering that all electric motors account for around 65% of industrial energy use, and industry accounts for about 60% of the country's total energy demand, these efficiency gains are not negligent. 'Electric motors are the prime mover for all industry — almost everything that moves is driven by an electric motor. 'If you go to where a cold drink is bottled, the pump that pumps it, the conveyor that moves the bottles, where bread is made, or where mielies are crushed to make flour — it's all powered by motors,' he said. 'Almost everything that moves is by a motor.' Efficiency standard So starting this year, the new rules will require that all new motors meet the IE3 efficiency standard, which means they use electricity more efficiently and last longer. While the rules don't force businesses to replace existing motors immediately, over time, as older motors wear out, they will be replaced with these more efficient models. Dr Theo Covary, the lead researcher of the cost benefit analysis undertaken to inform these new regulations, estimates that this change will save South Africa 474 gigawatt hours (GWh) of electricity in the first year alone — enough to power about 44,000 homes for a year. Over the next decade, the savings will add up to 5,763 GWh, roughly the annual electricity use of a major South African city. 'The new IE3 regulation is expected to reduce electricity demand by approximately 0.25% in year one, which is reducing electricity by 0.25% in one year, 'which may seem small and insignificant but is material given the high net economic benefit to the economy', said Covary. The total cumulative energy savings of 5,763 GWh after 10 years is equivalent to the electricity used by Nelson Mandela Bay in one year. This is because as more and more older, less efficient motors reach their end of life and get replaced by more efficient models, the savings increase. In addition to energy savings, this reduction would prevent about 5 million tons of CO₂ emissions. To put this in perspective, offsetting that amount of carbon would require planting spekboom — an indigenous South African plant known for its carbon sequestration ability — over an area of approximately 3,333 square kilometres, which is about twice the size of the Western Cape's Garden Route District. Energy efficiency adds up If you consider that Eskom generated about 200 terawatt-hours (TWh) of electricity in the financial year ending March 2024, the estimated 840 GWh saved (or 0.84 TWh) from this new standard represents 0.25% of the power the country uses in a year. ' It might not sound like much, but believe me — 0.25% is a lot, and it all adds up,' said Chris Yellend, an electrical engineer and energy analyst from Business EE Intelligence. 'It's good that South Africa is following suit and becoming more energy efficient.' He added that energy efficiency measures like this offer the best returns in terms of cost. 'Instead of spending billions on new generation infrastructure, the economy can invest in efficiency — it's a no-brainer. Improving energy efficiency is the most cost-effective way of 'building' new electricity supply. It's not as insignificant as it might seem.' Steyn echoed these sentiments, saying: 'What do you do if you don't have energy? You have to build more power stations, maybe solar or wind farms — but all those options are massive projects with huge capital outlay. And it takes time and long periods of investment and installations before you can do that. 'We have an energy crisis, so in the short term one of the quickest or easiest ways to overcome that is to increase efficiency of products.' Steyn added: 'South Africa has done a phenomenal job over the years with labelling programmes — for fridges, TVs, lights. But now, finally, we're targeting the big energy consumers: electric motors.' According to a 2022 cost-benefit analysis by Covary and economist Linton Reddy of DNA Economics — which informed the regulation — these seemingly small savings are actually substantial, especially given the poor performance of Eskom's generation fleet. Despite the modest efficiency improvements, the long operating hours of motors translate into significant overall savings. To put it into context, Yelland said: 'If you value electricity at around R2.00 per kilowatt-hour, that's a saving — or a reduction in revenue to Eskom — of about R1.68-billion.' Tax breaks and rebates for motor upgrades Companies that upgrade to the new IE3 motors can tap into financial incentives. Zadok Olinga, a former president of the Southern Africa Energy Efficiency Confederation and director of resource management consultancy Oelinga, said the new minimum standards aligned with South Africa's broader push for energy efficiency — and opened the door to claiming Section 12L tax deductions and Eskom rebates. Under Section 12L, businesses can claim 95 cents per kilowatt-hour of verified energy saved as a tax deduction. Eskom also offers a 41c/kWh rebate for projects that cut electricity use — including motor upgrades — as long as minimum savings and demand reduction targets are met. Phase in Manufacturers and Original Equipment Manufacturers can still sell off their existing IE1 and IE2 stock until May 2026. End-users — such as factories or farms — aren't required to immediately replace older motors, but must buy energy-efficient ones when they do. 'Motors are built to last around 20 years,' said Van Niekerk from WEG.'But in reality, many reach end-of-life within seven to 10 years, especially in demanding environments.' For businesses that run motors 24/7, the higher upfront cost of an IE3 motor is often recovered in a matter of months through lower electricity bills. For others — say, a bakery or a workshop that runs motors eight hours a day — the payback period might be two to three years. DM
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
Clean energy investment rising despite economic uncertainty: IEA
Investment in clean energy technologies is set to strike a record this year. Image: Willem Law Investment in clean energy technologies is set to strike a record this year despite global economic uncertainty, double the spending on fossil fuels that will dip for the first time since 2020, the International Energy Agency said Thursday. While the Trump administration has been hostile to renewable energy sources and trumpets boosting oil production, the IEA said security concerns as well as rising demand for electricity - including from artificial intelligence and data centres - is driving investment in clean energy sources. "Amid the geopolitical and economic uncertainties that are clouding the outlook for the energy world, we see energy security coming through as a key driver of the growth in global investment this year to a record $3.3 trillion (R59trl) as countries and companies seek to insulate themselves from a wide range of risks," Executive Director Fatih Birol said as the IEA published its latest annual World Energy Investment report. It expects investment in clean technologies, including nuclear and electricity distribution grids, to hit a record $2.2trl this year. Meanwhile, investment in oil, natural gas and coal is set to dip to $1.1 billion, as companies react to falling prices and lower demand expectations. Most of the drop is due to investment in US oil production, while investment in liquefied natural gas (LNG) projects there and elsewhere is expected to lead to the largest-ever capacity growth in 2026-2028. Since returning to the White House, Trump has slapped a 10% tariff on most trading partners, alongside higher rates on dozens of economies, including China and the European Union, that have since been reduced or put on pause until early July while negotiations are held. Earlier this week the OECD slashed its annual global growth forecast, warning that Trump's tariffs blitz would stifle the world economy. But energy investments haven't suffered yet. "The fast-evolving economic and trade picture means that some investors are adopting a wait-and-see approach to new energy project approvals, but in most areas we have yet to see significant implications for existing projects," Birol said. US renewables to 'level off' But the IEA said the shift in US policies would impact investment there in renewables. "Spending on renewables and low-emissions fuels in the United States almost doubled over the last 10 years but is now set to level off as supportive policies are scaled back," it said. The report found the rapid rise in electricity demand - for industry, cooling, electric mobility, data centres and AI - was also shaping investment trends. The sector is expected attract $1.5trl in investments this year, 50% more than fossil fuels. The IEA also noted that nuclear energy has been making a comeback as electricity demand from data centres risks doubling in the next five years. While renewables are expected to meet most of that additional demand, the steady supply that nuclear plants offer have prompted a number of tech companies to enter into supply agreements. But the Paris-based IEA, which advises industrial nations on energy policy, warned that spending on electricity grids was not keeping up with investment into generation. In addition to lengthy permitting procedures, grid expansion was also being held back by tight supply of transformers and cable, it found. Despite the rising levels of investment in renewable energy production, the IEA said it must double to achieve the goal set at the 2024 UN climate conference: a tripling of the installed renewable capacity by 2030. And the urgent demand for power means new plants using dirty fuels such as coal are still being built, with a four percent increase in investment expected this year. "In the face of rapid electricity demand growth and concerns linked to security of supply, such as various geopolitical risks as well as uncertainties over hydropower output, China and India are approving increasing amounts of new coal-fired power," said the IEA report. AFP
eNCA
23-05-2025
- eNCA
Rare earth production outside China 'major milestone'
BEIJING - An Australian firm's production of a heavy rare earth, a first outside of China, is a "major milestone" in diversifying a critical supply chain dominated by Beijing, experts say. But the announcement by Lynas Rare Earths also illustrates how much more needs to be done to broaden the supply of elements critical for electric vehicles and renewable technology. What are rare earths? Rare earth elements (REE) are 17 metals that are used in a wide variety of everyday and high-tech products, from light bulbs to guided missiles. Among the most sought-after are neodymium and dysprosium, used to make super-strong magnets that power electric car batteries and ocean wind turbines. Despite their name, rare earths are relatively abundant in the Earth's crust. Their moniker is a nod to how unusual it is to find them in a pure form. Heavy rare earths, a subset of overall REE, have higher atomic weights, are generally less abundant and often more valuable. China dominates all elements of the rare earths supply chain, accounting for more than 60 percent of mining production and 92 percent of global refined output, according to the International Energy Agency. What did Lynas achieve? Lynas said it produced dysprosium oxide at its Malaysia facility, making it the only commercial producer of separated heavy rare earths outside of China. It hopes to refine a second heavy rare earth -- terbium -- at the same facility next month. It too can be used in permanent magnets, as well as some light bulbs. It "is a major milestone," said Neha Mukherjee, senior analyst on raw materials at Benchmark Mineral Intelligence. The announcement comes with China's REE supply caught up in its trade war with Washington. It is unclear whether a 90-day truce means Chinese export controls on some rare earths will be lifted, and experts say a backlog in permit approvals will snarl trade regardless. "Given this context, the Lynas development marks a real and timely shift, though it doesn't eliminate the need for broader, global diversification efforts," said Mukherjee. How significant is it? Lynas did not say how much dysprosium it refined, and rare earths expert Jon Hykawy warned the firm faces constraints. "The ore mined by Lynas contains relatively little of the heavy rare earths, so their produced tonnages can't be that large," said Hykawy, president of Stormcrow Capital. "Lynas can make terbium and dysprosium, but not enough, and more is needed." The mines most suited for extracting dysprosium are in south China, but deposits are known in Africa, South America and elsewhere. "Even with Lynas' production, China will still be in a position of dominance," added Gavin Wendt, founding director and senior resource analyst at MineLife. "However, it is a start, and it is crucial that other possible projects in the USA, Canada, Brazil, Europe and Asia, also prove technically viable and can be approved, so that the supply balance can really begin to shift." What are the challenges to diversifying? China's domination of the sector is partly the result of long-standing industrial policy. Just a handful of facilities refining light rare earths operate elsewhere, including in Estonia. It also reflects a tolerance for "in-situ mining", an extraction technique that is cheap but polluting, and difficult to replicate in countries with higher environmental standards. For them, "production is more expensive, so they need prices to increase to make any seriously interesting profits," said Hykawy. That is a major obstacle for now. "Prices have not supported new project development for over a year," said Mukherjee. "Most non-Chinese projects would struggle to break even at current price levels." There are also technical challenges, as processing rare earths requires highly specialised and efficient techniques, and can produce difficult-to-manage waste. What more capacity is near? Lynas has commissioned more processing capacity at its Malaysia plant, designed to produce up to 1,500 tonnes of heavy rare earths. If that focused on dysprosium and terbium, it could capture a third of global production, said Mukherjee. The firm is building a processing facility in Texas, though cost increases have cast doubt on the project, and Lynas wants the US government to pitch in more funds. US firm MP Materials has also completed pilot testing for heavy rare earth separation and plans to boost production this year. Canada's Aclara Resources is also developing a rare earths separation plant in the United States. And Chinese export uncertainty could mean prices start to rise, boosting balance sheets and the capacity of small players to expand. "The Lynas announcement shows progress is possible," said Mukherjee. "It sends a strong signal that with the right mix of technical readiness, strategic demand, and geopolitical urgency, breakthroughs can happen." by Sara Hussein
