SC stays MP HC order in Saif Ali Khan's family property dispute
A bench comprising Justices P S Narasimha and Atul Chandurkar issued notice on a plea of Omar Faruq Ali and Raashid Ali, descendants of the elder brother of Nawab Hamidullah Khan, against the high court's order of June 30.
The petitioners have challenged the high court's decision to set aside a February 14, 2000, trial court judgment that upheld the exclusive rights of Nawab's daughter Sajida Sultan, her son Mansoor Ali Khan (former India cricket captain), and their legal heirs, actor Saif Ali Khan, Soha Ali Khan, Saba Sultan, and veteran actress Sharmila Tagore, over the estate.
The high court said the trial court's ruling was based on a 1997 Allahabad High Court verdict which was later overturned by the Supreme Court in 2019.
However, instead of applying the 2019 precedent and deciding the case conclusively, the high court remanded the matter for re-evaluation.
Senior advocate Devadutt Kamat, appearing for the petitioners, said the high court remand order was contrary to the procedural norms outlined under the Civil Procedure Code (CPC).
The case has its origins in civil suits filed in 1999 by members of the Nawab's extended family, including the late Begum Suraiya Rashid and her children, Mahabano (also deceased), Niloufar, Nadir, and Yawar, as well as Nawabzadi Qamar Taj Rabia Sultan, another daughter of the Nawab.
The plaintiffs sought partition, possession, and equitable settlement of the Nawab's private estate.
The trial court ruled in favor of Sajida Sultan, stating the estate was not subject to Muslim Personal Law and had devolved upon her under constitutional provisions.
Following the Nawab's death in 1960, the Government of India issued a 1962 certificate recognising Sajida Sultan as both the ruler and rightful heir to the personal estate under Article 366(22) of the Constitution.
The plaintiffs, however, contended the Nawab's personal estate should be distributed among all legal heirs under Muslim Personal Law.
They also pointed out the 1962 certificate was not formally contested but claimed it should not bar equitable partition.
The respondents, including actor Saif Ali Khan and his family, argued succession followed the rule of primogeniture and Sajida Sultan had rightfully inherited both the royal title (Gaddi) and personal properties.
While overturning the trial court ruling, the high court remanded the case.
The petitioners moved the top court seeking reversal of the remand order.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
29 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Roger Binny may get new term as BCCI president as National Sports Bill adds twist; decision rests on ‘powerful people'
Former India all-rounder Roger Binny turned 70 last month. As per the Supreme Court-approved BCCI constitution, he is no longer eligible to continue as board president—a role he took on in October 2022, succeeding former captain Sourav Ganguly. However, with the recent passage of the National Sports Bill and ensuing uncertainty, the 1983 World Cup hero could remain in office until the board's Annual General Meeting in September. Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) president Roger Binny(AFP) Under the new bill, the age limit for office bearers of National Sports Federations has been raised to 75. If state unit members of the BCCI agree, Binny could remain in office until then. This provision aligns with the fact that global cricket governing bodies, in this case, the International Cricket Council (ICC), do not impose specific age limits on officials. A BCCI source, speaking on condition of anonymity, told PTI, "Roger will continue till board meeting in September. Whether he will get a fresh term depends on what members and other powerful people associated with the BCCI decide." While the BCCI now falls under the National Sports Bill's purview, it remains exempt from the Right to Information (RTI) Act since it does not receive government grants. The board's legal team is still reviewing the bill's detailed provisions. "The national sports bill has just been passed, so, we have some time to study it and engage in proper discussion before taking any decision," the source said. "There are other points to discuss in the bill for sure, and all the stakeholders, including senior players and coaching staff, will be consulted, particularly because cricket will be played at the 2028 Olympics," he added.
Hindustan Times
29 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
China suspends all engagements with Czech Republic President. Here's why
China on Tuesday said it has decided to "cease all engagement" with Czech Republic President Petr Pavel over his recent meeting with the Tibetan spiritual leader, the Dalai Lama. Petr Pavel met the Dalai Lama in Ladakh on July 27, the first time a sitting head of state visited India to meet the spiritual leader. (ANI) The Chinese Foreign Ministry also said Beijing has lodged a diplomatic protest with the Czech Republic over Pavel's meeting with the Dalai Lama. 'In disregard of China's repeated protests and strong opposition, Czech President Petr Pavel went to India to meet with the Dalai Lama," a spokesperson of the Chinese Foreign Ministry said while replying to a question about Pavel's meeting. 'This seriously contravenes the political commitment made by the Czech government to the Chinese government, and harms China's sovereignty and territorial integrity,' the spokesperson said in a reply posted on the official website of the ministry. "China strongly deplores and firmly opposes this, and has lodged serious protests with the Czech side. In light of the severity of Pavel's provocative action, China decides to cease all engagement with him,' the spokesperson said. China routinely protests any leaders and officials meeting the Dalai Lama, whom it terms a separatist. Pavel met the Dalai Lama in Ladakh on July 27. This was the first time that a sitting head of state visited India to meet the Dalai Lama, who had reached Leh on July 12 on a month-long tour of the Union Territory. "During the meeting, the President extended his warm congratulations to His Holiness on the occasion of his 90th birthday," the office of the spiritual leader posted on X.
Scroll.in
29 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Excluding non-citizens from voter rolls is within EC remit, says Supreme Court
The Supreme Court on Tuesday observed that the Election Commission has the authority to include citizens and exclude non-citizens from the voter rolls, Bar and Bench reported. A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi was hearing a clutch of petitions challenging the revision of electoral rolls in Bihar ahead of the Assembly elections. Kant noted that it is not the Election Commission but the Aadhaar Act that says the unique identification number is not proof of citizenship. However, the court on Tuesday objected to the practice of allowing prospective voters to only submit a self-declaration of citizenship to be included in the voter rolls, The Indian Express reported. The remarks came after advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the petitioners, told the court that it was not within the Election Commission's remit to decide on citizenship. 'This entire exercise is without jurisdiction,' Bhushan contended, according to The Indian Express. 'Because the ECI has converted itself into an agency that flags citizenship. The court, however, said that while Parliament has the authority to pass laws on citizenship, once such a law is passed, it is within the Election Commission's jurisdiction to include citizens in the electoral rolls, and to exclude non-citizens. Bhushan also highlighted before the court that the poll body had changed the draft rolls to make them hard to read by machines. Scroll had reported on Saturday that the Election Commission had replaced the digital draft voter lists in Bihar with scanned images of the voter lists on its official websites. The digital draft lists are machine-readable and easier to analyse for errors and patterns on a large scale. The scanned versions make this process harder. 'On August 4, the draft roll was searchable,' Bar and Bench quoted Bhushan as saying. 'After August 6, they have removed it and now names cannot be searched. That was suspicious.' 'Why should I, as a citizen, not know from their document and should ask an agent of the political party?' Bhushan asked. The court agreed and verbally held that 'voters and all bona fide citizens have a right' to know, The Indian Express reported. The matter will continue being heard by the Supreme Court on Wednesday. Bihar voter roll revision The revision of the electoral rolls in Bihar was announced by the Election Commission on June 24. As part of the exercise, persons whose names were not on the 2003 voter list needed to submit proof of eligibility to vote. Voters born before July 1, 1987, were required to show proof of their date and place of birth, while those born between July 1, 1987, and December 2, 2004, had to also submit documents establishing the date and place of birth of one of their parents. Those born after December 2, 2004, needed proof of date of birth for themselves and both parents. The draft voter list, published on August 1, comprises electors who submitted their enumeration forms to the poll panel between June 24 and July 26. They will now have to produce proof of citizenship to make it to the final list that will be published on September 30.
