
Bags, Bikes And Booze: When Delhi's Delivery Boys Became Bootleggers
However, unbeknownst to passersby, Kumar was being closely tracked by police, who had been monitoring a bootlegging operation. He was apprehended and a large quantity of illicit liquor seized.
Sourabh's story bears a striking resemblance. A delivery boy for an e-commerce firm, he succumbed to his vices and began delivering liquor on the side, seeking an extra source of income. This decision eventually led him to run afoul of the law, landing him in police custody.
In both these cases, the facade of a harmless delivery boy hid a more sinister reality, highlighting how this illicit trade of bootlegging is exploiting gig economy workers.
On Thursday, 25-year-old Khurshid, who looked like any other delivery boy, was nabbed in southeast Delhi's Govindpuri while trying to flee with an unusually bulky e-cart bag, stuffed with 400 quarters of liquor marked "For sale in Haryana only."
You Can Also Check:
Delhi AQI
|
Weather in Delhi
|
Bank Holidays in Delhi
|
Public Holidays in Delhi
These are not standalone cases and represent a new breed of challenges for law enforcement agencies tasked with curbing bootlegging in the city. In the first quarter of 2025 alone, Delhi recorded 2,496 cases under the Excise Act, a sharp 80.6% jump from 1,382 cases in the same period last year. That's a reversal from 2023 to 2024, which had seen a slight 3.2% drop. Compared to Q1 of 2023, this year has seen a 75% surge.
What's being trafficked is mostly cheap, local liquor, bottles of "Desi Santra" and similar brands.
A 180ml bottle sells for around Rs 50, making it easy to transport in bulk and highly profitable. Similarly bottles of whiskey, rum and vodka also give a substantial margin, making the trade lucrative.
The carriers, cops said, are paid handsomely enabling constant supply of workforce in this trade. For a car full of good quality liquor to the brim that includes the boot and the rear passenger cabinet, the driver can be paid as high as Rs 30,000 per trip.
Most of this liquor continues to come in from Haryana, particularly through border points like Bajghera, Surakhpur, Jharoda, and Dhansa, most of which feeds into Dwarka. Over the past three years, the number of illicit liquor quarters seized by the Dwarka district police through these borders alone has grown sharply from nearly 2 lakh in 2022 to 3.5 lakh in 2023, marking a 72.5% increase, and further rising by 16% in 2024 to reach approximately 4 lakh.
In the first five months of 2025 alone, 1.8 lakh quarters have been seized.
Shidipur-Lowa, a village just across the Haryana border near Bahadurgarh, has emerged as a major source point. Here, licensed manufacturers exploit a legal loophole, holding valid production permits but selling the stock through illegal channels, cops said. "The traffickers keep adopting new strategies to stay ahead of us. From using tempos, trucks, sedans and even ambulances, they are known to experiment with different kinds of carriers to keep their business afloat," says a senior officer.
However, the cops are upgrading their game as well. Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) cameras were installed at key checkpoints in Dwarka sometime ago. These systems scan vehicle plates and flag suspicious travel patterns. A car entering from Gurgaon at 9.50pm and exiting again at 11.30pm, for example, might be prioritised for inspection. "Quick turnaround is often a red flag," said DCP (Dwarka) Ankit Singh.
"Now, ANPR data alerts ground teams in real time. That's helped us recover bottles and catch modified vehicles."
Officers recently spotted unusual bike movement in ANPR footage, repeated trips from Gurgaon into Delhi within hours.
Plainclothes teams now monitor hotspots like Bahadurgarh, Shidipur-Lowa and parts of Gurgaon. "We watch the loading zones. Box after box of liquor going into a vehicle is all the evidence we need.
Once we know, we follow and intercept," the DCP said.
Cops in Najafgarh and other bordering areas like Kapshera are using decoys to trap the big fish. "However, many bootleggers are careful with traps. They don't entertain direct customers and go through reference of on-ground bootleggers," said an inspector.
As authorities step up efforts to combat bootlegging, the challenge lies in staying ahead of emerging trends and tactics that threaten to undermine law and order.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Indian Express
15 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Behind bars, convicts in Bengaluru Central Prison use WhatsApp to extort undertrial inmates
BENGALURU: There have been several incidents of inmates being caught using mobile phones in Bengaluru Central Prison. Now, convicted inmates are running extortion rackets from behind bars, raising serious questions about the effectiveness of restrictions on mobile phone usage inside the prison. A source told TNIE that convicts, especially rowdy-sheeters, are targeting undertrial inmates who are about to secure bail. They collect the phone numbers of these inmates and, once they are out on bail, the convicts call them via WhatsApp from prison to extort money by issuing death threats and harassing them. The convicts allegedly instruct them to transfer money through UPI to multiple bank accounts belonging to their relatives. The relatives then deliver the cash to the prison to help maintain the convicts' lavish lifestyle behind bars. The extortion racket came to light after Arul Kumar (36), who is out on bail in a drug case, filed a complaint with the CCB. He accused convicts Harshith and Gangaraju—serving sentences in a rape case—and another individual, Likith, of receiving extorted money via UPI transactions on their behalf to multiple accounts. Others named in the FIR include Nelson Sawan alias Bablu, Viji alias Guru, Chetan, and Shankar, who were allegedly running the racket. The FIR further stated that Chetan, an under trial prisoner in a murder case, was allegedly extorting money through his relative Lokesh Rao. Another rowdy-sheeter, Shekhar, was also found to have received money. A CCB officer said the mobile numbers mentioned in the FIR will be verified, and their transaction history will be traced. The amount is between Rs 5,000-Rs 15,000 and that a letter has been sent to the banks seeking account details.


New Indian Express
15 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Bike DCM DK Shivakumar rode has Rs 18.5K in traffic penalties
BENGALURU: A day after Deputy Chief Minister and Bengaluru Development Minister DK Shivakumar was seen riding a two-wheeler on Hebbal flyover during his inspection, the BJP and JDS trolled Shivakumar and said the two-wheeler has many traffic violation cases registered against it. JDS, on its official X handle, said a sum of Rs 18,500 has to be paid as penalty for various traffic violations. The video of Shivakumar riding the two-wheeler on Hebbal flyover went viral on Tuesday. The JDS, on its social media platforms, tagged Hebbal Traffic Police and urged it to take action. Following this, police summoned the owner who paid Rs 1,000 and assured police that he would pay the remaining later. The regional party, stating that the vehicle has more than 34 traffic violation cases against it, urged Shivakumar to stop photo shoots and reels for publicity, and fulfil his responsibilities as a minister. The BJP questioned why there is a separate law for the Deputy CM. 'Traffic police should charge additional Rs 500 from Shivakumar for wearing a half-helmet,' the party said.


New Indian Express
15 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Madras HC slaps Rs 30,000 costs on ED for not filing counter affidavits in Tasmac scam case
CHENNAI: In what is considered to be a first-of-its-kind move, the Madras High Court on Wednesday imposed costs of Rs 10,000 each, for three petitions, on the Enforcement Directorate (ED) for failing to file counter affidavits to the petitions moved by film producer Akash Bhaskaran and businessman Vikram Ravindran over the search and seizure operations held in their offices and residences for money laundering connected to the alleged Tasmac scam. The order imposing costs was passed by a division bench of Justices M S Ramesh and V Lakshminarayanan after taking seriously the failure of the ED to file the counter affidavits despite giving it a last chance. The bench termed it 'unfair' on the part of the central agency for not having come up with the counter affidavit. Special public prosecutor N Ramesh, appearing for ED, submitted that the counter affidavit was being prepared as a comprehensive one encompassing the three petitions and so, it could not be completed on time. He sought more time to file it.