Tillis becomes third GOP senator to oppose Trump' s big, beautiful bill
North Carolina Sen. Thom Tillis (R) announced after a meeting with Senate GOP leaders and colleagues Saturday afternoon that he will vote 'no' on both the motion to proceed and final passage of the Republican megabill to implement President Trump's agenda because of deep cuts to federal Medicaid funding.
Tillis said he wants Senate Republican leaders to drop their plan to lower the cap on healthcare provider taxes and instead embrace the Medicaid language passed by the House last month, which would cut much less federal funding in the program.
'Oh no. The data hasn't changed so I got to vote no,' he said.
The North Carolina Republican said Senate leaders should return to 'starting with the House baseline.'
'I'm going to vote no on motion to proceed and on final passage,' he said.
Tillis's strong opposition to the bill is a significant development because two other Republicans, Sens. Rand Paul (Ky.) and Ron Johnson (Wis.), have already said they will vote 'no.'
That gives substantially more leverage to Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) and other swing-vote senators to demand changes to the bill.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) can only afford three defections from his conference and still pass the bill with a tie-breaking vote from Vice President Vance given their 53-seat majority.
Collins said she will vote Saturday to begin debate on the megabill but she says she wants to make several changes to it and is not guaranteed to vote 'yes' on final passage.
'I am planning to vote for the motion to proceed. Generally, I give deference to the majority leader's power to bring bills to the Senate floor. Does not in any way predict how I'm going to vote on final passage,' Collins told reporters Saturday.
Tillis said he would help House Republican colleagues by 'defending their bill,' which would prohibit states that expanded Medicaid coverage under the Affordable Care Act from increasing health care provider taxes and barring states that did not expand the program from establishing new provider taxes.
The Senate bill would cut more deeply into federal Medicaid funding for states by reducing the 6 percent cap on health care provider taxes by half a percentage point a year starting in 2028, reducing the cap down to 3.5 percent in 2032.
States use healthcare provider taxes to collect more federal Medicaid funding, as the federal government matches what states collect in those taxes.
Johnson, the Wisconsin senator, said in an interview with 'Fox & Friends Weekend' that he will vote against the motion to proceed to the bill on Saturday.
'I'm not going to vote for motion to proceed today. We just got the bill. I got my first copy about 1:23 in the morning, this morning,' he said.
He said lawmakers have preliminary budget scores on less than half of the legislation.
'We don't even have the scores,' he said.
'We shouldn't take the [Rep.] Nancy Pelosi [(D-Calif.)] approach and pass this bill to find out what's in it,' he warned. 'We need to have a debate.'
Paul, the Kentucky senator and other 'no' vote, has repeatedly said he will oppose the bill because it includes language to raise the debt ceiling by $5 trillion.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Magazine
25 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
Musk Reignites Feud, Labels Trump Bill 'Insane, Destructive'
Elon Musk has renewed his criticism of President Donald Trump's 'Big, Beautiful, Bill,' showcasing his fierce opposition to the measure at a critical time. As Senate Republicans scrambled to advance the newly-revised 940-page proposal, Musk took to social media on Saturday to highlight his disapproval. 'The latest Senate draft bill will destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic harm to our country,' Musk said to his more than 220 million followers on X. 'Utterly insane and destructive. It gives handouts to industries of the past, while severely damaging industries of the future.' Musk, the former lead of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), who had a spectacular falling out with Trump not long after leaving the White House, doubled down on his stance in a series of follow-up messages. The Tesla CEO referred to the bill as 'political suicide' for the Republican party, citing poll data that showed an approval of his stance against the measure. Musk went on to say that the bill 'raises the debt ceiling by $5 trillion, the biggest increase in history, putting America in the fast lane to debt slavery.' Musk's long-established opposition to the Big, Beautiful Bill proved to be a sticking point during his DOGE leadership, and notably became a point of contention between himself and Trump, his one-time ally whose presidential campaign he helped fund. Read More: The Musk-Trump Implosion Can Be Seen From Space In early June, Musk said the 'massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination.' He took things a step further by telling his millions of followers to 'call your Senator, call your Congressman… kill the bill!' In the midst of Musk's public criticism, Trump's domestic policy bill, which centers tax and spending cuts, cleared a significant hurdle on Saturday night. The Senate delivered a 51-49 vote to take up the bill, after holding the floor open for hours to debate with holdouts and secure the numbers necessary to move forward. Vice President J.D. Vance arrived at the Capitol ready to break a potential tie, and he reportedly held deep talks with people unsure of pledging their support to the bill. Republicans Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina and Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky notably voted to block consideration of the measure. Sen. Tillis said he could not support the bill due to his concerns over Medicaid cuts and what that would mean for people in his state. 'The Senate version… contains significant changes to Medicaid that would be devastating to North Carolina, and I cannot support it,' Tillis said. 'The Senate should go back to the House's common-sense approach to Medicaid reform to enact work requirements while protecting care for those who truly need it.' Trump took to his own social media platform, Truth Social, to air his grievances with Tillis' oppositional stance. 'Numerous people have come forward wanting to run in the primary against Senator Thom Tillis,' he said. 'I will be meeting with them over the coming weeks, looking for someone who will properly represent the Great People of North Carolina and, so importantly, the United States of America.' Sen. Paul, meanwhile, took a stance against the bill's provision to raise the nation's debt limit by $5 trillion. On Saturday evening, he shared Musk's X post showcasing poll numbers being against the bill, and commented: 'Not that we should govern by poll, but it is very clear people don't want this extreme amount of debt and reckless spending.'Explaining his issue with the numbers, Sen. Paul said: 'How about this: Tweak the 'Big, not so beautiful, bill' so it doesn't add so much to the debt? The legislation, as currently written, would pay someone like Elon Musk $1000 per child, and we know how prolific he is . . . No offense, Elon, but is that a wise use of our $$?' Responding to Sen. Paul's vote, Trump said: 'Did Rand Paul vote 'NO' again tonight? What's wrong with this guy?'On the other end of the opposition, some hard-right Republicans held off on their votes until the last minute, angling for further spending cuts into the bill in exchange for their support. Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, who had earlier in the day urged fellow Republicans not to rush through the bill before knowing exactly what it contained, dramatically changed his vote to a yes in the closing moments. Speaking out after his last-minute change of heart, Sen. Johnson said: 'Biden and the Democrats left behind enormous messes that we are trying to clean up—an open border, wars, and massive deficits. After working for weeks with POTUS and his highly capable economic team, I am convinced that he views this as a necessary first step and will support my efforts to help put America on a path to fiscal sustainability.' Read More: Trump Lobbies for Passage of 'Big Beautiful Bill' Hours After Big Setback in Senate The newly-revised bill—released just after midnight on Saturday—may have advanced, in spite of the vocal opposition it faced from some, but there is still a lot of work to be done. The measure will now be debated in the Senate, and if it passes the Senate, it will go back to the House. The timeline is incredibly tight, as Trump has expressed his desire to sign the bill on July 4th. In the early hours of Sunday morning, Trump celebrated the progress the bill has made thus far, saying he was 'very proud' of the Republican party. 'Tonight we saw a great victory in the Senate,' Trump said, before going on to name the key people involved in advancing the measure. 'I look forward to working with them to grow our economy, reduce wasteful spending, secure our border, fight for our military/veterans, ensure that our Medicaid system helps those who truly need it, protect our Second Amendment, and so much more.'
Forbes
25 minutes ago
- Forbes
When Labor Meets AI: The Next Frontier In Workforce Economics
Industry engineer construction,using smart tablet,control automation robot arm machine intelligence ... More operation construction site,concept business industry 4.0,Artificial intelligence or AI,5G network Even in the mid-20th century, leaders understood that organized labor was not only a bargaining tool but a pillar of economic credibility. Addressing the Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America Convention in 1956, Eleanor Roosevelt observed: Nearly seventy years later, her words echo with renewed relevance. As artificial intelligence accelerates in capability and adoption, the definition of work—and the institutions built to protect it—are entering uncharted territory. Labor unions, long a cornerstone of worker advocacy and financial leverage, now confront a systemic test: whether they can not only defend wages and conditions, but credibly guide the transition toward a machine-augmented economy whose disruptions are often invisible until they are irreversible. From their origins in the trades and industrial movements of the 19th century, unions gained influence by organizing workers around shared physical spaces, defined tasks, and predictable employment structures. Over the 20th century, these organizations grew into major political forces, channeling member dues into campaigns, legislation, and collective bargaining aimed at securing better wages, conditions, and protections. But technology has always tested the boundaries of labor. The disappearance of elevator operators—once a common union job—following the introduction of automated elevators in the mid-20th century serves as an early example of how technological efficiency can render once-essential roles obsolete. Today, artificial intelligence presents a far more expansive and systemic challenge. AI is not merely optimizing tasks; it is absorbing entire functions. From logistics to legal review, customer service to manufacturing, AI systems are increasingly performing duties once reserved for human workers, often at higher speeds and lower costs. world. During a conversation at Hamilton College in Upstate New York on April 3, former President Barack Obama remarked that only the most elite coders will be able to keep up with machine-generated code, signaling a broader trend: automation is no longer confined to repetitive tasks. It now threatens knowledge work and professional careers once thought immune to disruption. For unions, this evolution raises urgent questions. The traditional tools of organized labor—strikes, contract negotiations, grievance processes—were designed for human-centered workplaces. As algorithms replace decision-makers and predictive models supplant manual oversight, those tools are being tested. What does collective bargaining look like in a workplace run by artificial agents? How do you negotiate with a system that cannot respond to protest? Some unions are adapting. Contract language in select industries now includes clauses on algorithmic transparency, human review of AI decisions, and mandated re-skilling initiatives. Others are advocating for legislation that treats AI systems as subjects of labor law, requiring disclosure, audits, and ethical use standards akin to workplace safety regulations. In elections to come, we may see political contributions, once focused on wage floors and benefits, that are increasingly focused on supporting candidates who prioritize digital rights and AI governance. Still, many labor organizations remain caught in a reactive posture, confronting displacement after it has already occurred. Unlike prior technological waves, AI does not just replace physical tasks, it replicates judgment, analysis, and communication. Its spread is faster, its learning curve steeper, and its effects less visible until the disruption is complete. The future of organized labor may depend on its ability to reframe its role, not just as a protector of existing jobs, but as a steward of equitable transitions in a machine-augmented economy. Just as elevator operators once gave way to automation, today's workforce may need to accept that some roles will vanish. The question for unions is whether they can still shape what comes next. The German Model: IG Metall and Volkswagen A recent agreement between Volkswagen AG and IG Metall, one of the world's largest industrial unions, offers a roadmap for how labor organizations might not only adapt, but also influence the transformation. Finalized in December 2024 and titled Zukunft Volkswagen (Future Volkswagen), the agreement redefines union relevance in an age of automation. The deal includes a socially responsible workforce reduction of more than 35,000 positions across German plants by 2030. Rather than through layoffs, this reduction will be managed through early retirement, voluntary buyouts, and attrition. In return, Volkswagen committed to a job security guarantee through 2030 for remaining workers, even as automation and electric vehicle production reshape operational needs. The agreement also introduced flexible work models, redistributed development roles within the corporate network, and preserved core manufacturing functions across sites. The union's role extended beyond protection, it also helped co-design the structural transition, ensuring that workers had a voice in how technology would be integrated and labor reallocated. From a financial standpoint, the arrangement allows Volkswagen to realize €1.5 billion in annual labor cost savings while retaining production viability in Germany. It aligns with the company's goal to become the world's leading volume manufacturer of electric vehicles by 2030, without discarding its workforce. Implications for U.S. Labor While the U.S. legal and economic environment differs from Germany's, elements of the Volkswagen AG and IG Metall agreement offer instructive value for American unions navigating the AI era. Sectors including logistics, transportation, customer service, administrative support, and even healthcare are likely to become more vulnerable to automation-driven role reduction. In these fields, labor organizations might consider: From the steam engine to the microchip, labor unions have consistently recalibrated to meet changing conditions. AI represents a steeper curve, but not an insurmountable one. If unions can establish a role not only in defending existing positions but also in shaping the frameworks that govern new ones, it may help them continue to serve as key stakeholders in an evolving economic landscape. In this respect, they have an opportunity to reinforce the aspiration Roosevelt articulated: that collective strength, applied thoughtfully, can help align technological progress with broadly shared prosperity.
CBS News
26 minutes ago
- CBS News
Gov. Healey calls same-sex marriage and abortion access "non-negotiable" in Massachusetts
Ten years after the U.S. Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriage nationwide and three years after it overturned Roe v. Wade, Gov. Maura Healey said both topics are "non-negotiable" in Massachusetts and vowed to protect them. On the 10th anniversary of the U.S. Supreme Court ruling legalizing same-sex marriage nationally, one of the nation's most prominent gay politicians, Healey, was asked if she thought that right was secure in the face of a movement among some Republican lawmakers at the state level to ask the court to reverse its position, a possibility mentioned by conservative Justices Thomas and Alito. "Non-issue here in Massachusetts" "It's a non-issue here in Massachusetts," she said. "Marriage is marriage, whether you're gay or not, and that's the law here. It's going to continue to be that way." Healey said the same about abortion rights in Massachusetts. "This is the third anniversary of the Supreme Court's decision overturning Roe v. Wade, and I'll also just say that abortion rights, abortion access, access to reproductive health care, is non-negotiable. In Massachusetts, we're going to continue to protect that right, continue to protect patients, providers and others who need that care," Healey said. Massachusetts energy costs In the meantime, Healey says she's intently focused on curbing the high cost of living in Massachusetts, most recently with legislation aimed at bringing down energy costs. "We need to get as much energy into the region as possible. I've been saying this for years, and I don't really care what form of energy that is, I just want more supply so that we can drive costs down," she says. Does that mean Healey is dropping her past opposition to new gas pipelines? "We already have gas coming in, and I support that. It's very important that we continue to build out solar, that we bring wind in. We need to do everything. There is a reason that the states, you know, the states in this country that are have the fastest growth in wind and solar, Texas, Louisiana, you know, so called red states, because this is where we need to go. Everybody needs energy. We're consuming so much energy now with our devices, with AI coming.... It's why I convened all the New England governors and the state of New York, along with the Canadian premiers recently, to have a discussion about how we can bring more energy into the region from Canada." Antisemitism in Massachusetts Healey also claimed she had "immediately" pressured officials at the Massachusetts Teachers Association to remove antisemitic material from a teacher "resource" section of their website when it became public a few months ago. "I had direct conversations with union officials asking them to remove that from the website. I've also said, because we've seen a rise in antisemitism around this country, and even incidents here in Massachusetts, there is no place for anti-Semitism. I don't tolerate it, and we all need to work together to speak out to denounce that kind of bigotry and hatred and racism and xenophobia in all forms." Healey also discussed tax policy, vowing to revisit raising the amount of wealth exempted from the estate tax and keep an eye on the impact of the income surtax on business. You can watch part one of our two-part interview with the governor here on-demand; join us next Sunday morning at 8:30 a.m. when Healey directly rebuts the criticisms of her potential Republican challengers in the 2026 election, on the Sunday edition of "Keller At Large."
