Samsung's big Tesla order fuels recovery bets despite chip woes
Its stock has risen 9 per cent since news about the agreement on Monday (Jul 28), bringing Samsung's gains in July to over 20 per cent and putting the stock on track for its best month in more than four years. Samsung accounted for more than half of July's gains in Korea's stock benchmark Kospi, underscoring growing investor enthusiasm.
The Tesla deal is significant as it marks a shift for the ailing foundry business, from relying on captive internal orders to deeper external engagements, Citigroup analysts said in a report. A successful implementation would boost Samsung's prospects for generating more external clients and validate its investment in a US plant.
'I think the market basically paid not even zero value, negative value, on the foundry business so far, and suddenly the market checked and said: 'Okay! they still can do',' said Young Jae Lee, senior investment manager at Pictet Asset Management, who has Samsung as the biggest position in his US$831 million fund.
Once considered a serious challenger to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), Samsung has steadily ceded ground in the global chip race. The company, which supplies its own memory chips and produces semiconductors for clients, has struggled to fill its foundry capacity as major customers such as Apple exited and its high-bandwidth memory (HBM) business has gone woefully off track.
The order announcement comes more than a year after Samsung replaced the head of its semiconductor business with seasoned memory expert Jun Young-hyun in a bid to restore the company's technological edge. Under Jun's leadership, Samsung replaced the head of the foundry business with Han Jin-man, a highly regarded executive at its chip division in the US and recruited Margaret Han, a former Intel and TSMC executive, to lead Samsung's US foundry business.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
The deal also secures long-term utilisation of its facility in Taylor, Texas, which has suffered from construction delays. Samsung is expanding production there with support from the 2022 Chips and Science Act, Washington's effort to rebuild the American semiconductor industry with billions in subsidies and tax incentives for the likes of Intel.
Morgan Stanley analysts Shawn Kim and Michelle Kim estimate the partnership with Tesla could add more than US$50 billion to Samsung's market value.
'Tesla's AI6 chip announcement validates Samsung's advanced nodes at its US fab, an endorsement that stands out amid Intel's well publicised struggles with domestic manufacturing,' said Gary Tan, portfolio manager at Allspring Global Investments in Singapore.
There's still caution about calling the Tesla tie-up the start of a meaningful turnaround, but it gives ground for greater optimism around South Korea's largest company.
'Samsung now has the narrative tailwinds and the cash flow support to justify more constructive positioning, but it still needs to prove execution in artificial intelligence (AI) chips beyond just this Tesla headline,' said Haris Khurshid, chief investment officer at Karobaar Capital, a Chicago-based firm. 'I'd expect some consolidation until earnings prove that this is more than just a headline trade.'
Some analysts say the company's other problems are likely to remain. For the first time in April, homegrown rival SK Hynix overtook Samsung as the world's biggest producer of Dram chips. Samsung has also struggled to secure approval from Nvidia for its latest HBM offerings.
But Tan said Nvidia's latest line of AI chips 'presents Samsung with an opportunity to regain momentum in advanced memory'.
Despite the slow pace of development, JPMorgan Chase in a Jul 8 note, said that it has noticed growing interest from investors on 'Samsung's comeback in the high-bandwidth memory market'.
The company is expected to give more details on the Tesla deal and the outlook for the second half of the year on Thursday when it reports its full second-quarter earnings. It said earlier this month its preliminary operating profit fell by a sharper-than-expected 56 per cent on inventory writedowns that followed the US curbs on Chinese-bound AI chips.
Investors will also be keen to get details on whether Samsung would be able to benefit from Nvidia's resumption of sales of its H20 AI chips to China. The Korean memory maker has provided HBM3 to pair with H20 chips in the past.
The stock is in a better position than last year, when company management issued a rare public apology for disappointing results. But despite the fanfare, analysts warn the rally may be overextended in the short term. Technical indicators show Samsung shares are trading at overheated levels, and consensus targets imply the smallest 12-month upside in more than four years. BLOOMBERG
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
5 hours ago
- Straits Times
China can buy Nvidia H20 chips again. But it's not all good news
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox The Cyberspace Administration of China on July 31 flagged concerns about possible 'backdoor' security risks associated with the H20 chips, which American chipmaker Nvidia has denied. – Two weeks after Nvidia's chief executive Jensen Huang mounted a charm offensive to court the Chinese market, the American chip giant found itself once again the centre of attention in Beijing – and not in a good way. 'Nvidia, how can I trust you?' So read the headline of a commentary published by the People's Daily, the communist party's mouthpiece, a day after Chinese regulators summoned on July 31 the company's representatives over what they deemed 'serious security issues' related to its chips. The processor in question, known as the H20, was until recently the most advanced chip that Nvidia could sell to China under US restrictions. Washington effectively banned their exports in April amid an escalating trade war, but said in July that it would allow sales to resume. Some US officials touted the easing of export controls as a negotiating chip in ongoing trade talks with Beijing. But this apparent concession, analysts say, is not necessarily all good news for China. 'The reversal of the H20 ban offers short-term relief for China's artificial intelligence (AI) industry,' said Mr Charlie Dai, a vice president and principal analyst at advisory firm Forrester Research. 'On the other hand, it could slow domestic chipset adoption and impact the pace of technology self-reliance (amid) ongoing geopolitical frictions.' A taste for Nvidia China has been advocating the use of homegrown chips by its companies as part of a broader push for self-reliance, including in key technologies such as AI. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore LTA, Singapore bus operators reviewing Malaysia's request to start services from JB at 4am Singapore Despite bag checks and warnings, young partygoers continue to vape in clubs in Singapore Singapore President Tharman meets migrant workers who saved driver of car that fell into sinkhole Singapore Now flying solo, Acres CEO Kalaivanan Balakrishnan presses ahead with wildlife rescue efforts Opinion The charm – and drawbacks – of living in a time warp in Singapore Business UMS Integration becomes first SGX company with secondary listing in Malaysia Singapore Ong Beng Seng to plead guilty on Aug 4, more than 2 years after trip to Qatar with Iswaran Business Decoupling to save on tax? You may lose right to property if ties go awry Despite this, many Chinese AI firms – in particular private tech giants – are said to still prefer using Nvidia's H20s to train and run their models, even though the chips are not Nvidia's most powerful. After the US announced a lifting of its export ban, news agency Reuters reported that Chinese companies were scrambling to buy the H20s, citing sources. It also said that Nvidia had placed fresh orders for 300,000 chipsets from its contract manufacturer amid strong Chinese demand. 'The general sense is that Chinese customers, especially Bytedance, Baidu, Tencent and Alibaba, still prefer Nvidia's solutions, whether it's H20 or whatever comes next,' said Mr Ray Wang, research director for semiconductors, supply chain and emerging tech at advisory firm The Futurum Group. Nvidia's edge over its Chinese rivals – which 'continue to improve' – is manifold for now, he explained. Its hardware has larger memory bandwidth, making it better for inference tasks, or the application of trained AI models that makes them useful in the real world. The company also has a stronger software platform with which to program the chips, as well as more capable networking technology to harness the combined performance of hundreds and thousands of processors, Mr Wang said. Importantly, he added, Chinese firms' rivalry with Huawei – seen as the biggest domestic rival to Nvidia on the chip front – also fuels their preference for the American chipmaker. Huawei has a sprawling business empire that boasts not just chipsets, but also extends to cloud computing and AI model development. This puts them in direct competition with the other tech giants. Mr Wang said: 'So if you're Alibaba or Tencent, do you want to source your most important computing resources from Huawei?' The push for self-reliance Nvidia's current advantages notwithstanding, analysts say that China will simultaneously double down on growing its domestic chip ecosystem – a goal that could be helped by regulators' recent scrutiny of the American firm. The Cyberspace Administration of China had on July 31 flagged concerns about possible 'backdoor' security risks associated with the H20 chips, which Nvidia has denied . A People's Daily commentary released on social media the next day sketched out possible 'nightmare' scenarios associated with such risks, such as electric cars suddenly losing power on the highway. It asked the company to provide proof of the chips' security to alleviate users' worries. The regulators' move 'will likely cause Chinese tech firms to temporarily curb adoption (of the H20) due to fears of potential vulnerabilities and regulatory uncertainty, despite strong underlying demand,' said Mr Dai of Forrester Research. He added that even as companies' continued reliance on Nvidia's superior AI capabilities may sustain some purchases of its chips, he expected firms to simultaneously also accelerate shifts towards domestic alternatives. Mr Su Lian Jye, chief analyst at technology research firm Omdia, said that Chinese firms in recent years had already been buying more homegrown chipsets or developing their own amid sharpening geopolitical tensions. These include China's three major telcos, banks, cloud service providers, and various other state-linked companies, he said. Tech giants including Baidu and Alibaba are also developing their own chips. In recent weeks, following news that Nvidia would once again be allowed to ship H20s to China, local firms have spoken up about strengthening support for homegrown chipmakers. On July 25, AI start-up StepFun, a model developer, announced an 'ecosystem innovation alliance' with several domestic chip companies including Huawei, Cambricon, Moore Threads and MetaX, news outlet Caixin reported. The same day, StepFun released a large language model that was developed with the properties of domestic chips in mind, the report also said. Separately, co-founder of cyber-security company Qihoo 360 Zhou Hongyi said on July 23 that his company had turned to procuring domestic chips, and that its recent purchases had all been of Huawei products, news outlet Yicai reported. The company, which has also branched into AI, is on the US' entity list, which restricts access to American technology. Mr Zhou acknowledged that there was a 'gap' between Chinese chips and Nvidia's, but stressed the need to use domestic processors anyway, in comments that were videoed and uploaded to social media. 'If you don't use them, the gap will always be there,' he said. 'The more (you) use them, the more they will improve.'
AsiaOne
a day ago
- AsiaOne
South Korea says it has no written pact on US trade deal, Asia News
SEOUL - There is no written agreement yet on a trade deal between South Korea and the United States announced by President Donald Trump this week, the Asian nation's trade minister said on Friday (Aug 1). The US tariff on South Korean imports will be 15 per cent, Trump said after meeting its ministers on Wednesday, down from a threatened 25 per cent, but the US gave scarce details, apart from social media posts by him and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. Speaking to reporters as he arrived home from a visit to Washington, Trade Minister Yeo Han-koo said the two sides had an oral negotiation because of time constraints. "What we felt during this negotiation is that the US trade environment is fundamentally changing. This is completely different from the first Trump term," Yeo said of the deal easing tension with a top-10 trading partner and key Asian ally. "I think we are entering a new normal era. So, although we have overcome this crisis, we cannot be relieved, because we do not know when we will face pressure from tariffs or non-tariff measures again." The White House, which issued factsheets on trade deals with Japan and the European Union a day after striking them, has not yet released a separate one on the pact with South Korea. Trump said South Korea would invest $350 (S$450 billion) billion in the United States in projects "owned and controlled by the United States" and selected by him. Lutnick said 90 per cent of profits from the investments would go to the American people, while White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said they would go to the US government to help repay debt. More discussions were necessary on the investment fund's profit structure, said Industry Minister Kim Jung-kwan, who returned with Yeo. [[nid:720806]] Finance Minister Koo Yun-cheol, also one of the negotiation team, said detailed plans for the $350-billion investment would need be established. Wednesday's deal did not tackle most non-tariff barriers discussed during working-level talks, as well as security and foreign exchange aspects.
Business Times
2 days ago
- Business Times
Tesla ordered by Florida jury to pay US$243 million in fatal Autopilot crash
[NEW YORK] A Florida jury on Friday (Aug 1) found Tesla liable to pay US$243 million to victims of a 2019 fatal crash of an Autopilot-equipped Model S, a verdict that could encourage more legal action against Elon Musk's electric vehicle (EV) company. The verdict is a rare win for victims of accidents involving Autopilot. Musk has been pushing to rapidly expand Tesla's recently launched robotaxi business based on an advanced version of its driver assistance software. Tesla shares fell 1.8 per cent on Friday, and are down 25 per cent this year. Jurors in Miami federal court awarded the estate of Naibel Benavides Leon, as well as her former boyfriend Dillon Angulo, US$129 million in compensatory damages plus US$200 million in punitive damages, according to a verdict sheet. Tesla was held liable for 33 per cent of the compensatory damages, or US$42.6 million. Jurors found the driver George McGee liable for 67 per cent, but he was not a defendant and will not have to pay his share. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up 'Tesla designed Autopilot only for controlled-access highways yet deliberately chose not to restrict drivers from using it elsewhere, alongside Elon Musk telling the world Autopilot drove better than humans,' Brett Schreiber, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, said. 'Today's verdict represents justice for Naibel's tragic death and Dillon's lifelong injuries,' he added. Tesla said it will appeal. 'Today's verdict is wrong and only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardise Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement life-saving technology,' the company said. The plaintiffs had sought US$345 million of damages. Their lawyers said that the trial was the first involving the wrongful death of a third party resulting from Autopilot. Impact on future cases Tesla has faced many similar lawsuits over its vehicles' self-driving capabilities, but they have been resolved or dismissed without getting to trial. In June, a judge rejected Tesla's bid to dismiss the Florida case. Experts said on Friday's verdict may spur more lawsuits, and could make future settlements more costly. 'It's a big deal,' said Alex Lemann, a law professor at Marquette University. 'This is the first time that Tesla has been hit with a judgment in one of the many, many fatalities that have happened as a result of its Autopilot technology.' The verdict could also impede efforts by Musk, the world's richest person, to convince investors that Tesla can become a leader in so-called autonomous driving for private vehicles as well as robotaxis it plans to start producing next year. As Tesla's electric vehicle sales fall, much of its nearly US$1 trillion market value hinges on Musk's ability to pivot the company into robotics and artificial intelligence. Driver's role The trial concerned an Apr 25, 2019, incident where George McGee drove his 2019 Model S at about 100 kph through an intersection into the victims' parked Chevrolet Tahoe as they were standing beside it on a shoulder. McGee had reached down to pick up a cellphone he dropped on his car's floorboard and allegedly received no alerts as he ran a stop sign and stop light before hitting the victims' SUV. Benavides Leon was allegedly thrown 23 metres to her death, while Angulo suffered serious injuries. 'We have a driver who was acting less than perfectly, and yet the jury still found Tesla contributed to the crash,' said Philip Koopman, a Carnegie Mellon University engineering professor and expert in autonomous technology. 'The only way the jury could have possibly ruled against Tesla was by finding a defect with the Autopilot software,' he added. 'That's a big deal.' Tesla, in its statement, said McGee was entirely at fault. 'To be clear, no car in 2019, and none today, would have prevented this crash,' the company said. 'This was never about Autopilot; it was a fiction concocted by plaintiffs' lawyers blaming the car when the driver, from day one, admitted and accepted responsibility.' REUTERS
