Servant of the band of thieves attacks UN mission
The briefing of the UN envoy to Libya, Ms. Hannah Tetteh, did not appeal to the thieves in their fiefdom in Cyrenaica. UNSMIL's accusation that some "political figures" were inciting against the mission and encouraging mobs to commit illegal acts was not sufficient insinuation to identify the person directly accused in this respect.
In her briefing to the UN Security Council, the UN envoy praised the discipline of government forces in the face of the Tripoli demonstrations. However, she expressed concern over the budget that the band of thieves wanted to pass to the treasury official of the General Command of thieves. She stated that it would undermine the efforts of the Central Bank to stabilize the exchange rate and address inflation.
The person to whom insinuations were made, imagined that he was really head of a government with a stake in the political movement, then issued a statement criticizing the mission and holding it responsible for the worsening crisis. He accused it of failing to achieve any real progress for more than a decade, and of contributing, intentionally or unintentionally, to the escalation of the crisis. He described the attack by some mobs on the UNSMIL's headquarters as a natural expression of popular discontent.
The delusional person's talk of popular discontent is laughable—in fact, it is so absurd it knocks you off your feet. The delusional person's talk about popular discontent, as if he doesn't know that the law, within the sphere of his delusional jurisdiction, shackles the discontented with chains, locks and throws them into a doghouse. Or it tortures them to death, and yet the obituary announces their suicide. Or women; members of their family are detained to force them to surrender themselves to the murderers. Yet, in the evening, their sheikh prostrates in prayer of thanks, thanking Allah for the safety of their girls. How can you encourage popular protest and cast it as evidence of growing discontent, while you forbid it and consider it a heinous crime, deserving its perpetrators of chains and locks, the arrest of their girls, and a fall from a balcony?! And so on, of other peculiar stories of so-called artificial intelligence!
The delusional person exploited the climate of freedom of expression and the situation in Tripoli, paying a clumsy boy to hire a few dozen thugs and push them toward the UN mission headquarters in Tripoli. With all impudence, the delusional person considered the protests a natural expression of popular anger, holding the mission responsible for the failure to resolve the Libyan crisis. The delusional man ignored the people's will and their calls for comprehensive change, sweeping away all criminal gangs across the country, especially the gang he imagines he heads. He has never even cast a sheer doubt that the systematic and deliberate mischief being perpetrated by the head of the House of Servants [House of Representatives], loyal to the ruling gang in the Cyrenaica fiefdom, was the catastrophe that had ruined the country.
The delusional man was unaware that the ruler of his fiefdom had plunged the country into civil wars, oppressed the people, brought in mercenaries, and smuggled oil. He could not have committed all these heinous crimes without the aid of delusional people like him.
The delusional is raging with anger at the mission's intervention to halt a major banditry operation under the banner of reconstruction. The delusional man has forgotten that the country's economic situation could not tolerate further devastation, and that those for whom the illusion of reconstruction is being marketed, were no longer able to provide a living for their children.
The mind of a person who is immersed in his delusions fails to perceive the clear truths, because delusion only leads to more delusion. Objectivity and fairness completely disappear from the mind of the person who is delusional, because he does not think through the data of reality and its developments, but through his delusions. Like all those who are immersed in their delusions, the person who is delusional does not return to his senses except with a strong shock that restores the flow of electrical charges in his brain to their natural lines. Calm logic based on solid rules is of no use with the delusional, as long as their mind does not work in accordance with the rules of sound thinking.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect those of the Libya Observer
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Libya Observer
16 hours ago
- Libya Observer
Turkish warship visits Tripoli port
The Turkish warship " TCG Kinaliada" visited Tripoli port on Sunday, according to the Turkish Embassy in Libya. The embassy explained that Ambassador Güven Begec received a Turkish naval delegation, headed by Admiral Tiğli. The same ship visited Khoms port on November 17, 2023, as part of the Turkish Naval Task Force. These repeated visits come under the umbrella of the cooperation agreement signed on July 10 by the Ministry of Defense of the Government of National Unity with its Turkish counterpart, which aims to enhance the capabilities of the Libyan army. News Tagged: Libya-Turkey agreement Turkish warship
Libya Observer
4 days ago
- Libya Observer
UN envoy, 5+5 JMC review commitment to ceasefire agreement across Libya
The UN envoy to Libya Hanna Tetteh has met with the Joint Military Commission 5+5 (JMC) in Tunis to discuss progress of the implementation of the Ceasefire Agreement and means of sustaining it, UNSMIL said in a statement on Thursday. UNSMIL added that the 5+5 JMC had reiterated its commitment and subcommittees to sustain the ceasefire agreement including withdrawal of the "foreign forces,foreign fighters and mercenaries in support of security and stability in Libya." "The 5+5 JMC stressed the importance of making progress in the political process in order to facilitate the security track in the country." UNSMIL added.
Libya Observer
5 days ago
- Libya Observer
At the Crossroads: Tetteh's Decisive Step or Libya's Missed Opportunity?
By Al-Mihdi Hindi, political activist In Libya, the political scene remains mired in a web of agreements that stir controversy more than they resolve issues, set against a backdrop of suspicion and hesitation surrounding every step toward holding elections. The Advisory Committee for Political Resolution has announced a constitutional amendment and new electoral laws. Yet, in reality, these outcomes seem far removed from the people's aspirations and closer to 'tailored' arrangements shaped by the interests of certain factions at the expense of others. The amendment to the Constitutional Declaration — supposedly the backbone of the political process — has instead become a new battleground. Supporters view it as a legal necessity, while opponents warn of 'playing with fire,' fearing it could be weaponized to sideline political rivals and empower others in a transparent game of power. Meanwhile, the electoral laws reflect deep polarization; the criteria for presidential and parliamentary candidacy appear custom-designed to serve narrow agendas, sidelining a Libyan public that still awaits genuine representation. The Advisory Committee has Not stopped there. It has put forward four possible solutions, the last of which is the formation of a Political Dialogue Committee or Constituent Assembly — an attempt to move beyond the tug-of-war between the House of Representatives and the High Council of State, and to reach a broader national consensus. This step followed a notable effort to gauge public opinion through online platforms and meetings with political parties, youth groups, and civil society, aiming to bridge the gap between the elite and the people. On the other side, the United Nations has acted with cautious diplomacy. Special Envoy Hannah Tetteh visited the capital, Tripoli, meeting with leaders of the High Council of State and the Prime Minister of the Government of National Unity, Abdul Hamid Dbeibah. She announced a political plan that carries promises of progress but remains contingent on the approval of the UN Security Council, expected on August 21, 2025. Here lies the pressing question: Can this plan lead Libya out of its recurring cycles of crisis, or will it become yet another chapter in the long saga of agreements that fail to materialize? The Libyan people, weary of promises, watch anxiously as time slips away, political opportunities shrink, and the international agenda is consumed by other crises that risk pushing Libya further down the list of global priorities. If, at this historic moment, the interests of major powers fail to align with a genuine national will, the difficult question in Libya may shift from 'When will we vote?' to 'Do we still have anything left worth voting for?' Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect those of the Libya Observer
