Indigo issues statement after viral video of man slapping other passenger sparks outrage
The airline said it is aware of the incident, and that "such unruly behaviour is completely unacceptable".
Following the spat, the airline identified the individual involved as "unruly" and handed him over to the security authorities upon arrival, it said in the statement.
Indigo also informed appropriate regulatory agencies, and its crew "acted in accordance with established Standard Operating Procedures."
Indigo said it condemned "compromising the safety and dignity of its passengers and crew, and remains committed to maintaining a safe and respectful environment on all our flights".
A viral video shows a man slapping another passenger, who was reportedly having a panic attack, according to social media users.
The video is doing the rounds on various social platforms, as several commenters expressed shock and called on airlines to ensure safety during travel. Several, including politicians and journalists, have also called for the man to be put on a no-fly list.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Khaleej Times
2 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
'7 years, no house': UAE investors claim heavy debts after Bangalore project stalls
When JE, a Dubai-based mother of two, paid Rs 6 million (around Dh251,000) in 2018 for a flat in Ozone Urbana, she imagined annual visits to Bengaluru, a peaceful retirement, and a secure home for her children. Instead, seven years later, she's staring at an empty plot, rising debt, and a fading dream. 'There's no house. Nothing has moved at the site in years,' she said. 'But I still have to pay the bank over Rs 13 million (Dh544,000) for something that doesn't even exist,' she told Khaleej Times. JE is one of several Indian expats in the UAE who say they were misled by Bengaluru-based Ozone Group into buying homes in a massive integrated township that was never delivered. Among them is Errol John Noronha, a former Dubai resident and president of the Ozone Urbana Buyer Welfare Association, which represents affected buyers, including many from the UAE. Noronha, who was visiting Dubai, spoke to Khaleej Times o n Monday. 'The stories in our group are heartbreaking. People have lost their savings, taken loans they can't repay, and are now stuck with nothing to show for it,' Noronha said. 'The builder failed us, yes. But where were the banks, the regulators? Everyone just looked the other way.' Raids on developer sparks hope Now, after years of delay and frustration, a recent crackdown may have finally offered a rare glimmer of hope. On August 1, the Enforcement Directorate (ED), India's financial crime watchdog, conducted raids at 10 locations linked to Ozone Urbana Infra Developers Pvt Ltd and its key executives, including promoter Satyamoorthi Vasudevan, in Bengaluru and Mumbai. The action, taken under India's anti-money laundering law, follows dozens of complaints alleging cheating, criminal conspiracy, and fund diversion. Authorities say they seized documents showing that money collected from homebuyers for the Ozone Urbana project was diverted to unrelated group entities and individuals. The developer is also accused of selling at least 65 flats to multiple buyers. The 1,800-unit township project, spread across 185 acres near Bengaluru Airport, was launched in 2012 and billed as one of the city's largest integrated residential developments. Completion was promised by 2018. Today, buyers say less than half of the construction is complete. However, Satyamoorthi Vasudevan, managing director of the Ozone Group, disputed this. In an emailed response to Khaleej Times, he said the project is closer to 80 per cent complete and that delays have been misreported or misunderstood. 'All funds have been channelled solely towards construction and development,' Vasudevan said. 'There has been no diversion of funds — only misinterpretation or misreporting of project progress.' He confirmed that the Enforcement Directorate is currently reviewing the company's accounts. 'As a responsible organisation, we are fully cooperating with the authorities by providing all required documentation and information,' he said. On the remaining construction and delivery timelines, Vasudevan said the company is ready to deliver completed units but is navigating regulatory and administrative hurdles, including pending RERA approvals, banking procedures, and statutory clearances. 'Once these are resolved, we will be able to move swiftly toward final completion and handover,' he said. Regarding UAE-based and overseas buyers, Vasudevan acknowledged that some have raised concerns. 'We are actively engaging with them to find satisfactory resolutions,' he said. For buyers seeking refunds, the company is working on a structured mechanism. For those awaiting possession, efforts are being made to accelerate construction and deliver homes in a 'transparent and accountable manner.' Rebuilding trust, he said, remains a top priority. Vasudevan also addressed the allegations of double-selling, calling them a 'misinterpretation' of the company's earlier buyback scheme — a structured investment model offering assured returns or repurchase after a defined term. 'Some individuals with vested interests have attempted to manipulate this model to create confusion and extract undue financial advantage,' he said. The company, he added, is actively addressing this issue to protect genuine investors and prevent future misuse. Buyers tell a different story Despite the company's assurances, many UAE-based buyers say their experiences tell a different story. Sharjah-based private pilot Sunil Sequeira, who booked a three-bedroom apartment in 2018 for Rs 10 million (approximately Dh420,000), said he was sold a dream under a subvention scheme, a financing model where the buyer takes out a home loan, but the developer agrees to pay the EMIs (equated monthly installments) and PMIs (pre-EMI interest payments) until possession. He took a loan through India Bulls, now rebranded as Saman Capital. 'They came to my house in Dubai with slick presentations, floor plans, and big promises,' he told Khaleej Times. 'We were told this was a landmark project near the airport that would redefine luxury. The scheme sounded safe; they said they'd pay my EMIs until handover, and I believed them.' According to Sequeira, the developer initially kept up the payments but later stopped without warning. 'That's when the bank came after me. I ended up with an arrest warrant for defaulting on a loan for a house that doesn't exist.' 'I ended up with an arrest warrant for defaulting on a loan for a house that doesn't exist.' Sunil Sequeira, Sharjah The Ozone Urbana website still describes the project as 'a holistic journey of life' with 'apartments, duplexes and penthouses surrounded by lush greenery.' For many, the reality is very different. Moiz Abdulhussain, an early investor from Mumbai, booked an apartment in 2016 under a buyback scheme that promised him double the booking amount at handover. 'I paid Rs 750,000 (Dh31,500) upfront and took a Rs 5.7 million (Dh239,000) loan. The bank has already released Rs 3.6 million (Dh151,000) to the builder. The site is still flat ground.' For years, he says, the developer cited Covid-19 delays and regulatory approvals. 'They made it sound routine. Then in 2018, I joined a WhatsApp group of buyers and realised the truth. I was blindsided. But what about the banks? Why release funds when there was barely any structural work on site?' Moiz has since secured a RERA order asking the developer to pay him Rs 8 million (Dh335,000). 'It's on paper. No one's enforcing it.' According to the welfare association, many buyers were told the builder would cover EMIs until possession. 'But once the payments stopped and construction stalled, the banks came knocking, like in Sunil's case,' said Noronha. Buyers allege that banks released large sums to the developer without proper agreements or any disbursement linked to actual progress on site. Some say they never received construction deeds at all. 'The banks didn't wait for construction milestones. They just disbursed the money, and now we have to suffer.' A police complaint filed by the welfare association pegs the alleged fraud at Rs 33 billion (Dh1.38 billion). Of this, Rs 15 billion (Dh628 million) was reportedly raised through unauthorised loans taken in buyers' names, while Rs 18 billion (Dh754 million) was collected directly from them. Living in limbo According to homebuyers, nearly 200 families have moved into partially completed towers despite the chaos. Many blocks reportedly do not have occupancy certificates, permanent electricity, or water connections. Earlier this year, the Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority (KRERA) named Ozone Group and its affiliates as the state's biggest defaulters, with 201 complaints and over Rs 1.78 billion (Dh74.8 million) in unpaid dues. Access denied Several overseas homebuyers said they were unaware of the scale of defaults because they couldn't access the KRERA website. The concern isn't unfounded. When Khaleej Times attempted to access the site from Dubai, it failed to load. We also asked contacts in the UK, US, and Singapore to try; none could open it. In contrast, RERA websites of other Indian states were accessible without any issue. Buyers said this lack of access kept non-resident investors in the dark about the project's status. The crisis at Ozone isn't limited to Bengaluru. In Chennai, the Metrozone project launched in 2008 remains unfinished. In Mumbai and Goa too, complaints are mounting. The pattern is familiar: grand promises, large sums collected, construction delayed, and buyers left scrambling. Back in Dubai, JE still hopes something might change.
Khaleej Times
3 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
India's tax department investigating Jane Street over possible tax treaty misuse, sources say
India's tax authorities are investigating whether Jane Street violated tax laws by booking profits via its Singapore entities on its derivative trades in the Indian market, three sources briefed on the matter said. Searches at the U.S. trading firm's India offices by the income tax department have been underway since last week, sources have said. A government source who was briefed on the matter later said that Jane Street staff were not cooperating. The tax authorities' enquiries follow a temporary ban by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), the market regulator, which publicly alleged that the firm manipulated stock indexes through its derivatives positions. Jane Street has denied the SEBI allegations, but has not made any public comments so far on the tax investigation. The firm did not respond to a Reuters request sent to its U.S. headquarters for comment on Monday on the latest developments. India's income tax department did not respond to Reuters request for comment. Tax authorities are investigating whether Jane Street violated the General Anti-Avoidance Rules (GAAR) by using the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) between India and Singapore to evade taxes on large profits it made on Indian derivative trades, all three sources said. The sources declined to be named because they were not authorised to speak to the media. The DTAA is designed to prevent residents from being taxed twice, while the GAAR gives a country the power to deny a particular tax benefit if it is being used solely for tax avoidance. The Indian tax authorities are looking into whether Jane Street booked larger profits on its derivatives positions in the Indian market via its Singapore entities as a way to reduce the tax burden, all three sources briefed on the matter added. SEBI's July 4 ban order showed that Jane Street made more than $4 billion trading in India from January 2023 to May 2025. Jane Street's two India entities - JSI Investments and JSI2 Investments - made a profit of 39.35 billion Indian rupees ($448.23 million), Jane Street Singapore made a profit of 256 billion rupees ($2.92 billion) and its Hong Kong entity, Jane Street Asia Trading, made a profit of 69.30 billion Indian rupees ($789.39 million), the order showed. If the tax department's probe shows the tax rules have been breached, Jane Street could be issued with a tax demand, the third source said. Tax authorities are trying to access Jane Street's accounts, which are maintained overseas, they added. The second source said SEBI had provided the tax department with the profit and loss details of four Jane Street group entities the regulator had named in its orders.
Khaleej Times
5 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
NRIs in UAE: How Indian authorities are tackling cybercrime, banking fraud
Question: Many persons in India have complained about false emails and fraudulent telephone/mobile calls being received. Some have fallen prey to fraudulent transactions, resulting in huge losses. Are any measures being taken to stop this practice and prevent frauds from being perpetrated? ANSWER: The Reserve Bank of India has decided to introduce exclusive domains for banks which will make it easier to identify genuine banking websites and avoid phishing scams. Bank customers can verify the authenticity of an e-mail by checking if the website has ' extension. If this extension is not there, it can be assumed that the email is from an unknown source and the customer may refrain from responding to the same. It has been emphasised by the Reserve Bank that the ' domain has been exclusively assigned to Indian banks with the object of curbing cyber frauds and to ensure secure banking services. This will enhance trust in digital banking and payment services. The exclusive registrar for banks to register and obtain the domain name is the Institute for Development and Research in Banking Technology (IDRBT). A separate domain ' is proposed for non-banking financial entities with a view to create a trusted space for non-banking financial institutions and their customers. Further, with a view to combat online and telephone frauds, the Government has taken measures to 'whitelist' genuine financial websites and call centres. The Reserve Bank has mandated banks to use 160 series telephone numbers exclusively for transactional and service related voice calls. This will help customers to easily identify genuine and legitimate calls. Further, a web-based platform has been put in place for reporting payment related frauds. Question: With the data centre industry growing at a fast pace, energy consumption will go up dramatically. Will power generation be able to keep up with the demand? This will be a big challenge for India. ANSWER: Power demand and consumption in India are growing exponentially. While green energy will take time to be available, the country will have to depend on coal and oil for at least two decades to meet the demand for power. In 2024 the data centre capacity was 1.1 GW, which is expected to reach 3 GW by 2030. This is on account of rising data consumption, AI and cloud adoption, and policy initiatives which are focused on data localisation. State Governments are therefore ramping up the generation of electricity to meet the demand. This will entail massive investments in power infrastructure, for which both Central and State Governments are making substantial budgetary allocations in the next three years. Edge data centres are coming up in Tier-2/Tier-3 cities where the power cost is 40 per cent lower and land is available at one-third the price prevailing in metros. In fact, about 20 cities have been identified where there is a distinct advantage in costs and the employee costs are 30 per cent lower than prevailing in Mumbai, Delhi, Chennai and Bengaluru. Some of the State Governments which are surplus in power generation are attracting data centres by offering them land parcels at competitive rates and even electricity duty exemptions. Therefore, steps are being taken to ensure that the data centre industry continues to grow and is able to overcome the challenges which will arise if the target of 6 GW by 2033 is to be reached. Question: While the highways and expressways in India have spread dramatically during the last ten years, the quality of construction leaves much to be desired. Are steps being taken to ensure that established construction standards are being adopted? ANSWER: The Ministry for Road Transport has revised the eligibility criteria for bidding for highway projects under the hybrid annuity model (HAM) as well as engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) model. This revision has been done with a view to ensure quality construction for expressways and highways and timely completion of the projects to avoid cost overruns. Under the revised guidelines, the minimum financial requirement for bidders has been raised to 20 per cent of the estimated project cost from 15 per cent. Further, the net worth requirement for each member bidding through a consortium has been raised from 7.5 per cent to 10 per cent of the project cost. For EPC projects, the minimum net worth of a bidder has been raised from 5 per cent to 10 per cent of the project cost and the average annual turnover requirement has been increased from 15 per cent to 20 per cent. Steps have been taken to ensure that companies with a good track record for executing such projects are eligible to bid. Further, to ensure quality construction within the stipulated timelines, provisions have been made to impose hefty penalties. During the financial year 2025-26, the Government is to invite bids for around 120 road projects, for which the project costs are estimated to be Rs3.5 trillion.
