Government deal closer for Central Otago and Queenstown
Congestion charges or tolls could be on the way for Queenstown as part of a government deal to cope with population growth and pressure on infrastructure.
Otago Central Lakes is one of three regions which have made it to the next stage to negotiate a 10-year regional deal partnership, the government announced today.
Three Otago councils have been working together since late last year to secure the agreement which Infrastructure Minister Chris Bishop and Local Government Minister Simon Watts say will help unlock growth.
The region, which comprises the Otago Regional Council, Central Otago District Council and Queenstown Lakes District Council, submitted a proposal last year.
It outlined the region's challenges with rising population and visitor numbers and how to manage it.
The proposal said mass rapid transit such as a gondola or the gondola-like cable cars could help to "alleviate road congestion by offering transport that bypasses traditional road networks".
It called for a revised public transport funding model to enable long-term private sector partnering for mass rapid transit along with "road pricing".
Among the expectations laid out by the ministers is that the region commit to exploring congestion charging.
The government also expected the region to "unlock housing growth including around rapid transit corridors".
'City and Regional Deals will be strategic 10-year partnerships between local and central government to progress joint priorities including economic growth, enabling abundant housing, better management and utilisation of local assets, and closing the infrastructure deficit,' Mr Bishop said.
Queenstown Mayor Glyn Lewers said government help was needed to manage the impact of growth..
"We need to work with central government on affordable and sustainable tools that enable us to continue to manage growth and ensure the entire region retains its status as a destination of choice'.
Central Otago mayor Tamah Alley said the announcement was a significant step forward but cautioned it was "not a done deal".
"Central Otago understands the growth issues Queenstown has faced in recent years and we are already seeing some of those emerge in our district.
"Working alongside ORC, QLDC and Central Government to future proof our communities across infrastructure, housing and economic growth is a smart play'." - APL
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
21 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
No go on Oamaru-Dunedin bus link
Hopes of Oamaru getting a direct bus service to Dunedin have been dashed for now, after the Otago Regional Council last week discarded proposals to establish a link. Waitaki District Mayor Gary Kircher had lobbied strongly for the regional council to provide a bus service to Oamaru during its recent annual plan submissions but said he recognised the challenges of funding it. "There's a lot of calls from other areas wanting to expand their services. For us, obviously, it's about starting a service and it's really difficult if the co-funder, (Waka Kotahi) NZTA, doesn't have the money there. "Fundamentally, that's the issue and it's something that the government has to address because it's causing issues not just with public transport, but with projects everywhere. "It would just be too expensive if ORC paid for the whole thing themselves without the co-funding. It would just be too costly on our ratepayers." Mr Kircher had also submitted to the regional council about providing a connecter service between central Oamaru and the North End. He told the Oamaru Mail that was a service that would need to be funded by ORC, not the district council. "Again, it would come at a cost and public transport doesn't cover its costs, unfortunately. So, there has to be some other money coming from somewhere and with all of the pressure on rates, that'd be a difficult thing for the [district] council to be able to underwrite. It is a regional council responsibility." Mr Kircher said he was meeting with regional council representatives and would be talking about what other opportunities there might be to "make something happen". ORC chairwoman Gretchen Robertson said the council remained committed to connecting Oamaru. "Some regional upgrades will not happen due to co-funding gaps but we're committed to finding ways to improve connectivity options for Ōamaru, Balclutha and Central Otago." "The transport planning team will be investigating the cost and viability of connecting Oamaru to the existing Dunedin services, which currently terminate at Palmerston," she told the Oamaru Mail. "There are a range of ways to do this — through traditional public transport, or community-based transport services. "The investigative work the team will undertake will look at a range of options, including ones based on co-funding and ones not reliant on co-funding. Any decisions on funding additional services will be subject to future decisions through annual plans or long-term plans." Transport Minister Chris Bishop said public transport was funded from both public and private revenue sources, noting government funding for public transport in Otago has increased from $90 million to $125m. "Private share refers to the proportion of funding that comes from private sources, including fares paid by passengers, advertising on buses, bus stops, trains, train stations, as well as other commercial opportunities like renting or leasing commercial space," he said. "The Government Policy Statement on land transport 2024 (GPS 2024) sets the expectation that there will be increases in private share revenue to support the growing operational costs for public transport, as well as to reduce the burden on ratepayers and taxpayers. "Under the previous government the private share revenue dropped as low as 10%, meaning far more of the costs had to be covered by taxpayers and ratepayers. "To reach agreement on targets, NZTA asked PTAs (public transport authorities) to show they had considered methods appropriate to each region that did not drive adverse outcomes such as patronage decline. Actions considered include reviews of fare policy, regular fare increases and third-party revenue sources. As a result, targets for the next three years have now been agreed. "NZTA is committed to working with Public Transport Authorities to ensure a reliable and resilient public transport system for everyone. Increasing the private share of public transport expenditure can help contribute to this goal and I expect PTAs to continue working collaboratively with NZTA." ORC rates to increase 5.5% overall With the adoption of the annual plan, ORC rates will increase 5.5% overall in the year ahead. For most in the Waitaki district, it means regional rates will rise 1.72% to $263.93 a year. However, for Waitaki residents in the Palmerston area, the rate rise is more, up 6.18% to $381.33 a year. This is because Palmerston residents have an ORC-funded bus service to Dunedin. However, they will also have to pay increased fares for that bus. From late September, adult fares will rise from $2 to $2.50 (with a Bee card). Children will also have to pay, following another decision ORC councillors made last week, to reintroduce a $1.50 fare for 5 to 18-year-olds.
Otago Daily Times
2 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
ORC moving to system where no votes are ‘wasted'
An elections law specialist is urging people not to be too daunted by the Otago Regional Council's decision to switch to a single transferable vote (STV) system for this year's council elections. The councillors last year approved the shift from first past the post, bringing it in line with the Dunedin City Council, the only one of Otago's five territorial authorities to use the electoral system where voters rank their preferred candidates. University of Otago political science professor Janine Hayward said Dunedin had been using the system for several years with little difficulty. "I do think it's a great idea to give voters a little bit more confidence in how straightforward it is." Under STV, voters rank their preferred candidates from best to last, with "1" being the highest ranking, also known as first preference. Once the votes are collated, they go through a process called an iteration, where there is a quota each candidate has to reach in order to be elected. Anyone who reaches that quota is declared elected. "The least popular candidate drops out of the race and their votes are redistributed to the next preference of the people who voted for them. "If the person who got elected, or the people who got elected, had surplus votes, then those votes are redistributed as well. So what the STV process is ensuring is that there are no votes that are wasted." Prof Hayward urged people to be careful, if they particularly did not want a candidate to sneak in on redistributed votes. "Put simply, if you don't like the candidate, don't rank them. "After first past the post (FPP), there was a tendency among some people to rank every single candidate on the ballot sheet, but really that's unnecessary." STV avoided the premise of a "wasted vote", Prof Hayward said. "Votes get wasted in two ways. "When you're voting for multiple people, they get wasted because too many people vote for somebody, and they get more votes than they needed to get elected, or people vote for somebody who's really unpopular and was never going to get elected. "So the point about the transferring of the single transferable vote is to keep as many voter preferences alive, basically, as possible until the number of candidates required meet that quota that they're aiming for." It was also a good indication of the "depth" of someone's voter support, she said. "When you're doing something like electing Otago Regional Council, it's likely to see somebody or a couple of people elected on first preferences. "But having a large vote in your first preferences doesn't necessarily mean that you have enough support across the whole community to get elected, and I think that's the point about single transferable vote. "It really tests, beyond the first vote, whether somebody has the breadth and depth of support that they need to get elected." Council elections take place from September 9 to October 11.
Otago Daily Times
2 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
A sad sign of the times
It's a perennial question which becomes even more insistent at this stage of the three-year cycle: Why would anyone want to be a local body councillor? Many who sit back comfortably and let someone else do it undoubtedly have inklings as to why they wouldn't get involved. Thank goodness then for those who are courageous or foolhardy or even egocentric enough to want to have their names out there publicly. Like in all politics, serving as a city, district or regional councillor comes with a heavy price to an individual's privacy and ability to live as a regular citizen. Walking down the street at the weekend, enjoying being part of an anonymous throng and simply running errands, going out for a quiet meal or a few drinks with mates it all becomes nigh-on impossible, particularly in smaller communities. And then that banter from the public on your "day off" turns into something more annoying, complaints from a resident about rates rises or the drains outside their house, money being spent on cycleways or something which isn't even a council but a central government responsibility. Before you know it, that has turned into overt aggression. Angry people in your face, leaving repeated and intimidating messages on your cellphone, even knocking on your front door and threatening violence, because they didn't like the way you voted on something. Some years ago, you might have read about such actions overseas and tutted. Unfortunately, it's here now as well. Back to that question of why someone might want to stand as a councillor. For the status, the kudos? Possible, but unlikely. For the money? Also pretty unlikely. For the chance to make changes for the better for one's community? Most likely. When people engage with such altruistic intentions, it seems even more egregious that their personal safety should be jeopardised. Yet this is what has been increasingly happening around the country in recent years. The South is not immune to such childish, worrisome behaviour. Clutha Mayor Bryan Cadogan has had angry constituents at his door, while Clutha district Lawrence-Tuapeka ward councillor Jock Martin received a threatening voicemail message calling him the n-word over rates relief for Mâori land. Abusive behaviour has also been directed at a Central Otago District Council representative. Elsewhere, three-term Nelson mayor Rachel Reese was confronted by a man with a nail gun inside her house. Nobody should be subjected to such vitriol. Councillors are not always going to be able to make decisions everybody agrees with. Mr Cadogan says times have changed, and not for the better. When he was elected as a councillor in 1998, he says such behaviour would have been "inconceivable", but now it happens regularly. Local Government New Zealand has now approved a home-security allowance for elected members to offset potential personal harassment. Councillors are entitled to up to $4500 to install a security system with another $1000 for annual maintenance. This is a good idea. It should never have got to this stage, but our councillors deserve to have an extra layer of protection in such angry days. We have to hope that ongoing harassment and intimidation simmers down and does not put people off standing for local councils. New era for science? After many years of discussion and complaint about New Zealand's old and creaking public science sector, and unnecessary competition, much-awaited changes kicked into life this week. Gone are the seven Crown research institutes. Instead, we have a refocused CRI in the form of the Public Health and Forensic Science Institute and two mega-sized public research organisations, Earth Sciences New Zealand and the Bioeconomy Science Institute. The alterations are long overdue, given the CRIs were established in the 1992 science reforms. However, it remains to be seen how much will really change. The New Zealand Association of Scientists warns the new PROs statements of purpose make it clear the three are still commercially oriented, "just bigger". The concern is the two big new entities could end up feeling more like the supermarket duopoly than the solution to the country's research needs. Time will tell.
