
Deborra-Lee Furness says she remains ‘grateful' after experiencing the ‘breakdown' of her marriage to Hugh Jackman
Nearly two years after Hugh Jackman and his wife Deborra-Lee Furness announced their separation, Furness is opening up about the 'breakdown' of their 27-year marriage.
'My heart and compassion goes out to everyone who has traversed the traumatic journey of betrayal,' Furness told the Daily Mail in a statement Tuesday. 'It's a profound wound that cuts deep, however I believe in a higher power and that God/the universe, whatever you relate to as your guidance, is always working FOR us.'
Furness added that 'this belief has helped me navigate the breakdown of an almost three-decade marriage' and that she gained 'much knowledge and wisdom through this experience.'
'Even when we are presented with apparent adversity, it is leading us to our greatest good, our true purpose,' she also said. 'It can hurt, but in the long run, returning to yourself and living within your own integrity, values and boundaries is liberation and freedom… We are all on our individual journeys and I believe that the relationships in our lives are not random.'
Furness concluded her statement saying that through it all, she remains 'grateful.'
She filed a petition for divorce in New York City on May 23, according to publicly available court records. Jackman has not yet formally responded to the petition.
CNN has reached out to representatives for Furness and Jackman for comment.
The pair announced that they were separating in September 2023, saying in a joint statement at the time that 'we have been blessed to share almost 3 decades together as husband and wife in a wonderful, loving marriage.'
'Our journey now is shifting and we have decided to separate to pursue our individual growth,' the statement read, in part. 'Our family has been and always will be our highest priority. We undertake this next chapter with gratitude, love, and kindness.'
Furness and Jackman first met on the set of Australian television series 'Correlli' in 1995. They wed the following year and share two adult children, Oscar and Ava.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Geek Tyrant
8 minutes ago
- Geek Tyrant
Video Explores How 1920s Filmmakers Pulled Off Death-Defying Stunts Without Dying — GeekTyrant
A new video from Lost in Time dives into some of the wildest and most iconic movie stunts from the silent film era. This is a behind-the-scenes look at how legends like Buster Keaton, Harold Lloyd, and Charlie Chaplin pulled off seemingly impossible feats of physical comedy and danger… without modern safety gear or visual effects. 'In this video we're breaking down how they pulled off the craziest stunts in the 1920s from Hollywood legends Buster Keaton, Charlie Chaplin and Harold Lloyd. I have made 3D animations showing exactly how each scene was filmed, and it is amazing how creative they were back then.' And those animations really drive it home. Watching them reveals just how much thought and trickery went into making these death-defying moments is fascinating. This is just a reminder that the roots of modern movie magic were built with brains, not just bravery.


Fox News
10 minutes ago
- Fox News
Navy veteran's $500M defamation lawsuit against Associated Press advances with first hearing
Zachary Young's high-stakes defamation lawsuit against the Associated Press continues to inch along in Bay County, Florida, as the U.S. Navy veteran seeks to clear his name. Young successfully sued CNN for defamation earlier this year after saying the network smeared him by implying he illegally profited from helping people flee Afghanistan on the "black market" during the Biden administration's disastrous 2021 military withdrawal. When covering the trial in January, Associated Press media reporter David Bauder wrote that "Young's business helped smuggle people out of Afghanistan." Young's legal team has said that the Associated Press article "went even further than CNN's falsehoods," and the veteran is seeking nearly $500 million in a defamation suit against the AP. On Monday, Young's legal team responded to the AP's motion to dismiss the suit. The AP had insisted Young's complaint is "without merit" and unjustly challenges the outlet's free speech rights, but the Navy veteran's legal team believes the motion failed to address "core issues." "It does not dispute that the term 'human smuggling' implies criminal conduct, nor does it offer any valid explanation for its use of that term, even though a court previously ruled that Mr. Young committed no crime. AP's own Stylebook defines 'smuggling' as illegal," Young's attorney, Daniel Lustig, wrote. "Dozens of AP articles reflect that usage. Just days before this filing, AP published a story about a man sentenced to 25 years in prison for 'smuggling people,' reinforcing that understanding," Lustig continued. "Even after receiving notice, AP refused to retract or revise the statement, not even to use a more accurate term such as 'evacuate' or 'rescue.'" Young's attorney believes the most "notable" part of the AP's motion to dismiss is that it never denied that "smuggling" refers to a criminal act. "Instead, it argues that the statement, in context, was not defamatory. That is not a defense, it is a concession. Under Florida law, if a statement is reasonably capable of a defamatory meaning, it is a question for the jury, not one to be resolved on a motion to dismiss. AP's attempt to invoke the anti-SLAPP statute to shield such a statement is both legally unsupported and fundamentally flawed," Lustig wrote. Young's legal team has also filed a motion to amend the complaint to include punitive damages. The 242-page filing suggested this case "exemplifies the very scenario in which punitive damages are warranted to punish and deter such consciously indifferent conduct by a media organization." On Tuesday, each side appeared for the first hearing in front of 14th Judicial Circuit Court Judge William S. Henry, who also presided over the CNN trial. The Case Management Conference, conducted over Zoom, was largely procedural and offered a chance for each party to explain why respective motions should be heard. Judge Henry scheduled the next hearing for July 3. He is expected to rule on both the AP's motion to dismiss and Young's amended complaint. The AP has referred to the lawsuit as "frivolous" in past statements to the press.


Fox News
13 minutes ago
- Fox News
Trans athlete sparking uproar in California
All times eastern The Journal Editorial Report Fox Report with Jon Scott Fox Report with Jon Scott FOX News Radio Live Channel Coverage