logo
$75 million was awarded to plant trees in places that badly need them. In anti-DEI push, that's over

$75 million was awarded to plant trees in places that badly need them. In anti-DEI push, that's over

Independent01-03-2025

Arthur Johnson has lived in New Orleans ' Lower 9th Ward for nearly three decades, long enough to appreciate the trees that filter pollution from the big ships traveling the nearby Mississippi River and that offer shade on sweltering summer days.
When Hurricane Katrina roared through two decades ago, it wiped out 200,000 trees across the city, including many in Johnson's neighborhood and several in his own yard. The city has struggled ever since to restore its tree canopy.
Those efforts will be set back by the U.S. Forest Service's decision in mid-February to terminate a $75 million grant to the Arbor Day Foundation, which was working to plant trees in neighborhoods that might not otherwise be able to afford them. The program is the latest victim of a drive by President Donald Trump 's administration against environmental justice initiatives.
In New Orleans, part of the money was going to the environmental group Sustaining Our Urban Landscape (SOUL), which has planted more than 1,600 trees in the historically Black community but has now paused plans for another 900.
Those are trees that largely low-income residents otherwise couldn't afford to plant or maintain, said the 71-year-old Johnson, who runs a local nonprofit, the Lower 9th Ward Center for Sustainable Engagement and Development, that has helped SOUL with its work and done some tree plantings of its own in the area.
'You're not just cutting out the tree, the environment' with such cuts, said Johnson. If those trees aren't replaced and more aren't continually added, 'it really takes a toll on the sustainability of the Lower 9th Ward and its community.'
The benefits of trees are vast. They capture stormwater and replenish groundwater. They help clean the air in polluted areas, improve mental health, and cool air and surfaces of the built environment, especially during heat waves that are growing more intense and frequent with climate change.
One study by the UCLA Luskin Center found that shade can reduce heat stress on the human body from 25% to 35% throughout the day. And much research shows that low-income and communities of color have fewer trees — and are hotter — than better-off neighborhoods.
The Arbor Day Fund's grant was part of former President Joe Biden 's signature climate law, the Inflation Reduction Act, which sent $1.5 billion to the forest service's Urban and Community Forestry program. In a Feb. 14 email canceling the grant, the Forest Service wrote that the award "no longer effectuates agency priorities regarding diversity, equity, and inclusion programs and activities.'
But Dan Lambe, the Arbor Day Foundation's chief executive, said the projects weren't just going to serve disadvantaged people. They were going to benefit every member of the community, he said. In total, 105 nonprofits, municipalities and Indigenous organizations — from Alaska to Florida to Maine — have lost funding for critical environmental projects, the foundation said.
'This was an opportunity to make a really meaningful impact on people's lives, so it's been disappointing," Lambe said.
The Forest Service didn't say if other recipients of the $1.5 billion forestry investment also had grants terminated. In a statement, its parent agency, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, said the agency was following directions to comply with Trump's executive orders.
'Protecting the people and communities we serve, as well as the infrastructure, businesses, and resources they depend on to grow and thrive, remains a top priority for the USDA and the Forest Service,' the agency said.
For SOUL in New Orleans, losing the grant means they don't have the money to water trees already planted, and they've had to drop plans to hire three people. Another $2.5 million grant is on hold due to the federal funding freeze, and founder and executive director Susannah Burley said the nonprofit's survival is uncertain. Its annual budget is a little more than $1 million.
'We kind of are lost because we don't know if we should be planning to close our doors or if we should be planning for next season,' she said.
For others who were set to get Arbor Day Foundation money, the loss is not existential but still devastating. In the city-county of Butte-Silver Bow in southwest Montana, forester Trevor Peterson was going to use a $745,250 grant to buy chain saws, rigging gear and other essential tools, remove up to 200 dead or dying cottonwoods and plant as many as 1,000 trees as part of a decades-long effort to replenish trees cut to make way for copper mining. He wanted to help organize large community events focused on education, hoping to impart the knowledge necessary for future stewardship of the urban forest.
'We will now have to go back to the drawing board to determine where to go from here,' he said.
Jackson County, Oregon, was awarded a $600,000 grant to replant trees after wildfires in 2020 destroyed thousands of homes and charred more than 60,000 trees. The town of Talent lost two-thirds of its trees.
The nonprofit Oregon Urban Rural and Community Forestry, founded in the fires' aftermath, fought for years to get a single dollar, recalled Mike Oxendine, the group's founder and director.
The grant money from the Arbor Day Foundation was being used to help low-income and disadvantaged mobile home park residents — among the hardest-hit by the fires — identify and remove hazardous trees badly burned or killed, and replant trees for shade and cooling.
'This is a rural red area that needs it badly,' said Oxendine. 'We hit temperatures that exceed 110 degrees every summer now. We go through massive droughts and we're always prone to wildfire here.'
The loss of funding will create a 'tremendous burden' for the organization, he said.
———
The Associated Press receives support from the Walton Family Foundation for coverage of water and environmental policy. The AP is solely responsible for all content. For all of AP's environmental coverage, visit apnews.com/hub/climate-and-environment.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Race Council Cymru on racial justice five years after Newport protest
Race Council Cymru on racial justice five years after Newport protest

South Wales Argus

time3 hours ago

  • South Wales Argus

Race Council Cymru on racial justice five years after Newport protest

Five years ago today, on the 11th of June 2020, more than a thousand people gathered in Newport to support the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement, joining the millions worldwide standing against racial inequality. At the time, the Black Lives Matter movement, whilst not a new movement, had gained a substantial amount of momentum internationally following the death of George Floyd in the US. Race Council Cymru (RCC), work with key organisations in Wales to combat racial inequality, recall that point in time as a turning point, not only around the world but within Wales. 'People took to the streets, to screens, to classrooms, and to their hearts to say: enough is enough,' they explained. In Newport, a city known for its cultural diversity, people came together in protest against racial inequality, raising placards, kneeling in silence, and pledging to be part of the change. At the time, the world was amid a global pandemic, and there were concerns surrounding public gatherings. Nevertheless, supporters of the movement left the safety of their homes anyway, sending a powerful message. Various protests took place throughout Wales, sparking important conversations about racism, about the systems we live under and about racial inequality in Wales. In the five years since, Wales has seen many significant changes which seek to ensure racial equality. In 2022, the Welsh Government launched an Anti-Racist Wales Action Plan, with the ambition of creating an anti-racist nation by the year 2030. Wales is also said to be the first UK nation to make the teaching of Black, Asian, and minority ethnic histories mandatory in schools, recognising that Black history is Welsh history. Nevertheless, Race Council Cymru highlights that positive progress has not erased racial inequality in Wales. 'There is progress. But there is also pain. While the conversation around race has evolved, racism has not disappeared,' they said. 'Hate crime in Wales remains a serious concern,' they added. Reminding the public to recognise the human being behind each crime statistic. As the years pass since the BLM protests, organisations such as Race Council Cymru continue to push for racial equality in Wales. 'We cannot and will not allow racism to go unchallenged. Not in our streets. Not in our institutions. Not in our silence,' they declared. Race Council Cymru invited everyone to take a stand, saying: 'Use your voice. Support our work. Speak up when you see injustice. Teach your children about the value of every human life.' 'Let's build a Wales where every person, regardless of race, background or belief, feels safe, respected, and heard,' they said.

US Senate should ease start date requirement for clean energy tax credits, Republican senator says
US Senate should ease start date requirement for clean energy tax credits, Republican senator says

Reuters

time17 hours ago

  • Reuters

US Senate should ease start date requirement for clean energy tax credits, Republican senator says

WASHINGTON, June 10 (Reuters) - The U.S. Senate should make changes to House budget reconciliation bill provisions that phase out clean energy tax credits, including easing start-date requirements, said Republican Senator John Curtis on Tuesday. Curtis, one of a handful of Senate Republicans who have said they want to preserve some of the clean energy tax credits in the Senate's version of the budget bill, said changes are needed to protect investors and jobs from major disruption. "Let's just be thoughtful in how we phase them out. Let's not destroy careers and things like that. Let's give people a chance to adjust," he said. The House bill aimed to weaken clean energy tax credits enshrined in the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act by abruptly terminating several credits just 60 days after enactment for projects that have not yet begun construction, making most projects unfeasible.

Trump tax bill squeeze on clean power could raise energy bills
Trump tax bill squeeze on clean power could raise energy bills

Reuters

time20 hours ago

  • Reuters

Trump tax bill squeeze on clean power could raise energy bills

June 10 - President Trump's tax bill passed by the House of Representatives on May 22 is set to slow the country's clean energy expansion by accelerating the expiry of key tax credits introduced under the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and making them harder to access. The bill, which is now being debated by the Senate, shortens the window for developers to start and complete new clean energy projects in order to qualify for a production tax credit (PTC) or an investment tax credit (ITC). Developers would have to begin construction within 60 days of the bill's enactment and the project must become operational before the end of 2028 in order to access the tax credits. The inflation act stipulated these tax credits would be available until at least 2032. Solar and battery storage activity soared on the back of falling costs and tax credits but President Trump's rollback of clean energy support and prioritisation of fossil fuels will curb activity in the coming years, industry experts warn. "Requiring a range of advanced energy projects to commence construction within 60 days of enactment, along with moving up the 'placed in service' deadline to 2028, will pull the rug out from a host of projects in active development and effectively end use of the ITC & PTC going forward," Advanced Energy United, an association supporting low carbon power and transport, said in a statement. CHART: US planned power generation installs in 2025 If approved, the bill could see a surge in clean energy investments in the short-term as developers rush to meet new construction deadlines, followed by a "big drop," Gautam Jain, Senior Research Scholar, Center on Global Energy Policy at Columbia University, told Reuters Events. Approval of the bill would see a lot of projects trying to start construction within 60 days, John Powers, Schneider Electric's VP for Cleantech and Renewables, said. For companies with renewable energy or carbon reduction targets, 'it's the time to be proactive in the market,' Powers noted. Join hundreds of senior executives across energy, industry and finance at Reuters Events Global Energy Transition 2025. Beyond the short-term bump, the bill would "have an adverse impact on deployment," Jain warned. In the long run, this would likely lead to "higher electricity costs for consumers," he said, since the levelised cost of solar and other clean power sources have dropped significantly over the last 10 to 15 years and are often lower than the cost of gas-fired power. Import worries Trump's cutbacks to clean energy support and higher import tariffs and have created major uncertainty for developers and manufacturers. Clean power developer RWE has introduced higher requirements for future investments in the U.S. since the start of the year, a spokesperson told Reuters Events. RWE owns and operates over 10 GW of US clean power capacity and has over 4 GW under construction. "In addition to a stable incentive framework, all necessary federal permits must be in place, all relevant tariff risks mitigated and projects must have secured offtake at the time of the investment decision," the spokesperson said. "Only if these conditions are met will further investments be possible, given the uncertain policy environment.' CHART: Levelised cost of US utility-scale solar Developers are concerned about another restriction in Trump's tax bill that would prevent developers and manufacturers from gaining tax credits if they source components from foreign entities of concern (FEOC). This includes China, a key global supplier of components for solar, wind and battery storage. The bill has slowed the expansion of U.S. clean energy manufacturing as suppliers await clarity before making investments in new factories. Developers and manufacturers are already facing higher costs due to hikes in import tariffs imposed by President Trump. Developers had feared the bill would also restrict the transferability of tax credits, a mechanism which has expanded financing sources for small and mid-size developers, but following a last-minute change this was left intact for the life cycle of the tax credits. The bill also reflected more kindly on nuclear power developers by giving them a later deadline of breaking ground by the end of 2028 in order to qualify for tax credits. Trump wants to accelerate a new wave of nuclear plant construction and on May 23 he ordered the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to streamline regulations and fast-track new licenses for reactors. In March, the DOE reissued a tender for $900 million of federal funding towards light water reactor (LWR) SMR technology (Gen III+), removing a requirement for community engagement. Senate scrutiny Trump has said he wants Senate approval and a final bill on his desk by July 4 but many Republican Senators have seen benefits from the tax credits in their states and the bill may be adapted and sent back to the House. The Senate tends to be a moderating force in comparison to the House, David A. Sausen, partner at Arnold and Porter, noted. 'I think there's some hope that some of the more extreme measures here will be dialed back,' he told Reuters Events. For exclusive insights on the energy transition, sign up to our newsletter. The clean energy sector has called for less drastic changes to the tax credits along with greater clarity on the foreign entity measures, which could take time. The foreign entity rules would take effect on January 1, 2026, under the current bill. 'I'm getting a lot of concern from clients that it's going to be very difficult to interpret these (foreign entity) rules,' Sausen said. The current language of the rules is "fundamentally unworkable," Advanced Energy United said. The foreign entity rules must be clarified and should not deter manufacturing investment, Schneider Electric's Chief Policy Officer Jeannie Salo told Reuters Events. 'Let's remember the underlying goals of the want a tax policy to bring down the deficit, of course, but they want a tax policy that's going to attract more manufacturing and investment into the United States," Salo said. "We need to make sure that there aren't provisions in the bill that inadvertently disrupt that goal.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store