logo
$75 million was awarded to plant trees in places that badly need them. In anti-DEI push, that's over

$75 million was awarded to plant trees in places that badly need them. In anti-DEI push, that's over

Independent01-03-2025
Arthur Johnson has lived in New Orleans ' Lower 9th Ward for nearly three decades, long enough to appreciate the trees that filter pollution from the big ships traveling the nearby Mississippi River and that offer shade on sweltering summer days.
When Hurricane Katrina roared through two decades ago, it wiped out 200,000 trees across the city, including many in Johnson's neighborhood and several in his own yard. The city has struggled ever since to restore its tree canopy.
Those efforts will be set back by the U.S. Forest Service's decision in mid-February to terminate a $75 million grant to the Arbor Day Foundation, which was working to plant trees in neighborhoods that might not otherwise be able to afford them. The program is the latest victim of a drive by President Donald Trump 's administration against environmental justice initiatives.
In New Orleans, part of the money was going to the environmental group Sustaining Our Urban Landscape (SOUL), which has planted more than 1,600 trees in the historically Black community but has now paused plans for another 900.
Those are trees that largely low-income residents otherwise couldn't afford to plant or maintain, said the 71-year-old Johnson, who runs a local nonprofit, the Lower 9th Ward Center for Sustainable Engagement and Development, that has helped SOUL with its work and done some tree plantings of its own in the area.
'You're not just cutting out the tree, the environment' with such cuts, said Johnson. If those trees aren't replaced and more aren't continually added, 'it really takes a toll on the sustainability of the Lower 9th Ward and its community.'
The benefits of trees are vast. They capture stormwater and replenish groundwater. They help clean the air in polluted areas, improve mental health, and cool air and surfaces of the built environment, especially during heat waves that are growing more intense and frequent with climate change.
One study by the UCLA Luskin Center found that shade can reduce heat stress on the human body from 25% to 35% throughout the day. And much research shows that low-income and communities of color have fewer trees — and are hotter — than better-off neighborhoods.
The Arbor Day Fund's grant was part of former President Joe Biden 's signature climate law, the Inflation Reduction Act, which sent $1.5 billion to the forest service's Urban and Community Forestry program. In a Feb. 14 email canceling the grant, the Forest Service wrote that the award "no longer effectuates agency priorities regarding diversity, equity, and inclusion programs and activities.'
But Dan Lambe, the Arbor Day Foundation's chief executive, said the projects weren't just going to serve disadvantaged people. They were going to benefit every member of the community, he said. In total, 105 nonprofits, municipalities and Indigenous organizations — from Alaska to Florida to Maine — have lost funding for critical environmental projects, the foundation said.
'This was an opportunity to make a really meaningful impact on people's lives, so it's been disappointing," Lambe said.
The Forest Service didn't say if other recipients of the $1.5 billion forestry investment also had grants terminated. In a statement, its parent agency, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, said the agency was following directions to comply with Trump's executive orders.
'Protecting the people and communities we serve, as well as the infrastructure, businesses, and resources they depend on to grow and thrive, remains a top priority for the USDA and the Forest Service,' the agency said.
For SOUL in New Orleans, losing the grant means they don't have the money to water trees already planted, and they've had to drop plans to hire three people. Another $2.5 million grant is on hold due to the federal funding freeze, and founder and executive director Susannah Burley said the nonprofit's survival is uncertain. Its annual budget is a little more than $1 million.
'We kind of are lost because we don't know if we should be planning to close our doors or if we should be planning for next season,' she said.
For others who were set to get Arbor Day Foundation money, the loss is not existential but still devastating. In the city-county of Butte-Silver Bow in southwest Montana, forester Trevor Peterson was going to use a $745,250 grant to buy chain saws, rigging gear and other essential tools, remove up to 200 dead or dying cottonwoods and plant as many as 1,000 trees as part of a decades-long effort to replenish trees cut to make way for copper mining. He wanted to help organize large community events focused on education, hoping to impart the knowledge necessary for future stewardship of the urban forest.
'We will now have to go back to the drawing board to determine where to go from here,' he said.
Jackson County, Oregon, was awarded a $600,000 grant to replant trees after wildfires in 2020 destroyed thousands of homes and charred more than 60,000 trees. The town of Talent lost two-thirds of its trees.
The nonprofit Oregon Urban Rural and Community Forestry, founded in the fires' aftermath, fought for years to get a single dollar, recalled Mike Oxendine, the group's founder and director.
The grant money from the Arbor Day Foundation was being used to help low-income and disadvantaged mobile home park residents — among the hardest-hit by the fires — identify and remove hazardous trees badly burned or killed, and replant trees for shade and cooling.
'This is a rural red area that needs it badly,' said Oxendine. 'We hit temperatures that exceed 110 degrees every summer now. We go through massive droughts and we're always prone to wildfire here.'
The loss of funding will create a 'tremendous burden' for the organization, he said.
———
The Associated Press receives support from the Walton Family Foundation for coverage of water and environmental policy. The AP is solely responsible for all content. For all of AP's environmental coverage, visit apnews.com/hub/climate-and-environment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sturgeon takes swipe at Boris Johnson in book launch event
Sturgeon takes swipe at Boris Johnson in book launch event

The Herald Scotland

time2 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Sturgeon takes swipe at Boris Johnson in book launch event

Speaking on stage at her alma mater, Ms Sturgeon said: 'I've been a politician for most of my adult life. I don't really enjoy reading political memoirs. 'I didn't want to write a memoir that was what most are, which is dry and quite detailed and also just recounting things that happened with the person writing it saying: 'wasn't I great and didn't I get everything right and everything else was wrong?' 'I didn't want to write that, I wanted to write something that was absolutely unashamed about the things I'm proud of'. Ms Sturgeon later told the audience she was 'really proud' of her memoir, saying 'It's my story'. READ MORE: 'There's no shortage of other people's opinions on what I say, what I did, what I do," she said, "And this was about me putting that into my words. And it feels good to have done it. 'Some people read it and love it, some people might read it and not love it. Many of the people who are writing about it now haven't and never will read it.' The former first minister later referenced ex-Tory Prime Minister Johnson and dubbed his memoir 'not worth reading'. Discussing Mr Johnson, Ms Sturgeon said: 'I do think there are strengths that women have that are a lot more conducive to leadership sometimes but they don't always get recognised as strengths. 'Sometimes it isn't a good thing to have people like Boris Johnson in positions of leadership. 'He's got a memoir out too, it is not worth reading.' At the Thursday night event, Ms Sturgeon was interviewed by UK Journalist Sam Baker. The former first minister answered a small number of audience questions, which had to be submitted to organisers over 24-hours prior to the event. Attendees were also told they were not allowed to take photos or drink in the event space.

Fringe 2025: Conversations with the Godless: Peter Tatchell
Fringe 2025: Conversations with the Godless: Peter Tatchell

Edinburgh Reporter

time4 hours ago

  • Edinburgh Reporter

Fringe 2025: Conversations with the Godless: Peter Tatchell

Peter Tatchell has been arrested 103 times (though convicted only once) and lived to tell the tale. He may be best known as an LGBT+ rights activist, but he's campaigned for numerous causes over the last 58 years. Today he's here at The Stand to talk about his life and career with Chief Executive of Humanists UK, Andrew Copson. Tatchell is a patron of the organisation. 'He's very necessary…incredibly brave…doing good work in a world where most people are too timid' Sir Elton John Is Tatchell happy, asks Copson, with being described as a 'veteran humans rights campaigner'? Indeed he is, and at the age of 73 he has no plans to retire, and has said that he intends to carry on protesting well into his 90s. His activism is motivated by a sense of injustice, born of two key events in his working class Melbourne childhood. Australia had no free health care until 1975, and even after that it was patchy. Tatchell's mother was severely asthmatic; her treatment swallowed up most of the family's money; was that fair? Things got worse when his mother remarried a violently abusive man; both Peter and his mother suffered, but Australia at that time had no women's refuges, no charities that might help. 'It left me with a burning sense of injustice.' In 1963 white racists bombed the 16th Street Baptist Church in Birmingham, Alabama, a key civil rights meeting place. Four young girls were murdered. The bombing marked a turning point in the US, and a pivotal moment for 11 year-old Peter Tatchell. His interest in the Black Civil Rights movement led to his first campaign, opposing the death penalty in the state of Victoria. While it did not succeed in saving the life of an alleged murderer against whom evidence was poor, it did help fuel a public outcry. By 1969 Tatchell realised he was gay. Homosexual activity was still a crime in Victoria – punishments included long prison sentences and compulsory psychiatric treatment. He'd heard about the Stonewall uprising in the US: 'I had no gay role models, so when I heard about Stonewall I thought 'YES! I want to be a part of that.' When his friends were too scared to join him in a public campaign, he started writing to newspapers, at first anonymously but later in his own name. He was very scared, but again that sense of injustice won through, coupled with his lifelong view that, 'it's always better to do something than nothing.' He adapted his campaign from the Black civil rights movement. Credit: Peter Tatchell Foundation Two years later, he moved to the UK. He opposed Australia's involvement in Vietnam, wanted to avoid the draft, and thought he'd stay just two years, until the government changed back home. He's been here ever since. He stayed partly because the 1967 Sexual Offences Act had partially decriminalised homosexual acts. In Australia they were still illegal. The Gay Liberation Front, the first mass movement of LGBT people in the UK, was campaigning. Within five days Tatchell was at his first meeting; less than a month later he was campaigning, 'It was so exciting to be part of that.' Tatchell had noted that non-violent direct action had worked for the Black Civil Rights movement when lobbying the President had not, and decided to try the same approach for LGBT+ rights. In the 1970s and 80s the Westminster Parliament would not even allow a discussion of LGBT rights. In 1972 he helped organise the UK's first Pride march. That year GLF started to splinter; eventually, in the 90s, Tatchell and some other members formed OutRage! They also worked with lobbying groups like Stonewall. You need, he says, a two-pronged approach; direct action and lobbying are not mutually exclusive. Every campaign begins at the grassroots, 'Parliament is usually the last place to get a message.' OutRage! used protests to attract media coverage and raise public consciousness about the scale of LGBT+ oppression; when public opinion starts to shift, he says, MPs have to listen. Prior to the direct action campaign there was almost no public awareness of what was going on. Credit: Peter Tatchell Foundation In 1998 he and other activists famously interrupted the Archbishop of Canterbury's Easter sermon at Canterbury Cathedral. At the time. Tatchell says, the Archbishop opposed changes in the law to give LGBT+ people equal rights; he also opposed same-sex marriages, and supported the ban on LGBT+ people fostering children. OutRage! had been requesting a meeting with him for eight years; if he wouldn't come to them, they'd go to him. Tatchell walked up to the pulpit and began his own sermon; discrimination, he said, was not Christian. As the police tried to remove him he clung on to the pulpit, which promptly fell to pieces. Church wardens punched and scratched him. A video of the event proved he had not damaged the pulpit, but he was still charged with 'indecent behaviour in a church', 'I did not have my trousers down!' Magistrates had no choice but to convict him, but they fined him just £18.60 in reference to the date of the statute under which he'd been charged. Copson asked Tatchell about OutRage!'s controversial outing of closeted people. Tatchell insists this is not what happened, that the group never named anyone just because they were gay or closeted. What it did do was name some influential closeted people who were using their positions to target the LGBT+ community. Those people were ten Anglican bishops, who persisted in saying homosexuality was a sin and LGBT+ people should not have equality before the law, 'There was no Biblical justification for it at all. After that not one of them said anything more against the community.' OutRage! also wrote to twenty MPs who'd voted in favour of anti-gay laws, saying that this was hypocritical given their own sexuality, 'There was no threat, we told them it was their own decision but we hoped they would choose the morally right option. Most of them never voted in this way again.' The irony of the tabloid press's two-faced approach is not lost on him, 'When they outed adulterous 'family values' MPs, there was no outcry. When we did it we were called terrorists and LGBT+ fascists.' Any regrets about it, asks Copson? Only, replies Tatchell, that he wishes he'd used that tactic earlier to deal with bigots; he still thinks it's a good one, and he's trying to encourage LGBT+ people in Poland to use it, 'but they're scared.' Would he advocate its use in African and Arab countries, where, says Copson, well known closeted statesmen impose anti-LGBT laws? It'd probably too dangerous, says Tatchell, but in any case it's a decision for local activists. He's not bothered about outing being risky for the statesmen though; 'they bring it on themselves, but they should be given fair warning and a chance to change.' Tatchell is very clear and uncompromising in his stance on just about every issue Copson raises. He says this comes from always putting himself in the position of the victims. And he doesn't act alone; everything is discussed with his fellow activists 'I'm just often the front man.' Credit: Peter Tatchell Foundation And although he has strong convictions, he's not afraid to change his mind. He used to support hate crime legislation, but now feels it may infringe free speech. It's one thing, he says, having an opinion that he doesn't agree with, and quite another to issue death threats. People are entitled to their views. The definition of 'hate' is difficult, and laws that were intended to protect people are often used for other purposes. He's very concerned about current policing; human rights legislation should not be interpreted as a tool to prevent people expressing a legitimate opinion. In May this year he attended a Palestinian Solidarity march with a placard, 'Stop Israeli genocide, stop Hamas executions.' He was arrested for 'racially and religiously aggravated breach of the peace.' 'My criticism of Hamas, a proscribed organisation, mentioned neither race nor religion, but that was the basis of my arrest….the Met eventually told me there'd be 'no further action' – there will be from me! The English Public Order laws were written to deal with football violence and violent street disorder, but I've been arrested for a 'Gay Equality Now' sign. The laws are so broad they can be used to justify anything.' After decades of Tory government, what, asks Copson, does Tatchell think of Keir Starmer's new regime? Is it better? No, Tachell replies, it's a huge disappointment. Starmer promised to outlaw gay conversion therapy; nothing has happened. Exorcisms and beatings are still being inflicted on LGBT+ people. The Scottish government has also dropped its commitment to legislate against this. In opposition, the Labour Party condemned the anti-Trans agenda. Now it's banned puberty blockers (on the basis that they are dangerous) for young trans children, but not for non-trans children with early onset puberty. So are they 'dangerous' or not? Keir Starmer has said that the much discussed Supreme Court decision on 'biological sex' 'provides clarity' – 'rubbish' says Tatchell. The Court took representations from anti-Trans groups but not from any Trans ones. It even refused to allow the intervention of Dr Victoria McCloud, the UK's first transgender judge, and Stephen Whittle of the Good Law Project. (McCloud intends to take the government and the Supreme Court to the European Court of Human Rights.) 'Would they make a decision about Black issues without hearing the representations of the Black community?' As the session draws to a close, the audience has many questions, Tatchell's views on the monarchy being one of them. He supports its abolition on the basis that it is incompatible with democracy. Public positions of statehood, he says, should be open to everyone; the crown, the highest office in the land, excludes every single one of us except the Windsor family. This is also 'profoundly, if unintentionally, racist, as no person of colour can ever be head of state.' He doesn't want to see a president with executive powers, but one with only ceremonial duties, as in Germany, would be good. 'It'd be much cheaper too.' Credit: Peter Tatchell Foundation Another question focuses on the Trans community. What does he think should be done to protect them, and how do we build a broad base of allyship? Public opinion, says Tatchell, has shifted against trans people and a different approach is now needed. His controversial view is that trans and non-trans people are not the same, though they are of course equal, and their differences should be celebrated, 'We should say 'yes, there is a difference, but it's great.'' He feels this could bring the community more public support. He also thinks much more work needs to be done to highlight the shared experiences of trans and non-trans women. They both suffer misogyny, domestic abuse, hate crimes and prejudice and should be working together to oppose these things. A final question asks for his views on the rights of Indigenous Peoples in his native Australia. Having heard that many Aboriginal students were leaving school early to work to support their families, he and others campaigned for a scholarship fund to help them stay on to get qualifications, better jobs and the ability to uplift their own communities. The scheme still exists today and has helped many people. Credit: Peter Tatchell Foundation Peter Tatchell is often described as a 'fearless' campaigner, but he mentions more than once that he has been 'terrified' when taking direct action. He's been violently assaulted over 300 times, his coordination, memory, balance, vision and concentration are somewhat impaired, and he suffers from PTSD. Nevertheless, he has always persevered, still motivated by that burning sense of injustice, still always ready to put himself out there to try to right the many wrongs of the world. Not many people have been prepared to stick their neck out as consistently as he has over almost six decades of protest. Is he brave, foolhardy or a combination of both? I'll stick with Richard Holloway's opinion, A modern-day prophet…dauntingly brave in his pursuit of equality and justice Rchard Holloway Conversations with the Godless is a series of events being hosted by Humanists UK at The Stand Comedy Club, York Place (various Venue numbers, please check) this August. Journalist and broadcaster Polly Toynbee and writer, comedian and broadcaster (The Infinite Monkey Cage with Brian Cox) Robin Ince are next, on 14 and 15 August (times vary.) For full details please check the Fringe tab on The Stand website here. The Peter Tatchell Foundation promotes and protects the human rights of individuals, communities and nations, in the UK and internationally. Read more here and sign up for Peter's free weekly newsletter here. Like this: Like Related

Countries urged to ‘hold the line' in Geneva plastics treaty negotiations
Countries urged to ‘hold the line' in Geneva plastics treaty negotiations

The Guardian

time20 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Countries urged to ‘hold the line' in Geneva plastics treaty negotiations

Talks between nations to hammer out a plastics treaty to end plastic pollution continued behind closed doors in Geneva on Thursday, the final day of negotiations, as civil society groups urged countries to 'hold the line' to secure a strong agreement. With time running out to seal a deal between 184 countries, environmental groups expressed concern that frontline communities, Indigenous people and others suffering the worst impacts of the world's growing plastic crisis were being 'sold out' in an effort to secure a treaty, without meaningful or legally binding measures that would address the scale of the problem, 'at any cost'. This week's negotiations towards a legally binding agreement to tackle plastic pollution are the latest in five rounds of talks over the past two and a half years, which have so far failed to seal a deal. Talks at the UN offices stalled on Wednesday after a consensus draft treaty, presented by the chair of the event, Luis Vayas Valdivieso, was rejected by 80 countries. The ambitious countries – who want curbs on production – described it as 'unacceptable', a 'lowest common denominator' and a toothless waste management instrument, because it did not include production caps nor address the chemicals used in plastic products. Countries from the 'like minded' group, chiefly oil-producing countries and including Saudi Arabia, who want the treaty to focus on recycling and voluntary measures, said it crossed too many of their red lines and did not do enough to pare down the scope of the treaty. Graham Forbes, Greenpeace's head of delegation, said: 'The entire day has been behind closed doors. All of civil society is on edge, waiting to see what the next move is going to be from the chair and from the secretariat. We are nervous, we are anticipating, and we're concerned that we're going to be sold out in an effort to get a treaty at any cost. 'Civil society, frontline communities, Indigenous peoples, everyone is united in wanting to see something meaningful here. And we're praying that these governments are going to do the right thing and put our collective health before short term profits for the petrochemical sector.' A rush for a weak treaty in Geneva, Forbes said, 'would be a disaster'. Some NGOs said they had 'lost faith' in a process with the need for consensus between a majority of countries who want production caps versus a small but powerful minority of oil- and plastic-producing nations who continue to reject production limits. Christina Dixon, a campaign lead at the Environmental Investigation Agency, said the need for consensus was being 'weaponised'. 'A lot of civil society have lost faith in the process, because we've consistently seen a majority of countries aligning around a vision for the type of treaty that we'd be happy with. Yet, because of the way that this is being weaponised, we're constantly bowing to a small but vocal minority who are holding it hostage,' she said. This system was allowing a majority of countries to be 'drowned out', Dixon said. She urged: 'What we need to see tonight is that the views of that majority reflected fairly.' Sign up to Down to Earth The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential after newsletter promotion Earlier on Thursday, Camila Zepeda, the director general for global affairs at Mexico's ministry of foreign affairs and a negotiator at the talks, said: 'If [the next treaty draft] is exactly the status quo, then we'll need to assess if it's better to then keep working and trying to find a better environment for this topic, but it's too early to tell … 'We understand it will be a very simple treaty at this stage. But if the key components are there and we can build it in time, then we will be signing. By now, we've given up bans, we've given up production limits. We've given up so much, so much. 'As ambitious countries, we want an outcome, and we see that if we don't get an outcome, we're risking a lot. But at the same time, we won't take just anything.' Ahead of this week's talks, an expert review published in the Lancet described plastics as 'a grave, growing and under-recognised danger to human and planetary health'. It estimated health-related damages globally added up to £1.1tn annually, with infants and children particularly vulnerable. However, some delegates were still hopeful. Sivendra Michael, the Fiji government's permanent secretary for the ministry of environment and climate change, said: 'There is still time. There are still processes that the chair can explore. There are many other innovative processes that have worked in other multilateral settings that can be explored. 'It's important for us to take a step back and reflect that we are negotiating at the edge of a planetary emergency.' The talks continue.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store