OpenAI just gave ChatGPT a search boost — and it's coming for Google
Now available, the new version of ChatGPT Search can interpret more complex questions, run multiple search queries at once and even handle visual inputs like screenshots.
Combined with better memory and voice tools in GPT-4o, it's starting to look a lot like the kind of all-purpose search assistant Google's been trying to build, but in chatbot form.
Feature
ChatGPT Search (GPT-4o)
Google AI Search / AI Overviews
Query Style
Conversational, multi-turn
Traditional search input, evolving toward AI summaries
Source Transparency
Links shown under citations (but limited detail)
Inline links with mixed source visibility
Live Web Access
Yes (with browsing enabled on)
Yes, but not always clear when results are real-time
Image Understanding
Accepts images + screenshots for context-aware responses
Limited visual interpretation (outside of Lens)
Tone & Use Cases
Personalized, assistant-style responses
Factual, one-shot summaries for faster results
Ad Integration
None (currently)
Google Ads + Shopping baked into some queries
Memory & Context
Can recall past prompts and preferences (in GPT-4o)
No long-term memory, personalization only if enabled
Primary Strength
Deep context + synthesis across multiple domains
Quick facts, maps, and shopping results
ChatGPT Search and Google AI Overviews take different approaches to answering queries.
Google AI Overviews pull from existing web content to generate summarized answers at the top of search results, often quoting or paraphrasing websites.
In contrast, ChatGPT Search blends AI-generated responses with live web results from trusted sources, offering a more conversational experience.
While Google favors brevity and directness, ChatGPT provides more context, personalization and reasoning. ChatGPT also allows follow-up questions in a chat format, making it feel more interactive. Google is still a traditional search engine with AI layered on top — ChatGPT is search reimagined through conversation.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
The upgraded ChatGPT Search now offers:
So far, I've also noticed cleaner answers, fewer hallucinations and faster response time. As a power user with ChatGPT Plus, I've noticed a major shift because GPT-4o is enabled by default.
With every prompt, responses feel sharper and more confident, with less of the filler or second-guessing I used to get.
It's like the model knows what I'm asking before I finish typing, which is without a doubt the upgraded memory in ChatGPT Plus. ChatGPT Search is free for everyone, but Plus, Team and Pro users may experience even more of a streamlined search than those using the free tier.
Google Search still dominates traditional queries, especially for quick facts, maps, shopping, or local recommendations. Environmentally, it uses less energy, which is why it might be the better option for short queries. But if you want any of the following, ChatGPT Search just got a lot more competitive:
And while OpenAI says it's not trying to "kill Google," CEO Sam Altman admitted earlier this year that he doesn't use Google anymore. In this not-so-subtle statement, the CEO has made it clear that search habits are shifting.
ChatGPT Search has become a legit search companion. More than a chatbot with search capabilities, the AI has the ability to understand what you're really asking and how best to answer. While Google is still the default for millions, this recent update from OpenAI shows that the tech giant is aiming higher and getting closer to Google.
Do you use ChatGPT or Google for your searches? What is your deciding factor? Let us know in the comments!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
OpenAI's head of ChatGPT shares the one trait you need to be successful at the company
OpenAI's head of ChatGPT said it's those who can build "from scratch" who succeed at OpenAI. Nick Turley said the company looks for this quality in new hires and even tests for it. It's critical in an industry where "there is no analogy for what we're building," he said. Succeeding at the company, however, requires the ability to work without a playbook. "Approaching each scenario from scratch is so important in this space," Nick Turley, the head of ChatGPT, told Lenny Rachitsky on his weekly tech podcast on Saturday. "There is no analogy for what we're building. You can't copy an existing thing." He added that OpenAI cannot iterate on products or features developed by existing tech giants like Instagram, Google, or a company already known for its productivity tool. "You can learn from everywhere, but you have to do it from scratch. That's why that trait tends to make someone effective at OpenAI, and it's something we test for," he said, referring to an employee's ability to start a project from the ground up. Turley also discussed OpenAI's release strategies. The company unveiled GPT-5 on Thursday to mixed reviews. He said OpenAI intentionally ships features before they're fully ready. "We get a lot of crap for the model chooser," he said, referring to the now-discontinued dropdown menu in ChatGPT that allowed users to select between OpenAI's models. Turley's thesis is that it's better to "ship out something raw even if it makes less sense" so you can start learning from real users. Companies often wait to unveil productsbecause they want to adhere to "a quality bar," but it's actually better to roll out features quickly to ensure you get the feedback you need, he said. "The reason really is that you're gonna be polishing the wrong things in this space," he said. "You won't know what to polish until after you ship" and that is "uniquely true in an environment where the properties of your product are emergent." The launch of GPT-5 is an example of thisphilosophyat work. After criticism, the model switcher has been removed and replaced with a "real-time router" that selects the most appropriate model to handle each user request. "Previously, you had to go deal with the model picker in ChatGPT," OpenAI COO Brad Lightcap said in an interview with Big Technology, a tech newsletter, on Friday. "You had to select a model that you wanted to use for a given task. And then you'd run the process of asking a question, getting an answer. Sometimes you choose a thinking model, sometimes you wouldn't. And that was, I think, a confusing experience for users."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Big Tech's next major political battle may already be brewing in your backyard
The next major political fight over Big Tech has been brewing for years in the backyards of northern Virginia. Now the debate over data centers is poised to go national. The push by companies like OpenAI and Google to win the artificial intelligence race has led to a proliferation of data centers — giant warehouses for computer systems — in communities across all 50 states. The rise of these server farms has sparked fierce battles from the Virginia suburbs to Tucson, Arizona, and beyond, as city and county governments grapple with how to balance job creation and new revenue streams against the strain data centers put on water and energy resources. That debate is inching up the ballot as state lawmakers race to regulate a nascent industry, governors rush to embrace a new economic boon and Big Tech makes major investments in AI growth. Even as data centers are ready to explode on the national scene, the politics around them don't cut neatly across party lines. The sites sit at the intersection of a typically partisan divide between pro-business interests and organized labor. Efforts to regulate data centers in Virginia's Legislature have drawn bipartisan backing, though they've been largely unsuccessful because of concerns about local control and excessive bureaucracy. And some Democratic officials appear as eager as their Republican counterparts to attract data centers to help bolster their states' economies. 'Every governor — Democrat or Republican — is going to want economic development. I think the question is always at what cost — and that's where you see some of the political rubber meeting the road in terms of cost of energy bills, whether Big Tech's paying its fair share,' Virginia-based Democratic strategist Jared Leopold said. But, he added, 'it is so nascent that there isn't a standard Democratic-versus-Republican playbook for dealing with data centers yet." Tech companies like Amazon and Microsoft are counting on data centers to power their AI expansions — and the U.S. already has more of these facilities than any other country. President Donald Trump has vowed to 'win the AI race,' moving to implement a Biden-era executive order to build the facilities on federal lands and announcing a $500 billion AI and data center sprint with large tech companies known as Stargate, with a site underway in Texas. But the surge is proving polarizing, particularly in northern Virginia — considered the tip of the spear on this issue with the world's largest and fastest-growing data center market. The Energy Department is projecting data centers will require up to nearly three times as much energy by 2028, raising fears that the tech sector will turn to polluting sources like coal and natural gas in their rush for power. The data center industry is expected to contribute $9.1 billion in gross domestic product to Virginia's economy annually. In Loudoun County, Virginia, that has meant a $250 million budget surplus and a property tax cut. That's a prospect that's hard to ignore for counties with Big Tech knocking on their doors. 'We don't know where to put the money,' said Democrat Juli Briskman, who sits on the county board of supervisors. But the typical residential ratepayer in that state could experience a $14 to $37 monthly electric bill increase by 2040, according to a report from Virginia's Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission, in part because of the need for infrastructure upgrades whose costs could be spread to all customers. 'Enough is enough,' said Loudoun County Vice Chair Michael Turner, also a Democrat, who is largely opposing new data centers. 'The next election for supervisor will hinge on data centers,' adding that two weeks don't go by where he doesn't hear from other county officials around the country looking for advice. In Arizona, Tucson's city council just unanimously voted against a massive data center proposal from Amazon that promised jobs and millions in tax revenue but stoked fears about its water and energy consumption. In other cases, public officials of both parties are rushing to capitalize on the promises of AI — and the tax dollars it can bring in. John Chambers, a spokesperson for Rep. Mike Carey (R-Ohio), said in a statement he attributes the Columbus area's growth to 'tech jobs and data centers that will help America win the AI innovation race' and that he supports 'an all-of-the-above energy strategy to ensure electricity is affordable and available for families and businesses in the region.' Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, who's seeking a third term as governor and is considered a potential Democratic presidential contender in 2028, is looking to lure data centers to his state so as not to miss out on the boom. And down south, De'Keither Stamps, a Democratic member of Mississippi's Public Services Commission, said data centers could bring positive economic development and the opportunity to finance needed electrical system upgrades 'if regulated prudently.' Not everyone is on board. Ben Inskeep, program director at Indiana-based Citizens Action Coalition, a consumer and environmental advocacy group, sees the issue is up for grabs and at an inflection point as grassroots opposition takes shape. 'Both our political parties have been completely captured by Big Tech and are doing the bidding of Big Tech in every way imaginable,' he said. 'This does have all the hallmarks of an issue that could create new, interesting political coalitions.' In the Virginia Legislature, efforts to put guardrails around the rapid expansion of data centers — such as assessing who's footing the energy bills for them — drew bipartisan support even as they failed. Youngkin, the Republican governor, vetoed a bipartisan bill that would have required data-center applications complete site assessments because he said he didn't want to create 'unnecessary red tape.' Still, 'It's less partisan than most issues. It's more geographic,' said Virginia state Del. Ian Lovejoy, a Republican from Prince William County who unsuccessfully pushed a bill last session to put land buffers between data centers and parks, schools and residential areas. 'So if you're in an area that is negatively affected by them, then it crosses party lines. And if you're not in an area that's really affected by them, neither party really cares that much, because broadly speaking, on the right side of the aisle you have the pro-business desire to build, and on the left side of the aisle, you have the labor movement, where unions really like these data centers because it's jobs.' Now, Lovejoy expects state Democrats to loosen fossil fuel restrictions baked into the state's Clean Economy Act in response to the energy crunch. Industry efforts to advance data centers have also been targeted at both parties. The nearly quarter of a million dollars the Data Center Coalition has poured into state legislative campaigns in Virginia have been split across the aisle. The group has spent nearly the same amount on federal lobbying and is active in states like California, where it spent $50,000 so far this year. Other players in the sector are targeting northern Virginia officials, too. 'Data centers enjoy bipartisan support across states, but we have also heard our fair share of bipartisan concerns across states,' said Dan Diorio, vice president of state policy at the Data Center Coalition, an industry group. 'We are very much an engaged stakeholder in all the states in which our members are active in to work on policies with lawmakers of both sides of the aisle to ensure that states continue to see the economic benefits of data centers while also addressing their priorities.' As data centers move up the ballot as a campaign issue, the complications for candidates in both parties are playing out in real time. Democrats who are watching their party nationally hemorrhage voters over the economy are scrambling to strike a balance between adding jobs and revenue while stopping energy costs from skyrocketing. And in some cases, Republicans whose party leaders are cracking down on renewable energy are calling for 'all of the above' approaches to energy production to keep power prices down — providing tacit backing to a sector Trump is trying to crush even as they follow the president in promoting fossil fuels. That dynamic is on clear display in Virginia's gubernatorial race, where data-center regulation has emerged as a focal point. Former Rep. Abigail Spanberger, Democrats' nominee, is proposing a 'statewide strategy' for data centers that calls for boosting local and renewable energy production and charging Big Tech companies to offset rising energy costs for consumers. 'Virginia can benefit from having data centers here — but to reap those benefits, we need to make sure we are accounting and planning for the energy generation, water, and other resources needed to support them,' Spanberger said in a statement. Her Republican opponent, Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears, wants to open the state to 'all kinds of energy' and to reduce red tape around power projects to help meet increasing demand. Earle-Sears' campaign did not respond to a request for comment. Rising power prices, which could spike further as more energy-demanding data centers come online, are already roiling politics across the midwest and mid-Atlantic asDemocratic governors and candidates blame grid manager PJM for consumers' higher bills and New Jersey's gubernatorial candidates clash over how to bring those costs down. The debate has the potential to spill into next year's broader slate of gubernatorial contests, with several of those governors — including Pritzker, Pennsylvania's Josh Shapiro and Maryland's Wes Moore — up for reelection and Democrats eager to prove they understand voters' cost-of-living concerns. The issues surrounding data centers are bleeding into federal politics, too, though ultimately decisions around zoning and electric rates will largely remain in state and local control. Congressional Republicans had pushed a 10-year moratorium on state-level AI regulations — including those around data center permitting — as part of their 'big, beautiful' domestic policy bill, though the effort fell apart in the Senate. At the same time, they voted to roll back credits for clean-energy projects from Democrats' 2022 climate law that could help offset rising energy demand. 'The federal government is going to have to take this on,' said Virginia state Sen. Russet Perry, a Democrat who has spearheaded data center regulatory efforts in her legislature. 'In the interim, the state is going to be at the forefront for dealing with it, and it's going to be bipartisan.' Shia Kapos contributed to this report.
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
OpenAI's head of ChatGPT shares the one trait you need to be successful at the company
Landing a job at OpenAI often requires a strong tech background, experience at top-tier companies, and a genuine passion for AI research. Succeeding at the company, however, requires the ability to work without a playbook. "Approaching each scenario from scratch is so important in this space," Nick Turley, the head of ChatGPT, told Lenny Rachitsky on his weekly tech podcast on Saturday. "There is no analogy for what we're building. You can't copy an existing thing." He added that OpenAI cannot iterate on products or features developed by existing tech giants like Instagram, Google, or a company already known for its productivity tool. "You can learn from everywhere, but you have to do it from scratch. That's why that trait tends to make someone effective at OpenAI, and it's something we test for," he said, referring to an employee's ability to start a project from the ground up. Turley also discussed OpenAI's release strategies. The company unveiled GPT-5 on Thursday to mixed reviews. He said OpenAI intentionally ships features before they're fully ready. "We get a lot of crap for the model chooser," he said, referring to the now-discontinued dropdown menu in ChatGPT that allowed users to select between OpenAI's models. Turley's thesis is that it's better to "ship out something raw even if it makes less sense" so you can start learning from real users. Companies often wait to unveil productsbecause they want to adhere to "a quality bar," but it's actually better to roll out features quickly to ensure you get the feedback you need, he said. "The reason really is that you're gonna be polishing the wrong things in this space," he said. "You won't know what to polish until after you ship" and that is "uniquely true in an environment where the properties of your product are emergent." The launch of GPT-5 is an example of this philosophy at work. After criticism, the model switcher has been removed and replaced with a "real-time router" that selects the most appropriate model to handle each user request. "Previously, you had to go deal with the model picker in ChatGPT," OpenAI COO Brad Lightcap said in an interview with Big Technology, a tech newsletter, on Friday. "You had to select a model that you wanted to use for a given task. And then you'd run the process of asking a question, getting an answer. Sometimes you choose a thinking model, sometimes you wouldn't. And that was, I think, a confusing experience for users." Of course, it's impossible to satisfy everyone. After GPT-5's release, users immediately complained that they could no longer access a fan-favorite older model. So OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said he'd bring it back.
