Meta to ban political ads in EU due to bloc's 'unworkable' rules
"This is a difficult decision -- one we've taken in response to the EU's incoming Transparency and Targeting of Political Advertising (TTPA) regulation," the company said.
Political, electoral and social issue advertising will no longer be allowed from October in the bloc, it said, because of "unworkable requirements" under the new rules.
"Unfortunately, the TTPA introduces significant, additional obligations to our processes and systems that create an untenable level of complexity and legal uncertainty for advertisers and platforms operating in the EU," Meta added.
The EU says its political advertising rules seek to increase transparency in online advertising after Facebook's Cambridge Analytica scandal, which came to light in 2018.
Cambridge Analytica was a consulting firm that was found to have improperly accessed personal data from millions of Facebook users for targeted political advertising, particularly during the 2016 US election and Brexit referendum.
The change is set to impact Meta's flagship platforms Facebook and Instagram, as well as WhatsApp -- which is largely ad-free but announced in June it would be introducing new advertising features in some parts of the app.
Meta said it was "not the only company to have been forced into this position".
Google last year announced it would also prevent political advertising in the EU from October 2025 because of the "significant new operational challenges and legal uncertainties".
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has been highly critical of European rules, accusing Brussels in January of "censorship" and equating EU fines against the company to tariffs.
The latest row between Meta and the EU has been over the firm's "pay or consent" system.
The EU imposed a 200-million-euro ($235-million) fine in April after concluding Meta violated rules on the use of personal data on Facebook and Instagram.
The company faces additional daily penalties if it does not make changes, with Brussels yet to decide whether Meta has modified the platforms enough to avoid more fines.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
26 minutes ago
- Euronews
The Baltics scored a key European victory on energy security that can inspire others
Recent crises have highlighted the critical role that energy plays in our economies and societies. From Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine and conflicts in the Middle East to blackouts in Chile and Spain, we have been repeatedly reminded of the need to ensure the security and reliability of our energy supplies, which can never be taken for granted. In this context, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania took a bold step forward this year to strengthen their energy security, which deserves widespread attention. For 65 years, the electricity systems of the three Baltic states operated fully within the Russian and Belarusian system, which Russia controls. Yet earlier this year, following extensive preparations, they switched away from this system and connected to the continental European grid instead. This is a clear and concrete example of what it means to take the hard but necessary actions to strengthen energy security, especially in an era of heightened geopolitical tensions. The change was not only a significant technical success but also a political victory for the entire European Union. Synchronising the electricity systems of the Baltic states with the rest of Europe helps to ensure the reliability of power supply for homes, businesses, hospitals and schools. It bolsters national and economic security. And it marks an important step towards closer integration with the EU's internal energy market – something Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania have been working towards since their independence from the Soviet Union in 1990. Strategic steps towards independence Before this reorientation, Russia retained sole control over a critical parameter of the Baltics' electricity systems: frequency. This meant it had the capacity to influence how the power systems in the Baltic states operated, making them vulnerable to Russia's weaponisation of energy. The Baltics long recognised this as a potential threat. In 2007, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania signalled their political will to desynchronise from the Russian system, and in 2018, they highlighted their intention to join the continental European system by the end of 2025. In the years that followed, the Baltic states took strategic steps towards greater energy independence from Russia, with a continued focus on their power systems. They approved and implemented key investments in infrastructure, including electricity connections to Poland, Finland and Sweden and among the Baltic states themselves. More than 40 projects were carried out in relation to the synchronisation project alone – including the installation of new and reconstructed power lines, substations, synchronous condensers and additional storage capacity. As a result, when Russia went on a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in early 2022, the Baltic states were able to move swiftly – immediately ending electricity imports from Russia, which met between 10% and 25% of the Baltic states' total electricity demand on average. Then, on 9 February 2025, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania disconnected from Russia's power system and synchronised with Europe's through Poland – meeting this longstanding objective ahead of schedule and without incidents. Baltic states can serve as inspiration to others Reconfiguring an electricity system is a major undertaking, and this success was the result of many ingredients. Engineering was just one of them. Strong political will and long-term vision ensured direction and continuity across different governments. Meanwhile, cooperation – both among the sprawling network of power system stakeholders and regionally – also proved essential. Poland was pivotal in providing the necessary infrastructure and political support. The European Union also contributed significantly – financing 75% of the synchronisation investment costs. This strong example of regional cooperation can serve as a model to follow in other parts of the world that are looking to better integrate their electricity systems and markets, including Southeast Asia and more. Today, the Baltics are formulating new goals to deepen their energy security. This includes a push, together with Poland, to ensure the protection and resilience of critical energy infrastructure, which has recently come under threat. A new flagship framework for accomplishing this, based on four priorities – prevention, detection, response and repair – could ultimately serve as a blueprint for safeguarding critical energy infrastructure across the European Union and beyond. The successful and timely implementation of this new model will also require political and financial support from the European Union. We live in a complex and dangerous world today, with a wide range of serious energy security challenges – from geopolitical tensions to cyberattacks and extreme weather. In this context, it is vital to anticipate and prepare for adverse events before they happen. Through smart policymaking, courage and collaboration, the Baltic states are demonstrating what this looks like – and can serve as an inspiration to many countries around the world. Fatih Birol is Executive Director of International Energy Agency (IEA), Kaspars Melnis is Minister for Climate and Energy of Latvia, Andres Sutt is Minister of Energy and the Environment of Estonia, and Žygimantas Vaičiūnas is Energy Minister of Lithuania.
Local France
an hour ago
- Local France
US tariff tussles stuff of nightmares for Bordeaux winemakers
In southwestern France, around the Bordeaux region's famed vineyards, months of talk on what US President Donald Trump will decide on tariffs have been the stuff of nightmares for producers as they look on helplessly. The United States is by far the top export market for Bordeaux's wine, accounting for €400 million worth of annual sales - or about 20 percent of the total. China lags behind with €300 million ahead of the United Kingdom with €200 million. Sunday's announcement of a trade deal between the United States and the European Union did not clear up what tariffs European wine and spirits producers will face in the United States. Advertisement While Trump said European exports face 15 percent tariffs across the board, both sides said there would be carve-outs for certain sectors. EU head Ursula Von der Leyen said the bloc still hoped to secure further so-called "zero-for-zero" agreements, notably for alcohol, which she hoped to be "sorted out" in the coming days. Philippe Tapie, chairman of regional traders' union Bordeaux Negoce, which represents more than 90 percent of the wine trade in the Bordeaux area, is worried by the uncertainty. "One day, it is white, the next it is black - the US administration can change its mind from one day to the next and we have no visibility," he told AFP. In mid-March, Trump had threatened Brussels with 200 percent tariffs on alcohol in response to a proposed EU tax on US bourbon. Then in April he brandished a new threat of 20 percent across the board on EU products, a threat ultimately suspended. Since then, the level first held at ten percent but, in late May, the US leader threatened to revert to 50 percent before pivoting to 30 percent starting August 1st, the deadline for the negotiations with the EU that led to a preliminary accord after Trump and Von der Leyen met in Scotland on Sunday. "At 10 percent or 15 percent, we'll find solutions. At 30 percent, no. End of story," Tapie warned just ahead of the announcement as he criticised a "totally unpredictable American administration". To export wine, "there's a minimum of 30 days by boat. If you go to California, it's 60 days. We can't think in terms of weeks," says Tapie, who says he has "never been confronted with such a situation" in 30 years of business. Advertisement Twins Bordeaux, one of Bordeaux's leading wine merchants, also laments the tariffs' impact. "The American market represents about a third of our turnover, or around €30 million," explains Sebastien Moses, co-director and co-owner of Twins, which usually ships upwards of a million bottles a year to the United States. Since January, "our turnover must have fallen by 50 percent compared to last year," he says. "So far, we've managed to save the situation, because as soon as Donald Trump was elected we anticipated this and sent as much stock as possible to the US," explains Moses, though longer term he says this is not a "stable" strategy. As an attempted work around Twins Bordeaux even shipped cases of around 10,000 bottles by air in March. "But only very expensive wines, at no less than €150-€200 per bottle, because by air it's at least two and a half times the price of shipping by sea," he said. For Bordeaux wine merchant Bouey, the US market represents less than 10 percent of its exports. "We have long since undertaken a geographical expansion. Faced with the global chaos, commercial strategies can no longer be based on a single- or dual-country strategy," Jacques Bouey, its CEO, told AFP in April. The tariffs come with the industry already struggling with declining consumption that has led to overproduction and a collapse in bulk prices. By early 2023, a third of Bordeaux's approximately 5,000 wine growers admitted to being in difficulty. "We're starting to become world champions in terms of accumulating problems," complained Tapie.
LeMonde
2 hours ago
- LeMonde
Tariffs: EU hands Trump a political win to avoid trade chaos
Suddenly, Donald Trump leaned toward Ursula von der Leyen and extended his hand, praising, with his signature superlatives, "the biggest deal ever made." Up to that point, the European Commission president had remained still in her large green velvet chair, but she accepted the handshake. That gesture closed, on Sunday, July 27, dozens of hours of sometimes bewildering negotiations between the European and American delegations, culminating in the meeting held in the ballroom of the sprawling Turnberry golf resort, owned by Trump, on Scotland's west coast. The suspense lasted until the very last minute. At the start of the meeting, the Republican, claiming to be "not in a good mood," still estimated the odds of reaching a deal at 50%. The agreement was clinched just five days before the August 1 deadline he had previously set, after which European exports would have faced punitive tariffs of 30%. Faced with two evils, the 27 EU member states chose what they saw as the lesser: an unbalanced compromise favoring the US rather than risking a full-scale trade war with unpredictable consequences. The choice was of "stability over total unpredictability," European Commissioner for Trade Maros Sefcovic explained on a flight from Brussels to Glasgow. While German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni welcomed the agreement without much enthusiasm, it was Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever who best summed up the mood among European leaders: "This is a moment of relief, but not of celebration." French Minister for European Affairs Benjamin Haddad, meanwhile, recognized the deal would bring "temporary stability" but called it "unbalanced."
