logo
Senate Vs. House Tax Bills: Key Differences Impacting Estate Planning In 2025

Senate Vs. House Tax Bills: Key Differences Impacting Estate Planning In 2025

Forbes4 hours ago

Senate vs. House Tax Bills: Key Differences Impacting Estate Planning in 2025
As Congress debates the 'Big Beautiful Bill' – the next round of significant tax legislation, estate planners and their clients are paying close attention. The Senate Finance Committee and the House have each advanced their versions of the 2025 tax bill, both aiming to make permanent many provisions from the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA). However, important differences could significantly impact estate and tax planning for high-net-worth families.
Core Differences: Estate and Gift Tax Exemption
Both the House and Senate bills propose making the TCJA's estate and gift tax exemption permanent, rather than reverting to the 2017 law on January 1, 2026 . The House version sets the exemption at $15 million per individual (indexed for inflation after 2025), up from the current $13.99 million. The Senate version closely aligns with this, though the specifics of inflation adjustments may vary. Both bills retain the 40% tax rate on estates above the exemption.
For those with substantial estates, this is good news. The possibility of the exemption reverting to pre-TCJA levels in 2026 has prompted a surge in lifetime gifting and trust planning. If either bill passes, the urgency for immediate action may lessen, but the opportunity to remove future appreciation from one's taxable estate remains compelling.
SALT Deduction: A Major Divergence
One of the most significant differences for high-net-worth taxpayers is the treatment of the state and local tax (SALT) deduction. The House bill proposes raising the SALT cap to $40,000 per year for taxpayers with adjusted gross income (AGI) under $500,000, providing substantial relief to residents of high-tax states. In contrast, the Senate bill retains the current $10,000 cap, although this could change as negotiations continue.
For clients in Massachusetts and other high-tax areas, the House version offers a clear advantage. Greater deductibility of state and local taxes would improve after-tax cash flow and could influence decisions about property ownership and residency.
Business and Individual Tax Provisions
The two bills also differ in their treatment of business taxes. The House bill extends certain deductions, such as those for research and development, on a temporary basis, while the Senate would make these extensions permanent. For business owners and family offices, the Senate's approach offers more predictability.
On the individual side, the House increases the standard deduction and child tax credit and introduces 'Tax-Advantaged Savings Accounts' for newborns with government contributions and tax-advantaged growth. The Senate bill offers a larger deduction for seniors and a pared-back child tax credit, along with permanent extensions of the Trump-era tax cuts.
International Taxation and Debt Limit
The Senate bill proposes more extensive changes to international tax provisions, including rules around global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI), foreign-derived intangible income (FDII), and the base erosion and anti-abuse tax (BEAT), as defined under the Internal Revenue Code. It also includes a higher debt limit increase than the House bill, which may affect future fiscal policy.
Estate Planning Strategies: Next Steps
For estate planners and their clients, the prospect of a higher, permanent exemption is reassuring but not a reason for complacency. Here's what you should consider:
Tax laws are subject to frequent changes and modifications. Proactive, flexible planning remains the best defense against evolving legislation.
Top Ten Keywords:

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Primary lessons: Trump rules, Dems are revved. NYC's melee is next.
Primary lessons: Trump rules, Dems are revved. NYC's melee is next.

USA Today

time9 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Primary lessons: Trump rules, Dems are revved. NYC's melee is next.

Primary lessons: Trump rules, Dems are revved. NYC's melee is next. Off-year elections are the tea leaves of U.S. politics, and just as reliable. Still, here are clues from 2025 contests in Virginia and New Jersey. Show Caption Hide Caption Justice Department orders dismissal of New York mayor Adams case Acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove sent a memo telling the U.S. Attorney's office in Manhattan to dismiss the case against Adams. It's a long stretch to Election Days that matter more, but the season's handful of race offer some political clues. Trump commands the GOP while Democrats are still debating the party's direction. The mayor's race in New York shows how it's easier these days to stage a comeback after scandal. Off-year elections are the tea leaves of American politics, and just as reliable. With votes being counted in Virginia's June 17 primary, the competitors are set for the commonwealth's gubernatorial race: Former Democratic Rep. Abigail Spanberger will face Republican Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears. A week earlier, in New Jersey, Democratic Rep. Mikie Sherrill and Republican Jack Ciattarelli won their parties' nominations for the only other governorship on the ballot in November. It's a long stretch to Election Days that matter more − including next year's midterms when control of the House and the Senate at stake, not to mention the presidential race in 2028. But this season's handful of contests do provide early clues about the mood of the voters and the direction of the nation's politics. Some primary lessons learned so far: 1. Democrats are revved up. In Virginia, Democratic turnout was rising even without much of a reason to vote. That was true earlier this spring, when Democrats turned out in two special House elections in Florida, slashing in half the GOP's margin in solidly red districts. Spanberger was unopposed for the nomination in the marquee gubernatorial race, yet in the run up to the primary more than 196,500 people had cast early ballots as of June 16. That's nearly 60% more than those who voted during the comparable period four years ago, when the race was fierce. (The Democratic nominations for lieutenant governor and attorney general were contested this year.) No state has been more affected by President Donald Trump's efforts to cut the federal government than Virginia, home to more federal workers than any state except California. The firestorm over those firings creates a hurdle for Republicans. So does history. In 11 of the last 12 elections, the candidate who won the Virginia governorship was from the opposition party of the president who had been elected to the White House a year earlier. The purple-state contest is often seen as a way to send a message to the new president about how he's doing. In New York, turnout has also surged in the city's mayoral primary. More than 30,000 voters cast ballots on the first day of voting June 14, nearly double the number who went to the polls on the first day they could four years ago. The overwhelmingly Democratic city holds its primary on June 24. 2. Trump's hold on the GOP is unshaken. In New Jersey's primary on June 10, President Trump wasn't on the ballot, but he was on the minds of GOP voters. That posed a problem for Ciattarelli, viewed as a moderate Republican when he served in the state Assembly. Before his first bid for the gubernatorial nomination in 2017, he called Trump a "charlatan" who was unfit to be president. In his second bid in 2021, he kept his distance. Not this time. Ciattarelli went to Trump's golf course in Bedminster, New Jersey, to woo him, then bragged about it. "Tonight, my great honor and pleasure to share time with @POTUS," he posted on social media. with a photo. His courtship worked. "Jack, who after getting to know and understand MAGA, has gone ALL IN, and is now 100% (PLUS!), Trump said in his endorsement on Truth Social. "HE WILL NOT LET YOU DOWN." That embrace sealed his landslide in the state's GOP primary over conservative radio host Bill Spadea, who had earned Trump's ire by backing Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis in last year's Republican presidential primary. Ciattarelli sailed to victory, winning 68% of the Republican vote. Spadea got 22%. State Senator Jon Bramnick, a moderate who had criticized Trump, claimed just 6%. Today's asset could be tomorrow's problem, of course. Trump lost the Democratic-leaning state to Kamala Harris in 2024 by 6 points, though that was considerably closer than his 16-point loss to Joe Biden in 2020. The morning after this month's primary, Ciattarelli was ready to pivot to appeal to independents and Democrats. "This race is all about New Jersey," he told NBC, though he acknowledged, "My opponent is going to want to talk about Donald Trump every day of the week." 3. Nobody has a hold on the Democratic Party. Don't look for that kind of coherence among Democrats. In New Jersey, the primary results showed a fractured party. Sherrill prevailed with 34% of the vote after a campaign that promised competence and spotlighted her resume as a Navy veteran and former federal prosecutor. But the two most progressive candidates in the primary, Newark Mayor Ras Baraka and Jersey City Mayor Steven Fulop, got a combined total of more votes, at 37%. And the two most moderate contenders, Rep. Josh Gottheimer and former state Senate president Stephen Sweeney, got a fair share, too, at a combined 19%. None of them were touting their ties to Harris or Biden or, for that matter, the national party in general. The debate nationwide over how to rebound from last year's electoral thumping isn't close to being settled yet. New York's mayor's race also illustrates the Democrats' divide, with a centrist frontrunner trying to fight back a leftist challenger. 4. NY, NY? It's a hell of a town. Start with this: New York's Democratic mayor is running for a second term, but not as a Democrat. Eric Adams is running as an independent after convincing the Trump Justice Department to drop federal charges of corruption. Now leading in the Democratic contest is Andrew Cuomo, who resigned as governor in 2021 amid allegations of sexual harassment. He denies the accusations and now says he shouldn't have left office. His top challenger is Zohran Mamdani, a 33-year-old democratic socialist, who if elected would be the first Muslim to serve as mayor of America's biggest city. He's been endorsed by two progressive icons, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders and New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. The messy melee that is New York politics − including an 11-candidate race and a ranked-choice voting system − may be so specific to the city that it provides few lessons for the rest of the country's politics. Except, perhaps, that during the Trump era it may be more possible to stage a comeback in politics after scandal, as evidenced by the campaigns of Cuomo and Adams. The definition of who can hold electoral office may also be expanding. Mamdani's election would break new ground. So will the race in Virginia, now poised to elect its first woman as governor.

GOP squares off over AI ban
GOP squares off over AI ban

The Hill

time19 minutes ago

  • The Hill

GOP squares off over AI ban

The Big Story A push to ban state regulation of artificial intelligence for 10 years is setting off a debate among Republicans, further complicating its path towards passage in President Trump's 'one, big, beautiful bill.' © Greg Nash The AI provision has divided Republicans into two camps: one touting the party's traditional support of states' rights, and another concerned with overbearing regulation. As the Senate works out its own changes to the larger tax and spending package, an increasing number of Republicans from both chambers are coming out against the AI provision, which calls for a 10-year moratorium on state laws regulating AI models and systems. Republicans opposed to the measure differ in their opinions of AI and how beneficial it could be, but share concerns with the federal government stifling the ability of states to set their own rules for it. Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), one of the most vocal GOP critics of Trump's broader bill, said Tuesday he is 'not a real fan of the federal government' and is against the provision. 'I personally don't think we should be setting a federal standard right now and prohibiting the states from doing what we should be doing in a federated republic. Let the states experiment,' Johnson said. While Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) has expressed concerns about the economic impact of AI, he said he is willing to introduce an amendment to eliminate the provision during the Senate's marathon vote-a-rama if it is not taken out earlier. 'I'm only for AI if it's good for the people,' he told reporters, citing AI's potential disruptive impact on the job market. 'I think we've got to come up with a way to put people first.' Even some House Republicans who already voted to pass the bill in the lower chamber are speaking out against the provision. A group of hardline conservatives argued in a letter last week to Senate Republicans that Congress is still 'actively investigating' AI and 'does not fully understand the implications' of the technology. This was shortly after Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) confirmed she would be a 'no' on the bill if it comes back to the House with the provision included. 'I am 100 percent opposed and I will not vote for any bill that destroys federalism and takes away states' rights, ability to regulate and make laws when it regards humans and AI,' the Georgia Republican said. Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) declined to say whether he would support the moratorium but noted he 'likes states' rights.' Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), the chair of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, rejected concerns the moratorium could encroach on states' rights, pointing to the Commerce Clause in the Constitution. 'The Constitution,' Cruz said, 'gives Congress the authority to regulate commerce between the states and AI is quintessentially commerce between the states and having a patchwork of 50 different standards crippling the development of AI.' The battle comes just over a month after OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and other tech leaders appeared before Cruz's committee and voiced their opposition to state-by-state regulation of AI. Read more in a full report Wednesday morning at Welcome to The Hill's Technology newsletter, we're Miranda Nazzaro and Julia Shapero — tracking the latest moves from Capitol Hill to Silicon Valley. Did someone forward you this newsletter? Subscribe here. Essential Reads How policy will be impacting the tech sector now and in the future: White House says Trump will push TikTok deadline another 90 days President Trump will sign another executive order this week extending the deadline for TikTok's parent company to divest the video sharing app, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Tuesday. 'As he has said many times, President Trump does not want TikTok to go dark,' Leavitt said in a statement shared with The Hill. 'This extension will last 90 days, which the Administration will spend working … What to know about Trump's spat with Tucker Carlson President Trump is taking fire over his posture toward Iran from an unlikely critic in the media: Former Fox News host Tucker Carlson. Trump attacked Carlson directly late Monday, marking a major departure from what has for months been a rosy relationship between the pundit and president. The rift is underscoring GOP divisions on how the U.S. should respond to the escalating crisis in the Middle East and highlighting … Musk shares drug test results showing 'negative' for ketamine Tech billionaire Elon Musk shared drug test results on Tuesday showing that he tested negative for ketamine after The New York Times reported he was using drugs on the 2024 campaign trail. The Tesla CEO shared a picture of the test results, which showed negative results for several other drugs, on the social platform X, simply captioning the post, 'lol.' Musk continued his criticism of the Times and The Wall Street … Democrats demand details from Palantir on federal contracts after Social Security, IRS report A coalition of Democratic lawmakers are asking tech giant Palantir to turn over details of their contracts with the Trump administration amid reports the data company has been given lucrative contracts that could allow it to assemble a database on Americans. The New York Times reported last month that Palantir is in discussions with numerous government agencies for use of its technology that analyzes data, including … The Refresh News we've flagged from the intersection of tech and other topics: Crypto Corner Senate passes stablecoin bill in major crypto milestone © Greg Nash Welcome to Crypto Corner, a daily feature focused on digital currency and its outlook in Washington. The Senate on Tuesday passed legislation creating a regulatory framework for payment stablecoins in a major milestone for the crypto industry. Lawmakers voted 68-30 to pass the GENIUS Act, which seeks to establish rules of the road for the dollar-backed cryptocurrencies. It marks the first time that major crypto legislation has cleared the upper chamber. The bill now heads to the House. 'With the GENIUS Act, we're bringing clarity to a sector that's been clouded by uncertainty and proving that bipartisan, principled leadership can still deliver real results for the American people,' Senate Banking Chair Tim Scott (R-S.C.) said in a statement. 'This did not happen by accident,' he continued. 'It happened because we led – across the aisle and with purpose.' Eighteen Democrats joined with most Republicans to pass the legislation, which has trudged forward through a series of procedural hurdles on the Senate floor over the past four weeks. Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.), who was a lead negotiator for Democrats on the GENIUS Act, touted its passage as 'proof of what can be achieved through honest negations and a willingness to work across the aisle.' ICYMI: Stand with Crypto, a nonprofit grassroots crypto movement, surveyed 1,000 New Jersey Democratic primary voters last week. Here's what they found: In Other News Branch out with other reads on The Hill: NAACP planning to sue Musk AI company over supercomputer pollution The NAACP and an environmental group are planning to sue Elon Musk's artificial intelligence company xAI, amid concerns that its supercomputer facility is prompting air pollution in Memphis, the groups announced Tuesday. The Southern Environmental Law Center (SELC), on behalf of the NAACP, sent a letter to xAI and its affiliates on Tuesday notifying the company of their intent to sue over its alleged continued use of … What Others are Reading Two key stories on The Hill right now: The Memo: Risks loom as Trump moves toward direct participation in Israel's attack on Iran President Trump is becoming ever more emphatic in his backing of Israel's attack on Iran, with the chances rising by the hour that he will green-light … Read more US positions military to potentially join Israel war with Iran The U.S. military is positioning itself to potentially join Israel's assault on Iran, as President Trump weighs direct action against Tehran … Read more What Others are Reading Opinions related to tech submitted to The Hill: You're all caught up. See you tomorrow! Thank you for signing up! Subscribe to more newsletters here

The impossible politics of bombing Iran
The impossible politics of bombing Iran

Politico

time21 minutes ago

  • Politico

The impossible politics of bombing Iran

TRUE TEST — President Donald Trump suddenly faces one of the most fateful decisions of his second term: Whether to intervene militarily in the war between Israel and Iran, a conflict that threatens to draw the United States into yet another Middle East quagmire. Trump spent today posting on Truth Social, insisting that the United States has 'control over the skies of Iran,' that they 'know where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding' and asking for 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!'. But he has not been forthcoming about whether America will directly involve itself in the conflict at all, or whether he's willing to deploy a 'bunker buster' bomb capable of inflicting significant damage on Iran's Fordo nuclear site. What is clear, however, is that there is a very limited appetite for direct U.S. engagement. If the U.S. joins the Israeli campaign, the involvement would be opposed by an expansive and motley coalition that spans the ideological spectrum. Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), a libertarian and spiritual successor to Ron Paul, and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), a leading progressive and a 2028 presidential prospect, are together introducing a bipartisan resolution to limit America's role in the escalating conflict. The bill has the support of Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and most House progressives; Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) introduced a similar piece of legislation on Monday aimed at curbing the president's authority to strike Iran without congressional authorization. To some Democrats, Israel has engaged in a 'reckless escalation' that threatens to throw the entire region into conflict. There's also a fear among many Democrats that Trump's administration has continued to empower Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu without sufficient pushback (a complaint that some had about Biden as well). And Kaine's legislation gets at an even more widely held belief in the party — that whatever the nuance of your views on Israel's decision to strike Iran, Trump shouldn't be the one who is solely empowered to carry out U.S. policy in the region. On the Republican side, a considerable segment of the MAGA coalition views military intervention as a true test of 'America First' principles — and of the president's promise to 'stop all wars' and end U.S. adventurism. 'Anyone slobbering for the U.S. to become fully involved in the Israel/Iran war is not America First/MAGA,' Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), a staunch Trump ally, posted on X on Sunday. A piece the next day in the paleoconservative magazine The American Conservative underscored the point. 'A U.S. war with Iran has bipartisan opposition from both right- and left-wing congressmen,' wrote Sumantra Maitra. 'The people hate the idea of it.' A Economist/YouGov poll conducted between June 13 and June 16 found just 16 percent of Americans said that the U.S. military should get involved in the conflict between Israel and Iran, with 60 percent saying America shouldn't and 24 percent reporting they aren't sure. Even among Republicans, a majority — 53 percent — said the military should not get involved. There are some neoconservatives, particularly in the Senate, who are urging Trump toward military action. Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) said on 'Face the Nation' on Sunday that 'We back Israel to the hilt, all the way.' Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) told Fox News that 'it's time to close the chapter on the Ayatollah and his henchmen.' And many in the president's party, of course, will fall in line and support the president whichever policy he pursues. But that doesn't obscure the broader picture. After decades of U.S. presence in the Middle East, the tide has turned decisively against American involvement in the absence of a direct attack on U.S interests. In the deeply polarized Trump era, it's one of the few things that's true across ideological and party lines. Welcome to POLITICO Nightly. Reach out with news, tips and ideas at nightly@ Or contact tonight's author at cmchugh@ or on X (formerly known as Twitter) at @calder_mchugh. What'd I Miss? — Former Sen. Bob Menendez reports to prison for 11-year sentence: Former Sen. Bob Menendez began his 11-year prison sentence this morning, the Federal Bureau of Prisons said. The New Jersey Democrat, 71, was at the height of his power in 2023, as chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, when federal prosecutors in New York revealed allegations based on a yearslong investigation that he'd sold his office for piles of cash and bars of gold. Now, he's at Federal Correctional Institution Schuylkill in Minersville, Pennsylvania. — Bass to lift curfew in downtown Los Angeles: Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass is lifting a curfew on the city's downtown, capping off nearly two weeks of immigration protests that saw President Donald Trump federalize the National Guard and send in active-duty Marines despite opposition from Bass and Gov. Gavin Newsom. Bass, a Democrat, blamed the chaotic tenor of the protests on the White House and reserved the right to resume the curfew if needed, she said in her announcement today. — Utah senator deletes Minnesota shooting posts amid GOP criticism: Utah Sen. Mike Lee, amid widespread outrage, has deleted a pair of social media posts associating the deadly Minnesota shootings last weekend with 'Marxists' and the state's Democratic governor. The move to remove the X posts came amid criticism from a Republican colleague today. Sen. Kevin Cramer of North Dakota told reporters said Lee's decision to comment online over the weekend 'seems insensitive, to say the least, inappropriate, for sure' and 'not even true.' 'I don't know if this person was a Marxist or not,' Cramer said. 'I have no sense. Nor does it matter, by the way, nor does it matter. I mean ... what happened is absolutely, positively unacceptable in any political environment, and it's tragic.' — ICE agents detain New York mayoral candidate in chaotic scene: New York City mayoral candidate Brad Lander was handcuffed and arrested by federal agents this afternoon while escorting migrants from immigration hearings in Lower Manhattan. Footage and video of the hectic incident is firing up the third-place candidate's suddenly energetic campaign, as he shows himself taking on an issue that's central to President Donald Trump's political agenda. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement posted a statement on X saying Lander was arrested and accusing him of assault. Lander has now been released. — Noem taken to hospital 'out of an abundance of caution': Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem was taken to a hospital due to an allergic reaction today, DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin told POLITICO. 'She was transported to the hospital out of an abundance of caution,' McLaughlin said in a statement. 'She is alert and recovering.' AROUND THE WORLD THE DANGERS OF REGIME CHANGE — French President Emmanuel Macron today opposed bringing down the Iranian regime violently as he warned of potentially destabilizing effects across the Middle East. 'The biggest mistake today would be to try to do a regime change in Iran through military means because that would lead to chaos,' Macron told reporters on the last day of the G7 summit in Canada, warning that 'no one can say what comes next.' Macron's remarks come as fears snowball over the U.S. potentially joining Israel's military campaign in Iran, which began late last week and has crippled Iranian nuclear sites and killed top regime officials. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said today that President Donald Trump was indeed considering that option. On his way back to the U.S. yesterday evening, Trump said he wanted a 'real end' to the conflict and that he was 'not too much in a mood to negotiate.' AGE LIMITS — The Dutch government today said children under 15 years old should not have access to social media like TikTok and Instagram. Children over 13 should be able to learn how to use 'social interaction platforms' like WhatsApp and Signal, the Dutch government said in new guidelines to help parents handle screen time and social apps. But when it comes to social media, the government advises to wait until the age of 15, it said in a press release. The Netherlands is one of several European Union countries that is taking action against the effects of social media on minors' mental health and development. France's President Emmanuel Macron has been vocal about a minimum age of 15 for social media use, and Greece and Spain also support tougher rules. Nightly Number RADAR SWEEP ON THE FLOOR — When you watch a professional basketball game on TV, you might notice that there are logos that appear on the floor that seem to move or aren't actually there — advertisements projected onto the broadcast only. Now, though, a company called ASB GlassFloor is doing the same thing in person: Using LED technology to light up the floors of sports arenas. There are lots of use cases here, from ad projections to running drills directly on the floor — and NBA teams who have used the ASB GlassFloor court in person for practice have talked about just how much it can help even athletes at the highest levels. At the same time, for in person or TV viewers, the courts can look jarring with all kinds of projections on them. Ben Dowsett reports on this new innovation for WIRED. Parting Image Did someone forward this email to you? Sign up here.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store