logo
It's Not About Jobs

It's Not About Jobs

Forbes20-05-2025

The ground beneath the world of work is shifting. As Rishad Tobaccowala insightfully argues in his latest piece, The Decline of Jobs. The Rise of Work, we are witnessing a profound transformation, not just in how people earn a living but also in how organizations create value. This is not a temporary blip on the post-pandemic radar. It's a structural reordering of the way we think about work, productivity, and ultimately, business resilience.
Let's be clear: jobs are a relic of the industrial age. They were never really designed to serve people. They were designed to serve factories. Jobs emerged in an era when the cost of coordination was high and the tools for distributing tasks were limited. So we bundled up a series of vaguely defined responsibilities, gave it a title, slapped on a salary, and called it a job.
But jobs aren't the work. And increasingly, they're standing in the way of it.
In the analog era, organizations put the burden of translating goals into outcomes on managers and employees. Now, thanks to the rise of generative AI and other enabling technologies, we can flip that model. We can define the outcomes first, then break down the work into discrete, task-level units, matching each task with the best available human or synthetic skill.
This taskification of work is not just a trend. It's an imperative. It allows organizations to evolve from a system optimized for headcount to one optimized for value creation. That means moving more fixed costs to variable ones. It means decoupling salaries from outcomes and deploying labor, whether full-time, freelance, or AI, in ways that are agile, efficient, and scalable.
Put simply, in the new world of work, organizations need stronger balance sheets, and the only way to get there is by transforming how they structure labor.
Let's borrow a page from the Open Talent playbook. Over the last decade, we've seen how companies that embrace open ecosystems, leveraging freelancers, crowdsourcing, and talent platforms, are more adaptive, more innovative, and more resilient. Why? Because they've traded the rigidity of headcount for the flexibility of outcome-based work.
This isn't about replacing people with AI. It's about making people more human by freeing them from the constraints of traditional job descriptions. It's about unleashing their creativity, their purpose, and their potential in service of clearly defined goals. AI doesn't eliminate the need for humans; it clarifies it.
The challenge and opportunity for leaders today is to build a new kind of organizational architecture: one that is modular, fluid, and outcome-driven. It's time to stop organizing around jobs and start organizing around work.
This transformation isn't just technical. It's deeply human. As I wrote in Open Talent and have continued to explore through my work with Harvard and Open Assembly, the future of work demands a new leadership mindset. One that is more emotionally intelligent, more adaptive, and more open.
If the old way was about control and compliance, the new way is about trust and transparency. It's about giving people the autonomy to plug into work when they are most capable and inspired. And it's about building cultures where human ingenuity is amplified by intelligent systems, not stifled by legacy structures.
For CEOs navigating this inflection point, the message is clear: it's time to rewire your organizations for resilience, not routine. That means moving beyond legacy job structures and investing in a modular, outcome-driven architecture that flexes with change. Build platforms that let people do their best work, whether human, freelance, or AI-powered, and design cultures where creativity, autonomy, and purpose are front and center. The winners won't be those with the biggest headcount, but those with the clearest outcomes and the most innovative systems to deliver them.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Donald Trump's Federal Funding Freeze For Harvard University Is Having A Ripple Effect On The Cambridge Housing Market
Donald Trump's Federal Funding Freeze For Harvard University Is Having A Ripple Effect On The Cambridge Housing Market

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Donald Trump's Federal Funding Freeze For Harvard University Is Having A Ripple Effect On The Cambridge Housing Market

Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. President Donald Trump's $3 billion funding freeze on Harvard University is starting to have an impact on the local real estate market in Cambridge, Massachusetts, according to Trump's freeze on grants and contracts on the esteemed Ivy League institution threatens to affect the ecosystem of start-ups, entrepreneurs, and researchers in the Boston metro area, particularly in Cambridge, the area surrounding the campus. Brokers are already seeing potential homebuyers backing out of deals, including one where the buyer lost a $10,000 deposit. 'It's very unusual in my experience for someone to put down a $10,000 offer deposit and then back out,' Sage Jankowitz, a solo broker in Cambridge, told Don't Miss: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — Invest Where It Hurts — And Help Millions Heal: Trump's attempts to block Harvard from enrolling international students — currently blocked in a court action — also threaten to harm the rental economy, which relies heavily on housing for graduate students. 'These people are mostly in their 30s or 40s,' says Jankowitz, who works with a broad cross-section of buyers and sellers, including investors. 'A lot of them are married. A lot of them have one kid or multiple kids that come with them while they're here.' Boston's housing market is one of the hottest in the country and not solely reliant on Harvard to thrive, but the loss of tenants and buyers could dampen the market in the Cambridge area, which immediately surrounds Harvard. 'It's the densest concentration of academic talent in the world,' Lawrence S. Bacow, who served as president of Harvard University from 2018 to 2023 and as president of Tufts University from 2001 to 2011, told the New York Times. 'Universities and teaching hospitals are to Boston what cars are to Detroit, what energy is to Houston, or finance is to New York.' Trending: If there was a new fund backed by Jeff Bezos offering a ? University-related research is an integral part of the Boston metro area, where biotech companies have contributed to the development of flourishing neighborhoods, such as Kendall Square in Cambridge, home to the biotech company Biogen, and Boston's Seaport District, where Vertex Pharmaceuticals is based, as reported by The Times. There is a concern that if academic researchers leave, the city's economy, including housing, will suffer. 'Some will leave their science behind, and it will end — after a huge investment, it just falls off a cliff,' Dr. Wendy Chung, chief of pediatrics at Boston Children's Hospital, told the Times. 'The instability is very hard for people who are so hard-working and dedicated to their mission — they can only be pushed so far before they break.'Evan Horowitz, executive director of Tufts University's Center for State Policy Analysis, told the Wall Street Journal that if the Harvard funding freeze persists, the city could suffer a 'wealth spiral effect,' with research, real estate, and retail all affected. 'These aren't distributed jobs—they're concentrated, so we could see strong local effects,' he said. Lauren Holleran, a vice president at Gibson Sotheby's International Realty in Cambridge, has already noticed a difference with high-end clients who are holding off on buying and selling. 'They're saying, let's see how things shake out,' she told the Journal. Lower interest rates mean some investments won't yield what they did in months past, but you don't have to lose those gains. Certain private market real estate investments are giving retail investors the opportunity to capitalize on these high-yield opportunities. , which provides access to a pool of short-term loans backed by residential real estate. The best part? Unlike other private credit funds, Looking for fractional real estate investment opportunities? The features the latest offerings. Image: Shutterstock This article Donald Trump's Federal Funding Freeze For Harvard University Is Having A Ripple Effect On The Cambridge Housing Market originally appeared on

‘Total discrimination': Chinese students facing US visa ban say their lives are in limbo
‘Total discrimination': Chinese students facing US visa ban say their lives are in limbo

Yahoo

time14 hours ago

  • Yahoo

‘Total discrimination': Chinese students facing US visa ban say their lives are in limbo

Chinese students in the United States are questioning their future in the country after the state department announced last week that it would 'aggressively' revoke visas for Chinese students and enhance scrutiny of future applications from China and Hong Kong. Chinese students hoping to study at Harvard, the US's oldest and wealthiest university, are under particular pressure after the Trump administration announced on Wednesday that it was banning the school from enrolling new foreign students. The presidential proclamation cited Harvard's links with China as a particular cause for concern. Related: 'They are in shock': Indian students fear Trump has ended their American dream For Jerry*, a 22-year-old applied mathematics student at the University of California, Los Angeles, the uncertainty started last month, when the Trump administration suddenly halted Harvard University's ability to enrol any international students. Jerry has a place on a health data science masters programme at Harvard, which is due to start in the autumn. The US government's attempt to ban Harvard from accepting international students appears to have been blocked, at least temporarily, by the courts. But Trump's announcement on Wednesday invokes a different legal authority. Marco Rubio, the secretary of state, has announced that the authorities will be targeting Chinese students specifically, nationwide. It is 'total discrimination,' Jerry said. 'I don't think anyone would consider that reason sufficient. That's just pushing Chinese students to go elsewhere'. Unsure about whether or not he will be able to enrol at Harvard, Jerry is considering taking up a place on a DPhil (PhD) programme at Oxford University in the UK. He said on Thursday that following Trump's latest attack on Harvard, Oxford seems like an even more likely option. Although he hopes to study at Harvard, Jerry feels lucky to have a back-up plan. 'A lot of the people who accepted Harvard offers don't have other options. So it must be much more anxious for them'. Across the US, universities have been scrambling to find ways to reassure the hundreds of thousands of Chinese students on their campuses about their academic future. In a memo sent to Chinese students at University of Oregon, the school described the state department's announcement about revoking the visas for Chinese students as 'vague' and said: 'A revoked passport does not impact your legal status in the US because it is only an entry document used when entering the US'. However, the university warned that a revoked visa could lead to removal proceedings by the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE). Warning about being targeted by ICE have taken on a new gravity since the agency started targeting international students with the lawful right to remain in the country. They include Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia University graduate and pro-Palestine activist who was detained despite holding a green card to reside in the US. Khalil is now fighting a deportation order. Steven*, a 34-year-old Chinese PhD student at the University of Oregon, said that although he is not planning to apply for a new student visa soon, the prospect of an encounter with ICE concerned him. 'Nowadays, even if you have a green card, you have legitimate status, you could get caught by ICE, because these guys are crazy'. Steven has been in the US for a decade. In that time, the US has become a less attractive destination for Chinese students, he said, something he sees borne out in his part-time job helping Chinese students with their college applications. The numbers wanting to study in the US have declined, with people favouring countries in South-east Asia, such as Singapore, which are more culturally similar to China. The US is 'just not that friendly' any more, Steven says. The loss of top Chinese students in the US would be a blow to academic research, and to the funding for higher education institutions, experts say. In the 2023-2024 academic year, there were about 277,400 Chinese students in the US, according to government statistics. That is a 25% drop compared to 2019-2020. 'By barring Chinese students and scholars from America, the Trump administration will strangle the pipeline of high-end talent into our universities, companies, and research institutes, sparking a serious deficit in talent and expertise that will damage American competitiveness,' said Denis Simon, non-resident fellow at the Quincy Institute, who specialises in science and technology policy in China. The state department's announcement last week specified that students with connections to the Chinese Communist party (CCP) or studying in 'critical fields' would be included in the visa crackdown. For years, the US has tried to root out Chinese espionage in academia, with concerns raised about CCP-backed programmes to recruit top talent in science and technology fields that are strategically important to China. But academics and campaigners say that this has bled over into racism, with all Chinese researchers or those of Chinese heritage being treated with suspicion. Jerry, the mathematics student, said he has experienced discrimination in the US, but not on campus. But if Chinese researchers, staff and PhD students feel they have to leave the US because of an increasingly hostile environment, 'it's going to be a disaster for American universities,' he said. *Names have been changed Additional research by Lillian Yang

Here's who polling says will win the showdown between Musk and Trump
Here's who polling says will win the showdown between Musk and Trump

Yahoo

time21 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Here's who polling says will win the showdown between Musk and Trump

As former pals President Donald Trump and Elon Musk face off in one of the most public breakups of the year, onlookers are wondering which figure will come out on top after the dispute. A 'net favorable rating among GOP' report from CNN suggests that Trump might take the metaphorical 'win.' The president's current favorability rating stands at +79 — that's 16 points higher than Musk's rating of +63. It's notable that Musk, formerly the head of Trump's Department of Government Efficiency, still scored higher than two major figures from the GOP, including U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson (+46), and U.S. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (+30). Even though Musk and Trump's feud stems in part from Musk's opposition to the 'Big Beautiful Bill,' — which he says would increase the federal budget deficit to $2.5 trillion — Musk likely won't garner much support from Democrats, either. The same CNN segment states that his favorability rating among Democrats currently stands at -91 points. It's a sharp drop from 2017, when his rating was +35. Since the dispute began, Musk has made many claims about Trump and his policies on X. In one post, he claimed that the president is included in the Epstein files, citing that as 'the real reason they have not been made public.' He also stated that 'the Trump tariffs will cause a recession in the second half of this year' — an unsurprising stance, given that the tariffs have impacted production at Tesla, Musk's automotive and clean energy company. Trump says Musk has 'lost his mind' as he disses peace offering Judge blocks Trump admin from banning Harvard international students from entering US 'Singling out': Harvard president says Trump admin is retaliating against institution Mass. lawmakers get bad grades on industry report card. But who's failing whom? | John L. Micek 'Government vendetta': Harvard fights back after Trump blocks its foreign students from US Read the original article on MassLive.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store