South Korea presidential candidates rally ahead of June 3 vote
South Korea's leading candidates held major campaign events Sunday, two days out from a snap election triggered by the former president's removal after his disastrous declaration of martial law.
The June 3 election is set to cap months of political turmoil sparked by Yoon Suk Yeol's brief suspension of civilian rule in December, for which he was impeached and removed from office.
All major polls have put liberal Lee Jae-myung well ahead in the presidential race, with the latest Gallup survey showing 49 percent of respondents viewed him as the best candidate.
Kim Moon-soo, from the conservative People Power Party (PPP) -- Yoon's former party -- trailed Lee on 35 percent.
The 60-year-old Lee began his rally in his hometown of Andong, 240 kilometres (150 miles) southeast of Seoul, telling his supporters he would seek to weaken the concentration of development in the capital region and boost areas away from Seoul.
"We should not simply seek a regional equal development strategy but rather provide more incentives for non-Seoul regions to support them more," said Lee, wearing a bulletproof vest.
Lee has been campaigning with additional security measures, including bulletproof shields set up on the podium.
He was stabbed in the neck in January 2024 in Busan by a man pretending to be a supporter, who later confessed that his intention was to kill Lee to prevent him from becoming president.
At his rally in the conservative stronghold of Daegu, Lee said he would seek to improve ties with nuclear-armed North Korea through dialogue -- hinting at a departure from the hawkish stance taken by impeached former president Yoon.
"Isn't real national strength about achieving peace through communication and finding a path to mutual prosperity, rather than pursuing confrontation?" he said.
"Competent national security means building peace in which there is no need to fight."
Relations between the two Koreas are at one of their lowest points in years, partly due to Yoon's hardline policies towards the North, which has bolstered ties with Moscow, including sending weapons and soldiers to help it fight Kyiv.
- 'Bulletproof measures' -
The conservative People Power Party candidate Kim Moon-soo kicked off a rally on Sunday in Suwon by commenting on rival Lee's security measures.
"Look, I'm not wearing a bulletproof vest, right? But Lee is now even using bulletproof shields, feeling the vest isn't enough," he said.
"With such bulletproof measures, Lee is poised to impose his own dictatorship and we must stop it," Kim added.
While most polls conducted before the blackout placed Kim a distant second, he expressed confidence in winning.
"I believe a major turnaround is currently taking place," he said.
South Korea has entered a so-called "dark campaign period" during which the results of public opinion polls are barred from being disclosed, although pollsters are still conducting surveys.
Nearly 35 percent of voters have already cast their ballots -- taking advantage of two days of early voting earlier last week, according to the National Election Commission.
The winner of the June 3 election will take office the following day on a single five-year term, with no transition period.
Front-runner Lee's likely victory could prove a "a watershed moment in South Korean politics, ending six months of turbulence for democracy since former president Yoon's errant declaration of martial law", said Leif-Eric Easley, a professor at Ewha University in Seoul.
Lee "has proved to be a political survivor, after legal scandals, questionable opposition tactics, and even threats to his life," he added.
kjk/ceb/mtp
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
31 minutes ago
- New York Times
Live Updates: Trump and Musk Have a Lot at Risk in Feud
White house memo Elon Musk with President Trump at the White House in March, during happier days. The moment had finally come, and it was every bit as lowdown, vindictive, personal, petty, operatic, childish, consequential, messy and public as many had always expected it would be. 'One thing's for sure,' Elon Musk posted on X midway through his relentless hourslong attack on Donald Trump, 'it ain't boring!' The clash of the titans was upon us, and the gloves were off. The speed of the fallout was breathtaking. Up until about 14 seconds ago, Mr. Musk was flying on Mr. Trump's planes, staying at his homes, socializing with his children. On Friday, Mr. Trump celebrated him with an Oval Office farewell address and gave him a novelty, oversize key to the White House. But all was not well. Mr. Musk had been stewing about the sweeping domestic policy bill that the White House was pushing through Congress. By Thursday afternoon, he started spitting venom. Image Less than a week ago, Mr. Musk was all smiles during his farewell in the Oval Office. Credit... Haiyun Jiang for The New York Times 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election,' Mr. Musk wrote on X. 'Such ingratitude.' How sharper than a serpent's tooth it is! Usually, when Mr. Trump has a big, messy falling-out in public, it is with someone who needs him, a lesser being who lives in fear of a primary challenge or somehow being ruined. But now he was beefing with the rare person who has leverage over him — political and financial leverage and perhaps even some emotional leverage. When Mr. Trump said on Thursday that he was 'very disappointed in Elon,' he sounded as if he meant it. But Mr. Trump, being the president of the United States, had some leverage of his own. He mused on Truth Social that the 'easiest way to save money in our Budget' would be to wipe out Mr. Musk's government subsidies and contracts. 'I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' Mr. Trump added, causing Mr. Musk to erupt further. There was a screwball element to their back-and-forth: Because Mr. Trump and Mr. Musk are each the masters of their own social media platform, neither one was directly replying to the other. Anyone following along at home (which is to say, everyone) had to toggle between platforms to keep up with these keyboard cowboys as they aimed shots at each other. 'THE GIRLS ARE FIGHTING' was a top trending topic on Mr. Musk's platform Thursday. There was a schoolyard aspect to their scrap as many on the playground rushed to jump in. 'SPICY,' Laura Loomer posted. 'hey @realDonaldTrump lmk if u need any breakup advice,' posted Ashley St. Clair, the mother of one of Mr. Musk's children. Mr. Musk began to hit the 'unfollow' button on accounts belonging to close Trump allies such as Charlie Kirk and Stephen Miller. Image Mr. Musk posted that Mr. Trump would never have won the election without his help. 'Such ingratitude," he wrote. Credit... Haiyun Jiang for The New York Times Four hours into the shootout, a peacekeeper emerged in the form of Kanye West. 'Broooos please noooooo,' he posted on X with an emoji of two people hugging. 'We love you both so much.' But they seemed far beyond the point of hugging it out. A line had been crossed that probably could never be uncrossed. 'Time to drop the really big bomb,' Mr. Musk wrote shortly after 3 p.m., '@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' The implication that Mr. Trump is somehow connected to Mr. Epstein's crimes was an especially explosive one to make, given that large swaths of Mr. Trump's base remain so animated by the sordid details of that particular case. 'Some food for thought,' Mr. Musk wrote in another especially cutting post. 'Trump has 3.5 years left as President, but I will be around for 40+ years.' Questions swirled above the fray: Just how hard might Mr. Trump, who has been shown to have no qualms about weaponizing government, actually go after Mr. Musk? Are Tesla and SpaceX about to get DOGE'd? What would happen to that red Tesla that Mr. Musk parked at the White House, the one that Mr. Trump's young aides love to drive around and post pictures from? And would Mr. Musk have to send back his key to the White House?
Fox News
35 minutes ago
- Fox News
Charlamagne knocks Jean-Pierre's book, says 'nobody wants to hear' from person who 'lied' for Biden admin
NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles! Radio host Charlamagne Tha God on Thursday said while he would gladly read former White House spokeswoman Karine Jean-Pierre's new book, her credibility is dubious. Former Biden White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre on Wednesday revealed she was registering as an independent and announced a forthcoming book about her time in the tumultuous administration. The longtime Democratic Party operative is urging Americans to step outside harsh party lines in her new book, "Independent: A Look Inside a Broken White House, Outside the Party Lines." "Until January 20, I was responsible for speaking on behalf of the President of the United States," she said in a statement, according to The Associated Press. "At noon on that day, I became a private citizen who, like all Americans and many of our allies around the world, had to contend with what was to come next for our country. I determined that the danger we face as a country requires freeing ourselves of boxes. We need to be willing to exercise the ability to think creatively and plan strategically." Charlamagne, who hasn't been shy about criticizing either party, offered mixed praise for Jean-Pierre's move during his radio show. FOX NEWS WHITE HOUSE CORRESPONDENTS SHARE SHOCK OVER KARINE JEAN-PIERRE'S PARTY SWITCH "I respect her being independent because I feel like if you Black in this country, you shouldn't be loyal to any party," he said on Thursday's episode. "You should only be voting your interest. You should only be voting for politicians who are implementing legislation and policies for your communities and your people. And if you ask me, none of these parties have done enough for us to be screaming, 'We Republican or Democrat,' so independent is the way to go." Jean-Pierre's reputation is still questionable in his eyes, however. "When it comes to her in particular, I'm probably going to read the book, but nobody wants to hear from anyone who got up there and lied for the Biden administration," he said. He argued such proclamations from people like Jean-Pierre are too little, too late, even if he approves of her general points. CLICK HERE FOR MORE COVERAGE OF MEDIA AND CULTURE "It's like a lot of these folks are having a come to Jesus moment way too late," he said. "They should have been talking like this two or three years ago, and she had a very interesting quote in her press release. The quote was, 'We need to be willing to exercise the ability to think creatively and plan strategically. We need to be clear-eyed and questioning rather than blindly loyal and obedient as we may have been in the past.' And that right there is the problem with Democrat supporters, especially Black ones, just blindly loyal and obedient for no damn reason." When asked by a co-host about whether such loyalty is referring to Biden or to the presidency as an institution, Charlamagne argued it ultimately resulted in betraying the American people. CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP Fox News' Hanna Panreck contributed to this report.
Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
Republicans worry Medicaid cuts would hurt their communities, poll finds
More than 4 in 10 Republicans worried significant cuts to Medicaid would hurt health-care providers in their communities and lead to people losing insurance, according to a KFF poll released Friday. The findings illustrate the political perils of upending the public health insurance program as Senate Republicans feud over Medicaid cuts. As they face pressure to slash spending to finance President Donald Trump's sweeping tax and immigration legislation, they risk alienating their own supporters who depend on the program. While most Medicaid enrollees identified as Democrats or independents, 27 percent said they are Republican, including 19 percent who identified as supporters of Trump's Make America Great Again movement. About 3 in 4 GOP Medicaid recipients were worried federal cuts to the program would hurt their ability to receive and pay for health care for themselves and their families, the poll found. Those concerns are not limited to people enrolled in the program. Nearly a third of all Republicans and 26 percent of MAGA Republicans had the same worries about their own access to health care if Medicaid is cut, the survey showed. While Democrats and independents were far more likely to express concerns, the level of worry among Republicans reflects Medicaid's appeal across party lines. 'Medicaid is really a popular program, and a large majority of Americans do not want to see decreases in spending,' said Liz Hamel, director of public opinion and survey research at KFF, a health policy research organization. 'These findings reflect that many people, whether or not they rely on Medicaid, see it as vital to their communities.' Medicaid is the nation's largest public health insurer, serving poor families, people with disabilities and nursing home residents, among others. It covers around one in five Americans, many of them in states and districts represented by GOP lawmakers. It also provides a crucial line of revenue for health-care providers such as rural hospitals. Half of rural adults, including 37 percent of rural Republicans, were worried the cuts could affect their access to care, the poll found. They were even more worried about health care in their communities. Almost every Democrat and half of Republicans in rural areas worried Medicaid cuts would negatively impact their local hospitals, nursing homes and other providers. Edwin Park, a health policy researcher at Georgetown University's McCourt School of Public Policy, said those findings about rural concerns are not surprising. 'We've done research showing that both children and non-elderly adults in rural communities disproportionately rely on Medicaid,' he said. 'And these are areas that tend to vote Republican and supported President Trump.' The poll was conducted May 5 through May 26 and included 2,539 U.S. adults and had a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points. The margin was slightly higher for findings about Republicans. Senate Republicans wrestled this week over how deeply to cut Medicaid as they strive to pass their own version of a bill to extend Trump's tax cuts and reduce other spending by Independence Day. The version passed by the House achieves nearly $800 billion in savings, primarily by requiring childless adults with low incomes to prove they are working, limiting a tax used by states to receive increased federal Medicaid funds and canceling new regulations proposed by the Biden administration to streamline enrollment. About 7.8 million fewer people would be insured within a decade because of Medicaid changes in the House legislation, according to projections from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. The Senate aims to revise the House legislation, but Republicans are engaged in hot debate over whether to contract or expand the Medicaid cuts. Senate Republicans, who hold a slim majority, can afford to lose only three of their members if all Democrats oppose the bill as expected. They're already likely to lose the vote of Sen. Rand Paul (R-Kentucky), who has raised concerns about the cost of a bill the CBO estimates would add $3 trillion to the national debt. Most Republican senators are on board with adding work requirements to Medicaid, a measure polling has found most Americans favor. That includes senators who have expressed the most concern about Medicaid cuts, such as Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Missouri) and Susan Collins (R-Maine). But there is growing concern around another provision in the House bill aimed at limiting the taxes states impose on hospitals and other Medicaid providers as backdoor way of increasing federal Medicaid payments. States pass the tax back to providers in the form of higher Medicaid payments, which are then partially matched by the federal government. 'I'm concerned about the impact on rural hospitals and how it all would work with a provider tax,' Collins told The Post this week. Hawley said 'it would hurt rural hospitals in my state.' Sen. Jim Justice (R-West Virginia), whose state has one of the highest Medicaid populations in the country, worried this week about letting provider taxes 'get undermined,' according to Punchbowl News. And in an April floor speech, Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kansas) said he's focused on making sure 'the hospitals have the capability and the revenues necessary to provide the services the community needs — Medicaid is a component of that.' Other Republican senators this week defended cuts to Medicaid, arguing the program would still be available to those most in need. Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) sparked an uproar last week after she flippantly replied 'Well, we all are going to die' to a town hall attendee who shouted people would die if they lose Medicaid coverage.
