Promincor - Lingerie Française shows in London for first time
Eight French lingerie brands showed in the UK capital for the first time at Ladbroke Hall, at an event attend by key buyers, media and influencers.
The runway show usually held in the US shifted from its NYC home this time and was held in conjunction with the Wonderland trade show.
Brands taking part included Aubade, Chantelle, Chantelle X, Empreinte, Lise Charmel, Louis Bracq, Maison legacy and Simone Perele.
So why the move? Alain de Rodellec, president of Promincor - Lingerie Française, said: 'The British market is now emerging as a true driver of growth for our businesses. Supported by a discerning clientele that appreciates elegance, quality, and craftsmanship, it provides Lingerie Française with a unique platform for expression.This market is a natural fit for our brands: they exemplify a French art de vivre, steeped in refinement, comfort, and timelessness—values increasingly appealing to British consumers.'
He added that 'London is an essential international showcase' and the UK 'stands out for its dynamism and openness, simultaneously embracing innovation and firmly rooted in tradition'. He explained that the event helps members 'to gain visibility, build targeted business connections, and strengthen their international position'.
Promincor - Lingerie Française was established in 1960 with the aim of 'allowing French Lingerie brands to express themselves with one and the same voice in France and on the international scene. It highlights the excellence of the profession of corsetry, its original designs and precision engineering'.
And on the London runway it offered a close-up look at the 'heritage, savoir-faire, creativity and innovation' of the eight brands 'that carry on traditional manufacturing practices'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
7 hours ago
- Euronews
Brexit sends Brits to Europe for Louboutins in a blow to UK luxury
Brits are swapping London's glittering storefronts for Paris' grands magasins and Milan's Quadrilatero della moda — and the numbers behind the luxury exodus are startling. Since tax-free shopping became possible for UK visitors in the EU after Brexit in January 2021, British consumers have increasingly directed their high-end spending towards brands and stores across the Channel. According to a recent report published by the Association of International Retail (AIR), Britons shelled out €854 million (£730mn) on VAT-free shopping in the EU in 2024, a five-fold leap from €169mn in 2021. "This is not the same people spending a bit more — it's a whole new shopping-led tourism market spending additionally on hotels, travel, restaurants, etc.," the AIR report stated. When the UK left the European Union, its shoppers became non-EU visitors or third-country travellers and instantly became entitled to VAT-free shopping. According to the EU's VAT directive, retailers in the bloc must provide shoppers with the option of reclaiming no less than 15%, with most countries applying an average rate of 20%, of the cost of the item. This can be particularly appealing when it comes to high-end or luxury items. Say you decide to buy the TikTok-viral Loewe Puzzle Bag during a trip to Paris or Spain. The small one retails at around €3,600 and the large one is currently priced at around €4,200, according to prices listed on Loewe's official website. With the VAT returns, you would get €700 back for the small bag and €840 for the big one. Suddenly, a weekend trip to the continent might seem more appealing. "So, they are spending hundreds of millions of additional euros on hotels, restaurants, transport, fun... at Britain's expense," the AIR report added, highlighting the blow to UK tourism. According to the Paris Tourism Office, there was a 44% spike in visitors from the UK visiting the French capital in 2023, the highest increase among European tourists in the ranking. No VAT-free benefits in the UK When the UK left the EU in January 2021, it proceeded to abolish its previous VAT scheme, citing cost and complexity. This made the UK the only major global shopping destination not offering VAT-free shopping to any international tourists. The only way you can currently buy VAT-free goods in the UK is if they are bought online and shipped directly to an address outside the UK. Northern Ireland has retained a VAT-free scheme, meaning that if you purchase goods there as an EU citizen and fly out within three months, you will get your VAT tax returned to you upon leaving. Even big-ticket items people buy at the airport — such as in the stores in the duty-free area — were stripped of the VAT-free status. So for UK travellers who would usually purchase laptops, smartphones or designer cosmetics at the airport, largely the same prices apply as the ones they pay in stores at home. Alcohol and tobacco purchases are exceptions, as these can be bought duty-free. Luxury retailers are furious Britain's luxury lobby is unhappy about the tax changes. Walpole — the official body representing Britain's luxury sector including Rolls-Royce, Burberry, and Harrods — published a study in May, claiming that luxury exports to the EU were "up to 43% lower than they may have been without Brexit". In the fashion and accessories sector alone, Brexit incurred a 64% loss. "This points to a substantial 'Brexit effect' on this industry which supports over 450,000 jobs and contributes £14.6 billion (€16.8bn) to the Exchequer" the report continues. Crucially, British luxury brands are not just losing sales to European rivals, they are also watching demand for UK-made goods slump across the EU and global markets. The luxury industry is uniquely dominant in Europe's history, having emerged from centuries of craftsmanship and artisanal work matched with the latest developments in artistry and design. 'Luxury is a global phenomenon, but it calls the UK and Europe its home,' Walpole CEO Helen Brocklebank said in a statement. The EU currently produces 74% of global luxury goods, and 62% of those goods are exported outside the EU, according to the European Commission — a profit opportunity the UK luxury industry is missing out on. "The British luxury sector has incredible growth potential, with a projection to reach £125bn (€144bn) by 2028," Brocklebank continued. "However, to achieve this ambition, we cannot afford to have one arm tied behind our back. Strong links and favourable trading with Europe remain essential to reaching this forecast, alongside our success in other global markets and key to supporting craft-led and high value manufacturing in the UK." Brands report that delays, surprise courier fees and inconsistent border checks have pushed EU customers to rival European labels and left a trail of negative reviews for UK brands, leading to a confidence shock on the continent that brands are not able to quell on their own without policy changes. They claim that the EU market is not replaceable, namely that they cannot just pivot to another market that would match the demand. Continental Europe is both their biggest customer base and the linchpin of their supply chains, with brands sourcing many leathers in Tuscan tanneries and continental brands buying from Scottish cashmere mills for their own products. 'At a time of global uncertainty and trade challenges, the Government must seize the opportunity to smooth the trade barriers with our closest and largest trading partner," Brocklebank continued. Apart from the UK-EU relations, luxury sales have faced additional challenges from rising US tariffs and reduced consumer demand in China. Brits love their luxury A YouGov poll shows there is an appetite to spend more on luxury. According to a 2024 study, a quarter of Britons bought a luxury product in the previous year and 45% of those shoppers say they are happy to pay extra for premium brands. More than half spent up to £500, while 9% blew through £5,000. More than a third or 34% of luxury shoppers say they are likely to spend the same amount on luxury goods this year, compared to the previous year. So until Westminster considers relaunching some form of VAT-free equivalent benefits, every swipe of a British card in the EU may ring up another missed sale at home.
Local France
15 hours ago
- Local France
Corrections website open for 2025 French tax declarations
The French tax office opened its corrections service on July 30th, and will remain open until December 3rd to allow people to make corrections on their annual tax declarations. Since 2018, when the French were permitted the legal 'right to make a mistake', declarations can be corrected without the risk of attracting a penalty or fine, and these corrections can now be made online. Who can use it? The platform is open to people who have an account at the site and who do their annual income tax declaration online. It can be used by either French residents or non-residents who are liable for taxes in France. Advertisement In order to use it, log in to your personal account at and click Accéder à la correction en ligne . Once you have made your changes, submit the new declaration and you will then be sent an amended tax bill, calculated according to the changes that you made. You can use the site to make corrections until December 2025. What can you use it for? The service is to correct the annual income tax declaration ( déclaration des revenus ) which were due in either May or June, depending where in France you live. The corrections service now opening is for declarations done earlier this year, which cover income from 2024. You can correct any of the information that you provided on the form. The most common corrections are either adding extra income that you forgot to declare, claiming tax breaks or credits that you did not realise you were entitled to, or altering personal details that you had forgotten to update (such as a change in relationship status or new bank details). What can you not use it for? The most common mistake for foreigners in France is simply not filing the income tax declaration in the first place, due to not realising that virtually everyone who lives in France must complete this annual task . Non-residents may also need to complete the declaration if they have income in France, including income for renting out a holiday home or second home. If you have failed to file the declaration in time, this cannot be corrected on the portal, which allows you only to alter declarations that are already filed. If you realise that you should have filed but haven't, you can find the next steps HERE . Advertisement The correction service also cannot be used for property tax declarations – the déclaration d'occupation or déclaration des biens immobiliers . The deadline for filing this year was July 1st – if you should have declared but didn't, you will need to visit or call your local tax office. The service is also intended to correct errors that you have made. If you think the tax office has made a mistake in calculating your bill, you will need to contact your local tax office directly either in person, by phone or online. If you need extra paperwork from the tax office (such as a P237 bordereau de situation fiscale , required if you are applying for French citizenship) you can request this online through the messaging portal of the site).
Fashion Network
16 hours ago
- Fashion Network
Relief for River Island as High Court approves restructuring, but the hard work starts now
Chris Bowers, a partner and head of insolvency at Forbes Solicitors, told 'The real question now is whether the restructure plans are anything more than just a sticking plaster, prolonging an inevitable collapse in the near future. Restructure plans concentrate on shutting stores and cutting rents. Such moves support liquidity but stop short of addressing declining sales. River Island's most recent accounts show turnover fell more than 19%. Any form of long-term survival needs to reconnect the retailer with consumers to boost revenues, and quickly.' Bowers cited Arcadia, which went into administration just over a year after a CVA-based restructure. Meanwhile, Marty Bauer, retail and e-tail expert at e-commerce marketing platform Omnisend, told us: 'River Island's decision to restructure, including the closure of 33 stores, is a stark reminder of the ongoing challenges faced by retailers operating on the British high street. 'Sadly, this is an all-too-familiar tale, with physical stores often struggling to compete with the convenience and accessibility of online shopping, and sailing against the wind when it comes to shifting buying habits. 'The future of the high street is uncertain, but while online shopping continues to innovate with better customer service and convenience, many shoppers still value the tactile in-store experience and personal interaction. This is where the key to success still lies. 'While the likes of River Island and New Look have faced challenges on the high street, other fashion brands such as Uniqlo are going from strength to strength by creating a seamless shopping experience that offers well-curated selections, an efficient checkout process and unique in-store experiences such as clothing alterations.' As for the reason for the court's approval of the plan, Lucy Trott, managing associate and insolvency expert at law firm Stevens & Bolton, added that with it having been supported by 80% in value of the company's creditors but failing to meet the required 75% support in each creditor class, 'the High Court was asked to 'cram down' the dissenting categories of creditors [ that is, impose it on them ], which reportedly included landlords, local authorities and trade creditors. 'For the court to grant sanction, it would need to be satisfied that none of the dissenting classes of creditors would be worse off than in the 'relevant alternative' scenario which would likely be administration or liquidation, with a sale of the company's business or assets to follow. 'It is possible that the dissenting creditors could yet seek to appeal the court's decision to sanction the plan particularly in light of the damaging precedent this decision sets in relation to cramming down commercial landlords. However, the River Island creditors will no doubt be wary of appealing the court's decision in light of the recent Court of Appeal judgment on the Thames Water appeal. If the restructuring plan were to be upheld on appeal, an adverse costs order would rub further salt in the creditors' wounds.'
