Ramaphosa didn't know about SANDF general's ‘ill-advised' trip to Iran — Presidency
Maphwanya met with Iranian military officials and was criticised for the comments he made during the meeting, where he reportedly pledged common goals with Iran, endorsed the stance on Gaza and expressed interest in political alignment between the two nations.
Speaking to the media on Thursday, Magwenya said Ramaphosa is not involved in supervising Maphwanya's trips, saying it's a matter that sits with defence and military veterans minister Angie Motshekga.
'The president didn't know the general was visiting Iran, nor did he sanction the visit,' Magwenya said.
'The general's administrative process for travel approval starts and ends with the minister. As much as the president is the appointing authority, he does not get involved in supervising the general's travel. That process sits with the minister.'
Magwenya said Maphwanya's trip was 'ill-advised' due to South Africa's efforts to reset diplomatic relations with the US.
'At this time of heightened geopolitical tensions and conflicts in the Middle East, one can say the visit was ill-advised, and the expectation is that the general should have been a lot more circumspect with the comments he made, which delve into the area of foreign policy, which only the president and department of international relations and cooperation (Dirco) are responsible for and do not fall into the purview of officers.'
The recent imposition of a 30% tariff on South African exports to the US has fuelled tensions between the two countries. Magwenya said Maphwanya's visit might complicate ongoing efforts to reset the relationship.
'We are in the process of managing a very delicate exercise of resetting diplomatic and political relations with the US, but more importantly balancing the trade relationship in a manner that is mutually beneficial.
'Therefore, it is not helpful that when we are in the process of resolving issues around the relationship with the US, you have senior military officials undertaking visits and participating in statements that would further inflame the situation. It's not helpful at all.'
The DA has demanded a court martial for Maphwanya for 'gross misconduct and a flagrant breach of the SANDF code of conduct'.
'Such political statements are explicitly prohibited for serving officers, violate the SANDF's duty of political neutrality and undermine the constitutional principle of civilian control over the military,' DA MP Chris Hattingh said.
Dirco and the defence ministry have distanced themselves from the comments.
'Any statements made by an individual or a department other than those responsible for foreign policy should not be misinterpreted as the official position of the government,' said Dirco minister Ronald Lamola.
'The remarks attributed to Gen Maphwanya, therefore, do not represent the government's official foreign policy stance.'
Motshekga said she would engage with Maphwanya when he returns.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mail & Guardian
9 minutes ago
- Mail & Guardian
Pace of gender equality at tertiary education institutions painfully slow
A 2024 study at a South African university found female staff are concerned about their future in the workplace because of their gender. Photo: File This year, 2025, marks the 30th anniversary of International Women's Day, the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action, an agenda for women's empowerment. On 8 March, International Women's Day was observed under the theme 'For All Women and Girls: Rights. Equality. Empowerment'. Sorry to burst the celebration bubble but, with the deadline to achieve the UN sustainable development goals just under five years away, true emancipation of women seems a distant goal. An Concerning women leaders at institutions of higher learning, the Without taking anything away from both women's achievements, it is perplexing that it took the institutions 167 and 148 years to have a woman at the helm. Several scholars have published articles about problems facing academic and support personnel in both traditional universities and universities of technology. The battle to attain gender equality at institutions of higher learning, even beyond 30 years of democracy in South Africa, is there for everyone to see. Delving into some of the scientific evidence, in their 2024 study Reforming Higher Education in South Africa by Addressing Gender Inequalities, researchers Anri Wheeler and Laurika Wiese identified the absence of ' Their research article, published in the Journal of Adult and Continuing Education , shows that the policy vacuum perpetuates the marginalisation of female students and personnel. The study was conducted with female employees from varied staff components at a university of technology and they applied the Gender and Development Theory, which asserts that 'genuine economic and social progress is hindered as long as gender inequalities endure'. Some of the study's key findings highlight the preference of some males for working only with colleagues of the same gender. Meanwhile, female staff remained concerned about their future in the workplace because of their gender. The results also highlight that the selection of female staff into higher positions often serves only to comply with filling of quotas — a tick-box exercise. Even more disturbing, some participants confirmed the existence of a 'band of brothers' mentality in institutions — a group of male colleagues indifferent to working with females and, in many instances, treating them with disrespect based on gender. Furthermore, one of the themes emanating from the study is female stereotyping, where female colleagues are undermined by labels such as 'emotional' because of their gender. The study indicates that universities can help to reduce inequities and create a more inclusive and diverse learning and working environment by addressing gender discrepancies in academic and professional contexts. Wheeler and Wiese affirm that by espousing sustainable development goal 5, higher learning institutions can simultaneously contribute to attainment of other goals such as poverty eradication; quality education; decent work and economic growth reduced inequalities. A 2022 study, Workplace Bullying and Its Implications for Gender Transformation in the South African Higher Education Sector: An Intersectional Perspective by Brightness Mangolothi and Professor Peliwe Mnguni is relevant in helping us find ways to fasttrack gender transformation. They employed qualitative semi-structured interviews wherein they targeted a sample of 25 women academics from three universities. Their research article, published in the International Journal of Critical Diversity Studies , makes a link between Mangolothi and Mnguni listed bullying behaviours directed at women such as excessive workload allocation, removal of key areas of responsibility and being given trivial tasks to replace their core duties. The researchers summarise women's academic journey through a model anchored in the elements of access, retention, development, performance, progression and exit through resignation. The authors' research findings are aligned to identified themes and point to bullying mostly affecting African, coloured and Indian women academics. Key findings include access being denied and resources withheld; not being seen or heard; shifting goalposts; recognition withheld and authorisation denied for women at institutions of higher learning. Mangolothi and Mnguni's study shows that there is a 'boys club' culture, where men support each other in bullying women, undermining and excluding them from decision-making structures. South Africa continues to grapple with the triple developmental challenges of poverty, inequality and unemployment, with women seemingly the most negatively affected. Amid the research concluding there is gender inequality, the question is whether there is a will to address the patriarchy's negative impact across society and the workplace — or will women emancipation remain an elusive dream? Shalate Davhana & Malesela Maubane are Tshwane University of Technology alumni, with the former a staff member at the university. They write in their personal capacities.
Eyewitness News
2 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
SACP defends SANDF chief Maphwanya over his Iran comments
JOHANNESBURG - The South African Communist Party(SACP) has hit back at critics of defence force chief, Rudzani Maphwanya, for his remarks during a recent visit in Iran. Maphwanya was at the centre of a diplomatic storm last week, when Iranian media reported that he appeared to publicly co-sign South Africa to stronger political and military ties with Tehran. It's understood that he said that Iran's military had significant capabilities that could be used in cooperation with the South African armed forces to serve mutual national interests and enhance regional and international security. READ: Presidency says action will be taken against SANDF's Maphwanya over his Iran comments Despite mounting pressure to account for his comments, the SACP has come to out in defence of Maphwanya. A few months ahead of his retirement, South African National Defence Force chief, Maphwanya, is now facing calls to step down over his comments. The SACP has since come out batting for him in what the party labelled as anti-Iran hysteria and geopolitical hypocrisy. In a statement released at the weekend, the SACP said that South Africa's ties with Iran were not out of the ordinary. The Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO) distanced itself from Maphwanya's comments, saying they did not reflect South Africa's foreign policy. President Cyril Ramaphosa called Maphwanya's comments ill-advised. The SACP said thats government's muddled response was concerning, accusing government of scapegoating the SANDF chief. It said that giving into the whims of Iran's foes to appease other countries sets a bad precedent.
The Citizen
3 hours ago
- The Citizen
Pull the plug and start dialogue over
It's time to pull the plug on this whole thing… and start again. While the National Dialogue saga seems destined to generate little more than more hot air – as if we don't have enough already from our verbose politicians – it does provide some fascinating material for pondering our parlous political situation. First, the foundations associated with the elders of recent South African history – those who negotiated the way towards ending apartheid – have pulled out of the process. What the National Dialogue should've been One of the prominent critics of the dialogue process is former president Thabo Mbeki. He was the man who set in motion this idea of a national dialogue, and, in his own words, it should have been civil society in the driving seat, not President Cyril Ramaphosa and the ANC. That would seem, at first glance, to be noble and wise, as befitting Mbeki's status as an elder statesman. However, what if Mbeki realised that his own legacy – despite the collapse which followed after he left office – was going to be less than shining? Even ignoring the Aids debacle, where an estimated 250 000 people died while he dithered about antiretroviral medications, Mbeki is regarded by many critics as having moved the country onto a neocolonial, capitalist-friendly course, failing to deal with critical issues like land restitution. Perhaps he needs the dialogue to rebuild his legacy into one of 'the man who saved South Africa'. Yet, whatever his motive may be, Mbeki is correct – and so are the others who withdrew – that this dialogue should not be steered by Ramaphosa and the ANC. People, not political parties, should air their views on the future. That is why it is concerning that organisations like the DA and Freedom Front Plus, which represent many in the white community, have also chosen to stay away. It's time to pull the plug on this whole thing… and start again. READ NEXT: Mazibuko reaffirms that the National Dialogue will be in the hands of South Africans
