Key architect of The Voice to Parliament makes major claim about Anthony Albanese's election win
Key Voice architect Thomas Mayo has declared that Labor's resounding election victory was a national endorsement of Welcome to Country ceremonies.
The cultural practice became a major issue in the final week of the election campaign after an address by Bunurong elder Mark Brown at Melbourne 's Anzac Day dawn service was drowned out by boos and jeers.
One of those responsible was a neo-Nazi and the ugly scenes were condemned from across the political spectrum.
But the episode sparked a national debate after a veteran was filmed telling a Channel Nine reporter it was a 'slap in the face' for those who have served their country in battle to be welcomed to it.
Opposition Leader Peter Dutton said he thought the ceremonies were 'overdone', later clarifying that he did not think they were appropriate on Anzac Day.
The debate around Indigenous recognition continued after Foreign Minister Penny Wong suggested the Voice to Parliament – a separate indigenous body with powers to influence government legislation - was, like marriage equality, inevitable.
But now Thomas Mayo, one of the key advocates of the Yes campaign, has claimed that Labor's thumping majority is an overwhelming rejection of Coalition's criticism of Indigenous recognition.
'Tonight, Australia voted No to ignorance & Yes to Acknowledgement; No to xenophobia & Yes to Welcomes; No to regression & Yes to progress,' he wrote on X.
After a week in which the news was dominated by controversies around Welcome to Country, the Prime Minister delivered a defiant Acknowledgement to Country during his victory speech on Saturday night
'Peter Dutton, Jacinta Price, Clive Palmer, Pauline Hanson, the IPA & Advance henceforth have no mandate.
'They've been thoroughly told NO.'
His comments were echoed by Anthony Albanese in his victory speech on Saturday night.
After a week in which the news was dominated by controversies around Welcome to Country, the Prime Minister delivered a defiant Acknowledgement to Country.
'I acknowledge the traditional owners of the land on which we meet,' he said, to huge applause and cheers from the crowd.
'And I pay my respects to elders past, present and emerging today – and every day.'
In October last year, Mr Mayo insisted constitutional change, like the rejected Voice to Parliament, could still take place down the track.
'Do you accept that this particular proposal, given it has been rejected by the Australian people is dead - or do you think it could still have a future,' ABC host Patricia Karvelas asked Mayo in an interview.
'There's still a future that includes Indigenous people in the constitution. Sure, in reality it's not going to happen again for a while,' he replied.
'It will be a while before any politicians will have the courage to put it to the people and hope for the best.
'We don't always get things right in a democracy. If we accepted the "No" answers that we got about equal wages or about our right to vote as Indigenous people ... things would be worse today.
'Because more than 60 per cent of young people voted "Yes" between 18 and 24, that tells me that we've got a future, and what we tried to do last year will be achieved.'
Mr Mayo criticised the No campaign and acknowledged that their slogan of 'if you don't know, vote No' was, in his words, 'unfortunately extremely powerful'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Labor reveals plan to deliver 1.2million new homes
Breaking ground on delivering 1.2million homes starts by untangling the maze of bureaucratic approvals, the federal government says. Housing Minister Clare O'Neil has signalled a second-term Labor administration will move quickly to boost construction. 'We've just been elected with a really clear mandate to improve our housing system in this country,' she told reporters on Saturday. 'We've got big reforms to implement, and not a day to waste in getting on with them.' The minister vowed to simplify local, state and federal planning regulations by leading a council of planning ministers. 'If we are going to address the housing needs of Australians, it is going to require the three levels of government to work together in new ways,' she said. She will work with the building sector to implement innovative technologies to move past time consuming and costly methods of construction. Her comments come after an interview with ABC on Friday where she said 'builders face a ridiculous thicket of red tape that is preventing them building the homes we need.' Master Builders Australia CEO Denita Wawn said the cost of building a home had skyrocketed by 40 per cent over the past five years while construction times had ballooned by 80 per cent over the past decade. 'It is critical that we remove the red tape that is hampering our capacity to build homes,' she said. Ms Wawn was hopeful the ambitious goal of 1.2million homes coming onto the market would be achieved, but said the group's projections showed there could be a slight drop-off. She argued that along with the focus on reducing red tape, there was an urgent need to apprenticeships and fast-tracking migration for skilled people. 'For the first time, the federal government is leaning in and trying to ensure that there is a focused attention on housing,' she said. But opposition housing spokesman Andrew Bragg said the government's plans were a 'joke' and described Labor as 'red tape champions.' 'Labor's signature housing policy, the Housing Australia Future Fund has built zero new homes in three years,' Senator Bragg said. 'Approvals are way down under their watch and their 1.2million new home target is a dead duck.' The Paris-based Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development warned Australia on Tuesday to boost housing supply and address falling affordability. The OECD said easing zoning restrictions would strengthen competition and productivity, as well as raise housing investment to 'reverse the long-standing decline in housing affordability'.
The Guardian
a day ago
- The Guardian
Worried about the tax on $3m plus super balances? Here's how you'll survive
Imagine you have $3m in super and have just retired, only to hear that Labor plans to hit you with a new tax. Or perhaps you're worried (dream?) that at some point in the near or distant future you might cross that multi-million-dollar savings threshold. Either way, you might be wondering whether the government's proposal to whack an extra 15% tax on earnings on balances over $3m is going to put a major crimp in your retirement plans. Breathe easy, your annual trips to Europe are safe, as are your smashed avocado brekkies. According to Guardian Australia's analysis, a wealthy Australian retiring with $3m in super today would pay an extra $2,355 in tax. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email And that's from annual retirement income of more than $170,000, based on an estimate from Asic's MoneySmart retirement calculator. In other words, the tax represents barely 1% of your income. If that doesn't make you feel better, then remember that the median full-time salary in Australia is $88,400, according to the ABS, and $72,590 across all employees. So you are making nearly twice the median full-time salary – and those suckers are paying income tax! Well, consider this: The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia reckons that a single person with a paltry $595,000 in savings can generate a 'comfortable' lifestyle in retirement with $51,807 in income a year. You're making more than three times as much, even after paying Labor's damned extra tax! What's that? You only have $800,000 in savings? Gosh, how sad. (If it makes you feel any better, that's still four times the median super balance among 65-69 year-olds, according to the ATO). Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion Don't worry, though, you won't be paying the proposed extra 15% tax - remember it only starts kicking in on balances over $3m. And anyway, you can still live pretty well on $67,000 a year, tax-free. That all sounds OK for the small-fry with $3m in super. But what about the serious savers with $5m? How much extra tax will they have to suffer in the name of making the super system 'fairer'? Bad news. They could be paying something like an extra $25,000 in tax under the proposed policy, if they earn the average 7.5% annual return in the year. The good news is that they'll still have nearly $270,000 left over to … wait, can a single retiree even spend that much in a year?
The Guardian
a day ago
- The Guardian
Nicolette Boele on climate, business and making a difference
Nicolette Boele was declared the winner in the Sydney seat of Bradfield this week, after a month of counting and recounting in her race against Liberal Gisele Kapterian. She is preparing to take her seat in parliament after a wafer-thin victory of just 26 votes. Boele speaks to chief political correspondent Tom McIlroy about why Labor needs to stop 'walking both sides of the fence' on climate and energy and where she thinks the government could improve productivity.
