logo
Reeves pledges to extend purge of City red tape to rest of UK economy

Reeves pledges to extend purge of City red tape to rest of UK economy

Irish Times16-07-2025
Rachel Reeves
said Britain has a 'culture of risk aversion to the point of obsession with stamping risk out', as she vowed to extend a purge on City of London red tape to the rest of the economy.
The UK chancellor of the exchequer said an excessive safety-first approach was not seen in any of Britain's global competitors, adding: 'It is bad for businesses, bad for growth and bad for working people.'
Ms Reeves, who is under intense pressure to pull levers to boost growth as Britain's fiscal position deteriorates, unveiled what she claimed was the biggest cut in financial services regulation in a decade.
She said Britain needed a cultural change, and that the 'pendulum has swung too far in the opposite direction' after the re-regulation of the City following the 2008 financial crisis.
'The same flawed judgment that has seen newts and bats block major infrastructure projects is the one that requires almost 140,000 finance professionals to certify they are fit for their roles on an annual basis,' she added.
Her comments followed her annual speech at the Mansion House in the City on Tuesday evening, in which she called on watchdogs to 'boldly regulate in the service of prosperity across our country'.
'It is clear we must do more,' she told City grandees. 'In too many areas, regulation still acts as a boot on the neck of businesses, choking off the enterprise and innovation that is the lifeblood of growth.'
Ms Reeves' overarching message was Britain needs to take more risks. In the City, that meant reforming ring-fencing rules that force UK banks to separate their retail and investment banking activities – a change introduced after 2008.
She also announced cuts to capital and reporting requirements, the scaling back of the onerous senior managers regime in the City, and an overhaul of the much-criticised financial ombudsman service.
Ms Reeves also launched a new taskforce to support businesses to list and grow in the UK as part of efforts to revive the London Stock Exchange.
She said she had retained reserve powers to mandate pension funds to invest in a wider range of riskier assets – but did not expect to have to use them – and was still considering 'further changes to ISAs' to encourage more investment in stocks and shares and less in cash.
In the meantime, the public will be encouraged by banks and through a national advertising campaign to take more risks with their savings, investing in stocks and shares to boost returns.
Ms Reeves is grappling with a deteriorating fiscal situation and the prospect that she will have to raise taxes significantly in her autumn budget.
She said that a riskier regulatory environment would be married to an ongoing commitment to economic stability, reassuring the City that she would not be blown off her fiscal course by increasingly rebellious Labour MPs opposed to spending cuts.
'Fiscal stability is a choice that reflects economic reality,' Ms Reeves said, noting that national debt was at its highest levels since the 1960s. 'That's why the prime minister, this government and I remain committed to our non-negotiable [fiscal] rules.'
She made light of her recent tearful appearance in the House of Commons. 'Recently on a visit to a school, a girl asked me 'What job would you do if you could do any job in the world?' Given the events of the last few weeks, I suspect many of you would sympathise if I had said 'Anything but chancellor'. But I didn't.'
Her comments on growth drew a sceptical reaction from observers who said Labour had failed to deliver reforms on the scale needed to transform the economy during its first year in office.
Despite policies to boost public investment that would pay off in time, 'it doesn't feel like a radical change', Helen Miller, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies think-tank, said earlier on Tuesday.
'Growth should be the number one mission,' she added. 'We should be throwing the kitchen sink at it but it doesn't feel like that.'
Ms Miller said the government's new focus on raising defence spending had overtaken other priorities, limiting the scope to invest in areas such as local transport or non-military research and development.
Meanwhile Richard Hughes, chairman of the office for budget responsibility, struck a gloomy note about the state of the public finances.
Mr Hughes said there were 'reasons to worry' about the level of public debt in the UK given the country's exposure to economic shocks and the hefty impact of events such as the financial crisis and the Covid pandemic.
'We have also already raised taxes quite a bit in this country – the tax burden is getting close to an all-time high, so we have used some of that policy flexibility,' he told MPs. – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

State to oppose applications to bring cases over failure to hold Omagh bombing inquiry
State to oppose applications to bring cases over failure to hold Omagh bombing inquiry

Irish Times

time15 minutes ago

  • Irish Times

State to oppose applications to bring cases over failure to hold Omagh bombing inquiry

The State will oppose applications by two survivors of the 1998 Omagh bombing who are seeking to bring lawsuits aimed at compelling the Government to establish a public inquiry into the atrocity, the High Court has heard. Emmet Tunney and Shawneen Conway say the Government is obliged to establish a public inquiry in circumstances where State authorities allegedly held 'actionable intelligence' relating to the attack. A total of 29 people, including Ms Conway's 18-year-old brother Gareth and a woman pregnant with twins, died when a car bomb planted by the Real IRA exploded in the centre of the Co Tyrone town on August 15th, 1998. The survivors, who are seeking to bring separate but similar cases, both point to a judgment of Northern Ireland's High Court which found the British and Irish governments bore responsibilities 'arising from the cross-Border nature of the attack and the intelligence failings that preceded it'. READ MORE 'The High Court in Northern Ireland found that there was a real prospect that fresh investigative measures could yield new and significant information regarding the atrocity, including the possibility of preventing it had certain intelligence been acted upon,' the survivors' court papers state. Their cases argue that a public inquiry is required to ensure an effective investigation of the atrocity. They allege the State's failure to hold such an inquiry is a breach of their rights under the Constitution and the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). According to their court documents, article two of the ECHR requires an 'effective, independent, prompt, and public' investigation in circumstances where state agents knew or ought to have known of a real and immediate risk to life. Articles 40 and 41 of the Constitution require effective investigations of deaths involving potential State failures, their papers say. An independent inquiry into the bombing, established by the UK government, opened in Omagh in January and is continuing. That inquiry is examining whether the atrocity could have been prevented by UK authorities. Ms Conway and Mr Tunney say the Irish Government should hold a parallel inquiry. In the High Court this week, Stephen Toal KC, for the survivors with Ruaidhrí Giblin BL and Karl McGuckin BL, moved an application seeking permission to bring the proceedings against the Government, Ireland and the Attorney General. Mr Toal said the State had indicated it would be opposing their application seeking permission to bring the proceedings. Ms Justice Mary Rose Gearty said she would hear Mr Toal's applications for permission to bring the proceedings in early November. The judge said the State should be put on notice of the applications. Mr Tunney, of Omagh, Co Tyrone, is represented in the action by Strabane-based firm Roche McBride Solicitors. Ms Conway, from Dungannon, Co Tyrone, is represented by Pa Duffy Solicitors in Dungannon.

Can I pay into Irish State pension from the UK?
Can I pay into Irish State pension from the UK?

Irish Times

time6 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Can I pay into Irish State pension from the UK?

I was born in Ireland and moved to London in 2002 ( aged 22) after graduating from university . I have been working in London since then (and will qualify for a full UK state pension upon retirement) and have no immediate plans to come home to live in Ireland. I did summer jobs in Ireland before leaving and so have paid some tax from 1997 until 2001. My query is to whether I can qualify for a full Irish State pension and what is the most straightforward way to set this up while living in London. Can I make voluntary contributions for an Irish State pension in the same way that it is possible to do for a UK pension? READ MORE Can I set up an Irish limited company and pay myself a nominal salary in order to make the required pension contributions? Is there any other way for which I can set myself up for an Irish State pension in a relatively straightforward manner? I really appreciate any help or guidance you can give me in this matter. Mr JK The principle of State contributory pensions – and other welfare benefits that are not means tested – is that you qualify on the basis of your social insurance contributions over a period of time. All countries that I am aware of have a minimum threshold before you can qualify for these benefits. In Ireland, that number is 520 – 10 years of PRSI (Pay Related Social Insurance) contributions . In your case, despite working here for a few years before heading for the UK, you are well shy of that threshold. So, as of now, you would not qualify for any Irish State pension. [ How can I find what my likely State pension will be? Opens in new window ] And, given that the 520-contribution figure is also a requirement to make voluntary PRSI contributions, you will not be eligible for that either. Even if you had those contributions, you would have fallen outside the qualification window – 60 months since your most recent paid PRSI stamp. You refer to the UK system of voluntary national insurance but it, too, has rules and a limit on how far back you can go. So there is no, as you put it, 'relatively straightforward' way you can set myself up for an Irish State pension. Could you set up a limited company here as a vehicle to allow you to pay contributions? To be honest, I'm not across company law sufficiently to answer one way or the other, but one thought comes to mind – why bother? There are costs involved in setting up and running a limited company even if it were possible. More pertinently, your life now is in the UK. You have spent your entire adult working life since graduation in the UK, it is your home and, by your own admission, you have no real intention to return to Ireland. [ Am I too late to apply to boost my UK pension? Opens in new window ] If you were eligible for a State contributory pension, it could be paid to you in the UK but it seems to me that you would be far better to invest in a private pension in the UK, availing of the tax relief available and with more control over its investment priorities. You are currently 45 with the possibility/ likelihood of 20+ years left in your working life. As I understand it, you can get tax relief at 20 per cent on any money you invest over there in a private pension and a 25-year investment window is more than enough to deliver a strong return. I am conscious there was a lot of talk recently about Irish residents who had worked in the UK for a time beefing up their UK national insurance record to qualify for or increase a future UK state pensions but that was different for two reasons. First, the qualifying criteria were lower under a special amnesty arrangement and second the cost of purchasing that extra entitlement was attractive for many people. Please send your queries to Dominic Coyle, Q&A, The Irish Times, 24-28 Tara Street, Dublin 2, or by email to , with a contact phone number. This column is a reader service and is not intended to replace professional advice

Trump to cut 50-day Ukraine ceasefire deadline as Russian strikes continue
Trump to cut 50-day Ukraine ceasefire deadline as Russian strikes continue

Irish Examiner

time21 hours ago

  • Irish Examiner

Trump to cut 50-day Ukraine ceasefire deadline as Russian strikes continue

Donald Trump has suggested he will bring forward a deadline for Russia to agree a ceasefire with Ukraine as he met British prime minister Keir Starmer in Scotland. The US president said he was 'very disappointed' with Vladimir Putin, criticising the Russian president's decision to continue air strikes against civilian targets in Ukraine. Speaking alongside Mr Starmer outside his hotel in Turnberry, South Ayrshire, Mr Trump said: 'We thought we had it settled numerous times, and then President Putin goes out and starts launching rockets into some city like Kyiv and kills a lot of people in a nursing home or whatever. 'You have bodies lying all over the street, and I say that's not the way to do it. So we'll see what happens with that.' Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and US President Donald Trump in South Ayrshire (Chris Furlong/PA) Earlier this month, Mr Trump threatened to impose 'very severe' tariffs on Russia if Mr Putin did not agree a ceasefire within 50 days, with the deadline due to expire on September 2. But on Monday, he said he would 'reduce that 50 days that I gave him to a lesser number', adding: 'I think I already know the answer, what's going to happen.' Efforts to secure a ceasefire in Ukraine are expected to feature on the agenda for Mr Starmer's meeting with Mr Trump on Monday, along with the situation in Gaza and progress on implementing the UK-US trade deal. Last week, Downing Street said both men were 'set to talk about their shared desire to bring an end to the barbaric war' and 'reflect on progress in their 50-day drive to arm Ukraine and force Putin to the negotiating table'. Meanwhile, the conflict in Ukraine continues, with Russian drone and missile strikes hitting the country's north-eastern Sumy region on Sunday, wounding four people. Russian officials also claimed to have shot down 150 Ukrainian drones, with one person killed and three others injured near St Petersburg.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store