What's the story with this PRSI tax thing on my payslip?
We've all been there. You look at your payslip, see all the deductions and wonder where your money's going. One of those deductions is PRSI. It's a small amount, it's easy to ignore and it often gets bundled into the same frustration as tax.
But PRSI isn't just another tax. It's one of the few things you pay that is directly linked to you and your entitlements. Without it, we wouldn't have the protections many of us take for granted. So what exactly is PRSI really doing for you and why should you care?
From RTÉ Radio 1's Today with Claire Byrne, will the amount of PRSI workers pay increase?
What the flip is PRSI?
PRSI stands for Pay Related Social Insurance. It's a system designed to protect you if you hit tough times, like losing your job, getting sick, or reaching retirement. If you're working in Ireland, you're almost certainly paying it, and it's your ticket to a range of benefits.
In 2023, PRSI contributions brought in over €15 billion, funding things like pensions, illness benefit, maternity leave and more. In simple terms, you pay in when you can and you're supported when you need it.
How does PRSI work?
The system is straightforward. Employees pay 4% of their gross weekly income (over €352) and employers pay between 8.8% and 11.05% on top of your wage. Self-employed people also contribute, with slightly different rules.
This money goes into the Social Insurance Fund, which covers:
In a way, it's like insurance: if you've paid in, you've earned the right to claim.
From RTÉ Radio 1's Late Debate, increases in PRSI to fund pensions and pay-related jobseekers allowance
Time to debunk some myths
'It's just another tax.'
It's a contribution towards your own safety net. Income tax funds public services; PRSI is specifically for social insurance. There's a big difference.
'I won't ever get anything back from it'
You might not need illness or jobseeker's benefits now, but the State Pension alone is likely to play a key part in your retirement income. Things like dental benefits, maternity, and paternity leave are real-world supports that many people use.
'It's wasted money'
Of course, the system isn't perfect but there would be no pensions, unemployment supports or sick pay without PRSI. It's a lot more efficient than it's given credit for.
Why the pension matters (even for Gen Z)
The most significant thing PRSI does for many people is build up your entitlement to the State Pension (Contributory). When you reach retirement age and start receiving that pension, it's a clear reflection of the contributions you've made over your working life.
From RTÉ News, State pension age to remain at 66
There's also a Non-Contributory Pension, which is means-tested and available to those without enough contributions. But here's the key difference: if you're receiving the Contributory Pension, you've earned it. This isn't free money, it's yours because you played your part in supporting the system through your working years.
And that does matter. There's a certain dignity and reassurance in knowing your pension is based on what you've put in, not just on circumstance.
What would happen without PRSI?
If PRSI didn't exist, the consequences would be huge.
No State Pension.
No paid maternity or paternity leave.
No jobseeker's benefit.
No illness or disability supports.
No dental or optical subsidies.
In other words, people would be completely on their own to plan for every major life event. For many, that simply wouldn't be realistic.
Thumbs up for PRSI
Ireland's social insurance system isn't perfect (no system is), but PRSI is a clear example of something that actually works for most people. It's easy to get caught up in focusing on the negatives, but it's just as important to look at the parts of the system that are doing their job.
Without PRSI, a lot of people would face real financial hardship. It spreads the cost of social protection across society and, in doing so, it makes sure that support is there when it's needed. It's worth pointing out that being able to contribute consistently is a privilege in itself. Not everyone is able to work full-time, whether due to health, caring responsibilities or other challenges. A system that offers protection across the board is essential, even if it's not flawless.
We all groan when we see deductions on a payslip. That's natural. But PRSI is not just a government levy. It's your safety net, your pension, your support system.
Next time you see PRSI on your payslip, remember that you're playing a part in keeping the system running for yourself, your family, and your community. It's not perfect, but it works, and that's something worth recognising.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
12 hours ago
- RTÉ News
'No climbing' signs erected at Dalkey Quarry
Mountaineering Ireland has said it is engaging with Dun Laoghaire Rathdown County Council after the erection of no climbing signs at one of the most popular sites in Ireland for rock climbers. The signs appeared recently at Dalkey Quarry and the local authority said it "has prohibited rock climbing activities at Dalkey Quarry, effective immediately". "This decision has been taken as a precautionary measure pending the completion of a comprehensive safety assessment at the site," said the council. The quarry has been used by rock climbers for decades and has more than 300 recorded climbing routes. Mountaineering Ireland CEO Liam Feeley said the majority of his organisation's climber members use the area and it is an important venue for any climber in Leinster. He told RTÉ News he did not know what had prompted the council's decision. Mr Feeley said Mountaineering Ireland is working with council officials and he added that changes to the Owners Liability Act, which came into effect in 2023, reduces the liability of the council to claims by climbers if they suffer an injury. The Act now provides a defence of voluntary assumption of risk, as a visitor or recreational user of an area can be judged by their words or actions to have accepted a risk and that would leave the owner with no liability. Representatives of Mountaineering Ireland hope to meet council officials before the end of the month to find a resolution "that will work for everyone", added Mr Feeley.
RTÉ News
17 hours ago
- RTÉ News
How do older employees view age discrimination in the workplace?
Analysis: A new report has found that one in 12 employers openly admitted to discriminating against potential employees because of age By Sophie Butler and Trudy Corrigan, DCU What does ageism in the workplace look like? It can be hiring bias, stereotyping, early layoffs, forced retirement, microaggressions or exclusion. Sometimes it's loud and visible; other times it's subtle and silent. Unlike many other forms of workplace discrimination, ageism often remains invisible and undiscussed, yet it profoundly affects the lives, careers, and mental well-being of those who experience it. While younger workers can experience ageism, research shows it is more commonly reported by older employees. Ireland's population is living longer and healthier lives than ever before, thanks to advances in healthcare, early diagnosis, and better nutrition. But an ageing population means we must challenge outdated stereotypes and re-imagine what positive ageing looks like in the workplace, in the media, and across society. In 2017, the Workplace Relations Commission issued a Code of Practice on Longer Working, recognising the growing number of older workers who wish to remain in employment beyond the traditional retirement age of 65. "The proportion of older workers, and, in particular, workers who want to continue in employment beyond what would have been regarded as the traditional retirement age, is forecast to grow significantly in the future. "This shift demands that employers and society create workplaces that support employees of all ages, foster lifelong learning, upskilling, and flexible working options; recognise the value of experience, mentorship, and stability that older workers bring; a healthy ageing workforce is not only beneficial for individuals; it's vital for our economic resilience and social cohesion." A recent report from the Say No to Age Discrimination in the Workplace project found that one in 12 employers openly admitted to discriminating against potential employees because of their age, particularly older individuals. 76% of respondents believe that the media plays a crucial role in the perpetuation of stereotypes associated with older people. This points to how the media can influence the perception of the public (not only on this topic) and should serve as a way to contribute to decreasing the stereotype. From RTÉ Radio 1's Today with Claire Byrne, how Age Friendly Ireland hopes to combat ageism The highest percentage of employees and employers found that companies and organisations do not have clear policies to address ageism. Where they have these policies, they are not always known to employees or are effective in their design and implementation. This is in particular to ensure that organisations value age diversity in the workplace. Where ageism is considered to be predominant, is in the recruitment of staff over 50 years of age and in promotions of older staff, relevant to some workplaces. Almost 87% of respondents believe that stereotypes associated with age exist. One respondent noted that "ageism is very active." When asked about perceptions of older workers, 58% agreed or strongly agreed that older workers are often underestimated in terms of their abilities, while 50% disagreed or strongly disagreed. This indicates a near parity of opinion on this issue. From RTÉ Radio 1's Liveline, listeners Teresa and Martin both feel they are victims of ageism in Ireland Additionally, 50% of respondents either disagreed or strongly disagreed that older workers are less adaptable to new technologies, while 22% were undecided. Notably, 88% either disagreed or strongly disagreed that older workers are less productive than younger workers, representing the strongest consensus that older workers are just as productive as their younger counterparts. In an era saturated with "age-reducing" products and procedures, real change requires reshaping attitudes, not appearances. Re-imagining ageing is about empowerment, dignity, and inclusion — building a society where all individuals, regardless of age, are valued and have opportunities to thrive. Positive ageing means: Seeing ageing as a time of opportunity, not limitation. Representing older adults in the media as active, diverse, and vibrant. Creating closer intergenerational contact to break down age barriers. Encouraging younger people to see ageing not with fear, but with optimism. Creating opportunities in the workplace where younger and older people can share their tacit knowledge and lived experiences to shape a better future together. Today's conversations around ageing and ageism must move beyond anti-ageing marketing and outdated stereotypes. We must reframe ageing as a phase of possibility, contribution and growth, rather than decline.
RTÉ News
20 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Why Metrolink is a much needed connection for North County Dublin
Analysis: Never has a transport project in Ireland been as analysed, appraised, criticised and debated as much as this By Brian Caulfield, Trinity College Dublin A rail line serving North County Dublin and the airport has been under discussion in the capital for over 30 years. Many factors are responsible for the lack of delivery of this project, including political indecision, cost and protracted debates over which option was best to deliver the required transport service. In 2011, the Metro North project received planning permission to proceed, but it was subsequently cancelled due to the economic recession. However, similar debates continued at the time about the best alternative to serve one of the country's fastest-growing populations in North County Dublin. From RTÉ Radio 1's Today with Claire Byrne, Prof Brian Caulfield and The Irish Times' Dublin editor Olivia Kelly discuss the long overdue Metrolink Around that time my team published a paper in the Journal of Transport Policy which examined several alternatives to the Metro North project. Our study looked at a DART spur line, a Luas line to the airport and a more efficient bus service operating via the Port Tunnel. Our findings showed that none of these alternatives were able to provide the capacity proposed by the Metro North project. 14 years later, a new plan to connect North County Dublin— Metrolink —is being proposed and is seeking planning permission. The project is very similar to its predecessor, and many of the arguments for its construction in terms of capacity and travel times remain largely the same. However, the narrative around the project still seems to be anchored in the belief that it is primarily an "airport train." This perception persists alongside arguments that other alternatives could be more efficient and concerns that a comprehensive Cost-Benefit Analysis has not been completed. From RTÉ News' Behind the Story podcast, will Dublin's Metro ever get built? Many of us are familiar with landing at international airports and using a direct rail line or metro system to travel onwards to our next destinations. Many believe that Metrolink in Dublin is just that; namely, a rail line that will connect the airport to the city centre. The airport is a stop on the Metrolink plan, but it is one of 16 stops. While it is projected to be the busiest stop, with approximately 18% of all passengers departing the metro there, the service is much more than just an airport link as it will provide much-needed connectivity to North County Dublin. Some say that other alternatives could provide the same transport capacity at a much lower cost. Unfortunately, the opportunity for a lower-cost option with the same capacity was lost when the original Metro North project was cancelled in 2011. Since that time, the population has grown, and so have the costs of constructing a metro. When evaluating possible alternatives, the key issues are capacity and travel time. A metro train can accommodate 500 people. Consider the following example: a metro train at 80% capacity would carry 400 people. To transport this number of people by bus, you would need 5.6 buses (assuming 80% capacity), or 200 private cars (assuming two people per car). Now, think of the amount of space these modes would occupy; the difference is significant. From RTÉ News, Transport Infrastructure Ireland says the Metrolink will 'revolutionise' public transport in the capital Metrolink can run a train every 90 seconds (40 trains per direction per hour), which would require 444 buses or 16,000 cars to provide the same level of hourly capacity. Even with dedicated tunnels, this would result in congestion. Furthermore, if the Port Tunnel were used, it would have significant impacts on freight movements due to the additional vehicles. What about a new Luas line as an alternative? The Luas Green Line has a capacity of just over 8,000 passengers per hour in each direction, but Metrolink's proposed capacity is 2.5 times greater. The Metrolink travel time of 25 minutes from Swords to the city could not be matched by any of these alternatives. Never has a transport project in Ireland been analysed, appraised and debated as much as the Dublin Metro. Every transport strategy written for the region in the past 30-plus years has indicated a metro line with the capacity currently under consideration is required. In 2021, a detailed business case, spanning thousands of pages of detailed design and appraisal, was published by the Department of Transport. The appraisal includes a cost-benefit analysis, which was reviewed by the Department for Public Expenditure and Reform and peer-reviewed by international experts. All of these steps are both prudent and responsible, considering the sum of public funding that will be spent on this project. The most recent cost-benefit analysis shows that the transport benefits of the project could amount to €15.6bn over 60 years. This does not take into account the wider economic benefits of improved air quality, reduced emissions or safety impacts. Assuming planning permission is granted and the final price for the project is known after the tendering process, the cost-benefit analysis exercise will be repeated to ensure that the final analysis still indicates the substantial benefits of proceeding with the project. From RTÉ Radio 1's Drivetime, Ryanair boss Michael O'Leary on why he says we don't need the Metrolink It's expected that 175,000 people and 250,000 jobs will be within walking distance of a metro stop. It will connect 127 schools, five hospitals and three universities. The project will connect with existing modes of public transport within the city, providing a network effect that will transform mobility in our capital. This is a project that will require political support for at least the next decade, as the timeline will span beyond the current Government and likely extend through the terms of perhaps two more. The project is at a pivotal stage and support from the government has been positive in the form of funding through the revised National Development Plan. Given that this will be the most expensive infrastructure project ever attempted in Ireland, this support will need to be steadfast and come from all political parties.
