logo
Massive planet discovered orbiting tiny star, puzzling scientists

Massive planet discovered orbiting tiny star, puzzling scientists

Yahoo2 days ago

Astronomers announced Wednesday they have discovered a massive planet orbiting a tiny star, a bizarre pairing that has stumped scientists.
Most of the stars across the Milky Way are small red dwarfs like TOI-6894, which has only 20% the mass of our sun.
It had not been thought possible that such puny, weak stars could provide the conditions needed to form and host huge planets.
But an international team of astronomers have detected the unmistakable signature of a gas giant planet orbiting the undersized TOI-6894, according to a study in the journal Nature Astronomy. This makes the star the smallest star yet known to host a gas giant.
The planet has a slightly larger radius than Saturn, but only half its mass. It orbits its star in a little over three days.
The astronomers discovered the planet when searching through more than 91,000 low-mass red dwarfs observed by NASA's TESS space telescope. Its existence was then confirmed by ground-based telescopes, including Chile's Very Large Telescope.
"The fact that this star hosts a giant planet has big implications for the total number of giant planets we estimate exist in our galaxy," study co-author Daniel Bayliss of the UK's Warwick University said in a statement.
Another co-author, Vincent Van Eylen, of University College London, said it was an "intriguing discovery."
"We don't really understand how a star with so little mass can form such a massive planet!" he said. "This is one of the goals of the search for more exoplanets. By finding planetary systems different from our solar system, we can test our models and better understand how our own solar system formed."
Planet is unusually cold
The most prominent theory for how planets form is called core accretion.
The process begins when a ring of gas and dust — called a protoplanetary disc — which surrounds a newly formed star builds up into a planetary core. This core attracts more gas that forms an atmosphere, eventually snowballing into a gas giant.
Under this theory, it is difficult for low-mass stars to host giant planets because there is not enough gas and dust to begin building a core in the first place.
A rival theory proposes that these planets instead form when their protoplanetary disc becomes gravitationally unstable and breaks up, with the collapsing gas and dust forming a planet.
However neither theory seems to explain the existence of the newly discovered planet, TOI-6894b, the researchers said.
The planet also interests scientists because it is strangely cold.
Most of the gas giants discovered outside our solar system so far have been what are known as "hot Jupiters," where temperatures soar well over 1,000 degrees Celsius. But the newly discovered planet appears to be under 150C, the researchers said.
"Temperatures are low enough that atmospheric observations could even show us ammonia, which would be the first time it is found in an exoplanet atmosphere," said study co-author Amaury Triaud of Birmingham University.
The James Webb space telescope is scheduled to turn its powerful gaze toward the planet in the next year, which could help uncover some more mysteries of this strange planet.
Recent cosmic discoveries
The spotting of the giant planet orbiting the undersized star marks the latest in a string of recent celestial discoveries.
Last month, a U.S.-based trio hunting the elusive "Planet Nine" said they instead stumbled on what appears to be a new dwarf planet in the solar system's outer reaches. Named 2017 OF201, the new object is roughly 430 miles across, according to a preprint study, making it three times smaller than Pluto.
Also in May, an international team reported that a newly found celestial object — perhaps a star, pair of stars or something else entirely — is emitting X-rays around the same time it's shooting out radio waves.
Meanwhile, scientists announced recently that a new planetarium show about the Milky Way helped them unlock one of the solar system's many secrets. Experts at the American Museum of Natural History in New York were fine-tuning a scene about the Oort Cloud that's far beyond Pluto. Scientists have never glimpsed this region, but when museum experts projected their scene onto the planetarium dome, created using simulation data, they saw a spiral shape.
Scientists had long thought the Oort Cloud was shaped like a sphere or flattened shell, warped by the push and pull of other planets and the Milky Way itself. The planetarium show hinted that a more complex shape could lie inside.Sneak peek: Where is Jermain Charlo?
Baldwin grills McMahon on unallocated funds for students, schools, approved by Congress
Hegseth orders Navy to rename USNS Harvey Milk, Jeffries calls it "a complete and total disgrace"

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Elon Musk's "Hubris and Arrogance" Are Ruining Our Chances of Actually Getting to Mars, Says Leading Expert
Elon Musk's "Hubris and Arrogance" Are Ruining Our Chances of Actually Getting to Mars, Says Leading Expert

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Elon Musk's "Hubris and Arrogance" Are Ruining Our Chances of Actually Getting to Mars, Says Leading Expert

The founder of the Mars Society has accused SpaceX CEO Elon Musk of derailing existing plans to explore and visit the Red Planet. Robert Zubrin, who has coauthored hundreds of papers and laid out several blueprints as to how to settle on Mars, told Agence France-Presse in an interview that Musk is "absolutely instrumental in opening up this opportunity to get humans to Mars, both through the development of Starship and also the inspiration that has caused." But given the "hubris and arrogance" he has since bred — Zubrin went as far as to compare him to failed European dictator Napoleon Bonaparte — our future efforts to travel to the distant planet over 140 million miles away could be in peril. For our effort to send humans to Mars "to succeed, it has to go beyond these — this initiative cannot be seen as a Musk hobbyhorse or a Trump hobbyhorse — it must be seen, at a minimum, as America's program, or preferably the Free World's program," Zubrin told AFP. The publication of the interview comes in the wake of an incredibly messy divorce between Musk and president Donald Trump, though Zubrin made his comments before the relationship disintegrated. The two have been going at each other's throats and even threatening to cut off NASA's access to space. Musk's dreams of making humanity interplanetary by establishing a city on Mars appear to have slipped significantly on his list of priorities. The mercurial CEO was heavily criticized for abandoning his businesses in favor of overseeing a disastrous gutting of the US federal government, and is now racing to make Tesla investors happy as sales continue to plummet worldwide. SpaceX has also encountered major headwind in getting its Mars-bound Starship to not explode. The company's last three test flights ended in so-called "rapid unscheduled disassemblies," highlighting growing technical difficulties and the enormous degree of complexity involved in launching and landing the most powerful rocket in the world. While Musk has previously vowed to land Starships on Mars before the end of next year — he admitted it was a "50-50 chance" late last month — his characteristically ambitious timelines are once again looking unrealistic at best. "Progress is measured by the timeline to establishing a self-sustaining civilization on Mars," Musk said in a promotional video shared by SpaceX on May 29. "Each launch is about learning more and more about what's needed to make life multi-planetary and to improve Starship to the point where it can be taking, ultimately, hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of people to Mars." But all the turbulence Musk has generated, in addition to the Trump administration's brutal budget cut proposal to NASA, likely will only hamper our efforts to visit Mars, Zubrin argued. Complicating matters are fundamental disagreements about NASA's future direction. In a move largely seen as retribution, the Trump administration pulled its nomination for SpaceX space tourist and billionaire Jared Isaacman, who was hand-picked for the job by Musk. "This combination of Trump and Musk is not going to persist forever," Zubrin told AFP, foreshadowing Thursday's drama. "And if this program is identified as their deal, it will be crushed as soon as opposing forces have sufficient power." Most of all, Zubrin disagreed with Musk's stance that humanity will be saved by leaving the Earth behind and settling on Mars instead. "We're not going to Mars out of despair," he told AFP. "We're going to Mars out of hope... to establish new branches of human civilization which will add their creative capacity to that of humanity as a whole." "If we do the kind of program that I advocated... we will once again, as we did in Apollo, astonish the world with what free people can do," he added. "We'll make it clear that freedom, not authoritarianism, is the future of the human race." More on Mars: Trump Just Kicked Elon Musk's Hand-Picked NASA Head to the Curb

Elon Musk Walks Back Threat to Decommission SpaceX's Dragon Spacecraft amid Ongoing Trump Feud
Elon Musk Walks Back Threat to Decommission SpaceX's Dragon Spacecraft amid Ongoing Trump Feud

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Elon Musk Walks Back Threat to Decommission SpaceX's Dragon Spacecraft amid Ongoing Trump Feud

Elon Musk appears to have walked back a threat to decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft amid his ongoing feud with President Donald Trump The comment was made after Trump had threatened to pull the billionaire's government contracts and subsidies In June 2024, NASA awarded SpaceX a $843 million contract to help deorbit the ISS, which will see the end of its operational life in 2030Elon Musk threatened to decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft amid his feud with President Donald Trump, but seemingly has already walked back that claim. Tensions between the SpaceX CEO and the 47th president of the United States escalated on Thursday, June 5, just days after Musk announced he was departing the new Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). On Tuesday, June 3, Musk criticized Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill" on X, calling it a 'massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill' and 'a disgusting abomination.' Trump shot back at Musk in a post shared Thursday on Truth Social, saying 'the easiest way' for the U.S. government to save money is to "terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts.' Musk rebutted on X a short time later. 'In light of the President's statement about cancellation of my government contracts, @SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately,' he wrote. A few hours later, however, Musk appeared to walk back his comment after a user by the name of 'Fab25june' suggested the SpaceX founder 'cool off and take a step back for a couple of days.' 'Good advice,' Musk replied. 'Ok, we won't decommission Dragon.' The Dragon spacecraft has completed more than 50 missions, including 46 visits to the International Space Station (ISS), according to its website. According to SpaceX, the ship 'is capable of carrying up to 7 passengers to and from Earth orbit, and beyond' and 'is the only spacecraft currently flying that is capable of returning significant amounts of cargo to Earth, and is the first private spacecraft to take humans to the space station.' In June 2024, NASA announced SpaceX was awarded a $843 million contract to help deorbit the ISS, which will see the end of its operational life in 2030. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Bethany Stevens, NASA press secretary, said in a statement on X that "NASA will continue to execute upon the President's vision for the future of space. We will continue to work with our industry partners to ensure the President's objectives in space are met." Neither the White House nor SpaceX responded to PEOPLE's requests for comment. Read the original article on People

Analysis: Why Trump can't just quit Musk
Analysis: Why Trump can't just quit Musk

CNN

timean hour ago

  • CNN

Analysis: Why Trump can't just quit Musk

A few years ago, when Elon Musk was turning heel to people worried about climate change, joining forces with Republicans and breaking up with Democrats, I wrote about how the government couldn't just quit him. It's still true now that Musk is breaking up with President Donald Trump, on whose candidacy Musk spent somewhere in the neighborhood of $300 million. Musk got a literal golden key to the White House and the opportunity to take a chainsaw to the federal bureaucracy from Trump in exchange for the friendship that campaign coin bought him. The Trump-Musk bromance, which burned hot during the campaign and for the first few months of Trump's second term in the White House, has now experienced what SpaceX might euphemistically call a 'rapid unscheduled disassembly.' Even if Trump all but demands that key back and the relationship can't be put back together again, a permanent divorce would necessarily be messy and drawn out. At one point as they were lobbing shots at each other on their respective social media platforms, Trump suggested canceling Musk's government contracts. Musk suggested not letting NASA use his SpaceX's Dragon Spacecraft. Both have retreated from those suggestions. As I wrote back in 2023: 'NASA needs his rockets. The Pentagon needs his satellites. The government needs for electric vehicles to access his network of chargers. Officials need his social media platform — Twitter, now called X — to communicate with people.' It's all still true, although Trump has no interest in electric vehicles, and a standoff over whether a massive tax bill should continue to incentivize Americans to buy electric vehicles may have contributed to their beef. There are still a growing number of Americans buying electric vehicles, and Tesla's charging network is a part of that infrastructure. If anything, the intervening years have made the government even more dependent on Musk and particularly SpaceX, which not only provides rockets to NASA, but also has the Starlink internet system, which is key to the Pentagon and has been floated as an option to improve coverage for rural America. SpaceX has gotten more than $20 billion in contracts from NASA and the Pentagon, according to CNN's Chris Isidore. Isidore also explains Trump can't just go to another rocket company. Replacing SpaceX on those contracts, however, is not realistic. That's because there is no other company available to replace it. For example, Boeing, the only other company able transport astronauts to and from the International Space Station (ISS), had problems on its only crewed flight last year. That required its Starliner spacecraft to return to Earth without two astronauts, who were stranded at the ISS for nine months instead of the planned trip of a handful of days. CNN's Jackie Wattles, who covers space, told me the government's reliance on SpaceX goes much further. 'It's hard to understate how crucial SpaceX's capabilities are for civil and military space endeavors,' Wattles said. 'NASA not only relies solely on SpaceX to get astronauts to and from the International Space Station, the space agency awarded SpaceX nearly $1 billion last year to develop a way to safely drag the ISS out of orbit when it's decommissioned — a move expected to happen in the early 2030s if not sooner.' She ticked off a number of ways in which the US relies on SpaceX: If the US does end up wanting to go to Mars, SpaceX's Starship, which is still in development, is the only vehicle designed for the purpose. The US is paying SpaceX $4 billion for moon landings. It's relying on SpaceX to dispose of the International Space Station in the future. SpaceX carries more payload for the military than any other company. It launches most US spy satellites, and the Pentagon plans to count on Starlink for connectivity. Plus, Starlink is now working on updating the technology the Federal Aviation Administration uses to manage US airspace, something that raised questions about conflicts of interest when it was announced, but now seems like one more thing binding the government to Musk. Musk's companies are at the mercy of federal regulators, as we explored with a look at the ethical minefield created by Musk's involvement with the Department of Government Efficiency. His Neuralink, which aims to implant chips in the brains of humans, will have to deal with the Food and Drug Administration. SpaceX has to deal with the FAA and other agencies. X, formerly Twitter, features in the oversight of the Federal Communications Commission. Tesla has been investigated by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Trump's administration has shown no reluctance to use the cogs of government to go after perceived enemies. Just ask Harvard. But if Trump were to use government to attack Musk, it would be like something out of Vladimir Putin's playbook in Russia, where oligarchs rise and fall based on whether they are in favor with the government. 'Trump can go after (Musk's companies), but then it'll be pretty explicit that's what he's doing,' said the tech journalist Kara Swisher, appearing on CNN's 'The Situation Room' Friday. 'Then he'll look exactly like what people accuse him of, which is an autocrat,' Swisher said. It would hurt the country if Trump did target Musk, she said. In additoin to Tesla, SpaceX and Neuralink, she pointed to the importance of Musk's forays into AI. 'We really do need cogent, important guidance on AI as it goes forward,' Swisher said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store