Hong Kong court nears verdict as media mogul Jimmy Lai trial enters final stage
The 77-year-old founder of the Apple Daily newspaper is charged with foreign collusion under Hong Kong's national security law, which Beijing imposed following huge and sometimes violent pro-democracy protests in 2019.
Lai has been kept behind bars since December 2020, reportedly in solitary confinement, with Western nations and rights groups calling for his release.
Aside from the collusion offence — which could land him in prison for life — Lai is also charged with 'seditious publication' related to 161 op-eds he allegedly wrote.
The tycoon gave spirited courtroom testimony over more than 50 days during the trial, fielding questions about his political ideology, management style and overseas contacts.
Lai described himself at least twice as a 'political prisoner', which drew sharp rebukes from the three-judge panel.
Hong Kong authorities have repeatedly rejected criticism related to Lai, saying last month that his case was 'handled strictly on the basis of evidence and in accordance with the law'.
Antoine Bernard of Reporters Without Borders said on Tuesday that Lai's treatment 'exposes the authorities' ruthless determination to silence and suppress one of the most prominent advocates for press freedom amid Hong Kong's rapidly deteriorating media landscape'.
'External political connections'
Prosecutors showed the court a diagram titled '(Lai's) external political connections', arguing that he had exerted influence in the United States, Britain and Taiwan.
It featured headshots of top US political figures, including President Donald Trump, his former deputy Mike Pence and ex-secretary of state Mike Pompeo. Former Taiwan leader Tsai Ing-wen was also among those named.
Two prosecution witnesses, Chan Tsz-wah and Andy Li, also accused Lai of financially backing the advocacy group 'Stand With Hong Kong' to run overseas newspaper ads supporting the 2019 protests.
Lai has denied calling for sanctions against China and Hong Kong and said he never advocated separatism.
Four other people who held senior roles in Apple Daily were called upon by prosecutors to testify about how Lai shaped the outlet's political stance.
The mogul said his newspaper championed democracy and freedom, adding that he had always disavowed violence.
'The core values of Apple Daily are actually the core values of the people of Hong Kong… (including) rule of law, freedom, pursuit of democracy, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of assembly,' Lai said on the first day of his testimony.
Apple Daily was forced to close in 2021 after police raids and the arrests of its senior editors.
Lai is a British citizen and his son Sebastien reiterated in March calls for the Keir Starmer administration to do more, saying: 'I don't want my father to die in jail.'
Judges have indicated that a verdict could be reached by October. — AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
19 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Raw deal for KL folk under new development rules
NGO Save Kuala Lumpur chairman M Ali called for balanced and sustainable development that will prioritise the primary interests of residents. PETALING JAYA : A Kuala Lumpur NGO has warned that residents stand to lose the most under City Hall's (DBKL) newly introduced planning rules that no longer require mandatory public consultation for some development projects. While DBKL has said that stakeholder consultations would remain for key projects, Save Kuala Lumpur (SKL) chairman M Ali expressed his concern that the new rules would benefit vested commercial interests more than those of residents. M Ali. Ali was responding to reports of the introduction of the Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur Planning Rules 2025 that exempts notification to and consultation with stakeholders for certain projects. The new rules, which are subsidiary legislation of the Federal Territory (Planning) Act 1982, also dispense with environmental, social, and traffic impact assessments. However, DBKL clarified on Wednesday that stakeholder consultations are still mandatory for specific types of developments, including high-density projects or temporary developments. It said developers are still required to engage stakeholders before, during, and after the construction of all developments. This was to 'clearly explain the planned development and the benefits it will bring to the local community', but there was no mention of whether stakeholders could raise concerns or objections. Neither has it been clarified if objections are raised, will developers have to act on them. This lack of clarity has become a major concern for residents. Ali said it would not prevent developers from 'bulldozing' their way through the development process for some projects, thus sidestepping the concerns of residents. 'There seems to be a trend (for the government) to just take care of commercial and business interests. We are not against development, but we want balanced and sustainable development with the primary interests of residents to be given priority,' he told FMT. He said that while residents could take legal action over unwanted developments, it is an expensive process that could take many years. He said many residents' associations in Kuala Lumpur did not possess the funds or legal knowledge to take such a step. 'We have always maintained that there must be engagement with residents. The public hearing must prevail above everything else and there must be public engagement on any development that changes the character of the community,' he said. Charles Tan. SKL secretary Charles Tan, and Peter Leong, policy adviser to the Kuala Lumpur Residents Action for Sustainable Development Association (KLRA+SD), discovered the introduction of the new planning rules 'by chance'. Tan told FMT they came across a public notice on planning changes that was published in a newspaper in July. He said a check on the Federal Gazette website later confirmed the change, which was gazetted on June 13. Tan Booi Charn. KLRA+SD chairman Tan Booi Charn said DBKL officers should act as moderators in engagements between developers and residents. She said that by playing the role of 'referee', the officers could prevent any attempt to raise conflicting information by either party. On the issue of development plans, Tan noted that even when one has been approved, such as the Kuala Lumpur Local Plan 2040 (PTKL 2040), it was still subject to change by the authorities. For instance, she said, the Kampung Bohol flood retention pond was degazetted to make way for a housing project although it was earlier meant to be preserved under the PTKL 2040. 'When a violation (of the PTKL 2040) occurs, especially when it was done by the authorities, how can you say that there is no need for public consultation?' she said. Tan said the new rules would make it difficult for residents to raise queries on the specifications of new building projects, such as building height, density, and traffic flow. She said these specifications could not be amended once a development order for the project had been granted by DBKL. She acknowledged that residents could file a legal challenge within 90 days of the development order being issued. However, it would be more difficult to do so now as planning changes would no longer be publicised for all projects, unlike in the past. 'There are many obstacles (to file legal challenges). Not many communities are like Taman Rimba Kiara. They had good support from their MP and they had to crowdfund to support their legal battle,' she said. Separately, Taman Tun Dr Ismail resident Khairuddin Rahim said civil society members should challenge the new rules in court. 'People must partner with our best legal minds to undo this handover of absolute power to the mayor. For proper governance, all government institutions must operate with check and balance,' he said.
Free Malaysia Today
an hour ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Former newsman subscribes to 10 print newspapers daily
Media consultant and political analyst G Manimaran says many insights, especially detailed reports or archived material, are still best found in print. (Bernama pic) KUALA LUMPUR : We might be in the digital media age, but former journalist and editor G Manimaran still flips through the pages of not one – not two – but 10 newspapers daily. For the past 30 years, the 58-year-old media consultant and political analyst has spent over RM7,000 annually on print publications. Some might consider this excessive but, to him, it is a worthwhile investment in knowledge. 'I don't see it as a waste of money. Some say you can read news online for free, but not everything is available on portals. Many insights, especially detailed reports or archives, are still best found in print,' he told Bernama when met at his home recently. Growing up in Paloh, a small town in Kluang, Johor, Manimaran's hunger for knowledge began early. As a primary school pupil, he would save pocket money to buy a newspaper, then priced at 50 sen – a hefty sum for a child. 'When I worked as a journalist and editor, I would read at least six newspapers a day to keep up with developments and because of the competitive nature of news reporting,' he shared. Today, he subscribes to 10 Bahasa Malaysia, English and Tamil dailies, costing him about RM600 a month, and adds Chinese papers – solely for archival purposes as he does not read Mandarin – during major national events such as general elections or budget announcements. More than just reading material, newspapers are part of his identity and professional toolkit. His home houses a personal library stacked with archived clippings, election reports and books. Even while on vacation, he makes sure to catch up on every paper upon returning. 'I cut and keep clippings of important stories, especially on politics and policy. When I need to refer to something, I don't have to search online as I already have it. This habit has helped me immensely in writing and analysis,' he said. He has started passing on the habit to his 10-year-old daughter, encouraging her to embrace the same reading routine that fuelled his lifelong passion. Manimaran showing articles written by him during his time at Utusan Malaysia. (Bernama pic) Manimaran has written three books, including 'Pilihan Raya Demokrasi Malaysia: Tanding, Pilih, Menang & Tadbir', co-authored with former Election Commission chairman Abdul Rashid Abdul Rahman. It was completed in just three months during the pandemic lockdowns. Three more books are expected in the coming months. His love for news was shaped in his youth watching 'wayang pacak' – outdoor screenings by the information department in the 1970s and 80s that entertained and informed rural communities. That early exposure, coupled with a fascination for current affairs, led him to a communications degree at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, an internship at Bernama, and a journalism career with Utusan Malaysia in 1991. 'Years of reading, archiving and analysing news naturally shaped my path into becoming a media consultant and analyst. It's all connected,' he noted. Manimaran acknowledges the challenges facing print media today but remains optimistic – provided the industry reinvents itself. 'The role of newspapers today should not just be about breaking news, as people get that online instantly. What's needed is value-added content, insightful analyses and exclusives,' he said, likening it to how traditional kopitiam outlets blend familiarity with innovation to survive. 'Maybe someday we will read news on our smartwatches, or newspapers may be printed in A4 format, which I saw in Cambodia in 2006. But the core – credible journalism – must stay,' he concluded.
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
Singapore authorities to review Malaysian tycoon Ong Beng Seng's PR status
SINGAPORE, Aug 16 — Malaysian billionaire Ong Beng Seng's permanent resident (PR) status in Singapore will be reviewed following his conviction and sentencing for abetting obstruction of justice in a case linked to former Transport Minister S. Iswaran, according to local media reports. An Immigration and Checkpoints Authority (ICA) spokesperson told The Straits Times (ST) yesterday that it will review the PR status of Singapore permanent residents who have been convicted of an offence. Ong, 79, was fined the maximum amount of S$30,000 on Friday after he pleaded guilty to the charge on Aug 4. A second charge of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts under Section 165 was taken into consideration for sentencing. Principal District Judge Lee Lit Cheng agreed with both the prosecution and defence that judicial mercy should be exercised in this case due to Ong's ill health. The property tycoon suffers from advanced multiple myeloma, an incurable form of cancer that has damaged his skeletal system and severely compromised his immune system, making him highly vulnerable to life-threatening infections. He also suffers from other complications that further increase his risk of infection and place him at risk of gangrene. — Bernama
