Letters to the Editor: electricity, Gaza and elections
There is a universal belief that us Kiwis are being exploited by the gentailers, including its part-owners, the government, by high electricity prices. A driver of this is constraint of supply.
Why then, when expansion of low-cost electricity is offered, it is opposed by the public?
I am referring to the Helios Energy solar farm proposal between Ranfurly and Naseby. Of 179 community submissions, opposition outnumbered supporters 6 to 1.
Objections included concerns about noise pollution, glint and glare from the panels but focused principally on fire safety and gas emissions if the panel ignited. Locals also lamented the noise and vibrations generated briefly while 10,000 metal stakes were installed.
These factors are vastly eclipsed by the alternative, business as usual, generating 20% of our electricity from burning fossil fuels, which globally are estimated to kill 3-6 million people annually by air pollution and heatwaves.
Photovoltaic electricity is very inexpensive and extremely safe, particularly when the biggest danger, falling off the roof during installation, doesn't apply in this instance.
Our need to decarbonise our electricity supply must not be stymied by Luddites, nimbys and pedants. Vale Jo Millar
A mighty totara has fallen with the death of Jo Millar. Jo was a tireless advocate for her community and particularly the elderly.
She fired up over issues and when she spoke she made sure people listened. Her life was a selfless one of service.
She had fire in her belly and a real need for fairness and better living conditions and lower costs for pensioners. RIP Jo. I will miss you. Beg to disagree
In the strongest possible terms I disagree with Lynne Newall's opinion "that it is not the Dunedin City Council's business to support a party in government backing sanctions against Israel" (Letters ODT 3.7.25)
Ever since the beginning of the genocide in Gaza I have been hoping that our city council would show some moral courage to voice their opinion on the atrocities Israel imposes on Gaza.
Now at last the council breaks their silence and shows some moral leadership. I applaud their decision, I salute them, and hope many more councils follow their example. Appeasement costs
The government was swift and decisive in sanctioning Russia over Ukraine and providing support to Kyiv, but has equivocated shamelessly with endless angry Winston weasel words over the Gaza and West Bank genocide and the illegal attack on Iran by Israel and the US.
Robert Patman ( ODT 14.7.25) is right. This revolting appeasement of Trump will come at a cost. Cowardly equivocation and silence makes our nation complicit in the crimes. Our foreign policy has plumbed new depths. How about a terrier?
Re: the proposed mural, ( ODT , 10.7.25) I very much admire art in all its forms and wish myself that I was gifted in the field. I love the subject proposed but the dog depicted is, I believe, of the wrong breed for Dunedin. With its very much Scottish heritage, I would love to propose tartan and the depiction of black and white Scottish, Westie, or Cairn terrier. Road to council is paved with good intentions
I read Steve Walker's letter ( ODT 18.7.25) with a certain amount of scepticism.
I have no doubt Steve, and indeed all councillors and candidates, are well intentioned fully believing in what they stand for: indeed Steve painted a wonderful campaign picture around it.
Good intentions are not the core issue however, all candidates have them. I believe independents have the freedom to draw from a cross-section of views and beliefs that aren't tied to a central ideology. Let's face it, all parties have something good to offer and an independent can choose from all options to specifically target what is best for our city overall.
Endorsed candidates are somewhat akin to chickens within a fenced run: they can wander a bit but aren't going past the boundaries. There's no free lunch and if candidates aren't toeing the party line the endorsement will inevitably end.
They are tied to party ideology and the bottom line is they stay under that party's umbrella.
The good thing about democracy though is that as voters we can decide which option we support and I encourage all voters to get out and do exactly that come election time.
Address Letters to the Editor to: Otago Daily Times, PO Box 517, 52-56 Lower Stuart St, Dunedin. Email: editor@odt.co.nz
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
13 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Green shoots ahead for party: Swarbrick
After a turbulent beginning to this Parliament, Greens co-leader Chloe Swarbrick tells ODT political editor Mike Houlahan it is only up from here. "Forged in fire, mate," a chipper Chloe Swarbrick says as she summarises the first half of the parliamentary term from a Green Party perspective. And then some. For a start, she is sitting in the ODT offices speaking as her party's co-leader — a role she did not have at the start of the current Parliament, although many expected she would eventually rise to it. However, Ms Swarbrick replacing the now retired James Shaw was the least troublesome of the many travails which have beset the Greens. The sudden death of Fa'anānā Efeso Collins last February was followed soon after by the prolonged and messy expulsion of former MP Darleen Tana. Then her replacement, Benjamin Doyle, was placed under the blowtorch by New Zealand First leader Winston Peters. And last but not least, for much of this Ms Swarbrick was the solo leader of her party; Marama Davidson requiring time off for breast cancer treatment. "That, unfortunately, is part of being in such a snow globe of public pressure, with the spotlights on. It's not unusual to have circumstances in workplaces where things go awry, but you add to that the level of public scrutiny, which is absolutely due," Ms Swarbrick said. "I knew that, sitting around the caucus table, we had a group of people who were dedicated to a cause that was bigger than something that any one of us could create by ourselves, so I always felt like the team was working together and prioritising that bigger picture. "But in terms of the personal reflections on it all, I mean, like, I didn't really intend to be a politician, I protested so hard, I raged against the machine so hard, but I got inside the machine somehow, right? "What I take from that is, yeah, the way that we tend to conceptualise of leadership is, you know, putting somebody at the top of the pecking order and going, 'That person's going to make all the decisions and have all the glory and all the other things', and the responsibility, obviously, is on the flip side of that coin. "But I've always felt really grounded in a team that I know has my back." It is not unusual for the Green Party to feel out of step with its parliamentary colleagues — an accusation the governing parties are happy to widen out to include the entire country. It has felt more stark than usual this term though, as its MPs have been assailed as being luddite opponents of progress for questioning the need for economic growth and the requirement for natural resources to be dug up to fuel it. While many of those attacks have come from National, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon's gentle urging that the Greens back the fast-track legislation are nowhere near as stinging as Mr Peters adorning the Greens' recently released alternative budget with a Soviet-era hammer and sickle or his NZ First colleague Shane Jones' exhortations to the Greens to not worry about moths or Freddy the Frog and push ahead with mining. If there is such a thing as a philosophic debate in the New Zealand Parliament, these two parties are having it. It can even be intellectual listening once the sloganeering is stripped away from it. "What they are saying is pretty boring, and it misses the mark in terms of the real debate that New Zealanders expect of the people who occupy positions of power to be having," Ms Swarbrick said. "That's part of the reason that we are currently all across the country touring the Green budget and talking to people directly about the things that matter to them, as opposed to waiting for it to be mediated, whether that be through the headlines that we manage to grab or otherwise. "Honestly, the experience of sitting in our chamber of Parliament, particularly under the tenor of toxicity that this government is ushered in, is so far removed from the reality that you experience and you talk to with New Zealanders up and down this country when you're actually on the ground and outside of those walls." The building blocks at the foundation of what will be the Green policy platform for the 2026 election are contained within that alternative budget. It is a beguiling document, opening with pledges of free community healthcare and dental treatment, full funding a new Dunedin hospital, publicly funded early childhood education, free school lunches, a guaranteed income for all, climate action, healthy oceans, a resurgent Jobs for Nature scheme, and a green jobs industrial strategy. But then comes the method of paying for it all — essentially making corporations, and those individuals at the apex of the existing progressive tax system, pay more through introducing a wealth tax (a long-standing Greens policy), an extra tax band at the top end, and hiking business tax. Despite Ms Swarbrick's immediate assertion that 91% of New Zealanders would pay less income tax under her party's plan, it is these revenue-gathering methods that stand her party accused of promoting communism. "Yes, the top 3%, the wealthiest 3% in this country, will pay the wealth tax," she said. "But in doing so, that unlocks the resources which are currently being bound up in unproductive uses, i.e., the likes of property speculation. It also addresses some of the unfairness in our tax system, which the 2023 IRD High Wealth Individuals Report showcased, where the wealthiest 311 households pay an effective tax rate less than half of the average New Zealander. "We currently have a situation where half a million New Zealanders are using food banks every single month; 191 New Zealanders, the majority of them of working age, are leaving the country every single day. "We do not arrest that issue with half measures." The next election is about a year away and, unlike some previous electoral cycles, the Greens have cause to be optimistic. The Greens' polling has held relatively steady — from a record election result high of 11.6%, its current average rating across all public polls is 10.4% — and its caucus now has a more settled look about it. Its southern rookie MPs, Scott Willis and Francisco Hernandez, have performed well and are helping to give the Greens a wider geographic representation than in recent years. It is also doing well in the House, thanks in no small part to the work of the impressively forensic Lawrence Xu-Nan. With three electorate seats and 15 MPs, Ms Swarbrick is adamant the Greens have great potential to grow that vote still further. "I think you're seeing the rise of meaningful progressive platforms like, for example, Zohran Mamdani in New York, who has unified people on the basis of material needs being met," she said. "That stuff is winning. That is a winning formula. And that is the formula that we are going to consistently keep rolling out. "We are talking to people about what really matters, not just poking holes and critiquing, but putting forward those productive solutions, but also mobilising people. "We do things a little bit differently and we are a little bit different, and we try and reflect what modern Aotearoa New Zealand looks like. "Hopefully that means that more people can see themselves in that so-called House of Representatives by virtue of us being there."
Otago Daily Times
2 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
‘Enduring' solutions important, councillors say
The Otago Regional Council building on the corner of Broadway and MacLaggan st. PHOTO: ODT FILES Resource management reform should produce "enduring, consistent and stable" solutions, Otago regional councillors say. The Otago Regional Council this week approved wide-ranging submissions on infrastructure and development, the primary sector, and freshwater management ahead of government reforms of the Resource Management Act and the national policy statements and standards that sit under it. Cr Tim Mepham said he was hopeful the council submissions would help to shape the new national directions. "But I definitely have concerns for our environmental management and the future of our freshwater quality. "I'm pretty happy with the comments that have been made in the submission in regards to the need for cross-party agreement because with the political cycles, to-ing and fro-ing, it doesn't create a lot of certainty." Cr Alan Somerville agreed. "Finding some enduring, consistent and stable solution to all this, so there aren't always changes, is very, very important," he said. The submissions demonstrated the value of local government and bringing together a diverse set of views around the council table, chairwoman Cr Gretchen Robertson said. "We listen to each other, just as we have again today and generally, we do come up with solutions that we all agree with — sometimes we don't, though, and that's fine as well." As well as the direct points the submissions made, the submissions made a "broader point" about the value the regional council provided "in partnership with central government and with mana whenua and with our communities", she said. The council submission on infrastructure and development national directions said infrastructure "in particular" needed a stable regulatory environment to drive investment. However, the submission on the primary sector also addressed the "need for enduring solutions". "Without broad political support for the proposals, there is a risk that future governments will reverse this reform, undermining the commitment of communities, industries, agencies and local authorities to plan their future and buy into actions that achieve the desired outcomes." The council supported moves "to better enable quarrying and mining". Its submission on commercial forestry had been drawn up with community concerns in mind, it said. "ORC is aware of the concerns that exist within Otago's communities about the conversion of large tracts of pastoral farmland into commercial forestry and how this may affect Otago's rural communities." The council submission on freshwater management said "three large overhauls" of freshwater policy — in 2014, 2017 and 2020 — "put considerable financial strain on councils and ratepayers and have disrupted planned or ongoing initiatives". The council also said it did not have a consensus view on whether the controversial concept of Te Mana o te Wai should be retained as the fundamental concept underpinning the national direction for freshwater. The council decided to finalise its submission on "going for housing growth" — a reform package designed to free up land for development and remove planning barriers — after staff had spoken to Otago's district and city councils.
Otago Daily Times
2 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
A prescription for dismay, disbelief
Everything is going up. The costs of butter, milk and cheese, fruit and vegetables, rents, rates and electricity are rising, some of them faster than belief. Annual inflation has lifted to 2.7%, according to the consumer price index. There can be no doubt New Zealanders are grappling with the escalating cost of living. The government says it is all about cutting costs for Kiwis, something we have seen with its policies and its energetic drive to cut the public service and put thousands of skilled workers out of jobs. However, despite its much-vaunted approach to trim things, some of which didn't need much pruning, the coalition is still releasing big pots of money for projects which have its favour and tickle its fancy, or the fancies of its cadres. As a consequence of that favouritism, something else is going up. Advice be blowed, let's have a third medical school in New Zealand at a time when the government has been doing everything it can to minimise the importance of, and squeeze the life out of, Dunedin's desperately needed new hospital. Until Monday afternoon's announcement that the University of Waikato's persistent and somewhat personal bid for a medical school had been approved, there had been perhaps a hope that surely common sense might prevail and the government wouldn't, after all, go along with the proposal. Such sanguine thinking, however, was always held in check by the knowledge that this government has already shown several times that logic, facts and evidence to the contrary will not stop it supporting something which it is hell-bent on delivering for its followers. At the heart of Waikato's proposal was something few could disagree with — that the country urgently needs to do something about the state and delivery of rural healthcare. Access to timely and effective medical services for those communities has been a big concern for many years, one which has only continued to grow. But does it take a spanking new medical school costing several hundred million dollars, and growing, to ensure rural targets will be met? No. There is no reason why the medical schools at the University of Otago and the University of Auckland could not have been funded to train more doctors at a significantly lower cost than launching a new school, a point they clearly made to the government. Even the Treasury advised against the wisdom of proceeding with this pet project, as did the Ministry of Education and the Tertiary Education Commission, warning that the expense, the duplication and the logistical challenges raised red flags for them. In spite of that, the government and Waikato University forged on regardless. Health Minister Simeon Brown announced a development with costs which have changed significantly from those pledged by the National Party before the last election. Then, National said it would provide $280 million for the new school and the university would need to find $100m. Now, the government will disburse $82.85m towards it, and Waikato will have to stump up more than $150m. The final cost, of course, is bound to be higher than current expectations. A lot has been written about links between National and the university and its vice-chancellor Neil Quigley, and also with consultant Steven Joyce, a former National government minister. Without getting too deeply into that, we are concerned that this is little more than an overt example of pork-barrel politics. We are also troubled and disappointed, yet again, at the lack of transparency around the government's decision-making, particularly over health matters. Whenever it makes pronouncements which it knows are likely to be contentious, the accompanying documents seem to take ages to surface — if they ever do. That in itself probably speaks volumes about the consideration of the evidence. It's difficult to stay calm and reasoned and attempt to rise above the feeling this government cares not a jot for the South. When one sees what a charmed life this Waikato proposal has apparently had through the coalition's approval process, and compare that with the absolute shambles it has promulgated with the new Dunedin hospital and its obvious level of disinterest in the project, it is hard to remain philosophical. Once again, this government has let us down.
