How Paychecks of the Lower Middle Class Would Look in Each State If Trump Ended Federal Income Tax
While there could be a number of benefits for many Americans if federal income taxes ended, it remains to be seen whether Trump's tariffs could be successful enough to facilitate such a radical change to America's tax structure.
Check Out:
Also See:
Still, if Trump were able to pull this off, one of the many changes Americans would experience would be higher paychecks. It's an idea that GOBankingRates has explored regarding the paychecks of the upper-middle class, as well as the median paycheck in each and every state.
Here, GOBankingRates analyzes how paychecks for the lower-middle class would be impacted in each state if President Trump were to abolish the federal income tax.
Median income: $55,135
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $1,681
Tax burden: 20.7%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $2,022
Tax burden: 4.7%
Learn More:
Find Out:
Median income: $79,409
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $2,462
Tax burden: 19.4%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $3,054
Tax burden: 0.0%
Also See:
Median income: $68,330
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $2,111
Tax burden: 19.7%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $2,576
Tax burden: 2.0%
Median income: $52,242
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $1,611
Tax burden: 19.8%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $1,930
Tax burden: 4.0%
Median income: $85,630
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $2,472
Tax burden: 24.9%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $3,135
Tax burden: 4.8%
Median income: $82,195
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $2,424
Tax burden: 23.3%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $3,048
Tax burden: 3.6%
Median income: $83,342
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $2,454
Tax burden: 23.5%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $3,091
Tax burden: 3.6%
Read More:
Median income: $73,648
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $2,167
Tax burden: 23.5%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $2,693
Tax burden: 4.9%
Median income: $63,743
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $2,039
Tax burden: 16.9%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $2,452
Tax burden: 0.0%
Median income: $66,368
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $1,995
Tax burden: 21.9%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $2,438
Tax burden: 4.5%
Median income: $87,392
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $2,437
Tax burden: 27.5%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $3,120
Tax burden: 7.2%
Median income: $66,343
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $2,003
Tax burden: 21.5%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $2,446
Tax burden: 4.1%
Discover More:
Median income: $72,624
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $2,141
Tax burden: 23.4%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $2,655
Tax burden: 5.0%
Median income: $62,267
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $1,926
Tax burden: 19.6%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $2,322
Tax burden: 3.1%
Median income: $65,019
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $1,942
Tax burden: 22.3%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $2,370
Tax burden: 5.2%
Median income: $64,568
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $1,945
Tax burden: 21.7%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $2,367
Tax burden: 4.7%
Median income: $55,481
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $1,710
Tax burden: 19.8%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $2,053
Tax burden: 3.8%
Also Read:
Median income: $53,353
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $1,660
Tax burden: 19.1%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $1,987
Tax burden: 3.2%
Median income: $63,798
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $1,922
Tax burden: 21.7%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $2,336
Tax burden: 4.8%
Median income: $90,357
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $2,396
Tax burden: 25.2%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $3,317
Tax burden: 4.6%
Median income: $90,080
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $2,373
Tax burden: 25.6%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $3,291
Tax burden: 5.0%
Median income: $63,243
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $1,922
Tax burden: 21%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $2,329
Tax burden: 4.3%
Explore More:
Median income: $77,827
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $2,272
Tax burden: 24.1%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $2,846
Tax burden: 4.9%
Median income: $48,813
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $1,519
Tax burden: 19.1%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $1,811
Tax burden: 3.5%
Median income: $61,262
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $1,890
Tax burden: 19.8%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $2,277
Tax burden: 3.4%
Median income: $62,152
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $1,897
Tax burden: 20.6%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $2,292
Tax burden: 4.1%
Median income: $66,653
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $2,011
Tax burden: 21.6%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $2,457
Tax burden: 4.2%
Find More:
Median income: $67,165
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $2,131
Tax burden: 17.5%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $2,583
Tax burden: 0.0%
Median income: $85,002
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $2,614
Tax burden: 20.1%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $3,269
Tax burden: 0.0%
Median income: $89,822
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $2,400
Tax burden: 24.6%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $3,316
Tax burden: 4.0%
Median income: $55,222
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $1,717
Tax burden: 19.2%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $2,058
Tax burden: 3.1%
Median income: $75,180
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $2,212
Tax burden: 23.5%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $2,756
Tax burden: 4.7%
Good Question:
Median income: $62,136
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $1,910
Tax burden: 20.1%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $2,304
Tax burden: 3.6%
Median income: $67,510
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $2,134
Tax burden: 17.8%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $2,590
Tax burden: 0.2%
Median income: $61,937
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $1,952
Tax burden: 18.1%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $2,344
Tax burden:1.6%
Median income: $56,536
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $1,739
Tax burden: 20.0%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $2,090
Tax burden: 3.9%
Median income: $71,489
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $2,028
Tax burden: 26.2%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $2,530
Tax burden: 8.0%
Median income: $67,627
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $2,064
Tax burden: 20.7%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $2,521
Tax burden: 3.1%
Trending Now:
Median income: $76,775
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $2,296
Tax burden: 22.3%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $2,857
Tax burden: 3.2%
Median income: $59,393
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $1,828
Tax burden: 20.0%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $2,201
Tax burden: 3.7%
Median income: $64,374
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $2,056
Tax burden: 17.0%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $2,476
Tax burden: 0.0%
Median income: $59,641
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $1,919
Tax burden: 16.3%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $2,294
Tax burden: 0.0%
Also Discover:
Median income: $67,815
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $2,149
Tax burden: 17.6%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $2,608
Tax burden: 0.0%
Median income: $81,555
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $2,376
Tax burden: 24.3%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $2,992
Tax burden: 4.6%
Median income: $69,354
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $2,089
Tax burden: 21.7%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $2,566
Tax burden: 3.8%
Median income: $80,865
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $2,351
Tax burden: 24.4%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $2,959
Tax burden: 4.9%
Find More:
Median income: $84,401
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $2,598
Tax burden: 20.0%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $3,246
Tax burden: 0.0%
Median income: $51,481
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $1,599
Tax burden: 19.3%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $1,912
Tax burden: 3.5%
Median income: $67,262
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $2,039
Tax burden: 21.2%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $2,492
Tax burden: 3.7%
Median income: $66,502
Average bi-weekly paycheck with federal income tax: $2,113
Tax burden: 17.4%
Bi-weekly paycheck without federal income tax: $2,558
Tax burden: 0.0%
Methodology: To generate the income tax for every state, GOBankingRates first found lower middle class median income based on 2023 American Community Survey median household figures. Income tax estimates were created by using an in-house calculator for a single taxpayer and using the standard deduction (with 2024 tax brackets). GOBankingRates found each state's (1) total annual income taxes paid; (2) total income tax burden; (3) amount taken out of bi-weekly paycheck; and (4) bi-weekly paycheck amount. GOBankingRates then took these figures and removed the federal income taxes (including FICA) to see what lower-middle-class paychecks would look like by state without federal income taxes. All data was collected on and is up to date as of April 15, 2025.
More From GOBankingRates
5 Types of Vehicles Retirees Should Stay Away From Buying
How Far $750K Plus Social Security Goes in Retirement in Every US Region
4 Things You Should Do if You Want To Retire Early
12 SUVs With the Most Reliable Engines
This article originally appeared on GOBankingRates.com: How Paychecks of the Lower Middle Class Would Look in Each State If Trump Ended Federal Income Tax
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
State of Freight for August: Market outlook remains murky
FreightWaves' State of Freight webinar painted a picture of an industry stuck in neutral as summer draws to a close. Founder and CEO Craig Fuller and Head of Freight Market Intelligence Zach Strickland described a market plagued by soft demand, economic uncertainty, and stubborn structural challenges. Here are five key takeaways: Freight demand remains historically weak Strickland noted that national truckload volumes are down 14% to 15% year-over-year, with demand even lower than 2019. 'A lot of the people I talked to in the shipping community, they're still dealing with some levels of uncertainty, not just from their procurement strategies for the raw inputs and things in the goods economy, but also from their consumers in the downstream, because there's still some level of, 'We don't know where this economy is going,'' Strickland said. Despite seasonal catalysts like back-to-school and hurricane season, volumes show little sign of rebound. 'It has not been the freight market that we hoped for. That's the freight market we've got,' Fuller said. Consumer spending shifts are reshaping freight flows Retailers with strong grocery and staples sales are holding up, while discretionary goods are faltering, Fuller said. 'If you're in a big-box retailer with groceries, you're probably doing okay. But when you get into discretionary spending items, that's where the challenge is,' Fuller said. 'Restaurant failures and weak housing turnover are adding more pressure.' Housing and autos remain critical weak spots Both sectors, which drive a large share of freight, continue to struggle. Fuller estimated that as much as 20% of trucking freight is tied to housing. Without a housing recovery, 'it's hard to believe that a freight market would come back,' he said. Automakers are also showing signs of stress, particularly in the electric vehicle segment. 'One of the core theses of the Biden administration was that electric vehicles should replace internal combustion engines. And a lot of Biden's infrastructure bill — the core thesis of that was decarbonization and electrification of the auto and power sector. That is no longer a core. It is obvious that that has changed,' Fuller said. 'The Trump administration is far more focused on moving back towards a multi-platform energy process.' Carrier capacity is shrinking, but not enough to spark a recovery Tender rejection rates are higher than 2019, not because of rising freight volumes, but due to carriers exiting the market. 'The outbound tender rejection index is actually up year over year. And it's significantly higher than it was in 2019, where we were covering right under 4% at this point in 2019,' Strickland said. Strickland said more carriers exiting the market through closures and bankruptcies has helped increase tender rejection rates across the country. 'We're going to continue to see bankruptcies,' Strickland said, pointing to the recent Carroll Fulmer collapse. Fuller added that the industry is in a 'range-bound' cycle where volumes and rates remain stuck. Uncertainty dominates business decisions Executives across sectors are pulling back on investment, delaying hiring, and prioritizing cost-cutting. 'It's the uncertainty element. And hiring people — when you don't know where things are headed, your natural inclination is to do nothing,' Fuller said. 'Once you resolve that things might get worse, you then resolve yourself to actually shrink, whether we're talking human capital or investments. That's what I think businesses have been doing for the last couple of quarters. That's why earnings look so great, because they're generating a lot of revenue and yet their costs are being turned out. What they're actually doing is they are sacrificing growth in the future by cutting back.' The post State of Freight for August: Market outlook remains murky appeared first on FreightWaves.
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Vance leans into DC crime fight in Georgia
Vice President JD Vance on Thursday took the White House's fiery crime crackdown on the road, casting another Black-led city in apocalyptic terms on a trip that was designed to tout tax cuts and other administration policies. Vance was in Peachtree City, Georgia, a purple Atlanta suburb, to sell the White House's One Big Beautiful Bill — since rebranded the Working Families Tax Cut — as a win for the working-class. Speaking from a refrigeration equipment manufacturer whose products end up in Chick-fil-A restaurants, the vice president extolled the GOP's marquee legislation for slashing taxes on tips and overtime and bolstering American manufacturing — the same messaging he's used during similar events this summer at a machine shop in Pennsylvania and a steel facility in Ohio, but now with a new name. But in the firehose of President Donald Trump's Washington, the megalaw — which Trump signed on July 4 — was no longer the story of the summer. Attention has since shifted to Trump's takeover of Washington, which the president celebrated by visiting National Guard troops and federal officers the same day his vice president was in Georgia. Vance decided to lean in. 'I want you to be able to go shopping, or go and get a nice meal with your family, without the fear that you're going to get mugged or even worse because you had the audacity to take your family out for a day in one of our great American cities,' Vance said. Trump and Vance have long described the country's urban centers — which tend to be deeply Democratic and ethnically diverse — as sites of danger, deviance and decay. Trump has referred to New York City, Los Angeles and Chicago — America's three most populous cities — as 'warzones.' And last week, when the president announced his crackdown on Washington, he put Baltimore, Maryland, and Oakland, California, on notice, saying 'they're so far gone.' 'We're not going to lose our cities over this,' Trump said. 'And this will go further. We're starting very strongly with D.C.' On Thursday, in Peachtree City, about 30 miles outside Atlanta, Vance painted the southern city as a place where families cower in fear of criminals and 'cross the street' to 'avoid a crazy person yelling.' 'Those are your streets, paid for with your tax dollars, and you ought to be able to use them like any other citizen of this country,' Vance said. The vice president acknowledged that the administration has focused on Washington because of Trump's unique power over it as a federal city, but said, 'We certainly hope, whether it's Atlanta or anywhere else, people are gonna look around and say, 'We don't have to live like this.'' Critics say Trump and Vance's rhetoric about urban crime has racial undertones, and the six cities he named explicitly in his news conference last week are led by Black mayors. But the White House is attempting to defend its position by slamming detractors for being white. When Vance, alongside Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and top White House aide Stephen Miller, were heckled by protesters Wednesday in Union Station, the vice president said they were 'old, primarily white people' who have 'never felt danger in their entire lives.' Vance continued that tactic Thursday. Bashing the racial justice protests in 2020, which led to major anti-police sentiment in the Democratic Party, Vance said it was 'disproportionately Black Atlantans who suffer the most from high violent crime.' Asked about the historical pain associated with homeless people who were swept off Atlanta's streets in preparation for the 1996 Summer Olympics, Vance first reminded the local reporter that he had been 12 years old at the time. 'I was worried about football and fishing,' he said. But, the vice president added, 'the question betrays the question of what we're trying to do, and what is the nature of true compassion.' 'Why have we convinced ourselves that it's compassionate to allow a person who's obviously a schizophrenic or suffering from some other mental illness, why is it compassionate to let that person fester in the streets?' he said. The 'compassionate thing to do,' Vance continued, was to 'get them in treatment, not to let them sit on the streets and yell at our people while they're walking by.' The vice president has spoken before about compassion in policy. He argued in January that 'your compassion belongs first to your fellow citizens,' citing an ancient Catholic concept called ordo amoris. The late Pope Francis later took issue with Vance's understanding of the concept in an unusual public rebuke of the Trump administration's immigration crackdown. Vance on Thursday appeared to blend his conception of compassion, passion for nativism and suggestion that people with generational roots in the country have a greater claim over its privileges of citizenship to sell a greater crime crackdown. 'This country was built by your grandparents, by your parents, by your forebearers — you ought to have the right to live a good life in this country,' he said. He added: 'The people who built Atlanta did not build it so that you would not be able to walk down the streets of Atlanta safely at night. They built it so you could enjoy it.'
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
State DFL strips Omar Fateh of Minneapolis DFL endorsement
The Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party has revoked the Minneapolis DFL's endorsement of mayoral candidate and state senator Omar Fateh, who is challenging Mayor Jacob Frey in this year's election. Fateh, a democratic socialist, won the endorsement on July 19 at a Minneapolis DFL convention marked by difficulties and delays with the party's electronic voting system. A review by the state party found that those flaws with the voting system warranted nullifying the convention's results. Frey, a Democrat, filed a complaint about the voting process at the convention, and the state party decided to review the process. His campaign claimed only 578 votes were counted on the first mayoral ballot, even though there were more than 1,000 delegates and alternates present. 'After a thoughtful and transparent review of the challenges, the Constitution, Bylaws & Rules Committee found substantial failures in the Minneapolis Convention's voting process on July 19th, including an acknowledgement that a mayoral candidate was errantly eliminated from contention,' Minnesota DFL Chair Richard Carlbom said in an announcement of the decision. Complaints about the process included allegations that the electronic voting system was flawed, leading to candidates getting dropped from the ballot early in the process, even though they likely had enough votes to remain, according to the review. The DFL found the convention failed to count 176 votes, which resulted in candidate DeWayne Davis' removal from the ballot in the first round of voting, even though he had above the minimum 20% support needed to move forward. After an evening of difficulties with the electronic voting system, the convention suspended its rules and voted by a show of hands. A draft report from the state DFL's rules committee, set to be released in full later this week, also found that the Minneapolis DFL didn't secure its delegate credential spreadsheets, allowing them to be accessed by campaigns. They also lost the entire Ward 5 credentials book, meaning delegates have to reestablish their status, the report said. As part of the state party committee decision, the Minneapolis DFL is barred from holding another mayoral endorsement convention in 2025 and won't be able to endorse a candidate through its central committee. The state party also placed the city party on probation for two years and ordered it to submit an improvement plan. In response to the decision, Fateh accused the DFL of 'insider games' and 'backroom decisions.' '28 party insiders met privately and voted to overturn our endorsement,' Fateh said in a post on BlueSky. 'Let me be clear, we're still in this fight. And we're going to win.' Frey praised the decision in a statement. 'I am proud to be a member of a party that believes in correcting our mistakes, and I am glad this inaccurate and obviously flawed process was set aside,' he said. 'I look forward to having a full and honest debate with Senator Fateh about our city's future.' Election Day is Nov. 5. Related Articles St. Paul man pleads guilty in 100 mph deadly crash off I-94 in Minneapolis Man fatally shot in St. Paul ID'd as 26-year-old from Minneapolis MN Rep. Cedrick Frazier announces campaign for Hennepin County attorney Minneapolis man charged with shooting gun inside St. Anthony Cub store Pohlads end search for Twins buyer, will add limited partners Play Farm Merge Valley
