
Fusion emerges, boosted by Big Tech
Helion Energy, a startup partnering with Microsoft, has started construction on a fusion power reactor, joining the race to complete the country's first. It's planning to deliver energy to Microsoft data centers within three years.
That timeline may be ambitious for a long-hyped technology, but a breakthrough would be significant, write Peter Behr and Christa Marshall. Fusion mimics the energy generation of stars and could produce massive amounts of power on demand without greenhouse gas emissions.
It's the latest sign of how Big Tech's deep pockets are reshaping energy technology.
Microsoft is working with Constellation Energy to reopen Three Mile Island, the nuclear power plant in Pennsylvania (that's fission, not fusion). Amazon has said it plans to deploy 5 gigawatts of small modular reactors by 2040, while Meta, Oracle, OpenAI, Google and Amazon have also made investments in advanced nuclear.
Support from Google has helped geothermal startup Fervo bring commercial pilot projects online.
Google has also committed to purchasing power from Commonwealth Fusion Systems' planned commercial fusion plant in Virginia. At an energy conference in March, Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin (R) talked up the announcement, saying fusion 'changes the whole game' in the race to unleash more power.
Reality Check
Helion's planned project in Malaga, Washington, is expected to produce at least 50 megawatts of electricity, enough to power more than 17,000 homes.
Here's the grain of salt (really a heaping spoonful): Fusion energy has been hyped for decades but scientists have not reliably been able to generate more energy than it takes to create the initial reaction.
Scientists reached by Peter and Christa are skeptical of Helion's timeline, with one saying they are still 'decades away' from competing with a conventional nuclear or natural gas plant.
But the money is there. The Fusion Industry Association says Helion is one of three developers with at least $1 billion in investments, with global investments topping $9.7 billion.
In part, that's because of the tech industry's unique needs. In the U.S. alone, the electricity needs from data centers could triple between 2023 and 2028, according to a 2024 federal study. An analysis this week from S&P Global found that the tech and web services sector accounts for a whopping 68 percent of the corporate clean energy market because of its 'unmatched combination of aggressive clean energy goals and unrivaled energy demand growth.'
Whether that boom continues after the Republican megalaw — which phases out many clean energy tax incentives — remains to be seen. And Trump's cuts may even be coming for fusion: the administration's budget proposal would reduce federal research into the technology, despite recent breakthroughs at federal labs that could bring the energy to reality.
It's Thursday — thank you for tuning in to POLITICO's Power Switch. I'm your host, Jason Plautz. Power Switch is brought to you by the journalists behind E&E News and POLITICO Energy. Send your tips, comments, questions to jplautz@eenews.net.
Today in POLITICO Energy's podcast: Ben Lefebvre breaks down the EU's massive energy deal that was part of its trade agreement with the U.S.
Power Centers
EPA axes researchThe Environmental Protection Agency's piecemeal dismemberment of its science initiatives is gathering steam, stoking fears over scientific independence, writes Sean Reilly.
EPA has already axed many grant-funded projects midstream, on the grounds that they no longer mesh with administration priorities. Now it plans to dissolve the Office of Research and Development, which supporters and former officials describe as an irreplaceable engine of innovation in fields like chemical safety and the risks posed by pollution exposure.
'It is heartbreaking to see what's being proposed and the actions that are being taken,' said Jennifer Orme-Zavaleta, who served as a top ORD career staffer before retiring in 2021. 'It's really putting American lives at risk.'
The Trump threat to American gasThere are fears in Europe that the continent's energy alliance with the U.S. could be shattered if Trump offers concessions to Russian President Vladimir Putin to end the war in Ukraine, write Karl Mathiesen, Zack Colman, Gabriel Gavin, Ben Lefebvre and Hanne Cokelaere.
U.S. exports of liquefied natural gas to Europe allowed countries to swap out Russian gas after the war started. They're committing to buy more of it now as part of trade deals with the U.S. to avoid tariffs. But it would be difficult to ignore cheaper Russian gas if it were to flow again because of any deals to end the war.
'The one thing that would derail the spectacular growth of the U.S. [LNG] industry is the reopening of flows from Russia. There's no question about that,' said Geoffrey Pyatt, a former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine and energy official for former President Joe Biden.
Wright's climate contrariansThe Department of Energy is reframing long-established climate science as a debate, with the help of five researchers who have spent years questioning climate change, Scott Waldman and Benjamin Storrow write.
The agency released a climate report Tuesday to support the Trump administration's push to roll back greenhouse gas regulations. Energy Secretary Chris Wright said on Fox News that the report was meant to push back on the 'cancel culture Orwellian squelching of science.'
Some of the report's assertions have been debunked for years, however, and multiple scientists said their work was misrepresented.
In Other News
New fear unlocked: DOE has reported the discovery of a radioactive wasp nest at a facility once involved in the production of parts for nuclear weapons.
How it happened: China has become the leading seller of electric vehicles, solar panels and lithium-ion batteries — all invented in the U.S. — thanks to government policies and incentives.
Subscriber Zone
A showcase of some of our best subscriber content.
Renewable energy is set to overtake coal at the top source of electricity globally by the end of next year, according to the International Energy Agency.
Trump nominated Ho Nieh, the vice president of regulatory affairs at Southern Nuclear, to serve on the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
A Trump administration official tasked with overhauling the Interior Department's budget and staffing is getting ready to leave the agency, raising questions about who will take over the reorganization.
That's it for today, folks! Thanks for reading.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Exclusive-SK Hynix expects AI memory market to grow 30% a year to 2030
By Heekyong Yang and Max A. Cherney SEOUL/SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) -South Korea's SK Hynix forecasts that the market for a specialized form of memory chip designed for artificial intelligence will grow 30% a year until 2030, a senior executive said in an interview with Reuters. The upbeat projection for global growth in high-bandwidth memory (HBM) for use in AI brushes off concern over rising price pressures in a sector that for decades has been treated like commodities such as oil or coal. "AI demand from the end user is pretty much, very firm and strong," said SK Hynix's Choi Joon-yong, the head of HBM business planning at SK Hynix. The billions of dollars in AI capital spending that cloud computing companies such as Amazon, Microsoft and Alphabet's Google are projecting will likely be revised upwards in the future, which would be "positive" for the HBM market, Choi said. The relationship between AI build-outs and HBM purchases is "very straightforward" and there is a correlation between the two, Choi said. SK Hynix's projections are conservative and include constraints such as available energy, he said. But the memory business is undergoing a significant strategic change during this period as well. HBM - a type of dynamic random access memory or DRAM standard first produced in 2013 - involves stacking chips vertically to save space and reduce power consumption, helping to process the large volumes of data generated by complex AI applications. SK Hynix expects this market for custom HBM to grow to tens of billions of dollars by 2030, Choi said. Due to technological changes in the way SK Hynix and rivals such as Micron Technology and Samsung Electronics build next-generation HBM4, their products include a customer-specific logic die, or "base die", that helps manage the memory. That means it is no longer possible to easily replace a rival's memory product with a nearly identical chip or product. Part of SK Hynix's optimism for future HBM market growth includes the likelihood that customers will want even further customisation than what SK Hynix already does, Choi said. At the moment it is mostly larger customers such as Nvidia that receive individual customisation, while smaller clients get a traditional one-size-fits-all approach. "Each customer has different taste," Choi said, adding that some want specific performance or power characteristics. SK Hynix is currently the main HBM supplier to Nvidia, although Samsung and Micron supply it with smaller volumes. Last week, Samsung cautioned during its earnings conference call that current generation HBM3E supply would likely outpace demand growth in the near term, a shift that could weigh on prices. "We are confident to provide, to make the right competitive product to the customers," Choi said. 100% TARIFFS U.S. President Donald Trump on Wednesday said the United States would impose a tariff of about 100% on semiconductor chips imported from countries not producing in America or planning to do so. Choi declined to comment on the tariffs. Trump told reporters in the Oval Office the new tariff rate would apply to "all chips and semiconductors coming into the United States," but would not apply to companies that were already manufacturing in the United States or had made a commitment to do so. Trump's comments were not a formal tariff announcement, and the president offered no further specifics. South Korea's top trade envoy Yeo Han-koo said on Thursday that Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix would not be subject to the 100% tariffs on chips if they were implemented. Samsung has invested in two chip fabrication plants in Austin and Taylor, Texas, and SK Hynix has announced plans to build an advanced chip packaging plant and an artificial intelligence research and development facility in Indiana. South Korea's chip exports to the United States were valued at $10.7 billion last year, accounting for 7.5% of its total chip exports. Some HBM chips are exported to Taiwan for packaging, accounting for 18% of South Korea's chip exports in 2024, a 127% increase from the previous year.


Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Latest Price Leaks Reveals Aggressive Pixel 10 Pro Pricing
Google will be holding its next 'Made By Google' event on August 20, where the Pixel 10 and Pixel 10 Pro smartphones will be launched. Not only will Google bring the latest hardware to the public, but it will also aggressively price the Pixel smartphones to gain market share in both retail sales and the critical AI services space. Pixel 10 Pro Pricing Stays Steady The latest information from retailers around the world, including Europe, the US and Canada, is that Google will retain the same pricing structure as the Pixel 9 family. This means the Pixel 10 will start at $799 for the 128 GB model, the Pixel 10 Pro starts at $999, the Pixel 10 Pro XL at $1,199 for 256 GB and the Pixel 10 Pro Fold at $1,799 for 256 GB. Pixel 10 Pro vs iPhone 17 Pro The obvious competition will be Apple's iPhone. Due to launch in the second week of September, the upcoming iPhone 17 and iPhone 17 Pro smartphones are expected to see a $50 increase across the board, pushing up the perceived price point. Apple is balancing this out by bumping up the base storage from 128 GB to 256 GB, but it's going to need someone carefully looking through the spec sheets to spot that little bonus. Google is taking a similar approach to Apple, with one model in the range. While the Pixel 9 Pro XL offered a 128 GB option, the Pixel 10 Pro XL will start with a 256 GB model. This matches the 256 GB Pixel 9 Pro XL, but it is another perceived price rise; even if it does give Google a smooth price ladder of $799 to $999 to $1,199 with the candybar phones. The Pixel 10 Pro Fold does break this, but Tech Radar reports on a potential delay to Google's third foldable, which leaves the three regular phones to represent the portfolio. Pixel 10 Pro's Gemini Boost One clear advantage that Google has over Apple is the robustness of AI on the Android platform. While Apple has struggled to bring the awkwardly backronymed Apple Intelligence to meet user expectations, Android manufacturers have tapped into the base offering from Google and then augmented the offering with their own. Google will update many of its own Android apps with new AI routines and features, which will push the Pixel family ahead of Apple and likely remain in the lead when iOS 26 and the iPhone 17 family reach consumers. It will be interesting to see just how much value-add Google will offer with the Pixel family. In previous years, the company bundled trial periods of the highest Google AI subscription plans with each handset. The Pixel family will keep the price low while offering more from the latest software, as the competition moves in the opposite direction. It's an aggressive move, but with Apple showing an atypical weakness in the iOS platform, the time is right for Google to press its advanage. Now read the latest Pixel 10 Pro, Samsung Galaxy S, and smartphone headlines in Forbes' weekly Android news digest...

Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Big Tech's next major political battle may already be brewing in your backyard
The next major political fight over Big Tech has been brewing for years in the backyards of northern Virginia. Now the debate over data centers is poised to go national. The push by companies like OpenAI and Google to win the artificial intelligence race has led to a proliferation of data centers — giant warehouses for computer systems — in communities across all 50 states. The rise of these server farms has sparked fierce battles from the Virginia suburbs to Tucson, Arizona, and beyond, as city and county governments grapple with how to balance job creation and new revenue streams against the strain data centers put on water and energy resources. That debate is inching up the ballot as state lawmakers race to regulate a nascent industry, governors rush to embrace a new economic boon and Big Tech makes major investments in AI growth. Even as data centers are ready to explode on the national scene, the politics around them don't cut neatly across party lines. The sites sit at the intersection of a typically partisan divide between pro-business interests and organized labor. Efforts to regulate data centers in Virginia's Legislature have drawn bipartisan backing, though they've been largely unsuccessful because of concerns about local control and excessive bureaucracy. And some Democratic officials appear as eager as their Republican counterparts to attract data centers to help bolster their states' economies. 'Every governor — Democrat or Republican — is going to want economic development. I think the question is always at what cost — and that's where you see some of the political rubber meeting the road in terms of cost of energy bills, whether Big Tech's paying its fair share,' Virginia-based Democratic strategist Jared Leopold said. But, he added, 'it is so nascent that there isn't a standard Democratic-versus-Republican playbook for dealing with data centers yet." Tech companies like Amazon and Microsoft are counting on data centers to power their AI expansions — and the U.S. already has more of these facilities than any other country. President Donald Trump has vowed to 'win the AI race,' moving to implement a Biden-era executive order to build the facilities on federal lands and announcing a $500 billion AI and data center sprint with large tech companies known as Stargate, with a site underway in Texas. But the surge is proving polarizing, particularly in northern Virginia — considered the tip of the spear on this issue with the world's largest and fastest-growing data center market. The Energy Department is projecting data centers will require up to nearly three times as much energy by 2028, raising fears that the tech sector will turn to polluting sources like coal and natural gas in their rush for power. The data center industry is expected to contribute $9.1 billion in gross domestic product to Virginia's economy annually. In Loudoun County, Virginia, that has meant a $250 million budget surplus and a property tax cut. That's a prospect that's hard to ignore for counties with Big Tech knocking on their doors. 'We don't know where to put the money,' said Democrat Juli Briskman, who sits on the county board of supervisors. But the typical residential ratepayer in that state could experience a $14 to $37 monthly electric bill increase by 2040, according to a report from Virginia's Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission, in part because of the need for infrastructure upgrades whose costs could be spread to all customers. 'Enough is enough,' said Loudoun County Vice Chair Michael Turner, also a Democrat, who is largely opposing new data centers. 'The next election for supervisor will hinge on data centers,' adding that two weeks don't go by where he doesn't hear from other county officials around the country looking for advice. In Arizona, Tucson's city council just unanimously voted against a massive data center proposal from Amazon that promised jobs and millions in tax revenue but stoked fears about its water and energy consumption. In other cases, public officials of both parties are rushing to capitalize on the promises of AI — and the tax dollars it can bring in. John Chambers, a spokesperson for Rep. Mike Carey (R-Ohio), said in a statement he attributes the Columbus area's growth to 'tech jobs and data centers that will help America win the AI innovation race' and that he supports 'an all-of-the-above energy strategy to ensure electricity is affordable and available for families and businesses in the region.' Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, who's seeking a third term as governor and is considered a potential Democratic presidential contender in 2028, is looking to lure data centers to his state so as not to miss out on the boom. And down south, De'Keither Stamps, a Democratic member of Mississippi's Public Services Commission, said data centers could bring positive economic development and the opportunity to finance needed electrical system upgrades 'if regulated prudently.' Not everyone is on board. Ben Inskeep, program director at Indiana-based Citizens Action Coalition, a consumer and environmental advocacy group, sees the issue is up for grabs and at an inflection point as grassroots opposition takes shape. 'Both our political parties have been completely captured by Big Tech and are doing the bidding of Big Tech in every way imaginable,' he said. 'This does have all the hallmarks of an issue that could create new, interesting political coalitions.' In the Virginia Legislature, efforts to put guardrails around the rapid expansion of data centers — such as assessing who's footing the energy bills for them — drew bipartisan support even as they failed. Youngkin, the Republican governor, vetoed a bipartisan bill that would have required data-center applications complete site assessments because he said he didn't want to create 'unnecessary red tape.' Still, 'It's less partisan than most issues. It's more geographic,' said Virginia state Del. Ian Lovejoy, a Republican from Prince William County who unsuccessfully pushed a bill last session to put land buffers between data centers and parks, schools and residential areas. 'So if you're in an area that is negatively affected by them, then it crosses party lines. And if you're not in an area that's really affected by them, neither party really cares that much, because broadly speaking, on the right side of the aisle you have the pro-business desire to build, and on the left side of the aisle, you have the labor movement, where unions really like these data centers because it's jobs.' Now, Lovejoy expects state Democrats to loosen fossil fuel restrictions baked into the state's Clean Economy Act in response to the energy crunch. Industry efforts to advance data centers have also been targeted at both parties. The nearly quarter of a million dollars the Data Center Coalition has poured into state legislative campaigns in Virginia have been split across the aisle. The group has spent nearly the same amount on federal lobbying and is active in states like California, where it spent $50,000 so far this year. Other players in the sector are targeting northern Virginia officials, too. 'Data centers enjoy bipartisan support across states, but we have also heard our fair share of bipartisan concerns across states,' said Dan Diorio, vice president of state policy at the Data Center Coalition, an industry group. 'We are very much an engaged stakeholder in all the states in which our members are active in to work on policies with lawmakers of both sides of the aisle to ensure that states continue to see the economic benefits of data centers while also addressing their priorities.' As data centers move up the ballot as a campaign issue, the complications for candidates in both parties are playing out in real time. Democrats who are watching their party nationally hemorrhage voters over the economy are scrambling to strike a balance between adding jobs and revenue while stopping energy costs from skyrocketing. And in some cases, Republicans whose party leaders are cracking down on renewable energy are calling for 'all of the above' approaches to energy production to keep power prices down — providing tacit backing to a sector Trump is trying to crush even as they follow the president in promoting fossil fuels. That dynamic is on clear display in Virginia's gubernatorial race, where data-center regulation has emerged as a focal point. Former Rep. Abigail Spanberger, Democrats' nominee, is proposing a 'statewide strategy' for data centers that calls for boosting local and renewable energy production and charging Big Tech companies to offset rising energy costs for consumers. 'Virginia can benefit from having data centers here — but to reap those benefits, we need to make sure we are accounting and planning for the energy generation, water, and other resources needed to support them,' Spanberger said in a statement. Her Republican opponent, Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears, wants to open the state to 'all kinds of energy' and to reduce red tape around power projects to help meet increasing demand. Earle-Sears' campaign did not respond to a request for comment. Rising power prices, which could spike further as more energy-demanding data centers come online, are already roiling politics across the midwest and mid-Atlantic asDemocratic governors and candidates blame grid manager PJM for consumers' higher bills and New Jersey's gubernatorial candidates clash over how to bring those costs down. The debate has the potential to spill into next year's broader slate of gubernatorial contests, with several of those governors — including Pritzker, Pennsylvania's Josh Shapiro and Maryland's Wes Moore — up for reelection and Democrats eager to prove they understand voters' cost-of-living concerns. The issues surrounding data centers are bleeding into federal politics, too, though ultimately decisions around zoning and electric rates will largely remain in state and local control. Congressional Republicans had pushed a 10-year moratorium on state-level AI regulations — including those around data center permitting — as part of their 'big, beautiful' domestic policy bill, though the effort fell apart in the Senate. At the same time, they voted to roll back credits for clean-energy projects from Democrats' 2022 climate law that could help offset rising energy demand. 'The federal government is going to have to take this on,' said Virginia state Sen. Russet Perry, a Democrat who has spearheaded data center regulatory efforts in her legislature. 'In the interim, the state is going to be at the forefront for dealing with it, and it's going to be bipartisan.' Shia Kapos contributed to this report.