Taoiseach says Europe's inability to put pressure on Israel 'incomprehensible'
He also suggested that Europe needed to follow other countries' steps to sanction individual ministers, noting that the UK, Norway and Canada had further sanctions against settlers in the West Bank and against Israeli ministers Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich.
He made the comments ahead of an EU Council Meeting in Brussels on Thursday, where it was expected that some countries would block Ireland's attempts to sanction Israel.
Mr Martin said that there must be European action to try and stop the war.
He said: 'The people of Europe find it incomprehensible that Europe does not seem to be in a position to put pressure on Israel and leverage on Israel to stop this war in Gaza, to stop the continuing slaughter of children and innocent civilians.
'The war must stop. There must be a humanitarian response and a surge of humanitarian aid into Gaza, an end to the blockade.
'I understand there are historical reasons why some member states have a particular perspective on this, in terms of the Middle East issue.
'But from a humanitarian perspective, it is incomprehensible what is going on, what continues to go on and Europe needs to really articulate that in the strongest possible way. We will be seeking to pursue mechanisms to ensure that this war stops and that humanitarian aid gets in urgently to Gaza.'
Mr Martin said he will call on his counterparts to consider the EU-Israel Association Agreement and any further actions that can be taken against Israel.
A review of the agreement found indications that Israel had breached human rights obligations contained within the deal.
Benjamin Neyenyahu's Government has criticised the Government, with the Taoiseach criticising this in turn.
He said: 'Israel needs to stop denouncing every report that comes out using objective criteria to describe the situation in Gaza.
'It's not an outrage, the review. The review, in some respects, is quite, some could argue, a modest document that seeks to objectively present the facts in relation to Gaza, but it avoids emotional language and so on like that.
'I think that that kind of tactic and pattern of undermining those who would even question what's happening in Gaza, that also has to stop. I passionately believe in the reassertion of the United Nations within the Middle East, the primacy of UN agencies.
'The European Union has an association agreement with Israel. Israel should respect all clauses of that agreement, including the Human Rights clauses.
'There are differences of opinion across the European Union table. I acknowledge that.
'But I think there are other areas, for example, the United Kingdom, Norway and other countries, Canada, have now issued further sanctions against settlers in the West Bank and against Israeli ministers, Minister Ben-Gvir and Minister Smotrich.
'These are issues that the European Union should look at, as well as the Association Agreement and aspects of the Association Agreement.'
The Irish Mirror's Crime Writers Michael O'Toole and Paul Healy are writing a new weekly newsletter called Crime Ireland. Click here to sign up and get it delivered to your inbox every week
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Post
an hour ago
- Irish Post
Northern Irish politicians lead petition for Prime Minister to recall parliament over Gaza crisis
POLITICIANS in Northern Ireland are leading a petition calling on Prime Minister Keir Starmer to recall parliament over the worsening situation in Gaza. A letter, led by the SDLP party, has been sent to Mr Starmer calling for urgent diplomatic intervention, an end to arms sales to Israel, and the immediate delivery of humanitarian aid to the war-torn region. It has been signed by members of Parliament as well as members of the Northern Ireland Assembly, the Scottish Parliament, and Senedd Cymru in Wales. 'Ever growing numbers of people across these islands have shown their horror and anguish at the events unfolding before our eyes in Gaza,' SDLP Leader Claire Hanna MP said. 'The situation is deteriorating, with more people dying every day. The people of Gaza don't have the luxury of waiting any longer for the UK Government to act. 'Today the SDLP is leading parties in giving voice to the despair and anger at the UK Government's failure to stand up to Netanyahu. Prime Minister Keir Starmer is currently enjoying a summer break while Parliament in is recess (Pic: Rolling News) 'Our voice may be the only tool we have, but together it is a powerful one - reflecting the depth of feeling of our constituents and highlighting the failure of the Prime Minister and his government to do all in their power to protect the people of Gaza.' There are 12 signatories to the letter, including Northern Ireland First Minister Michelle O'Neill, Scottish Liberal Democrats MP Alistair Carmichael and Plaid Cymru Leader Rhun ap Iorwerth. 'We are demanding the immediate recall of Parliament and an intervention that sends a clear message to the Israeli Government that this cannot continue,' Ms Hanna said. 'The Prime Minister must make it clear to Netanyahu that the UK will no longer stand by while he carries out genocide against the people of Gaza. 'From banning arms sales to Israel, to ensuring the immediate supply of humanitarian aid and the recognition of Palestine without strings attached, there is much more that the UK Government can do to take a stand against Netanyahu. 'The people of Gaza have no time to lose, and we stand united with other parties today in calling for this long-overdue action.' The House of Commons is currently set to re-open after its summer recess on Monday, September 1. See More: Claire Hanna, Gaza, Petition, Prime Minister Keir Starmer, SDLP
RTÉ News
an hour ago
- RTÉ News
Just what can the President of Ireland actually say and do?
Analysis: while there are significant restrictions on what the President can do, the Constitution places few limitations on what they might say The President of Ireland is the Head of State, not the Head of Government. Under the Constitution, the office-holder has a relatively modest range of functions to begin with. Moreover, according to Article 13.9, these powers and functions "shall be exercisable and performable by him only on the advice of the Government". In simple terms, the President must, for the most part, do what he or she is told. Indeed, Article 12.9 provides that the President may not even leave the State without the Government's permission. Many of the President's functions are automatic in nature. For example, the President appoints the Taoiseach, Government Ministers, and judges to office. But the Constitution compels the President to simply rubber-stamp the nominee put forward. The same applies to accepting the resignation of Ministers, or acceding to requests for the dissolution of the Dáil (provided the Taoiseach requesting the dissolution has the support of a majority - see below). Bills must be signed by the President before they become law, but the president does not have a veto. Subject to some exceptions, Article 25 provides that Bills must be signed by the President between five and seven days after being passed, while constitutional amendments must be signed "forthwith". If a President were to refuse to sign a Bill as a protest against its contents, the function would be performed by a Presidential Commission under Article 14; and the President would potentially face impeachment proceedings under Article 12. Other functions are purely titular or ceremonial. The President is named the Supreme Commander of the Defence Forces, but enjoys no actual power over defence policy or military affairs (clearly matters for Government to decide on). Similarly, the President has the right of pardon and the power to commute sentences, but only on the advice of the Government; this power has only been exercised on five occasions (1940, 1943, 1992, 2015 and 2018). Under Article 13.2, the President may, following consultation with Council of State, convene a meeting of either or both Houses of the Oireachtas. However, any message that the President wishes to communicate with the Oireachtas – whether at such a meeting or otherwise – must have received the approval of the Government (Article 13.7.3). The same applies to messages addressed to the Nation on matters of national or public importance. From RTÉ News, President Michael D Higgins says Ireland is 'playing with fire' over neutrality There are four functions in which the President has absolute discretion. First, before signing a Bill into law, the President may – following consultation with the Council of State – refer the Bill to the Supreme Court to test its constitutionality. This power has been exercised 15 times in total (most recently in 2005); eight of the referred Bills were found unconstitutional. Second, where the Taoiseach has ceased to retain the support of a majority in the Dáil, the President has the discretion to refuse to dissolve the Dáil (so as to encourage the parties to try again to form a Government). This power has never been exercised, although there was much speculation that it might be exercised during the drawn-out coalition negotiation following the 2016 General Election. In the event, Enda Kenny never made a request that might be refused. The only other occasion of note was 1987: as revealed in Garret Fitzgerald's memoirs, President Hillery indicated that he would refuse a dissolution if one was requested. In the event, Fianna Fáil secured support for Charles Haughey and the issue never arose. The ideal President would be visible in office and represent widely-held values, while remaining aloof from party politics and steering clear of the role of government The other discretionary matters are the nomination of members to the Council of State, which advises the President on the exercise of certain functions, and a procedure under Article 27 which allows Bills to be referred to a referendum prior to being signed into law. The latter can only arise in highly specific circumstances: i.e. the Seanad fails to pass a Bill, which is then passed by Dáil resolution after 180 days, following which a majority of the members of Seanad Éireann and not less than one-third of the members of Dáil Éireann present a petition to the President. Unsurprisingly, these circumstances have never arisen to date. Undoubtedly, then, there are significant restrictions on what the President can do. At the same time, and contrary to popular opinion, the Constitution places very few restrictions on what the President might say. It is a common feature of the Irish political scene for Presidents to be criticised for allegedly stepping outside their constitutional domain almost every time they express an opinion that touches on some aspect of economic or social policy. However, the only formal restrictions are in Article 13.7; namely, where the President makes a formal address to either the Oireachtas or the Nation on a matter of national importance, the address must first be approved by the Government. From RTÉ's Doc On One, Making Of A President profiles the former President Mary Robinson and her election campaign in 1990 The leading text on Irish constitutional law observes that beyond the above, the law does not impose total silence on the President; and, moreover, that the President must be free to respond to criticisms of the manner in which he or she has exercised the powers and functions of the office. A similar point was previously made by the late Robert Elgie. On the question of what is proper or seemly for the President to say, there is room for reasonable disagreement, and no hard and fast rules to guide us. Few would dispute that Presidents should avoid coming into direct conflict with the Government or favouring one political party over another. On the question of what is proper or seemly for the President to say, there is room for reasonable disagreement, and no hard and fast rules to guide us But there is no such thing as complete neutrality: anyone who stands for President will stand for something, and will have expressed this during their election campaign. How else can people decide which candidate to vote for? And why should the President abandon these views having been elected on the back of them? Whoever is elected President, he or she is not going to have the power to shape how we make our laws or spend our public monies. However, he or she will have some latitude to speak out on issues of importance, provided those speeches avoid conflicting with Government policy. A President can highlight causes and inspire people, like Mary Robinson, or build bridges and mend fences, like Mary McAleese. The ideal President would be visible in office and represent widely-held values, while remaining aloof from party politics and steering clear of the role of Government.
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Maybe, definitely: Seán Kelly finally confirms presidential run after attending Oasis gig
Over the weekend, Ireland South MEP Seán Kelly said he was reconsidering whether to seek the Fine Gael nomination for the presidency. But, first, he was going to Oasis. On Tuesday morning, he confirmed that whatever ruminations he would have had when the Gallagher brothers were on stage had led him to want in to the race. The Ireland South MEP said he was now 'enthusiastic' about running for the presidency, after previously ruling it out. 'I'll certainly seek the Fine Gael nomination now, unfortunately, that Mairead McGuinness had to withdraw. And there is a process now by which we can seek nominations over the next five days. So I would be looking for the nomination and after that, and if I'm nominated, I would greatly honoured to represent the party and stand for election for president," Mr Kelly said. Born in Killarney, he went on to train as a school teacher in Dublin before moving back to the Kingdom, where he became a key figure in Kerry GAA circles, serving as chair of East Kerry GAA from 1975 to 1987, and Kerry GAA from 1987 to 1997. He was elected to the Munster Council before becoming the first Kerry man to lead the GAA from 2003 to 2006. In a progressive presidency, he would oversee the establishment of secondary competitions like the Nicky Rackard Cup and the completion of the Croke Park redevelopment. But his abiding legacy is the abolition of Rule 42, which prohibited foreign sports being played on GAA grounds. Having been told his motions were out of order, Mr Kelly faced down the GAA and made, what he himself called hear this year, "the right call — not just for the GAA, but for Ireland as a whole". "Looking back, the Rule 42 decision was about more than just sport. It was about who we are as a people. It was about generosity, about stepping up when a neighbour was in need, about embracing modern Ireland while staying true to our roots." Following his departure from the GAA role, he entered politics. He was first elected to the European Parliament in June 2009 for Ireland South, contributing to an historic victory for Fine Gael in the European elections, polling 92,579 first preferences. He was re-elected to this position for a second term in May 2014, and a third in May 2019, topping the poll once again with 118,444 first preferences. In 2024, he became the first MEP over the line as he took a fourth term on the first count in Nemo Rangers in Cork, with 122,777 votes, bringing a surplus of 8,016. His high profile and large appeal to voters had long seen him linked to the presidency, but in July when Fine Gael nominations opened, he ruled himself out, saying he was enjoying his work as an MEP and continued to be "energised by the enormous challenges facing both Ireland and the European Union". However, the withdrawal of Mairead McGuinness on health grounds has changed the landscape, but Mr Kelly could struggle to get the 20 parliamentary party members required to receive a nomination.
