SNP ministers silent after being urged to defend pay rise
SNP ministers sat in silence after being challenged to defend their bumper £20,000 pay rises during a Holyrood debate.
Former Scottish Tory leader Douglas Ross urged Nats rivals to explain why they deserve the inflation-busting salary increase after First Minister John Swinney's decision to lift a long-standing pay freeze.
Advertisement
2
Scottish Tory MSP Douglas Ross challenged SNP ministers to respond.
Credit: Alamy
2
SNP leader John Swinney decided to lift the ministerial pay freeze.
The MSP raised the issue during a government debate titled, 'the international situation', with Mr Ross arguing that the parliamentary time should instead have been used to discuss issues relevant to Scotland.
And he pointed to the £19,126 extra cash that will be received by SNP ministers from this month as an alternative topic of discussion, as he called on those present on the frontbench, including Mr Swinney, to intervene on him in order to provide a response.
Mr Ross said: 'Can any of the ministers on the frontbench say that they deserve and have earned their £20,000 increase?'
The former Scots Tory boss then stood silently as he waited for an intervention to be made by any of the SNP ministers including Connectivity Minister Jim Fairlie and Constitution Secretary Angus Robertson.
Advertisement
He added: 'I'm just going to stand here and wait. If any of these highly paid Scottish government ministers can defend their £20,000 pay increase to the public, tell us now.'
The Scottish Tory MSP was again met with silence, before deputy Presiding Officer Liam McArthur asked him to return to the topic of the debate.
Mr Ross said: 'I'm making the plea again. Come on! If Mr Swinney believes that they deserve that funding, that increase of £20,000, I'll give way to the First Minister.
"I'll give way to the Cabinet Secretary, I'll give way to Angus Robertson or Jim Fairlie. Can no Scottish government minister defend it?
Advertisement
'And maybe that's why we're debating this international debate today, maybe this is why the topic chosen by the SNP government is one that they are not in charge of because they cannot answer simple questions about the area of their responsibility.
'And I think the people of Scotland can see that because they can see this is a government who take them for granted, who provide massive pay rises for their ministers and can't even hold themselves to account.'
Kenny MacAskill blasted over SNP - Crown Office comments
Former SNP leader Alex Salmond introduced the pay freeze in 2009 amid the global financial crisis.
But as it has been scrapped the party's ministers will receive £19,126 extra from this month.
Advertisement
Junior Nats ministers will earn £100,575 and cabinet secretaries will bank £116,125 per year.
Ministers have government and MSP parts to their salary and it is the latter that is increasing.
Despite the pay rise for his ministers, Mr Swinney previously stated that he will decline the uplift.
He said: "I've reflected on my own position - so that people don't think I've taken a decision that will benefit me personally - I will leave my salary as an MSP and ministerial frozen."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
11 minutes ago
- The National
Former SNP MP's critique of UK defence review was a missed opportunity
At the Royal United Services Institute members' briefing on the defence review, which I attended, it was pretty clear that many saw the review as an uncosted shopping list, a pick and mix of wares on offer from the UK's defence industries that the government could buy into, or not, depending what, at a future date, the Treasury thought could or could not be afforded. READ MORE: Skye power line approved despite council and resident objections New, more relevant threats were referenced, of course. Though how the existing products on offer from the UK's defence industry will square with actual future security needs, rather than the Russian Bogey, is not clear. Indeed, even on the day of publication the chief of the defence staff did point out that the actual lacklustre performance of Russian forces in Ukraine should be factored into future thinking. Martin's article was rather a useful comment on what Dominic Cummings thought of the modus operandi of the MoD. A critique of the review and its relevance for the future – particularly that of an independent Scotland's security future – it was not. Scotland and SNP policy got one sentence, in an article of more than 800 words. What he didn't do was offer a strategy of how the dog's breakfast of the review could be used as an opportunity to promote current SNP defence policy and develop it further in the future. READ MORE: Scotland's top doctor warns of greatest threat to health this century His mention of the clapped-out Vanguards was tangential and treated as a symptom of poor long-term planning, rather than a critique of Britain's reliance on Donald Trump. Mark Felton's widely viewed 'Rented Missiles & Worn Out Submarines' YouTube presentation of two months ago, now with more than 600,000 views, is rather more relevant contains within it some positive points of real electoral salience for the SNP. After all, positive, salient aspects of defence and security should be the drivers of SNP defence policy rather than the thicket of weeds that act as cover to a broken defence policy of a broken Britain. Bill Ramsay Convener, SNP CND THE independence movement is at a tipping point, and deepening despondency must reign in the long-stifled rank-and-file of the SNP. In perpetual deference to their high heid yins, they have permitted culture-war distractions, personality cults and parasitic alliances to obscure their core vision of a better life for citizens and their children in a new post-Union, post-colonial reality. They have seen their hard work and contributions, financial and otherwise, railroaded and dissipated by a recent leadership characterised by indolent complacency or cowardice of conviction. READ MORE: What's going wrong inside the SNP? Activists share all The cause of Scottish emancipation from colonial exploitation is not a vainglorious, ill-thought-out enterprise but rather an internationally acknowledged 'glorious revolution' in British politics whose wellsprings are popular sovereignty and direct democracy. The SNP 'strategists' have at best presented an anaemic dilution of these noble principles or collaborated consciously or unconsciously with Westminster politicians of every stripe to undermine them. Who but a reunited popular and political movement in Scotland can save our fellow citizens from the warmongering, corporate-captured, Lino (Labour In Name Only) party that consort and acquiesce to globalist elites rather than their own people? Who can blame decent Scottish and English brothers and sisters from seeking hope from the ultimately false prophets of Reform UK rather than 'Remove UK'? In Scotland, who is going to champion these folk? It is clear to me that a cohesion-seeking independence convention is required as a matter of national urgency where the SNP, Alba, all the factions of the independence movement and importantly all the as-yet-unconvinced but open-minded can meet eyeball to eyeball to form a national vision for our children and grandchildren. The first step must be for SNP grassroot members to signal their 'brotherhood' with the Alba party and non-aligned comrades rather than their effete and sadly incompetent erstwhile leaders, regardless of how 'steady' or 'safe' they may have appeared. Dr Andrew Docherty Selkirk AMAZINGLY, 10 MONTHS on from the Westminster government's announcement to withdraw the Winter Fuel Payment, Scottish Questions and Prime Minister's Questions in the House of Commons were dominated by this issue once again. The Labour government at Westminster has given some snail-paced hint of a U-turn on the withdrawal, but no firm commitment as yet. This would be very welcome. However, pensioners here in Scotland already have an assurance from the Scottish Government they will receive the WFP and will not be left out in the cold this winter awaiting the Labour government's decision. Catriona C Clark Falkirk
The National
12 minutes ago
- The National
What does the Winter Fuel Payment U-turn mean for Scottish pensioner?
The Chancellor announced on Monday the payment, worth up to £300, will be restored to anyone of pension age with an income of under £35,000 a year. But what does this mean for Scotland? The Scottish Government was due to take over responsibility for winter fuel payments in September but the introduction of a new universal benefit was delayed after the UK Government decided to start means-testing the payment. In November, it was announced a devolved benefit would be created, giving £100 for all pensioner households, with those on pension credit due to receive £200 or £300 depending on their age. It is set to be introduced ahead of this winter. While Scotland can still boast that the £100 payment is universal whereas the English and Welsh payment is not, it means a cohort of Scottish pensioners – those with income less than £35,000 – will now receive less than their English counterparts. READ MORE: Former SNP MP hits out at 'foolish' Hamilton by-election campaign Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville said ministers were not consulted on the major U-turn and has urged the UK Government to ensure the Scottish Government is 'fully appraised' of the proposed changes 'as soon as possible'. She said: 'I welcome any extension of eligibility by the UK Government, but this is a U-turn the Chancellor should have made a long time ago. 'But there is still no detail about how the Chancellor intends to go about that. Unfortunately, it still sounds as if many pensioners will miss out.' The Scottish Government now has a decision to make as to whether it makes any changes to the Pension Age Winter Heating Payment on the back of the announcement. Scottish Labour is calling for the extra money the Scottish Government will receive as a result of Barnett consequentials to increase the current offer. Labour MSP Paul O'Kane said: 'The SNP must re-examine their own proposals in light of this game-changing announcement, ensure payments reach those most in need, and give a cast-iron guarantee that no struggling Scottish pensioners will be left out of pocket under their plans.'
The National
18 minutes ago
- The National
What does the Winter Fuel Payment U-turn mean for Scotland?
The Chancellor announced on Monday the payment, worth up to £300, will be restored to anyone with an income of under £35,000 a year. But what does this mean for Scotland? The Scottish Government was due to take over responsibility for winter fuel payments in September but the introduction of a new universal benefit was delayed after the UK Government's decision to start means-testing the payment. In November, it was announced a devolved benefit would be created of £100 for all pensioner households, with those on pension credit due to receive £200 or £300 depending on their age. It is to be introduced ahead of this winter. While Scotland can still boast that the £100 payment is universal whereas the English and Welsh payment is still not, it means a cohort of Scottish pensioners – those with income less than £35,000 – will now receive less than their English counterparts. READ MORE: Former SNP MP hits out at 'foolish' Hamilton by-election campaign Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville said ministers were not consulted on the major U-turn and has urged the UK Government to ensure the Scottish Government is 'fully appraised' of the proposed changes 'as soon as possible'. She said: 'I welcome any extension of eligibility by the UK Government, but this is a U-turn the Chancellor should have made a long time ago. 'But there is still no detail about how the Chancellor intends to go about that. Unfortunately, it still sounds as if many pensioners will miss out.' The Scottish Government now has a decision to make as to whether it makes any changes to its own Pension Age Winter Heating Payment on the back of the announcement. Scottish Labour is calling for extra money the Scottish Government will receive as a result of Barnett consequentials to increase the current offer. Labour MSP Paul O'Kane said: 'The SNP must re-examine their own proposals in light of this game-changing announcement, ensure payments reach those most in need, and give a cast-iron guarantee that no struggling Scottish pensioners will be left out of pocket under their plans.'
