The Gold fans make desperate plea to BBC bosses as crime drama's second series kicks off
The multi-award-nominated series The Gold returned to BBC One last night, after two years of waiting.
The crime drama takes the viewer on an expedition through the 80s- retelling the story of the notorious Brink's-Mat Robbery- one of the largest robberies, and most expensive Met investigations in British history.
On 26th December 1983, six criminals broke into the Brink's-Mat warehouse on the Heathrow International trading estate in West London to undertake an dastardly scheme.
They successfully heisted £26m in gold bullion, cash and diamonds (equivalent to £111m today) in a plot dubbed the crime of the century.
But overshadowing the complexity of the heist was the operation that was set into effect following it - of smelting down and vanishing the gold, across the world, into the assets of a global network of criminals.
From A-list scandals and red carpet mishaps to exclusive pictures and viral moments, subscribe to the DailyMail's new Showbiz newsletter to stay in the loop.
The crime drama takes the viewer on an expedition through the 80s- retelling the story of the notorious Brink's-Mat Robbery- one of the largest robberies, and most expensive Met investigations in British history
The story was transformed into a captivating comedy-thriller on the small screen with the help of some 'diamonds' of the acting world, starring Hugh Bonneville, Dominic Cooper, Charlotte Spencer, Sean Harris, Jack Lowden and Tom Cullen.
One fan describes it as' A beautifully written limited series about a heist - actually post-heist - of likeable smaller-time crooks stumbling onto the biggest gold theft in history: 26 million; and how they try to get rid of it as equally likeable cops chase them.'
It achieved great acclaim following its first season, which concluded in March 2023, getting a 92% rating on Rotten Tomatoes.
Series one ended with luckless Met detective Brian Boyce's (Hugh Bonneville) gut-wrenching realisation that only half of the Gold had been accounted for by the investigation, and there was still a whopping £13 million left to locate.
Whilst season 1 followed the movement of the gold that was stolen and distributed by Kenneth Noye, the second season delves into the mystery of the elusive other half of the money.
Following last night's riveting episode, fans took to social media, demanding a third series from the BBC.
'Loved this series (hoping for series three). Series two of #TheGold starts tonight. So excited'
'It was brilliant again. I was nervous it wouldn't live up to series one but it was great #TheGold'
'I'm ten minutes in and loving the nostalgia plus it's a cracking drama with first class actors.'
'The writing in #TheGold is so good. Just binge watched the whole thing to reward myself for doing admin!'
'I loved the first series of The Gold and have been looking forward to seeing series 2!
However, in conversation with Radio Times, stars of the show Charlotte Spencer and Emun Elliot suggested that the series would be limited to a two-parter, to keep the show focused on the source story: the gold.
Spencer said: 'I think people don't realise that, even when I've spoken to friends and family who are like, 'Oh my God, it's got a second season?', and it's like, 'Yeah, because they only ever found half [of the gold]'. So there's, like, a whole other storyline that people don't know about which I think they're gonna like.'
Meanwhile, Elliott added: 'The way Neil writes often, because I've worked with him a couple of times, he always seems to know whether something's going to be a standalone thing, a two-parter, a three-parter.
'So he has that kind of entire story arc in his head from episode 1, season 1. And obviously if the first season had been a disaster, there would be no season two, but luckily, there was such a great response, that we got to continue chasing this gold.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
24 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
I live with my ex in a tiny flat even though we broke up - we still share a bed but neither of us can afford to move out
A woman has revealed how she's still living with her ex-boyfriend in a tiny flat - even though they broke up months earlier. Bethany Lee, who is from Devon, broke up with her fiancé David Smith around three months ago. The couple, who had been together for two and a half years and share one-year-old son Finneas, are still sharing the cooking and cleaning - and even sleep in the same bed. Bethany, who is in her late 20s, says that neither of them can afford to move out so for now they're making do in the 'tiny' two-bedroom flat in Derbyshire. She explained that the break-up was 'pretty mutual' and they still 'get along really well as friends'. In a video on TikTok, where she's posting with the aim to raise enough money to move out, Bethany said: 'I've been living with my ex-boyfriend for three months now and everyone's a bit interested in it. 'We just can't afford to live separately. We can hardly afford to live here together in this cheap little flat as it is because of the cost of living crisis.' 'It's not as weird as you think. Not ideal though,' she confessed in the comment section. Bethany and David met in their first year of university and were in the same halls. But their relationship didn't immediately go to plan, as Bethany became pregnant after knowing each other for just three months. 'Shock, our relationship didn't work out,' she said in her TikTok video. Now, her ex-partner works five to six days a week in management, while she works three days a week as a receptionist. This means that she will mainly do the cooking and cleaning during the week, to give her ex time with their son on his days off. She explained that initially post break-up, they'd tried to do things separately, such as washing and cooking, but it 'didn't work out' as the space they're sharing is so small. She explained: 'Now our set up is very similar to how it would be when we were in a relationship, where I cook and I do a lot more of the housework and he is out at work a lot more hours than I am.' Her partner did sleep on the sofa initially and they considered getting a sofa bed, but decided the money would be better used to save towards her moving out. Giving her followers a tour of her flat, Beth said it has 'no storage' and only one cupboard, containing the boiler. Moving onto the kitchen, she compared it to a 'glorified hallway with cupboards'. 'Every inch of space has been used to store stuff,' she said. In the comments, she admitted it's 'hard' but she doesn't 'know what else to do'. However, she did admit in the comment section that they're no longer having sex. Rushing to the comments, many were left baffled at Bethany and David's living arrangements. They said: 'I'm gonna say it. You can't be friends with an EX, because you either never loved or you are still in love with them'; 'You guys are basically a married couple without realising it.' Bethany admitted she does the majority of the cleaning as David is often at work Others thought it was unfair that Bethany was taking on the majority of the housework, especially since the breakup. One wrote: 'So he's basically got a live in maid sorry you deserve better girl look up the mental load.' A second said: 'I think he should pay you or cover more of the rent for the work you do for him,' while a third added: 'Girl you have been brainwashed.' However, another person praised the former couple as 'Brilliant parents. Total respect to you both.' In another video, Beth shared clips of herself 'cleaning up for the third time that day' before preparing dinner for her son and her ex. After receiving backlash, she clarified in another video that she enjoys the cleaning, and can make money by filming herself doing it on TikTok. Now she's started to look around for a new place to live, and hopes to go back to university in September to study psychology.
Telegraph
30 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Richard Wilson's fantastic King Lear is proof that the BBC should be doing more Shakespeare
According to the actor Jonathan Pryce, you should play Lear while your back can still handle it. Pryce played the octogenarian king when he was a mere 65, and still put his back out staggering onstage with Cordelia in his arms. Drama on 4: King Lear (Radio 4, Sunday) gave us a satisfying reminder that radio drama can reach the places other mediums can't, as the 89-year-old Richard Wilson took on the role – becoming the oldest British actor to do so in the process. When he staggers on with Cordelia in Sunday's concluding part, Wilson's back will be safe. Clive Brill's production, while relatively no-frills, is a treat, as well as being a potential blueprint for BBC radio drama. Wilson is the eye-catching name at the top of the bill, but the undercard isn't too shabby either – Toby Jones as Gloucester, David Tennant as Edmund, Greta Scacchi as Goneril, Tamsin Greig as Regan. Renowned cellist Steven Isserlis adds interstitial howls from his bow, which begin a little overbearing but grow in stature as the play increases in intensity. Among the less starry cast, Trevor Fox's Geordie Fool stands out. However, it is Wilson that this production will be judged on. His Lear is a slow-burn, beginning, as he vaingloriously beseeches his daughters to shower him with sycophancy in return for a share of the kingdom, in a stubbornly low gear. It is a little jarring at first, with Lear sounding mildly peeved rather than furious at Cordelia's refusal to play ball. 'Come not between a dragon and his wrath,' he says, sounding more like a sleepy guard dog lazing in the sun. While it's sensible not to start Lear at too high a pitch – he has some serious emotional mountains to climb later – I was, in those very early scenes, left wanting a bit more p--s and vinegar from Wilson. His stolid, pompous statesman act felt like it was going to be overshadowed by Tennant's duplicitous bastard (in every sense of the word) Edmund. Tennant gave the listener a fairground ride of an opening soliloquy ('Why brand they us / With base? with baseness? bastardy? base, base?') and his slippery chameleon act was matched by an emotionally raw performance from Jones, who reacted to Edgar's invented betrayal with the sort of passion previously missing from Wilson. Perhaps Wilson was to play an anchor role next to the pyrotechnics from his younger castmates. I was, like Lear, too quick to rush judgement and gradually Wilson's haughty, dismissive old king began to take a grip on proceedings. His Lear is a man who has grown used to hearing no dissent, to having his every whim catered to. When things do not go his way, he does not get angry (at first), because he does not need to – he'll still win. At the point Cordelia 'betrays' him, his reaction is not hot anger, but a surprised disappointment followed by a swift execution. He is vain, thin-skinned, completely in love with his own power, and unwilling to brook any kind of dissent or believe the cards will not fall for him. 'Fetch me a better answer,' he says when Regan and Goneril will not meet him. There is, yes, something very Trumpian about this Lear. If there's a sense that Wilson is saving something up for the more explosive events of this weekend's instalment, that's understandable, but it's tricky to truly give a verdict on his Lear before he has wandered the heath and delivered the most memorable lines ('Blow, winds, and crack your cheeks!', 'Howl, howl, howl, howl!', 'I don't believe it!' etc). Yet what a pleasure it is to hear him, age 89, delivering the words that presumably he'd long given up imagining he would. The production is also a salute to the power of the older actor – Matthew Marsh (Kent) is 70, Scacchi is 65, Jones and Greig are 58. Yet that cast is significant for another reason – put this production on in the West End, with the same actors, and you'd be paying more than £100 to sit behind a pillar or peer at them dimly from the upper circle. With theatre pricing becoming increasingly eye-watering, the BBC has a chance to remind everyone (ahead of charter renewal) of its essential place in British culture. With the Corporation's sway and reputation, they could put a star-name Shakespeare on once a month, or even once a week, increasing access beyond those who can justify the exorbitant West End fees. Not only can BBC radio drama save Wilson's back, it can save something that should be coursing through the nation's veins.
Telegraph
30 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Academics lose discrimination case over trans-critical film
Two academics have failed in their attempt to sue their union for stopping their trans-critical film from being shown to students at the University of Edinburgh. Dr Deirdre O'Neill, a lecturer at the University of Hertfordshire, and Michael Wayne, a professor at Brunel University, argued that they suffered unlawful discrimination when the University and College Union (UCU) opposed their film, Adult Human Female, which challenges claims made by trans rights activists. On Monday, Employment Judge Laidler, sitting with two side members, concluded the claimants were not treated detrimentally contrary to the Equality Act 2010, and were not subjected to harassment. Mary Senior, a UCU Scotland official, welcomed what she described as 'a sensible and common-sense decision'. She added: 'I am proud that UCU successfully defended this case in tribunal. It cannot be right that a trade union is not able to protest peacefully within the law and to employers when material is presented on campus which it believes attacks the human rights of others.' The tribunal, which was held remotely, heard that in November 2022, Dr O'Neill and Prof Wayne released their film examining claims made by trans rights activists that 'trans women are women and should be treated as women in all legal and social contexts'. The UCU's branch at the University of Edinburgh wrote to its principal, Prof Sir Peter Mathieson, asking the university not to host or facilitate the film screening, which it regarded as an 'attack on trans people's identities and not in line with the [university's] dignity and respect policy'. The tribunal was told that the union also published a series of social media posts denouncing the showing of the film, describing it as transphobic hate, and encouraging protests which twice blocked screenings in Edinburgh. The academics said the UCU's opposition amounted to unlawful discrimination on the basis of their gender-critical belief that there are only two sexes. Film 'contained misinformation' At the time, they wrote to Jo Grady, the union's general secretary, asking her to confirm they were entitled to their gender-critical beliefs and that UCU did not support preventing the showing of their film. Ms Grady confirmed that gender-critical beliefs were recognised to be legitimate philosophical beliefs protected under the Equality Act 2010. She also noted that UCU members held many opposing views and that it was not for the union to stand in the way of members and branches protesting certain expressions of protected beliefs. The tribunal noted that UCU Edinburgh was not objecting to the beliefs of the claimants but was protesting against a film which it believed presented misinformation about trans and non-binary people and that was damaging to trans and non-binary staff and students. Ms Senior added: 'It is welcome to have this positive decision at the start of Pride month, and at a time when trans and non-binary people feel under attack. 'This decision demonstrates that trade unions and others can stand up for trans rights and trans inclusivity, and our union is committed to continuing to promote a more equal and safe world for all people regardless of their gender identity'.
