GST overhaul: Rs 1.1 trillion worth revenue might be lost; UBS says fiscal cost manageable
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
For the financial year 2026, the firm expected the shortfall of Rs 430 billion, or 0.12% of GDP, that could be compensated by surplus cess collections along with a higher-than-budgeted dividend transfer from the Reserve Bank of India.
The report, as cited by ANI, highlighted that a GST cut would be more powerful in stimulating consumption than personal income tax or corporate tax cuts, since it directly affects spending at the point of purchase.
Citing a study by the National Institute of Public Finance and Policy, it pointed out that 'the GST multiplier stands at -1.08, higher than the multipliers for personal income tax (-1.01) and corporate tax (-1.02).'
In his Independence Day speech from the Red Fort, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had announced that 'upcoming next-gen GST reforms before Diwali' would benefit consumers, small industries and MSMEs.
Following that, the finance ministry unveiled its plan for a simplified two-tier GST structure, centred on three pillars: structural reforms, rate rationalisation, and ease of living.
Sources have since revealed that the Centre is proposing to scrap the existing 12% and 28% slabs, keeping only 5% and 18% GST rates. Government sources said, 99% of 12% slab are proposed to move in 5% slab and 90% of items in 28% slab are proposed to move in the 18% slab.
A GST Council meeting is expected around September-October to examine the proposal, ANI reported.
Under the plan, items currently taxed at 12% may move down to 5%, while those at 28% would shift to 18%.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
'Luxury and sin goods (latter includes cigarettes, other tobacco products, carbonated drinks, high-end automobiles, and intoxicants) will be taxed at a higher 'special slab rate' of 40%),' the report stated.
The sectors likely to benefit from the removal of the 12% slab include processed foods, garments, footwear, construction materials, tractors, hotels and two-wheelers.
Another change on the horizon is the end of the compensation cess.
The cess, amounting to Rs. 1.7 trillion and initially imposed to make up for state revenue shortfalls, will conclude ahead of the March 2026 deadline as related loans are paid off. UBS said this would create fiscal room for the government to align GST rates within the new system.
The report also suggested that lowering GST rates would have a deflationary effect, helping to cool inflation and opening the way for further monetary policy easing. With price pressures already soft, UBS predicted the repo rate could settle in the 5.0–5.25% range, leaving scope for another 25–50 basis points cut during the rest of FY26.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
Landmark Group to invest Rs 400 cr for construction of Gurugram housing project
Realty firm Landmark Group will invest Rs 400 crore in the construction of its new housing project in Gurugram. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Realty firm Landmark Group will invest Rs 400 crore in the construction of its new housing project in company is developing 240 apartments in its new residential project, spread over 4 acre of land parcel, at Sector 103 (Dwarka Expressway) in Gurugram."We will invest Rs 400 crore on construction of our new project ' Landmark SKYVUE '," Landmark Group Chairman Sandeep Chillar told reporters said the company has owned this land parcel since 2009, and all approval charges have been paid to the said the company would fund the construction cost with the help of internal accruals, bank loans and advances from customers against Group will sell apartments in a price range of Rs 5-7 crore per unit. The launch price is Rs 17,500 per sq chairman further said the demand continues to be strong in the Gurugram market, helped by infrastructure projects, including the opening up of Dwarka company has so far delivered 15 housing and five commercial projects, mostly in Delhi-NCR.
India Today
29 minutes ago
- India Today
Why Modi govt drew the line with online gaming bill
On August 19, when the Union cabinet cleared the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, 2025, the sense of urgency was unmistakable. Within 24 hours, the draft was tabled in Parliament, underscoring how swiftly the Narendra Modi government wanted to push through one of the most ambitious regulatory overhauls in India's digital the language of consumer protection and youth welfare lies a story of political calculation, social pressure and economic disruption that could reverberate across industries far removed from consider this to be step down from Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Independence Day announcement last year, wherein he aspired for India to become the leader in the global gaming market. Modi had then said that India must leverage its rich ancient legacy and literature to come up with Made in India gaming products. He added that Indian professionals must lead the global gaming market, not just in playing but also in producing the red line has been drawn to keep real-money games out of the ambit, argue those in the government. For months, the government had been under pressure to respond to a surge of distress stories linked to real-money gaming. Parents complained of teenagers running up debts on borrowed digital wallets; young professionals saw their salaries wiped out in a few nights of high-stakes play; and across small towns, reports of suicides tied to online gambling losses began to appear with disturbing regularity. The public perception that gaming platforms were becoming a social menace—akin to alcohol or narcotics in their addictive pull—was gaining ground. State governments, particularly in the South, had tried to legislate bans, only to have them struck down by courts. The Centre's reluctance to intervene had begun to look like vacuum was filled by the Sangh Parivar's affiliates, who brought ideological pressure to bear on the government. The Swadeshi Jagran Manch (SJM), in particular, made online gaming a moral economy issue, portraying it as a threat to household savings and traditional argument resonated within the BJP ecosystem: speculative play was not creating productive capital but draining families, and worse, it was ensnaring India's youth. In closed-door consultations, Sangh functionaries invoked parallels with colonial-era opium and liquor trades, which they said had weakened communities from within. By the time the Cabinet note circulated, the push from the ideological right had become impossible to bill itself is sweeping. It bans real-money games outright and criminalises their endorsement by celebrities, athletes and social media influencers. It arms regulators with extraordinary powers, including warrantless search and seizure, allowing officials to enter premises, seize servers and freeze accounts without prior judicial oversight. Penalties run into crores, with provisions for jail time for repeat offenders. For a sector that had operated in regulatory grey zones for years, the shift is nothing short of impact on India's celebrity economy is immediate. Over the past three years, endorsements for gaming platforms had become a major source of income for cricketers, Bollywood stars and digital influencers. That revenue stream vanishes overnight, leaving talent agencies scrambling. For venture-backed firms, many with global capital riding on India as one of the largest growth markets, the bill is potentially built around fantasy sports, poker, rummy and other real-money formats face outright extinction. Investors had poured billions into the sector, confident that India's courts would protect skill-based gaming from outright bans. That bet has now in one of those paradoxes that define India's markets, several listed tech and gaming-related stocks rallied after the Cabinet decision. Investors seemed to calculate that the elimination of grey-zone competition would consolidate opportunity in segments the government deems permissible—casual, skill-based or educational gaming. Some even speculated that global studios, wary of the unpredictability, would step back, leaving domestic firms to dominate what remains of the field. In that sense, capital was already reorienting to profit from the regulation even as hundreds of start-ups faced an existential the Modi government, the calculus is clear: the political dividend outweighs the economic cost. Positioning itself as a guardian of family welfare against predatory industries has appeal across caste, class and geography. In semi-urban and rural constituencies, stories of young men pawning jewellery or defaulting on loans after online gaming binges have spread the southern states, where courts had overturned state-level bans, the Centre's decisive intervention allows the BJP to claim ownership of a cause that regional parties had fumbled. By centralising regulation, the government not only resolves a messy federal dispute but also asserts Delhi's primacy over a digital sector once seen as beyond traditional symbolism goes further. Around the world, governments are moving against online gaming excesses. China has imposed strict limits on youth play, Europe is tightening gambling-related regulations, and the US has seen state-level crackdowns. India's permissive stance had begun to look tabling the bill, the government aligned itself with this global wave, signalling that its digital economy is not a laissez-faire frontier but one subject to moral and political oversight. As one economist who has tracked the sector for years put it, 'This is a blunt instrument, but perhaps a necessary one. When markets fail to self-regulate and the social costs pile up, the state asserts itself.'advertisementStill, the long-term consequences remain uncertain. India's digital economy has thrived on global investor confidence, and sudden, sweeping prohibitions risk undermining that perception of predictability. Venture capital funds have already begun reassessing their appetite for Indian start-ups, worried that other high-growth sectors could face similar crackdowns. Even firms in permissible categories will find themselves grappling with compliance costs and the chilling effect of regulators armed with warrantless powers. For entrepreneurs, the bill is a reminder that in India's political economy, social stability can trump for the ruling BJP, the political upside is too attractive to ignore. The legislation dovetails neatly with the party's broader narrative of moral guardianship: protecting the young, safeguarding families and curbing what it portrays as corrosive modern temptations. In campaign rallies, expect to hear references to the bill as proof that the Modi government will not allow 'digital addiction' to destroy households. The fact that it was tabled in Parliament so swiftly after Cabinet approval underscores its role as a political project, not just a regulatory the clash between capital and culture, the government has chosen culture. In the tug of war between states and courts, it has reasserted central authority. In the balance between innovation and morality, it has sided firmly with morality. Whether the online gaming bill becomes a model for future digital regulation or a cautionary tale of overreach will depend on its implementation. For now, what it represents is unmistakable: the assertion of the state's right to police not just the economy but the moral fabric of Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill is, therefore, more than a piece of legislation. It is a statement of intent from a government that thrives on decisive gestures. The message to investors is blunt: profits cannot come at the cost of social order. The message to voters is sharper still: the state will intervene, aggressively if necessary, to protect families from what it sees as corrosive forces. In a season of high political stakes, the bill has become both policy and politics, an emblem of how the Modi government views the trade-offs between growth, morality and to India Today Magazine- Ends
Scroll.in
29 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Gujarat school play allegedly depicting women wearing burqas as terrorists triggers row
A play during an Independence Day programme at a school in Gujarat's Bhavnagar has triggered a row about the alleged depiction of women wearing burqas as terrorists, The Indian Express reported. Videos of the cultural programme were widely shared on social media. On Tuesday, District Education Officer Hitendrasinh D Padheriya issued a notice to the Municipal School Board Administrative Officer Munjal Badmaliya seeking a report within a week about the programme held at the government school, the newspaper reported. The notice was issued based on a representation made by Bandharan Bachav Samiti Bhavnagar, a social organisation, which alleged that the play had portrayed the Muslim community as terrorists. The organisation demanded action against those behind the play, according to The Indian Express. Rajendrakumar Dave, the school principal, said: 'We only wanted to depict what happened in Operation Sindoor.' 'We did not intend to hurt anyone's sentiments,' he told ANI. 'We conducted this event only to invoke patriotism. If any community is hurt, I apologise.' The district education officer sought details of the programme and asked whether the depiction as has been alleged was intentional, and details of the event held at the school. The Bandharan Bachav Samiti Bhavnagar had alleged that the play was 'an attempt by the school staff to hurt religious sentiments and spread unrest in the public'. 'In the play, girls dressed in Muslim attire (burqa) were shown as terrorists, clearly depicting the Muslim community as terrorists,' the organisation alleged, according to The Indian Express. It added that the Muslim community was angry with the teachers, the organisation said. Badmaliya said that the event is held every year on Independence Day and Republic Day. 'This year it was themed on Operation Sindoor and the bravery of our defence forces, and programmes were held in every school,' the newspaper quoted him as saying. 'Nothing was intentional or deliberate.'
