logo
Trump's tariffs explained: Why they caused a market meltdown and who will bear the brunt

Trump's tariffs explained: Why they caused a market meltdown and who will bear the brunt

Khaleej Times08-04-2025
Major stock markets in the world suffered heavy losses at the start of the week triggered by US President Donald Trump's new tariffs. Some economists downplayed the global stock market plunge and said there was 'no reason" to anticipate a recession based on the tariffs.
Other countries, particularly China, have announced countermeasures after Trump announced another sharp tariff hike on goods from the world's second biggest economy. And there are also strong indications that this back-and-forth tariff announcements will see prices rising not only for the US consumers but will also harm the world economy.
Lest we get lost in the economic jargons and soundbites, let us take a more fundamental understanding of these Trump tariffs and how they caused markets around world to tumble. And more importantly, what these drops and gains mean for the consumers.
What are tariffs?
Tariffs are customs duties or taxes imposed by one country on goods/ products imported from another country. They raise revenues for governments. In international trade, tariffs serve as a protectionist measure to shield local emerging industries from international competitors. They give a price advantage to locally-produced goods over similar goods which are imported.
On April 2, US President Donald J. Trump 'declared that foreign trade and economic practices have created a (US) national emergency'. He said a 10 per cent tariff on all nations and much higher rates of up to 50 per cent on individual countries will boost the US economy and protect jobs.
In essence, the 'US changed from being among the most open economies in the world to its most closed,' noted Filipino economist Sonny Africa, executive director of Ibon Foundation — an independent non-government organisation providing research, information and education.
'Before Pres. Trump's so-called 'liberation day' tariffs, the US's average tariff of 3.3 per cent was just two-fifths of the global average of 8.7 per cent. With the additional reciprocal tariffs, the US's average tariff leaps six-fold to 19.8 per cent and it is now the most protectionist economy in the world, by the measure of average tariffs,' he underscored.
Who (really) pays for tariffs?
Tariffs levied on importers are eventually passed on to domestic consumers. Tariffs make foreign products relatively more expensive for consumers, particularly when domestic manufacturers rely on imported inputs in their production process. To recoup their expenses, they will pass the increased cost to consumers.
In the US, vehicle affordability is already a major issue for consumers, and this will hit harder when tariffs on auto parts will come no later than May 3.
In the UAE, buying new and used cars from the US could get more expensive in the aftermath of new tariffs rolled out by Trump, said experts, adding 'the impact could even extend to car maintenance and repairs.'
'On the other hand, the tariffs will also open an opportunity for cars produced in Asia, especially China, to capture a higher market share in the region,' noted Abhinav Gupta, CEO of Cars24.
Why is Trump using tariffs?
Trump, who is intrinsically a businessman, is using the imposition of tariffs as a political tool for his government. He said tariffs will boost the US economy by encouraging American consumers to buy more US-made goods. They will also hike government revenues.
Trump said the 'Made in America' is not just a tagline — but 'an economic and national security priority' of his administration.
A White House statement reads: 'President Trump refuses to let the US be taken advantage of and believes that tariffs are necessary to ensure fair trade, protect American workers, and reduce the trade deficit — this is an emergency.' This means the tariffs 'will remain in effect until such a time as President Trump determines that the threat posed by the trade deficit and underlying nonreciprocal treatment is satisfied, resolved, or mitigated.'
Who (really) benefits from tariffs?
Not the consumers for sure. The US government will see increased tax revenues as imported products will enter the domestic market. American companies can benefit from a reduction in competition, and local manufacturers can pass on the added cost to the consumers.
Some businesses will profit from reduced international competition and the government will see an increase in revenue from customs duties. But tariffs will increase the price of goods and services in domestic markets. To cover the increased costs, the importer charges higher prices for the goods and services. In the end, higher prices for consumer goods will reduce consumption which will eventually weaken the economy.
How are Trump's tariffs affecting the global economy?
We have seen at the start of the week — dubbed as Black Monday — the sharp fall in stock markets across the world. There are no signs of letting up as Trump is threatening the imposition of additional tariffs on Chinese goods entering US soil.
Some analysts say market falls often herald an economic downturn. Stock markets were hit but not only investors will be affected because there can also be an impact on pensions, jobs and interest rates.
The last time the world economy suffered a major blow was five years ago, during the Covid pandemic, when – understandably – the health emergency forced the apparent shutdown of the global economy.
Who are taking advantage of the stock market decline?
'Retail investors demonstrated strong conviction on April 3, the first full trading day following President Trump's so-called 'Liberation Day' and the announcement of new US tariffs. Instead of panic-selling, many chose to buy the dip, seeing the sharp sell-off as an overreaction to macroeconomic developments,' noted Lale Akoner, market analyst at eToro, in a statement to Khaleej Times on Tuesday.
Buying the dip means purchasing stocks during a market decline.
Akoner said: 'Many saw it as a buying opportunity in quality names like Nvidia, Amazon, and Nike, which have strong fundamentals but were dragged down in the broad risk-off move.'
She explained: 'Nike, for example, plunged due to tariff concerns on imports from Southeast Asia, but long-term bulls likely saw its brand strength and market dominance as worth holding through short-term supply chain pressures.'
Despite recent volatility driven by tariffs and inflation concerns, Akoner said 'retail investors are becoming increasingly sophisticated, using macro-driven sell-offs as entry points into fundamentally strong assets. In short, retail investors bought in because they believed the assets were fundamentally strong – the drop was temporary – and opportunity often lies in chaos,' Akoner concluded.
Are we seeing a global economic downturn?
There are indications that we may be heading in that direction. An economic study shared on Tuesday with Khaleej Times by Trends Research & Advisory noted: 'The new tariffs imposed by the Trump administration on China, the European Union, and several Asian nations may further destabilise global trade, potentially prompting retaliatory measures from affected countries.'
Trends Research & Advisory examined the global repercussions of Trump's tariff policies, which took effect on April 2, and said 'these measures could escalate trade protectionism and intensify economic tensions between the US and its key trading partners, ultimately affecting global trade and investment stability.'
'Global financial markets reacted sharply to these decisions… While the Trump administration's tariff policies aim to reduce the US trade deficit and boost domestic industry, the (fresh tariffs) could negatively impact American businesses and consumers by increasing import costs and product prices.'
'(These) policies could reshape global trade relations and alter the international economic landscape in the coming years. (We) may witness a further escalation of global trade conflicts, with the possibility of new negotiations or additional tariffs from both sides — placing the global economy at a critical crossroads,' the Abu Dhabi-based private, independent research institution added.
Africa, however, underscored we are not yet heading towards a global economic meltdown. He maintained 'the global stock market crash was a knee-jerk reaction to the uncertainty.'
'There are effects but the disruption is not generalised because the global supply chains are wide and there are alternatives to the US,' he added, noting: 'Economic growth will definitely be inflationary and slow, and the least developed countries that are foreign debt- and commodity export-dependent will have problems — they might have a debt crisis.
'But honestly, it's hard to say about the global meltdown because down the line the US might do something more – it might tighten or loosen up. Other countries might have a more extreme reaction, resulting in geopolitical crisis, etc.,' Africa noted.
Who must be really protected?
The consumers and the wider public first and foremost. Beyond the tariff wars, Africa noted 'there are far-reaching impact from disrupted global production lines and resulting adjustments and likely countermeasures.
Tariffs are not always negative – they are means to have negotiations between trading partners, and help to stabilise a country's economy.
'What's clear though is the global free market never really worked,' noted Africa, explaining: 'The biggest gainers from more open US economy were foreign firms, including American ones, setting up in enclave economic zones as an export platform of their global production lines. They're also the biggest immediate losers of the higher tariffs and more closed US economy.
Africa is in favour of protecting, supporting and strengthening domestic economy and industry. 'It's never too late to fix things but the sooner acceptance comes then the sooner we can start to rectify and radically reform,' he added.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Oil prices rise after Trump-Zelenskyy meeting as Ukraine ceasefire remains elusive
Oil prices rise after Trump-Zelenskyy meeting as Ukraine ceasefire remains elusive

The National

time34 minutes ago

  • The National

Oil prices rise after Trump-Zelenskyy meeting as Ukraine ceasefire remains elusive

Oil prices rose on Monday after US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy expressed hope that talks with European leaders at the White House could pave the way for a trilateral summit with Russian leader Vladimir Putin to end Moscow's years-long invasion of Ukraine. The talks held at the White House were expected to focus on security guarantees for Ukraine, a possible annexation of Ukrainian territory to Russia and a peace agreement. 'We are ready for a trilateral [meeting with Russia],' Mr Zelenskyy said during a meeting with Mr Trump. At the meeting with Mr Trump and European leaders, he said he would be willing to have the US President present during a meeting with Mr Putin. The hastily arranged meeting came days after Mr Trump and Mr Putin held talks in Anchorage, Alaska. Brent, the global benchmark for crude, rose 0.97 per cent to $65.54 a barrel as of 4pm ET. West Texas Intermediate, which tracks US crude, was 1 per cent higher at $62.60. Oil prices surged to $140 a barrel in March 2022 after Russia's invasion of Ukraine, and sanctions imposed on Moscow by Washington and London. Prices fell in the months since with factors including an inflationary surge, a decrease in Chinese demand and fears of a global economic slowdown. Mr Trump has lately sought to punish Russia by doubling the tariff rate placed on India to 50 per cent as New Delhi continues to buy oil and military machinery from Moscow. The latest tariff is due to go into effect in a couple weeks. 'India's dependence on Russian crude is opportunistic and deeply corrosive of the world's efforts to isolate Putin's war economy,' White House trade adviser Peter Navarro wrote in an opinion piece for the Financial Times on Sunday. 'In effect, India acts as a global clearinghouse for Russian oil, converting embargoed crude into high-value exports while giving Moscow the dollars it needs.' Eyes turn to Jackson Hole Major indexes on Wall Street, meanwhile, were largely muted as traders awaited incoming economic data and Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell's address at Jackson Hole this week. The Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 33.93 points, or 0.08 per cent, when trading closed on Monday. The S&P 500 ticked 0.01 per cent lower while the Nasdaq Composite rose slightly at 0.03 per cent. Mr Powell was due to speak at the annual symposium in Wyoming as traders increasingly expect the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates when it meets next month. The odds of a September rate cut have climbed considerably since a weaker-than-expected jobs report last month. The Fed has held interest rates steady this year after cutting rates three times to its current range of 4.25-4.50 per cent in the final three months of 2024. 'The risk of an earlier cut increased following the release of the July employment report. However, of the Fed's two policy objectives, inflation is still furthest from its target and that gap is likely to widen as the full impact of tariffs becomes apparent in the data,' Oxford Economics lead analyst John Canavan wrote to clients. The Fed is also due to release minutes from its July meeting on Wednesday, where traders will scrutinise a debate among Fed officials in which two governors dissented against last month's decision to hold rates steady. Big-box retailers including Home Depot, Lowes, Walmart and Target were also scheduled to release their earnings reports this week. Jobless claims and fresh housing data are due to be released before Mr Powell's keynote address on Friday.

Conservative network Newsmax agrees to pay $67m in defamation case over 2020 election claims
Conservative network Newsmax agrees to pay $67m in defamation case over 2020 election claims

The National

time43 minutes ago

  • The National

Conservative network Newsmax agrees to pay $67m in defamation case over 2020 election claims

The conservative network Newsmax will pay $67 million to settle a lawsuit accusing it of defaming a voting equipment company by spreading lies about President Donald Trump 's 2020 election loss, according to documents filed on Monday. The settlement comes after Fox News paid $787.5 million to settle a similar lawsuit in 2023 and Newsmax paid what court papers say was $40 million to settle a libel lawsuit from a different voting machine manufacturer, Smartmatic, which also was a target of pro-Trump conspiracy theories on the network. Delaware Superior Court Judge Eric Davis had ruled earlier that Newsmax did defame the Denver company Dominion Voting Systems by airing false information about the company and its equipment. But Mr Davis left it to a jury to eventually decide whether that was done with malice, and if so how much Dominion deserved from Newsmax in damages. Newsmax and Dominion reached the settlement before the trial could take place. The disclosure came as Mr Trump, who lost his 2020 re-election bid to the Democrat Joe Biden, vowed in a social media post on Monday to eliminate mail-in ballots and voting machines such as those supplied by Dominion and other companies. It not known how the Republican President could achieve that. The same judge also handled the Dominion-Fox News case and made a similar ruling that the network repeated numerous lies from Mr Trump's allies about his 2020 loss despite internal communications showing Fox officials knew the claims were bogus. 'How long are we going to play along with election fraud?' the Newsmax host Bob Sellers said two days after the 2020 election was called for Mr Biden, according to internal documents revealed as part of the case. Newsmax took pride that it was not calling the election for Mr Biden and, the internal documents show, saw a business opportunity in catering to viewers who believed Mr Trump won. At Newsmax, employees repeatedly warned against false allegations from pro-Trump guests such as lawyer Sidney Powell, according to documents in the lawsuit. In one text, even Newsmax's owner Chris Ruddy, a Trump ally, said he found it 'scary' that Mr Trump was meeting with Ms Powell. Dominion was at the heart of many of the wild claims aired by guests on Newsmax and elsewhere. The network retracted some of its more bombastic allegations in December 2020. Though Mr Trump has insisted his fraud claims are real, there is no evidence that they were, and the lawsuits in the Fox and Newsmax cases show that some of the President's biggest supporters knew they were false at the time. Mr Trump's attorney general at the time, William Barr, said there was no evidence of widespread fraud. Mr Trump and his backers lost dozens of lawsuits alleging fraud, some before Trump-appointed judges. Numerous recounts, reviews and audits of the election results, including some run by Republicans, turned up no signs of significant wrongdoing or error and affirmed Mr Biden's win.

Mideast Stocks: Most Gulf bourses slip on geopolitics, Fed rate cut uncertainty
Mideast Stocks: Most Gulf bourses slip on geopolitics, Fed rate cut uncertainty

Zawya

time4 hours ago

  • Zawya

Mideast Stocks: Most Gulf bourses slip on geopolitics, Fed rate cut uncertainty

Most Gulf equities ended lower on Monday, led by the Qatar index, as investors turned cautious while awaiting developments from a meeting between the U.S. and Ukraine presidents, and an annual Federal Reserve conference at Jackson Hole. Friday's U.S. data showed July retail sales rose as expected, but weaker consumer confidence and softer factory output suggested tariffs were weighing on parts of the economy, clouding the Fed's rate path. Traders are pricing an about 85% chance of a 25-basis-point cut on September 17, with further easing by year-end. Monetary policy shifts in the U.S. have a significant impact on Gulf markets, where most currencies are pegged to the dollar. Meanwhile, U.S. President Donald Trump said Ukraine should abandon hopes of regaining annexed Crimea or joining NATO, ahead of a meeting with Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskiy and European leaders in Washington. The Qatari benchmark index was down for a second day and fell 0.6% as investors took profits after an earnings-fuelled rally, with all constituents in the red. Qatar National Bank declined 0.9% and Industries Qatar fell 1.5%. Saudi Arabia's benchmark stock index slipped 0.1%, ending a two-session rise, with most stocks lower. ACWA Power fell 1.5%, while Saudi Arabian Mining and Umm Al Qura for Development and Construction each lost 1.1%. Umm Al Qura said it sold a land plot for 145.1 million riyals. The Abu Dhabi benchmark index eased 0.1%, its ninth straight decline and longest losing streak since February 2024. Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank fell 1.6% and First Abu Dhabi Bank slipped 1.3%. "GCC markets are exhibiting signs of consolidation after a period of strong gains following the end of the Q2 earnings season," said Milad Azar, market analyst at XTB MENA. Dubai's benchmark stock index rose for a third straight session and inched up 0.1%, supported by gains in finance and real estate shares. Emaar Properties advanced 1% and Emirates NBD, the emirate's largest lender, added 1.2%. Outside the Gulf, Egypt's blue-chip index fell 0.4%, pressured by a 3.8% drop in a tobacco maker Eastern Company and a 1.3% decline in Talaat Moustafa. Arabian Cement jumped 5.6% after second-quarter group profit more than tripled. SAUDI ARABIA lost 0.1% to 10,886 KUWAIT down 0.4% to 9,318 QATAR fell 0.6% to 11,516 EGYPT down 0.4% to 35,825 BAHRAIN lost 0.1% to 1,934 OMAN up 0.2% to 4,930 ABU DHABI down 0.1% to 10,213 DUBAI added 0.1% to 6,129 (Reporting by Md Manzer Hussain; Editing by Leroy Leo)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store