
Waymo to begin testing in Philadelphia with safety drivers behind the wheel
"This city is a National Treasure," Waymo wrote in a post on X on Monday. "It's a city of love, where eagles fly with a gritty spirit and cheese that spreads and cheese that steaks. Our road trip continues to Philly next."
The Alphabet-owned company confirmed to CNBC that it will be testing in Pennsylvania's largest city through the fall, adding that the initial fleet of cars will be manually driven through the more complex parts of Philadelphia, including downtown and on freeways.
"Folks will see our vehicles driving at all hours throughout various neighborhoods, from North Central to Eastwick, and from University City to as far east as the Delaware River," a Waymo spokesperson said.
With its so-called road trips, Waymo seeks to collect mapping data and evaluate how its autonomous technology, Waymo Driver, performs in new environments, handling traffic patterns and local infrastructure. Road trips are often used a way for the company to gauge whether it can potentially offer a paid ride share service in a particular location.
The expanded testing, which will go through the fall, comes as Waymo aims for a broader rollout. Last month, the company announced plans to drive vehicles manually in New York for testing, marking the first step toward potentially cracking the largest U.S. city. Waymo applied for a permit with the New York City Department of Transportation to operate autonomously with a trained specialist behind the wheel in Manhattan. State law currently doesn't allow for such driverless operations.
Waymo One provides more than 250,000 paid trips each week across Phoenix, San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Austin, Texas, and is preparing to bring fully autonomous rides to Atlanta, Miami, and Washington, D.C., in 2026.
Alphabet has been under pressure to monetize artificial intelligence products as it bolsters spending on infrastructure. Alphabet's "Other Bets" segment, which includes Waymo, brought in revenue of $1.65 billion in 2024, up from $1.53 billion in 2023. However, the segment lost $4.44 billion last year, compared to a loss of $4.09 billion the previous year.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNBC
13 minutes ago
- CNBC
Josh Brown adds Dominion Energy to his 'best stocks in the market'
Josh Brown, CEO at Ritholtz Wealth Management, joins CNBC's "Halftime Report" to explain why he's adding Dominion energy to his "Best Stocks in the Market".


Axios
13 minutes ago
- Axios
Big banks are now in Trump's crosshairs
President Trump is planning an executive order that would punish banks if they are believed to be discriminating against political conservatives. Why it matters: The president has previously targeted law firms and media companies, but with banks — one of the most heavily regulated industries — the administration has a number of levers it can pull to apply pressure. Driving the news: Appearing on CNBC Tuesday morning, Trump seemed to give a nod to a Wall Street Journal report that the White House is preparing an executive order directing regulators to penalize any bank found to have dropped a client on political grounds. The president accused both JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America of discrimination, by refusing to take his personal business. The big picture: A number of conservatives and crypto executives have claimed for years that they were "debanked" for political reasons, and the Senate Banking Committee held a hearing on some of those claims in February. Both JPMorgan and Bank of America have said that political reasons are not a factor in their customer decisions. "We don't close accounts for political reasons, and we agree with President Trump that regulatory change is desperately needed," a JPMorgan spokesperson says. "We're pleased to see the White House is addressing this issue, for which we've been advocating for many years, and look forward to working with them to get this right." The banking industry has also pointed to anti-money-laundering and reputational risk regulation as possible factors in restricting access. Bank regulators, however, have recently dropped reputational risk as part of their scrutiny. The intrigue: For the president, the political is clearly personal. On CNBC, Trump said of JPMorgan: " I had many, many accounts loaded up with cash. I was loaded up with cash. And they told me, 'I'm sorry, sir, we can't have you. You have 20 days to get out.' I said, 'You got to be kidding. I've been with you for 35, 40 years.'" Reality check: Trump was a businessman before becoming a conservative politician. In a 2019 article about investigations into Deutsche Bank, The New York Times noted that in recent decades, the German bank "was the only mainstream financial institution consistently willing to do business with Mr. Trump, who had a history of defaulting on loans. " What to watch: If and when an executive order comes out (the WSJ cautions the administration's plans could change), it will indicate whether banks' regulatory burden becomes heavier or lighter under this administration.


CNBC
14 minutes ago
- CNBC
Adam Parker: The case for the S&P 500 climbing to 10,000 by 2030
(This is an actual research report from Trivector's Adam Parker, reprinted for CNBC Pro subscribers with permission. Click here to subscribe to Trivector.) Investors with whom we are speaking appear well-aware of the potential negatives for the U.S. equity market. However, this awareness seems to be taking a back seat to FOMO (fear of missing out) on the current uptrend in the market. We share in some of that optimism as we see a path to 10% EPS growth for the S & P 500 , with a low 20x price-to-forward earnings ratio – elevated versus history but justified by structurally higher margins. Why are we more bullish on the long-term and what is the case for 10,000 on the S & P 500 by 2030? We have done extensive analysis looking at the relationship between margins and multiples, showing that expanding margins can lead to multiple expansion. This, combined with our view on AI and the positive impact it can have on margins across sectors, leads us to be bullish on U.S. equities for the next 12-to-18 months. We see the S & P 500 above 7000 before the end of 2026, if not sooner. The top 50 companies are relatively immune from higher inflation, a dynamic that was made crystal clear post-COVID. These companies account for nearly 50% of the gross profit dollars of the S & P 500. Moreover, lower input costs like commodities and oil, tame logistics expenses, and a weakening dollar might all help the earnings outlook for the second half of 2025. AI productivity and revenue synergies likely help 2026 and 2027 earnings. We don't see the market performing poorly with this as the backdrop driving double-digit EPS growth. In the table below, we show going left-to-right a range of per year EPS assumptions for the S & P 500 from 5% to 15%. Up and down we show a range of price-to-forward earnings multiples from 15x to 25x. The case for 10000 by the end of 2030 is one where investors pay 22x earnings on 10% per year earnings growth between now and then. Look at the range of multiples and earnings estimates below, with the cells in black showing the outcomes that support the S & P500 around 10000 by 2030. All opinions expressed by the CNBC Pro contributors are solely their opinions and do not reflect the opinions of CNBC, NBC UNIVERSAL, their parent company or affiliates, and may have been previously disseminated by them on television, radio, internet or another medium. THE ABOVE CONTENT IS SUBJECT TO OUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND PRIVACY POLICY . THIS CONTENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND DOES NOT CONSITUTE FINANCIAL, INVESTMENT, TAX OR LEGAL ADVICE OR A RECOMMENDATION TO BUY ANY SECURITY OR OTHER FINANCIAL ASSET. THE CONTENT IS GENERAL IN NATURE AND DOES NOT REFLECT ANY INDIVIDUAL'S UNIQUE PERSONAL CIRCUMSTANCES. THE ABOVE CONTENT MIGHT NOT BE SUITABLE FOR YOUR PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES. BEFORE MAKING ANY FINANCIAL DECISIONS, YOU SHOULD STRONGLY CONSIDER SEEKING ADVICE FROM YOUR OWN FINANCIAL OR INVESTMENT ADVISOR. Click here for the full disclaimer. The analyst, Adam Parker, responsible for the preparation of this research report certifies that: all the views expressed in this research report accurately reflect the research analyst's personal views