logo
Queer romance at the end of the world: the best new young-adult fiction

Queer romance at the end of the world: the best new young-adult fiction

Irish Times06-07-2025
The title gives it away, to a certain extent.
Vesuvius
(Atom, £9.99), the debut from Cass Biehn, is set in Pompeii just before that fateful eruption. For modern readers who may feel as if our own world constantly teeters on the brink of disaster (or has perhaps toppled over), there's an immediate appeal here in this tale of two star-crossed boys – one thief, one temple attendant – whose paths cross when the former steals a sacred relic.
Mercury's helmet is said to contain tremendous power, but when Felix steals it, he's mainly concerned with its monetary value. In a reverse Pascal's wager, he holds fast to one rule: 'magic isn't worth the cost of belief'. Loren, on the other hand, is all too aware the supernatural exists – all his life he has seen flashes of the future, though he's been cautioned not to share them publicly. When he encounters Felix, he instantly recognises the boy from his apocalyptic visions – 'the living counterpart of the nightmarish ghost who caused the destruction' of the city.
There's adventure, political intrigue, and reflections on what it means to be a hero – all wrapped up in a love story that reminds us, as Biehn notes in their preface, 'queer people existed in ancient times as they exist today'. The umbrella term is useful here, acknowledging the historically and culturally specific ways in which sexuality is conceived of and spoken about, and Biehn pleasingly resists the urge to impose modern labels. Loren confesses he is 'not… for women', a certainty that comes 'as a bright shock' to Felix, who understands the fluidity when one wants a 'dalliance' but is all too aware that settling down involves a woman. A wealthy man may have 'a boy on the side', but never an equal; to want a 'companion' is impossible.
Other concepts are slightly shakier for the period; there are conversations about virginity, historically policed for women but not men, that don't quite ring true, and there's a fuzziness over what 'childhood' might mean. These are nitpicks, of course, and more forgivable is the dialogue that moves between faux-archaic and contemporary idiom – if we are to be relentlessly purist, we would not be reading this text in modern English, after all.
READ MORE
This gripping adventure is part of a wave of classical-myth-inspired YA fiction and pop culture more generally, and one suspects the generation of kids who grew up on the Percy Jackson books and are now writing their own novels have more than a little to do with this. There are tropes and indeed some phrases that will be too familiar to readers – within two lines we have 'Loren's thudding heart skipped' and 'Felix's copper curls tangled like a storm-tossed ocean' – but if you are inclined to swoon over a queer romance at the end of the world (raises hand) you'll let it slide.
That sense of queer history, and a historical Italian setting, is also at play in Brian Selznick's
Run Away With Me
(Scholastic, £19.99), albeit a tad more recent. Rome, the summer of 1986. Danny wanders the streets while his mother works on old books, and meets a strange, beautiful boy. 'Angelo and I expanded and contracted across the city, a murmuration of two that shifted and changed shape but always felt complete and alive, no matter how big or small the space between us.'
It is like being in a myth, though he is aware how unhappily most end – 'People were usually transformed against their will into trees or constellations or deer killed by their own hounds'. Angelo is 'all sweat and cherries and rain', and together they will uncover the secret of the Monda Museum and its founders.
Selznick, best known for his illustrated children's novel
The Invention of Hugo Cabret
, bookends the lyrical text with charcoal drawings, lending to the dreamy, delirious first-love feeling of it all. Gorgeous.
Abdi Nazemian
Slightly later in the 1980s we might move to New York and find ourselves in the world of novelist and screenwriter Abdi Nazemian's
Like A Love Story
(Little Tiger, £8.99), featuring three teenagers in a quasi-love triangle against the backdrop of the Aids crisis. Reza has just moved to the city, and is sure of two things – he is gay and it will kill him. He will not let his mother bandage a minor wound: 'Just in case my blood is toxic. Just in case you can get it from having too many thoughts of boys in locker rooms.'
Meeting Art, out and proud at school, is a jolt, but even Art sometimes wonders: 'I don't know how I'll ever begin to live while this disease is raging. Who will love me when all they'll see when they look at me is the possibility that I may kill them?'
The terror, which may feel melodramatic for contemporary readers – as I write this there is news of yet another medical breakthrough in the prevention of HIV transmission – is legitimate, as we learn when we meet Judy (Art's best friend, who falls hopelessly for Reza) and her dying, fiercely activist uncle Stephen.
It's hard not to veer toward cliche when writing about truly awful historical moments, but Nazemian earns every single activist slogan, every entreaty to both fight and celebrate. There is nuance and care here, as various issues are explored; novels offer space beyond the simple binary of with us/against us that is so prevalent in our polarised society. Stephen noting, 'there's a difference between denying sick people access to life-saving drugs and expressing an opinion about how to define queer film' is a particularly welcome line. Thoughtful, emotional, haunting – I loved it.
Josh Silver
British author Josh Silver is always good on sideways glances at contemporary treatments for mental health, approaching the topic with tremendous empathy and knowledge but unafraid to squint a little at panaceas. In his latest,
Traumaland
(Rock The Boat, £8.99), the new silver bullet is 'optogenetics', a 'cutting-edge neuro modulation' that is 'a quick, effective and innovatory new therapy, set to revolutionise mental healthcare'.
Eli is unaware of all this at first – but he does know he has been through something traumatic, and it's left him unable to feel anything. Seeking out dark thrills at an underground club leads him into a tangled web of conspiracies (don't go clubbing, kids), and makes him determined to uncover the truth of his alleged accident. Silver's pacy writing and twisty plot makes this a delicious read as well as providing much food for thought.
Finally, sometimes one just needs a sapphic rom-com involving a princess and a scholarship student at a boarding school in a tiny fictional European country. This premise, too, is part of a broader trend in YA and romance – glamorous escapism, but make it gay. It's a little bit progressive and a little bit conservative, a repackaging of old ideas with a rainbow ribbon, often with little reflection, but in the best hands, it's tremendously pleasing.
And we are in good hands with the always-reliable Sophie Gonzales, whose
Nobody in Particular
(Hodder, £9.99) offers a sharp eye on public scrutiny – 'The media has been writing incessantly about me since six months before my birth,' Princess Rose recalls – while also providing a sweet, hopeful love story.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bob Geldof glows with awkward-customer energy as Boomtown Rats play All Together Now 2025
Bob Geldof glows with awkward-customer energy as Boomtown Rats play All Together Now 2025

Irish Times

time3 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Bob Geldof glows with awkward-customer energy as Boomtown Rats play All Together Now 2025

The Boomtown Rats Something Kind of Wonderful stage, Sunday ★★★★☆ It has been a year of anniversaries for Bob Geldof and The Boomtown Rats. Half a century has elapsed since Geldof and bandmates emerged, spluttering and snarling, from the Dublin punk scene. But 2025 is also the 40th anniversary of Live Aid, the moment Geldof the frontman with the crazy hair was replaced in the public imagination by sweary St Bob of telethon immortality. Both sides of the singer are on show during The Boomtown Rats' agreeably splenetic Sunday-afternoon set at All Together Now . The hits arrive at a steady clip, starting with Rat Trap, a neurotic slide tackle of a tune informed by Geldof's experience working in a Dublin slaughterhouse during the dead-end 1970s. [ Bob Geldof: 'I never read about myself. I can't stand the stupid f**king things I say' Opens in new window ] Looking professorially grey at the age of 73, Geldof glows with awkward-customer energy. His voice isn't what it was, and there are stretches when he rasps rather than sings – while his body language is that of a stick insect with a few things to get off its chest. The songs – including the beautifully bittersweet Someone's Looking at You, from 1979 – are evergreen, however, even if the rockabilly epic (She's Gonna) Do You In is stretched to snapping point. 'This is the Pink Floyd bit – it goes on for f**king ages,' Geldof explains. All Together Now 2025: Bob Geldof, Doc O'Connor and Pete Briquette of The Boomtown Rats onstage on Sunday. Photograph: Kieran Frost/Redferns The singer recently spoke out against Israel's action in Gaza . He repeats the message at All Together Now, pausing during I Don't Like Mondays' 'the lesson today is how to die' beat to talk about the women and children dying in Palestine and about those giving their lives on the frontline in Ukraine . As he talks the video screens show the Palestine flag. Fifty years in, Geldof is still an expert at big gestures and at combining pop and protest to theatrical effect. These rats have some scurrying left in them yet.

The hidden Jewish history at the heart of a Kyiv painting
The hidden Jewish history at the heart of a Kyiv painting

Irish Times

time3 hours ago

  • Irish Times

The hidden Jewish history at the heart of a Kyiv painting

The oil painting shows a carnage of darkness and menacing sharp edges, stricken through by a lightning bolt. Curled at its centre: a vulnerable fragment of text in the Hebrew alphabet, its significance buried by history. Painted in Kyiv in the turbulent years of 1918-1920, El Lissitzky's painting, titled Composition, is one of dozens of artworks secretly transported out of Ukraine under heavy bombardment after Russia's 2022 invasion. They toured top international art museums as the exhibition In the Eye of the Storm: Modernism in Ukraine, 1900-1930s. This was for safekeeping, as bombs rained on Ukraine and museums in occupied territories were looted. It was also an act of 'cultural diplomacy', in the words of curator Katia Denysova, aimed to cement international acceptance of a specifically Ukrainian chapter of art history, distinct from that of the invader. READ MORE The fact that these paintings could be viewed at all was, in itself, a remarkable story of survival. Most had been slated for destruction, caught on the wrong side of Stalinist ideological intolerance in the 1930s, and were hidden for decades in a secret cache in a museum basement. The collection includes the works of leading Ukrainian modernists, such as Oleksandr Bohomazov and Vasyl Yermilov, as well as those like Lissitzky who worked in Kyiv before becoming famous elsewhere. El Lissitzky, Composition (1918-1920). Photograph: Naomi O'Leary I first saw Lissitzky's Composition when the exhibition came to the Museo Nacional Thyssen-Bornemisza in Madrid. The fragment of text caught my notice. Though abstract, the painting was infused with a violent energy, and the placement of the text cradled in its centre seemed significant. I took a close-up photograph of the lettering. I wanted to find out what it meant. The exhibition curators, I was told, did not know. 'The National Art Museum of Ukraine, they have some experts looking at it, but no one has been able to decipher and find out where this text is coming from yet,' Denysova told me at the time. Had it been lost to history? There was something about this secret at the heart of the painting that stayed with me. I was determined to figure it out. My first breakthrough in identifying the text at the centre of Composition came from asking friends who know Hebrew if they could read it. They could not. It was in Yiddish, the language traditionally spoken by the Ashkenazi Jews of central and eastern Europe, which is Germanic but uses the Hebrew alphabet. That pointed to a very specific place and time. Composition was created during a brief moment of cultural flowering in Ukraine in the early decades of the 20th century, amid the tumult of the collapse of empires, the Ukrainian war of independence, and the emergence of the Soviet Union. It was a time of terror for Jewish communities, which then made up 12 per cent of Ukraine's population, as the instability unleashed brutal mob violence against them that killed tens of thousands. But amid the carnage was a period of relative cultural freedom. Tsarist prohibitions on the Ukrainian language fell away, and new literary movements sprang up in Kharkiv and Kyiv. A ban on printing in the Hebrew alphabet ended with the 1917 Russian Revolution, and new theatre and publishing incorporating Jewish themes boomed. It was a time when ideas of nationhood, not least in Ireland, were inspiring struggles for autonomy and cultural movements dedicated to celebrating and furthering national identity. Lissitzky began his career in this environment, travelling to Jewish towns and villages to record their ancient artefacts and illustrating Yiddish-language children's books. He cofounded the art section of the Kultur-Lige in Kyiv in 1918, a cultural organisation dedicated to fostering Yiddish-language theatre, music, art and intellectual life. The aim of his circle was to develop a distinctly Jewish modernist art, just as Ukrainian-language artistic groups were fostering their own 'national culture'. In these early years the Bolsheviks accommodated the use of local and minority languages, seeing this as a way to unite the diversity of the emerging Soviet Union and embed communism within its many ethnic communities. Lissitzky was swept up in the moment of optimism, depicting the revolution as God's will and creating a poster encouraging Jews to support the Bolshevik side in Russia's civil war. But the moment of liberation was to prove short-lived. Josef Stalin in 1936. Photograph:In 1919, Jewish organisations were designated enemies of the revolution, as part of a general crackdown against religion. Synagogues and Jewish cultural organisations were ordered to close, and the Hebrew alphabet was denounced as anti-communist. Lissitzky stopped incorporating Jewish themes in his art, left behind Yiddish book illustration, and abandoned his Hebrew name, Eliezer, becoming 'El'. As Josef Stalin built his totalitarian dictatorship from the late 1920s, artistic independence increasingly became impossible. Much of what had been celebrated before was now denounced as 'formalist' or 'bourgeois nationalism'. The statue Girl with Ears of Grain at the National Museum of the Holodomor Genocide in Kyiv. Photograph: Oleg Petrasyuk/EPA Ukrainian intellectuals were an early target. The man-made Holodomor famine killed millions, hollowing out Ukraine. The generation of artists and thinkers killed during the Stalinist purges came to be known in Ukraine as the 'executed Renaissance'. Soviet realism became the only officially approved art style. Unacceptable art was seized from public view and museum collections. Hundreds of artworks were marked for destruction and hidden in a secret archive, the Spetsfond, kept in the basement of the Ukrainian state museum. But the process of destroying them was slow, perhaps with the connivance of museum workers who still saw value in the art. A close-up of El Lissitzky's Composition, showing a fragment from Simon Dubnow's General Jewish History. Photograph: Naomi O'Leary Once I knew the text was in Yiddish, my next step was to look for help with transcription. I found it in David Nathan-Maister, a rare book collector who was able to extract most of the words from my photograph. This revealed four lines that were clearly a fragment from a larger text, their meaning difficult to interpret without the rest of the page. But a reference to 'Chaldea', an ancient term for an area in the Middle East, indicated a biblical commentary or history, Nathan-Maister suggested. He shared his work with his community of fellow bibliophiles, and this produced another breakthrough. A user of X with the handle kommdaweg – who did not respond to my messages asking for their name, to credit them – ran a search for the transcribed words in online databases. There was a result. There it was on page 23 of A General Jewish History, by Simon Dubnow (1920), a Yiddish-language book that had been digitised and uploaded in a searchable format to the Internet Archive by the non-profit Yiddish Book Centre. Visually comparing the fragmented text in the painting with the words on the page confirmed an exact match. The words, and the arrangement of the lines on the page, were identical. Seeing the unbroken sentences revealed the meaning of the text. It describes the ancient wanderings of nomadic Semitic tribes in the lands that are now the Middle East . The preceding paragraph recounts the command of God to Abraham to leave his homeland, promising that from him, a great nation would come. He and his family 'decided to go to Canaan, or Palestine', the text recounts, and there God promised Abraham to give the land to his children. It's the 'promised land', the foundation myth of Israel. Zionism was born in Ukraine, as a response to the persecution of Jewish people. Manuil Shekhtman, Pogrom Victims (1926), in the Modernism in Ukraine exhibition at the Royal Museums of Fine Arts of Belgium. Photograph: Naomi O'Leary The ferocious attacks on Jewish communities by street mobs in the lands that made up the Russian empire between 1881 and 1884 gave rise to the Russian word 'pogrom'. It also inspired students in Kharkiv to found a group called BILU. It was the world's first political organisation intent on the systematic colonisation of Palestine. It sent its first settlers in 1882. They founded what later became the Israeli city of Rishon LeZion, and town of Gedera. Each further wave of persecution convinced more Jewish people that they needed their own homeland to thrive. Zionism was popular in Ukraine at the time Composition was created, but it had not yet become a dominant ideology. Dubnow's General Jewish History – the text at the centre of the painting – lays out an alternative vision of Jewish nationhood. The book is intended as a 'history of our nation', Dubnow wrote, showing how throughout the 'violent crises' of thousands of years of history, the Jewish people survived to organise their own 'autonomous national life'. It's a Jewish national text, but not a Zionist one. Dubnow was the leading advocate of an 'autonomism', an alternative to Zionism. It argued that Jewish communities should be self-governing wherever they resided, rejecting assimilation with the local culture. It was cultural nationalism, without a territory. The Jewish people were a 'spiritual nation', Dubnow wrote, their lack of a land meaning that, unlike the nation states of Europe at the time, they could 'never become aggressive and warlike'. It took the calamity of the Holocaust to tip the scales in favour of Zionism, convincing Jewish survivors and international powers that a state of Israel was the only way. Composition is a survivor. Along with the other works of the Modernism in Ukraine exhibition, Composition outlived the brutal Nazi conquest of Kyiv, the death of Stalin in 1953, and now Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Understanding the text at its centre adds a richness of meaning to the painting. It is a portrait of the survival of the Jewish people, clinging together as a community amid violence and destruction. It's a postcard from the past that was somehow prophetic of the horrors of the century to come. Unexpectedly, it links the two conflicts that define the present day: in Ukraine, and in Palestine.

Prince Harry denies giving Prince Andrew bloody nose at family gathering
Prince Harry denies giving Prince Andrew bloody nose at family gathering

Irish Times

time12 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Prince Harry denies giving Prince Andrew bloody nose at family gathering

Prince Harry has denied he gave Prince Andrew 'a bloody nose' during a fight at a family gathering in 2013. According to an excerpt from a new biography of the disgraced Duke of York, published in the Daily Mail on Saturday, the pair had a heated argument that escalated into a physical altercation. 'Punches were thrown over something Andrew said behind Harry's back', the author Andrew Lownie claimed. The alleged fight began when 'Harry told [his uncle] he was a coward not to say it to his face. Harry got the better of Andrew by all accounts, leaving him with a bloody nose before the fight was broken up.' Lownie's biography, Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York, also claims Andrew told his nephew that his marriage to Meghan Markle, now the Duchess of Sussex, would 'not last more than a month'. He allegedly 'accused Meghan of being an opportunist and thought she was too old for Harry, adding that his nephew was making the biggest mistake ever,' and told his nephew he had gone 'bonkers', accusing him of not doing 'any due diligence into her past' before they got engaged in 2017. Late on Saturday, a spokesperson for Harry and Meghan said: 'I can confirm Prince Harry and Prince Andrew have never had a physical fight, nor did Prince Andrew ever make the comments he is alleged to have made about the Duchess of Sussex to Prince Harry.' The duke and duchess have sent a legal letter to the Daily Mail over the publication of what their spokesperson described as 'gross inaccuracies, damaging and defamatory remarks'. Prince Andrew fell from grace after a disastrous Newsnight interview in 2019 about his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein , the late American financier and convicted sex offender. The duke was stripped of his royal and military titles in 2021. The book claims Harry and his brother, William, had 'problematic' relationships with Andrew for years and that Andrew was also rude about William's wife, Catherine, the Princess of Wales. King Charles has allowed his younger brother to stay in the Royal Lodge, a 30-room mansion in Windsor Great Park owned by the crown estate. However, last year the king ended Andrew's allowance, estimated at £1 million annually, raising questions about future arrangements. The source quoted in Lownie's biography claims the Prince of Wales is keen to 'evict' the duke and his ex-wife, Sarah Ferguson, who lives with Andrew though the couple divorced in 1996. According to Entitled's source, '[William] also loathes Sarah ... and can't wait for the day when his father throws them both out. If Charles doesn't, I guarantee you the first thing William does when he becomes king is to get them evicted.' Harry broke ties with his family citing the 'toxicity' of royal life and alleged racism towards his wife, moving with his young family to Canada and then the US in 2020. In 2022 he published a memoir, Spare, in which he detailed strains in his relationships with his father and brother. Earlier this year he told the BBC he had forgiven his family and would 'love a reconciliation'. – Guardian

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store