Daily forex turnover hits record high in Q2 in S. Korea on foreign investment
The daily FX turnover, including trading of derivatives, came to an average of US$82.16 billion during the April-June period, up 12.9 percent from the first quarter, according to the data from the Bank of Korea (BOK).
It marked the largest quarterly figure since the central bank began compiling relevant data under the current statistical standards in 2008, reports Yonhap news agency.
"The increase was due to exchange rate volatility and increased trading by foreign investors in domestic securities," a BOK official said.
"Since the extension of foreign exchange market trading hours in July last year, trading volume has steadily increased," he added.
The daily average turnover for FX derivatives advanced 10.2 percent from the previous quarter to $49.39 billion in the second quarter, while the average daily spot FX trading volume surged 17.3 percent on-quarter to $32.77 billion, the data showed.
Meanwhile, foreign investors purchased the highest value of South Korean stocks in 15 months in June, central bank data showed this month, driven by eased concerns over U.S. trade policies and optimism about the new Seoul government's market-supportive measures.
Offshore investors bought a net US$2.27 billion worth of local stocks last month, marking a second consecutive month of net buying, according to the data from the Bank of Korea (BOK).
The June figure marked the highest level since March 2024, when foreigners purchased a net $3.84 billion worth of local stocks. Foreign investors also net purchased $2.81 billion of Korean bonds in June, extending their buying streak to the fifth month.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
US market today: Stocks edge higher as Fed meet, China tariff talks weigh; JetBlue, SoFi jump while Merck, UnitedHealth drag
Wall Street inched up on Tuesday with the S&P 500 and Nasdaq hitting fresh record highs, but gains were capped as investors remained cautious ahead of the Federal Reserve's interest rate decision and the outcome of high-stakes US-China trade talks. The S&P 500 rose 0.2% in early trading, building on a six-day record streak, while the Nasdaq Composite added 0.5%. The Dow Jones Industrial Average traded flat, AP reported. JetBlue Airways surged 14.4% and SoFi Technologies jumped 16.2% after stronger-than-expected results, while Merck fell 7.8% and UnitedHealth Group dropped 5.1% following disappointing earnings and forecasts. UnitedHealth projected at least $16 per share in 2025 profit, well below analyst estimates of $20, according to FactSet. The Federal Reserve's two-day meeting kicked off amid mounting pressure from President Donald Trump for rate cuts. However, most analysts expect the central bank to remain on hold as it gauges the impact of recent tariff hikes. In Stockholm, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng continued negotiations ahead of an August 12 deadline to avert a return to triple-digit tariffs. Additional tariffs on other countries are also set to take effect this Friday if deals aren't reached. Bond yields eased slightly, with the 10-year US Treasury yield dipping to 4.39% from 4.42%. The dollar index held firm ahead of key macroeconomic data releases later in the week. Japan's Nikkei slid 0.8%, but most Asian and European markets closed higher. In earnings, Beyond Inc. rose 3.4% after reporting a smaller-than-expected loss, while broader market sentiment remained sensitive to earnings surprises amid lofty valuations. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . Discover stories of India's leading eco-innovators at Ecopreneur Honours 2025
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
US firm tells employees to clock out for restroom breaks: Here's why labour laws matter now more than ever
US firm tells employees to clock out for restroom breaks. In a recent case that sparked widespread attention online, a US-based employee exposed a company's controversial policy requiring workers to clock out for using the restroom. When legal risks emerged, the company shifted tactics, opting instead to discipline staff who spent more than ten minutes in the bathroom. Backed by HR, the policy led to formal write-ups and threats of termination masked as 'coaching.' But one employee didn't stay silent. Armed with legal knowledge, documentation, and state laws on workplace recording, they filed a complaint with OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration). The case now serves as a striking reminder: labor laws are not just fine print, they're essential protections for every employee, and a crucial area of understanding for future HR professionals, business leaders, and students entering the workforce. Here is the Reddit post shared by a US-based employee: Reddit post highlighting the incident about US-based firm monitoring restroom breaks taken by employees. When bathroom time becomes company policy The issue began when management floated the idea of having employees clock out during restroom breaks, meaning time away from their workstation would be unpaid. Unable to implement that legally, the company switched to a different approach: employees who spent more than ten minutes in the bathroom would be issued formal warnings. This policy quickly escalated into an HR-approved disciplinary system. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Brigade™ Insignia. 3, 4 & 5 BHK Starting at ₹3.39 Cr* Brigade Group Learn More Undo Repeated 'violations' meant being 'coached into termination': a corporate euphemism for pushing someone out without direct firing. A complaint triggers a messy response The employee, recognising the potential legal and ethical violations, filed a complaint with OSHA, the federal body that monitors workplace health and safety. Soon after, HR posted a vague retraction, acting as though the policy had been misunderstood or misapplied. But the very next day, in a team meeting, a supervisor blamed the anonymous OSHA complaint, accused someone of 'lying,' and reintroduced the same policy under a new name. They openly admitted they were still seeking legal loopholes to dock pay for restroom use, highlighting just how committed the company was to controlling time, regardless of workers' well-being. One employee fights back, again Instead of being intimidated, the employee filed a second OSHA complaint, and this time, came prepared. Knowing their state allows single-party consent recording, they recorded the meeting where the policy and retaliation were discussed. Since the meeting was about workplace rules and discipline, it counted as a public discussion under company policy. The employee has stated they plan to publicly name the company and release all evidence once they complete their personal reason for staying in the job. Why labour laws matter more than ever This case may seem unusual, but it reveals deeper problems that HR students, business leaders, and professionals-in-training must understand: Human rights are not negotiable. Denying or punishing basic needs like restroom access creates a hostile and possibly unsafe work environment. Internal policies must still follow the law. HR departments cannot hide behind 'it's in the policy' if the rule contradicts labor standards or human dignity. Retaliation is a serious legal risk. Publicly blaming an employee for reporting to a labor authority can lead to fines or lawsuits. Knowledge is power. The employee in this case understood the law and used it — not to cause trouble, but to restore fairness. That's the kind of professionalism students should aim for. The bottom line As corporate environments become more performance-obsessed, cases like this are reminders of what happens when metrics override morality. For students pursuing careers in human resources, business management, or labour law, this is more than a viral post. It's a modern-day case study. Labour laws are not just about wages or safety gear. They're about respect, dignity, and the boundaries between policy and abuse. The next generation of professionals has a responsibility to know them, and to apply them wisely. TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us here . Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Chinese Whispers: Is Taiwan Trump's New Bargaining Chip With Beijing?
Donald Trump prioritises America First, and Taiwan's independence is no longer a priority Is the United States distancing itself from Taiwan? This at a time when, in Taipei, civilians are rehearsing responses to potential attacks from China in city streets. This raises questions: will Washington step in to defend Taipei if a Chinese invasion becomes imminent? Is the US President using Taiwan as a negotiating tool with China? These are likely concerns for Taiwanese President William Lai Ching-te. Recently, Lai cancelled his trip to Paraguay, Guatemala, and Belize—Taiwan's three allies in the Americas. The reason? Donald Trump. Why, you might ask? Lai's trip, planned for early August, included a stopover in the United States, which was blocked by Trump's administration. Trump is currently seeking a summit with China's President Xi Jinping. The Financial Times reported that China raised objections with Washington about Lai's visit, leading to the US denying him permission to stop in New York. Interestingly, Lai's office never formally announced his trip to Latin America. On Monday, Taiwan confirmed that Lai's overseas travel was cancelled to focus on tariff negotiations with the US and to manage a cleanup operation following a typhoon in southern Taiwan. Trump's social media rant coincides with a meeting between top US and Chinese economic officials in Stockholm, aiming to resolve longstanding economic disputes at the heart of a trade war between the world's two largest economies. The US and China are considering extending a tariff truce by three months, with China seeking reductions in US tariffs and tech export controls. Analysts believe a Trump-Xi meeting could ease trade tensions at this critical juncture. It is important to note that the president of Taiwan cannot officially visit the US, as the United States does not recognise Taiwan's government. However, Taiwanese leaders have historically used 'transit stops" in the US to meet top US administration officials outside Washington DC. As recently as 2023, then-Taiwanese President Tsai Ing-wen visited New York and Los Angeles during a transit stop. At that time, Joe Biden was the US president, committed to defending Taiwan militarily against any attack from the People's Republic of China. Biden approved over $500 million in defence support to Taiwan before leaving office. Donald Trump, however, prioritises America First, and Taiwan's independence is no longer a priority—a stark contrast to his previous term, when he reinstated a posture of strong deterrence in the Taiwan Strait with increased arms sales to Taiwan. During his first term, US trade policy towards China helped Taiwanese companies diversify across Asia. Diplomatically, Trump signed the Taiwan Travel Act in March 2018, ending several restrictions on official exchanges since the 1979 diplomatic breakup. But now, Trump's transactional diplomacy prioritises the sensitive US-China trade talks, raising critical questions for Taiwan's future. How much pressure will be placed on Taiwan to increase its military spending? Can Taiwan continue to benefit from the trade and technology disputes between the US and China? And what is the future of Taipei without Trump's support? view comments Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
