Lawyers Just Discovered Something About Meta's AI That Could Cost Zuckerberg Untold Billions of Dollars
A legal expert found that Meta's AI is able to spit out entire portions of books verbatim — and if he's right, it could be seriously bad news for the company and its CEO Mark Zuckerberg.
First, a quick primer. All the AI that's commercially buzzy at the moment, like OpenAI's ChatGPT or Meta's Llama, is trained by feeding in huge amounts of data. Then researchers do a bunch of number crunching using algorithms, basically teaching the system to recognize patterns in all that data so thoroughly that it can then create new patterns — meaning that, say, if you ask for a summary of the plot of one of the "Harry Potter" books, it'll give you (hopefully) a reasonable overview.
The problem, Stanford tech law expert Mark Lemley explains in an interview with New Scientist, is that his team's research found that Meta's LLaMA is able to repeat verbatim the exact contents of copyrighted books — such as, in one example he found, lengthy passages from the multi-billion dollar "Harry Potter" series.
For Meta, this is a gigantic legal liability. Why? Because if its AI is producing entire excerpts of material used to train it, it starts to look less like its AI is producing transformative works based on general patterns about language and the world it learned from its training data, and more like the AI is acting like a giant .ZIP file of copyrighted work, which users can then reproduce at will.
And it looks a lot like it is. When testing out various AI models by companies including OpenAI, DeepSeek, and Microsoft, Lemley's team found that Meta's LLaMA was the only one that spat out book content exactly. Specifically, the researchers found that LLaMA seemed to have memorized material including the first book in J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter" series, F. Scott Fitzgerald's "The Great Gatsby," and George Orwell's "1984."
It's not under debate that Meta, like its peers in the tech industry, used copyrighted materials to train its AI. But its specific methodology for doing so has come under fire: it emerged in copyright lawsuit against Meta by authors including the comedian Sarah Silverman that the model was trained on the "Books3" dataset, which contains almost 200,000 copyrighted publications and which Meta engineers downloaded using an illegal torrent ("Torrenting from a [Meta-owned] corporate laptop doesn't feel right," one of them fussed while doing so, in messages produced in court.)
Lemley and his team estimate that if just three percent of the Books3 dataset were found to be infringing, the company behind it could owe nearly $1 billion in statutory damages, and that's not counting any additional payouts based on profits gleaned from such theft. And if the proportion of infringing content is higher, at least in theory Meta could end up nailed to the wall.
Lemley is in a weird position, by the way. He previously defended Meta in that same lawsuit we mentioned above, but earlier this year, the Stanford professor announced in a LinkedIn post that he would no longer be representing the company in a protest of Meta and Zuckerberg's right-wing virtue signaling. Back then, he said he believed Meta should win its case — but based on his new research, it sounds like that opinion may have shifted.
Meta declined to comment to New Scientist about Lemley's findings.
More on Meta: Meta Says It's Okay to Feed Copyrighted Books Into Its AI Model Because They Have No "Economic Value"
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
26 minutes ago
- Axios
Study: ChatGPT's creativity gap
AI can generate a larger volume of creative ideas than any human, but those ideas are too much alike, according to research newly published in Nature Human Behavior. Why it matters: AI makers say their tools are "great for brainstorming," but experts find that chatbots produce a more limited range of ideas than a group of humans. How it works: Study participants were asked to brainstorm product ideas for a toy involving a brick and a fan, using either ChatGPT, their own ideas, or their ideas combined with web searches. Ninety-four percent of ideas from those who used ChatGPT "shared overlapping concepts." Participants who used their own ideas with the help of web searches produced the most "unique concepts," meaning a group of one or more ideas that did not overlap with any other ideas in the set. Researchers used ChatGPT 3.5 and ChatGPT-4 and reported that while ChatGPT-4 is creating more diverse ideas than 3.5, it still falls short ("by a lot") relative to humans. Case in point: Nine participants using ChatGPT independently named their toy "Build-a-Breeze Castle." The big picture: Wharton professors Gideon Nave and Christian Terwiesch and Wharton researcher Lennart Meincke found that subjects came up with a broader range of creative ideas when they used their own thoughts and web searches, compared to when they used ChatGPT. Groups that used ChatGPT tended to converge on similar concepts, reducing overall idea diversity. "We're not talking about diversity as a DEI type of diversity," Terwiesch told Axios. "We're talking about diversity in terms of the ideas being different from each in biology, we need a diverse ecosystem." Zoom in: A 2024 study found similar results. Participants were asked to write short fiction with and without ChatGPT. Generative AI–enabled stories were found to be more similar to each other than stories by humans. Yes, but: ChatGPT can be used as part of the brainstorming process. Terwiesch says idea variance comes from using ChatGPT to generate ideas, while also coming up with your own ideas and collecting original ideas from others. Terwiesch also recommends "chain of thought prompting," which means asking your chatbot to generate several ideas, but also specifically asking the bot to make those ideas different from each other. "If I just sit back and let ChatGPT do the work, I'm not taking the full advantage of what this tool has to offer. I can do better than that," Terwiesch told Axios. A spokesperson from OpenAI shared best practices for prompting ChatGPT, advice from writers on how to use the tool and a student's guide to writing with ChatGPT.
CNET
29 minutes ago
- CNET
Apple's Privacy Settlement Deadline Is Coming Fast. Here's How to Sign Up
If you want your cut of the settlement payout from Apple, you'll need to act fast. Viva Tung/CNET If you've ever accidentally triggered Siri and felt mildly annoyed, you're not alone. But what if that frustration could actually earn you some money? Thanks to a recent $95 million class-action settlement, Apple customers may be eligible for a payout if they've accidentally triggered Siri during a private conversation. The catch? The deadline to file a claim is quickly approaching, and time is running out. Apple agreed to the settlement after being sued for allegedly allowing Siri to listen in on private conversations without consent. Now, a claims website is live, and if you meet the criteria, you could get a piece of the payout. Whether you're a longtime iPhone user or just want to see if you're eligible, here's everything you need to know before the window closes. The settlement period covers a full decade and given the ubiquity of Apple products, there's a good chance you'll be eligible for a piece of the payout. If you meet the eligibility standards, you can claim a payment for up to five Siri-enabled devices, with a cap on how much you can receive per device. We'll get into the specific amount a little bit later. The impact of this settlement has the potential to be wide-ranging, given the reach of Apple's product ecosystem. According to a Business of Apps report from November, citing company and market research data, there were roughly 155 million active iPhones in the US as of 2024, a number that's been steadily increasing since the product's debut. Similarly, active Apple TV streaming boxes in the US have also been increasing year to year, with more than 32 million active in the US as of 2023. To find out if you're eligible for this settlement, read on. For more, find out what's up with the recent delay of T-Mobile data breach settlement checks. Who sued Apple and why? This class action lawsuit, Lopez et al v. Apple Inc., was first brought against Apple in 2019, with plaintiffs alleging that they were routinely recorded by their Apple devices after unintentionally activating the Siri virtual assistant, violating their privacy in the process. They further alleged that these recordings were then sold to advertisers and used to target them with ads online. Specific incidents mentioned in the suit include plaintiffs seeing ads online for brands like Air Jordan and Olive Garden after Apple device users discussed them out loud. In some instances, plaintiffs claimed that their devices began listening to them without them having said anything at all. At least one plaintiff involved in the case was a minor when it was first filed. Though it agreed to the settlement, Apple hasn't admitted any wrongdoing. "Siri has been engineered to protect user privacy from the beginning," Apple said in a statement sent to CNET. "Siri data has never been used to build marketing profiles and it has never been sold to anyone for any purpose. Apple settled this case to avoid additional litigation so we can move forward from concerns about third-party grading that we already addressed in 2019. We use Siri data to improve Siri and we are constantly developing technologies to make Siri even more private." Who is eligible for this class action settlement? The eligibility requirements for this settlement are fairly broad, as it's open to anyone who owned a Siri-enabled Apple device between Sept. 17, 2014, and Dec. 31, 2024. In order to opt in, you'll have to swear under oath that at some point during that period, you accidentally activated Siri on each device you want to get a payment for, and that these activations occurred during a conversation meant to be private. Siri-enabled devices include iPhones, iPads, Apple Watches, MacBooks, iMacs, Apple TV streaming boxes, HomePod speakers and iPod Touches. How can I opt in to this Apple settlement? As of Thursday, May 8, a website has been launched where Apple customers can claim a portion of the settlement, if they believe they qualify. If you're looking to submit a claim, you have until July 2, 2025, to do so. It's not clear at this time when payments will be disbursed to approved claimants but it will surely be sometime after Aug. 1, 2025, when a final approval hearing is scheduled. How much can I get from the class action settlement? Payments per device are to be capped at $20, although depending on how many people opt in to the settlement, claimants could receive less than that. Each individual can only claim payments for up to five devices, meaning the maximum possible payment you could receive from the settlement is $100. For more on Apple, see why a majority of users don't care for Apple Intelligence and find out which iOS setting can stop apps from tracking you.
CNET
29 minutes ago
- CNET
Watching TV Felt Like a Chore Until I Dumped All the Extra Subscriptions
With summer break in full swing, chances are you're streaming more than usual. But if your monthly charges are starting to creep uncomfortably high, you're not imagining it. Subscription fees keep rising, account sharing now comes with penalties, and it feels like every new show requires a whole new app. Streaming is starting to look a lot like the cable bill we all tried to escape. Even bundle deals, which promise more value, often end up adding extra logins, overlapping content, and more confusion. If your streaming setup feels more frustrating than fun, you're not alone. The good news is that a few smart changes can help you cut back on costs without missing the content you actually care about. Here's how to spend less and enjoy your shows a lot more. CNET's latest survey found that on average, we're spending more than $200 a year on subscriptions we're not even using. You've got to start asking yourself the tough questions: Are you actually watching everything you're paying for? Or are your subscriptions just piling up while your money quietly disappears? If you're holding onto five different subscriptions just to keep up with a couple of shows, it might be time to rethink your setup. You don't have to cancel everything -- just get strategic. Here's the simple system I use to cut down my streaming costs without sacrificing the shows I love. It's low-effort, high-reward, and your bank account will thank you. Rotate your streaming subscriptions Some of you may not have cut the cable cord yet and still stream, but if you're thinking of moving from cable exclusively to streaming, it can help save dough. With monthly plans, it's easy to subscribe to a streaming service and cancel if prices rise or the content becomes uninteresting. According to Deloitte's 2025 Media Trends report, the average US household spends $69 monthly on four streaming services. People cancel their streaming subscriptions mainly due to price and availability -- or lack of -- engaging content. Media companies call this behavior "churn." We're calling this the rotation method, and you should try it. The incentive? You save your coin and avoid content droughts. Let's say a series like Andor or Poker Face is set to premiere on a streaming service. Find the total episode count and wait until they're all available at once on a platform. You cancel Netflix, Hulu, Disney Plus, or other services and then resubscribe once all the episodes are available to catch up. Alternatively, you can start streaming a show midseason to cut costs. My monthly guide on which streaming services to cancel can help you keep up. The downside? You won't have immediate access to every show you want to watch and will have to wait until the full season airs. And since many streaming services release new episodes weekly, you might not be caught up at the same time as your friends. If you're someone who prefers to watch episodes immediately when they drop, you may decide it's worth it to have multiple subscriptions at a time. If you have patience, however, you can save some money. The strategy can also work if you have a live TV streaming service to watch a particular sport or major event like the WrestleMania or Super Bowl. Once the season wraps, cancel the service or move to a cheaper platform with fewer channels, like Sling TV. Need help figuring out the best way to rotate? Follow the tips below to learn how to churn streaming platforms until your wallet feels content. Now Playing: How to Get Hulu and Max for Free With Food Delivery Memberships 01:07 Tip No. 1: Cancel your subscription before getting charged Set calendar reminders for your billing cycle and upcoming TV show or movie release dates. Give yourself enough warning to begin or end a subscription. Apps such as JustWatch, TV Time and Hobi help you track when and where TV shows and movies appear on a streaming service. And JustWatch added a tracker specifically for sports. If you have a smart home device from Google or Amazon, you can set reminders for specific dates and allow a voice assistant like Alexa to notify you of an upcoming bill or streaming release date. Tip No. 2: Sign up for streaming service deals Look for discounts on streaming services. For example, Starz regularly offers months-long deals that slash its $11-per-month price. You can also take advantage of the Disney Bundle, which provides access to Disney Plus, Hulu and ESPN Plus in a single package for a reduced price. And eligible Hulu subscribers can add on Disney Plus for $2. Lastly, be sure to look for student discounts and check with your mobile carrier to see which ones offer free or discounted streaming subscriptions. Tip No. 3: Pick one or two default streaming services Subscribe to one or two must-have services for the year, and select only one or two more options to fit your monthly budget. Rotate the bonus service(s) according to what you want to watch, ensuring you don't miss your favorite shows while sticking to your monthly spending cap. Tip No. 4: Use monthly billing only Avoid annual subscriptions and pay attention to your auto-renewal payment dates, even if it means using one of these tracking apps. Your billing cycle can help determine when it's the best time to quit a service, even if you've only signed up for a free trial. The only advantage to signing up for an annual plan is when the price is drastically cut down. Tip No. 5: Don't cancel your subscription, pause it Hulu allows you to pause your subscription for up to 12 weeks, and Sling has a similar option with stipulations. Check with your streaming provider to see if you can take a temporary break without canceling. Give it a shot, and if you don't like it you can always resubscribe. For more excellent tips on streaming TV, check out this guide to Netflix's hidden tricks and our tips on the best VPNs.
