Jeremy Cross defends British Masters titles at Wimbledon
The August 19 extraordinary meeting of Pembrokeshire County Council's Cabinet is to consider a recommendation of the Services Overview and Scrutiny Committee in relation to an Individual Cabinet Member Decision (ICM) on a Long Course Weekend Host Agreement 2025-2029 decision, which had been 'called-in' on July 25.
The long-distance swim, cycle and running events returned to Tenby this June, with a 2.4-mile swim, a 112-mile cycle, and a marathon across the weekend.
The July 22 decision by Cabinet member Cllr Rhys Sinnett approved a retrospective agreement to enter a host agreement with Activity Wales to cover 2026 to 2029 events to 'ensure the event operates in line with the clear requirements of the Host Agreement, as per the recommendation of Cabinet in January 2025'.
It added: 'Continuing to support an event which links to PCC's Major Events Strategy and continues to support the tourism, economic and the associated benefits surrounding the event through visitor, participant and spectator contributions to the local economy.'
The 'call in' was made by Councillor Huw Murphy with the support of Councillors Alec Cormack, Chris Williams, Viv Stoddart, Tim Evans, Vanessa Thomas and Iwan Ward, considering the decision made by Councillor Sinnett did not fully comply with the budget and policy framework.
The call in was reviewed by Services Overview and Scrutiny Committee on August 8 where it was recommended the Cabinet member decision be referred to Cabinet on three grounds.
'For Cabinet and the Senior Leadership Team to have the opportunity to jointly review the decision-making processes related to the Long Course Weekend Host Agreement and identify any appropriate actions that might be taken.
'For Cabinet to determine whether they wish this Individual Cabinet Member decision to be signed immediately or alternatively be considered in advance of the 2026 event, but after member engagement and possible review by Overview and Scrutiny.
'Given the admission of governance failure both in the papers and verbally today [August 8] by the Head of Law and Governance, the matter be referred to the Governance and Audit Committee for further investigation.'
It is recommended members 'uphold the decision made by the Cabinet Member surrounding the approval of the ICM for the LCW Host Agreement 2026-2029. Continue with the review of the Events Strategy by the Events Advisory Board prior to the decision to formally adopt and also undertake consultation with the Events Advisory Board and Services Overview and Scrutiny Committee, along with those local members whose wards are impacted by the event on the contents of the LCW Host Agreement (to include meaningful discussions on whether to implement the break clauses for future years) in advance of the 2026 event'.
The recommendation adds: 'This will allow any changes to the agreement to be considered by Cabinet and negotiations with events organisers prior to the 2026 event to enable continued support for events from 2027 onwards.'
It concludes that option would 'ensure the event operates in line with the clear requirements of the Host Agreement, in accordance with the recommendation of Cabinet in January 2025'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
6 hours ago
- Daily Mail
This is how much taxpayer money the Government wastes ferrying empty red despatch boxes in chauffeured cars
Red despatch boxes. You'll have seen them exiting Number 10 and featuring in TV shows like The Crown and they are an iconic part of the British political landscape. But now it's been revealed that they cost the taxpayer thousands of pounds a year because they're being ferried around in empty Ministerial cars. A freedom of information by EV outlet Fast Charge has found that the Cabinet Office made 83 red despatch box journeys between 18 June 2024 and 31 March 2025 using the Government Car Service (GCS). This came at a total cost of £14,095.02 using taxpayer money. The trips, known as 'despatch box movements', involve chauffeuring government documents securely between locations, even though no Minister is present. If the trend continues in this way, red box movements could end up costing almost £18,000 annually, at the same time Chancellor Rachel Reeves has pledged to 'cut the costs of running the government by 15 per cent'. The expense is seen as an entirely unnecessary one in today's technology-focused world, with these empty car journeys being criticised by politicians on all sides for many years. In 2011, them Cabinet Office minister Francis Maude, who was leading calls to reduce cost by using technology, suggested using hard copies in Red Boxes was not needed, commenting: 'Security is often an alibi.' Fast Charge looked into the cost of each empty chauffeur car trips for the sake of official documents and worked out that the average cost per journey, based on the most recent data, is £169.82. The data suggests that the government would hit 106 journeys by the end of the year, costing £17,600. But this is a reduction on the number of empty-car journeys compared to the same period the previous year, when 120 trips were made costing £21,932.21 under the Conservative Government. However, despite the overall cost declining compared to last year, the cost per journey is up on previous years. In 2016, the Huffington Post found the average cost per journey for such movements was £125 on average. In the year 2015-16, the Cameron Government were reported as spending £41,520 on despatch movements. In March, Reeves said cutting running costs by the stated 15 per cent was 'more than possible' given advances in technology and artificial intelligence, which would add weight to the notion that the practice of driving empty cars around in the name of paperwork is out-of-date. Responding to the FOI the Cabinet Office told the Daily Mail: 'Over the last year, we have saved thousands of pounds by reducing the number of journeys booked through the Government Car Service. 'Official documents will still need to be transported in the safest way possible in the interests of national security.' Even as far back as 2009, before coming into power, David Cameron called for an end to red box car journeys. The pledge didn't stick and 2011 saw a bumper year of red box movement costs with a total of £110,865 spent. Daily Mail columnist Sarah Vine joked in 2010 that her then husband's papers were moved around in 'air-conditioned splendour' despite Cabinet Officer Michael Gove himself using public transport. She wrote: '[The Red Box] arrives unannounced at all hours in a chauffeur-driven car, the engine purring deferentially as her handler walks her to the front door... she deposits herself on the sofa to await her master. 'My husband is free to travel home by Tube, taxi, bicycle or carrier pigeon, but the (box) must arrive in air-conditioned splendour, snug and secure in the back of a locked car'. Tom Riley, founder of Fast Charge, commented: 'It's not only paperwork being taken for a ride, clearly us taxpayers are too. At a time when the Chancellor is looking to balance Britain's books, potentially with new tax rises, it's astonishing that the government is burning cash like this. 'Cheaper, safer, and greener options must surely now exist for Ministers to access their official documents. At the very least, they should review and reverse this practice.' In April the Government pledged that all central government cars and vans (except for the Prime Minister's gas-guzzling Range Rovers) will be zero emissions by the end of 2027 Not just a waste of money, it could be adding to government produced transport pollution as the Daily Mail recently revealed that the Government has not met its own EV targets despite pushing motorists towards electric cars by increasing taxes and running costs of hybrid, petrol and diesel. It pledged to electrify 25 per cent of the central government car fleet by 2022 and then in April the Government further pledged all central government cars and vans will be zero emissions by the end of 2027. This does not include the Prime Minister's gas guzzling Range Rovers, though. But WhatCar? found that the Government is falling short of its targets to electrify its fleets, with only 15 per cent of its cars and vans being pure electric.
Pembrokeshire Herald
7 hours ago
- Pembrokeshire Herald
Jeremy Cross defends British Masters titles at Wimbledon
A RECENT decision on an agreement with the organisers of the annual Long Course Weekend is to come under senior Pembrokeshire councillors' scrutiny. The August 19 extraordinary meeting of Pembrokeshire County Council's Cabinet is to consider a recommendation of the Services Overview and Scrutiny Committee in relation to an Individual Cabinet Member Decision (ICM) on a Long Course Weekend Host Agreement 2025-2029 decision, which had been 'called-in' on July 25. The long-distance swim, cycle and running events returned to Tenby this June, with a 2.4-mile swim, a 112-mile cycle, and a marathon across the weekend. The July 22 decision by Cabinet member Cllr Rhys Sinnett approved a retrospective agreement to enter a host agreement with Activity Wales to cover 2026 to 2029 events to 'ensure the event operates in line with the clear requirements of the Host Agreement, as per the recommendation of Cabinet in January 2025'. It added: 'Continuing to support an event which links to PCC's Major Events Strategy and continues to support the tourism, economic and the associated benefits surrounding the event through visitor, participant and spectator contributions to the local economy.' The 'call in' was made by Councillor Huw Murphy with the support of Councillors Alec Cormack, Chris Williams, Viv Stoddart, Tim Evans, Vanessa Thomas and Iwan Ward, considering the decision made by Councillor Sinnett did not fully comply with the budget and policy framework. The call in was reviewed by Services Overview and Scrutiny Committee on August 8 where it was recommended the Cabinet member decision be referred to Cabinet on three grounds. 'For Cabinet and the Senior Leadership Team to have the opportunity to jointly review the decision-making processes related to the Long Course Weekend Host Agreement and identify any appropriate actions that might be taken. 'For Cabinet to determine whether they wish this Individual Cabinet Member decision to be signed immediately or alternatively be considered in advance of the 2026 event, but after member engagement and possible review by Overview and Scrutiny. 'Given the admission of governance failure both in the papers and verbally today [August 8] by the Head of Law and Governance, the matter be referred to the Governance and Audit Committee for further investigation.' It is recommended members 'uphold the decision made by the Cabinet Member surrounding the approval of the ICM for the LCW Host Agreement 2026-2029. Continue with the review of the Events Strategy by the Events Advisory Board prior to the decision to formally adopt and also undertake consultation with the Events Advisory Board and Services Overview and Scrutiny Committee, along with those local members whose wards are impacted by the event on the contents of the LCW Host Agreement (to include meaningful discussions on whether to implement the break clauses for future years) in advance of the 2026 event'. The recommendation adds: 'This will allow any changes to the agreement to be considered by Cabinet and negotiations with events organisers prior to the 2026 event to enable continued support for events from 2027 onwards.' It concludes that option would 'ensure the event operates in line with the clear requirements of the Host Agreement, in accordance with the recommendation of Cabinet in January 2025'.
The Independent
17 hours ago
- The Independent
Swinney has ‘no intention' of reshuffling Scottish cabinet before May election
John Swinney has made clear he has 'no intention' of reshuffling his cabinet team at Holyrood, despite a number of key figures in his government stepping down at next May's Scottish elections. More than 20 SNP MSPs are set to leave Holyrood when voters north of the border go to the poll next year. Mr Swinney's deputy First Minister Kate Forbes is among them, along with Finance Secretary Shona Robison, Transport Secretary Fiona Hyslop and Rural Affairs Secretary Mairi Gougeon. However, Mr Swinney made clear he has no plans to reshape his top team in the light of the planned departures. Speaking at an event in Edinburgh organised by the think tank Enlighten, Mr Swinney said: 'I have no intention of reshuffling my team before the election.' While he spoke about his 'regret' about fellow MSPs leaving Holyrood, including 'close colleagues, friends and confidantes', he said he had reshuffled his cabinet team after government minister Mairi McAllan returned to work earlier this year following her maternity leave. She was given the newly created post of housing secretary, with Mr Swinney tasking her with tackling the housing 'emergency' in Scotland. Asked if the impending departure of senior members of his government would bring about a reshuffle ahead of May's Scottish elections, the SNP leader said he had 'decided, actively and purposefully' that he had people in his cabinet with 'experience and expertise in a number of roles that would help me to deliver to government's programme before the election'. And he argued that if he was to 'put in a whole host of new faces' then 'it would take a while to get things back up to the level of delivery' So he insisted: 'I have no plans to reshuffle the government.' His comments came as he spoke of his 'regret' over SNP MSPs leaving Holyrood, with the First Minister saying he 'very much' regretted Ms Forbes' decision to quit the Scottish Parliament. She announced earlier this month she would not be running for election next year, saying she did not want to 'miss any more of the precious early years of family life'. Meanwhile, former first ministers Nicola Sturgeon and Humza Yousaf are also stepping down. Mr Swinney said: 'Some of my colleagues are stepping down because they have done a very long shift.' While he said he was the 'longest serving' parliamentarian at Holyrood, having been first voted in as an MP 28 years ago before being elected as an MSP in the first devolved elections, he noted a number of those quitting had also been first elected in 1999. However, he added some MSPs were leaving because of the 'tough' nature of politics. 'We have to acknowledge that for many, I think particularly younger women, the climate is horrendous,' Mr Swinney said. He continued: 'The social media endurance is hard to bear for some people, and it makes public service look frankly unattractive at times.' In these circumstances, he said, he tries to 'support my colleagues, understand and be an ally'. But the SNP leader added: 'Ultimately, I can not protect people from what is thrown at them, and some of the behaviours are appalling, so that affects a number of people as well.'
