Don't let the sun go down on Mass: Markey slams Trump over solar funding
You can count U.S. Sen. Ed Markey, D-Mass., among the chorus of Bay State pols who are less than thrilled over the Trump administration's decision to cancel a $7 billion grant program for solar energy.
The Malden lawmaker, who sits on the Senate's Environment and Public Works Committee, slammed the Republican White House over what he called its 'unlawful' decision to stick a fork in the Solar for All Program. Sixty states, including Massachusetts, which was in line for $156 million, were impacted.
'Instead of Solar for All, [President Donald] Trump and [U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee] Zeldin want higher costs for all,' Markey said in a statement.
'This latest heist from the Trump administration will cause energy costs to rise, keep Americans beholden to monopolistic electric utilities, and make our grid overburdened and less reliable,' Markey continued. 'Trump and Zeldin's attacks on the Solar for All program and their attempts to cancel legally binding contracts will mean energy bills are going to continue to spike nationwide.
Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey also weighed in on the matter last week, urging the administration not to cancel the program. The plea fell on deaf ears.
'Solar is the fastest and cheapest way to bring affordable energy into Massachusetts,' Healey said in a statement
'Affordability isn't controversial – that's why states like Texas and Florida are building so much solar. And that's why my administration has been working hard to deliver more affordable solar to our residents and businesses through new incentives and programs like Solar for All," the Democratic governor continued.
Zeldin announced on social media last week that the administration was ending the program because the passage of the budget reconciliation bill in July eliminated its authority to run the program.
'The bottom line is this: EPA no longer has the statutory authority to administer the program or the appropriated funds to keep this boondoggle alive,' Zeldin wrote.
The program, passed under the former Biden administration as part of the Inflation Reduction Act, would have provided zero-interest loans, solar panels at public housing and funded workforce training, all with a focus on historically underserved communities.
It was set to begin in a few weeks in Massachusetts.
Healey's office said the funding was set to create 3,000 jobs and provide energy-bill-lowering solar for more than 29,000 households in the state.
Healey's office said the program would boost the state's solar capacity by 125 megawatts and touted the effect solar generation already has on the state.
U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., also weighed in, arguing in a statement that 'canceling [the program] would be reckless and further proof that the Trump administration doesn't care about lowering costs.'
On April 20, solar arrays supplied 55% of electricity across the grid in New England, Healey's office said. It said local solar relieves stress on the grid's transmission and distribution infrastructure, The Republican, of Springfield, reported.
For Markey, that's a lose-lose-lose for consumers, the environment, and the economy.
'American households are already facing skyrocketing energy costs and are begging for relief, not political retribution. Solar for All was set to cut participating households' average energy bills by $400 a year, with more than $8 billion in savings overall across all fifty states,' he said.
'This program should have been a win for the Administration— cutting it means stealing $4.6 billion away from states with Republican governors or senators," he continued. 'A heist of that magnitude simply makes no political or practical sense, especially when energy bills are going up and our grid is desperate for more generation, not more gridlock.'
Kraft says Wu's plans for Mass and Cass are ineffective
Democratic Boston mayoral hopeful Josh Kraft has backed a Boston City Council member's call to declare a public emergency at the open-air drug market at the intersection of Massachusetts Avenue and Melnea Cass Boulevard in the city's South End.
Kraft challenged incumbent Mayor Michelle Wu, also a Democrat, to explain how her office plans to tackle a public health and public safety crisis that remains an ongoing challenge after years of what he described as 'inertia' on the issue.
'Boston can no longer afford a passive response to the humanitarian crisis and public safety emergency unfolding on a daily basis,' around the area widely referred to as Mass and Cass, Kraft said in a statement.
Wu, he argued, has 'offered no coherent leadership. My plan puts public order, recovery, and real housing service solutions first.'
In a statement, Wu's campaign fired back, accusing Kraft of 'recycling' old ideas, The Boston Herald reported.
'Once again, Josh Kraft is willfully ignoring important work to enforce the law and address quality of life issues and root causes at Mass and Cass,' the Wu campaign said. 'Under Mayor Wu's leadership, Boston has built up pathways to recovery and permanent housing that never existed before and ended permanent encampments citywide. Hundreds of people who had been living on the streets are in treatment and housing, and fatal overdoses have dropped.'
Boston City Councilor Ed Flynn, a frequent Wu critic, issued the call for the emergency declaration earlier this month, arguing that the city's approach to the area, however well-intentioned, had failed.
'Any reasonable person who visits the area will say unequivocally that what has taken place there on a daily basis for over a decade now — an open air drug market and dealing, public drug use, the trafficking of women, acts of serious violence, public defecation and urination, among others — is completely unacceptable,' Flynn wrote in a resolution supporting the declaration.
Flynn said the challenges posed by the intersection have spilled into surrounding neighborhoods.
'South End and Roxbury are historic neighborhoods that are culturally diverse and host many families, seniors, and public housing residents who have lived in the area for many decades,' Flynn wrote. 'We must provide a safe and healthy environment, clean squares and parks, and a good quality of life for our residents by arresting and prosecuting those who are openly committing illegal crimes. It is critical that the Boston Police deploy more resources in addressing these complex public safety challenges.'
Flynn's resolution was on last week's Boston City Council agenda.
Both Wu and Kraft have acknowledged the tremendous difficulty of addressing the nationwide opioid epidemic and growing homelessness crisis at the local level.
The two campaigns also have advanced their own plans for dealing with the area, MassLive previously reported.
Wu's plan calls for using 'all levers' of city government, in partnership with the state and nonprofits, 'to end congregate substance use in Boston and the criminal activity that supports it,' she wrote to South End residents in a letter in June.
Under Kraft's plan, police would increase enforcement of public drug consumption, trespassing, tent camping, and other quality-of-life crimes. Prosecutions would be handled in specialty courts (something that's out of the mayor's hands), aiming to drive people into recovery programs rather than prison.
Kraft would also revive the Community Syringe Redemption Program, a needle collection program supported by pandemic relief money that encouraged people to return used needles for a monetary refund.
The city's preliminary election is Sept. 9.
Pressley calls for hearing for Epstein survivors
U.S. Rep. Ayanna Pressley, D-7th District, joined by 15 of her Democratic colleagues, has called on the U.S. House Oversight Committee to hold a public hearing to 'prioritize' the voices of people abused by Jeffrey Epstein.
'If we are to hold powerful people to account, our investigation must center the voices they tried to silence. To ensure that our investigation is comprehensive and credible, we urge the Committee to allow survivors the opportunity to provide their testimony if they wish to do so,' Pressley, who sits on the panel, wrote to its chairperson, U.S. Rep. James Comer, R-Ky.
The letter was first reported by The 19th.
Pressley, of Boston, has made no secret of her own experience as an abuse survivor and has emerged as a vocal supporter of fellow survivors.
'I know the pain and trauma that survivors carry. Those that have been victimized by Epstein and his co-conspirators, they deserve this transparency, this accountability, this healing, and I think they've not been centered enough,' Pressley told The 19th. 'People have gotten distracted and derailed with what they perceive as the political gamemanship of this and people doing what my Republican colleagues do so often, which is playing games with people's lives.'
They Said It
'It's more illegal insanity from Trump.'
— Massachusetts Secretary of State William L. Galvin has some thoughts on Trump's call last week for a new Census that would not count people living in the country illegally. Galvin's office administers the Census, and he is the state's chief elections officer. (h/t Axios Boston)
Read more MassLive politics coverage
The Voting Rights Act is 60. It's on 'life support,' Northeastern expert says. What happens next?
Mass. Gov. Healey signs 'landmark' shield law update to protect people seeking reproductive care
'Severely lacking': Trump admin has backlog of 27K student loan complaints
Mass. Auditor DiZoglio lawyers up, calls Legislature an 'authoritarian regime'
First-time Worcester candidate has raised nearly 50% more than any competitors
Springfield city councilor files lawsuit against former colleagues, alleging 'calculated attack'
Housing advocates propose ballot question to bring rent control back to Mass.
What Goes On
A contingent of state lawmakers, agency officials and advocates is headed to Maine on Tuesday to talk to farmers and others who have been affected by so-called 'forever chemicals,' or per- and polyfluoroalkyl chemicals often referred to as PFAS chemicals.
The trip is part of an effort by state Sen. Joanne M. Comerford, D-Hampshire, Franklin and Worcester, and state Rep. James Arena-DeRosa, D-8th Middlesex, to advance respective Senate and House bills aimed at tackling the environmental and public health challenge.
The Bay State contingent is set to visit a PFAS-impacted farm in Arundel and then head to the state capitol in Augusta for further discussions.
The trip will 'offer an opportunity to learn from Maine's nation-leading work on this issue,' Comerford's office said in a statement, noting that 'Maine was the first state in the country to investigate the impacts of sewage sludge applications on farmland.'
Turned up to 11
Indie poppers Fritz and the Tantrums play the House of Blues in Boston on Aug. 18 (tickets and more info here). The band's new record, 'Man on the Moon‚' has just dropped. And from that LP, here's 'Withdrawals.'
Your Monday long read
The Atlantic's Anne Appelbaum takes you inside what she describes as 'the most nihilistic conflict on Earth:' the brutal and seemingly endless civil war that's consumed Sudan.
Its lesson: 'This is what replaces the liberal order — anarchy and greed."
Here's the germane bit:
'Statistics are sometimes used to express the scale of the destruction in Sudan. About 14 million people have been displaced by years of fighting, more than in Ukraine and Gaza combined. Some 4 million of them have fled across borders, many to arid, impoverished places — Chad, Ethiopia, South Sudan — where there are few resources to support them."
'At least 150,000 people have died in the conflict, but that's likely a significant undercounting. Half the population, nearly 25 million people, is expected to go hungry this year."
Hundreds of thousands of people are directly threatened with starvation. More than 17 million children, out of 19 million, are not in school. A cholera epidemic rages. Malaria is endemic."
'But no statistics can express the sense of pointlessness, of meaninglessness, that the war has left behind alongside the physical destruction.'
That's it for today. As always, tips, comments and questions can be sent to jmicek@masslive.com. Have a good week, friends.
Read more analysis from John L. Micek
Boston's Big Wonk Summer: Thousands of lawmakers arrive for annual conference | Bay State Briefing
Market Basket drama — Deli, devotion & doughnuts: Why we care so much | John L. Micek
Mass. student turns terrifying choking incident into legislative action | Bay State Briefing
Read the original article on MassLive.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US budget deficit up 20% year-over-year despite record Trump tariff income
WASHINGTON (AP) — Despite the U.S. taking in record income from President Donald Trump's tariffs in July — with a 273% increase in customs revenues (or $21 billion) from this time last year — the U.S. budget deficit is still higher, according to Treasury Department data released Tuesday. The government's shortfall has climbed 20% this fiscal year compared to the same period in 2024. Even as Trump talks about America becoming rich because of his import tax hikes, federal spending keeps outpacing the revenues collected by the government. That financial picture might change as companies exhaust their pre-tariff inventories, forcing them to import more goods and generate even more in tax revenues that could whittle away at the deficit without meaningfully reducing it as promised. If tariffs fail to deliver on Trump's pledge to improve the government's balance sheet, the American public could be faced with fewer job options, more inflationary pressures and higher interest rates on mortgages, auto loans and credit cards. The budget deficit is the annual gap between what the U.S. government raises in taxes and what it spends, over time feeding into the overall national debt. A Treasury official who spoke on the condition of anonymity to preview the data said overall increased spending is in part due to a mix of expenditures, including growing interest payments on the public debt and cost-of-living increases to Social Security payouts, among other costs. This comes as the federal government's gross national debt creeps up to the $37 trillion mark. While organizations like the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget say that tariff income can be a stream of meaningful revenue — estimated to generate about $1.3 trillion over the course of President Trump's four-year term in office; some economists like Kent Smetters of the University of Pennsylvania's Penn Wharton Budget Model say tariffs are likely to result ' in only modest reductions in federal debt.' In June, the Congressional Budget Office estimated that President Donald Trump's sweeping tariff plan would cut deficits by $2.8 trillion over a 10-year period while shrinking the economy, raising the inflation rate and reducing the purchasing power of households overall. But revenue estimates are also difficult to predict as the president has changed his tariff rates repeatedly and the taxes declared as part of an economic emergency are currently under appeal in a U.S. court. A Treasury official did not respond to an Associated Press request for comment on when the U.S. could begin to see tariff revenue start to put a dent in the deficit. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said last month on Fox Business Network's 'Mornings with Maria' that the administration is 'laser-focused on bringing this deficit down.' The Trump administration expects to make more trade deals with other nations, including China and other major economies. For instance, on Monday, Trump extended a trade truce with China for another 90 days, which preserves the 30% tariffs he had imposed as a condition for negotiations. The previous deadline was set to expire at 12:01 a.m. Tuesday. Trump posted on his Truth Social platform that he signed the executive order for the extension, and that 'all other elements of the Agreement will remain the same.' Beijing, at the same time, also announced the extension of the tariff pause, according to the Ministry of Commerce. ___ Associated Press writer Josh Boak contributed to this report. Fatima Hussein, The Associated Press
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tariffs bring in record $27.7 billion in July as Trump calls haul 'incredible for our country'
President Trump's tariffs poured billions into US coffers in July as he continued to reshape the US trade landscape, putting the revenue supplied by importers at another monthly record. New data from the Treasury Department released Tuesday afternoon confirmed that June marked another record month on the revenue front, with some $27.7 billion in customs duties coming into US coffers. This was another step up from June's total of $26.6 billion and May's total of $22.2 billion. It represents a significant jump from around $8 billion in customs duties one year ago and brings the total for the fiscal year to around $135.7 billion. The government's fiscal year ends Sept. 30. Read more: The latest news and updates on Trump's tariffs The latest data is a continuation of the revenue spikes seen during Trump's second term in office, which are dwarfing counts from recent history, as well as the amounts collected during Trump's first term. Trump has frequently touted the new revenue source, writing in a post on Truth Social on Tuesday that it "has been incredible for our Country, its Stock Market, its General Wealth, and just about everything else." In that same post, Trump also attacked Goldman Sachs (GS) over its research and forecasts on tariffs and claimed tariff-related revenues were actually in the "trillions." The data also confirmed, however, that tariffs still don't make up a major piece of US government receipts, even in months like July, which the Treasury Department noted is generally softer on revenue "since there are usually no major corporate or individual tax due dates in this month." This latest Treasury monthly statement showed that total government receipts for the month topped $338 billion, meaning tariff-related revenues accounted for less than 10% of the total. Tariff revenue also hasn't helped make a dent in the overall US budget deficit, which grew around $291 billion last month. The gap for the 10 months through July came in around $1.63 trillion. And then there's the question of who ultimately pays the tariffs that supply that revenue to the US government. Contrary to Trump's claims, economists agree that the countries on which Trump has slapped tariffs do not ultimately foot the bill. Read more: What Trump's tariffs mean for the economy and your wallet In research this week, Goldman Sachs estimated that as of June, US businesses have borne the brunt of tariff price hikes — 64%, according to economists led by Jan Hatzius. Consumers' share of tariff hikes was only 22% through that time period. That mix could soon flip, the analysts noted. By October, US businesses could largely pass on those costs to consumers. Goldman Sachs estimates that consumers could foot around 67% of tariff costs by October, compared to just 8% for US businesses. Foreign exporters' share would sit around 25%, Goldman Sachs said. Still, tariff revenue numbers are likely to continue climbing in the coming months as Trump's tariffs take full effect. Measures that went into effect last week raised tariff rates on goods from dozens of partners, including the European Union, Japan, and South Korea. Another significant trade partner, India, is facing levies of 50% in the coming weeks. The latest complete tally, according to recent calculations from the Yale Budget Lab, shows that the US overall average effective tariff rate will jump to 18.6%, the highest level since 1933.
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's BLS Pick Calls For Suspension Of Monthly Jobs Report: Data 'Needs To Be Fixed Immediately'
E.J. Antoni, the economist tapped by President Donald Trump to lead the Bureau of Labor Statistics and an architect of the Heritage Foundation's Project 2025, suggested the agency should suspend monthly jobs reports in a Tuesday television appearance. Antoni appeared on Fox Business Tuesday morning to discuss Trump's lack of confidence in the Bureau's monthly job data. 'How on earth are businesses supposed to plan – or how is the Fed supposed to conduct monetary policy – when they don't know how many jobs are being added or lost in our economy? It's a serious problem that needs to be fixed immediately,' Antoni told FOX Business. Suspending Job Reports: A Risky Proposition Trump nominated Antoni to the position after his unprecedented firing of former BLS Chief, Erika McEntarfer, on Aug. 1. The Bureau's July jobs report showed nonfarm payrolls rising by 73,000, far below economists' estimates of 110,000. The report also included a revision of May and June's tallies, down by over 100,000 each. Similar revisions were observed during the Biden Administration. 'Until it is corrected, the BLS should suspend issuing the monthly job reports but keep publishing the more accurate, though less timely, quarterly data,' Antoni added. 'Major decision-makers from Wall Street to D.C. rely on these numbers, and a lack of confidence in the data has far-reaching consequences.' Can Data Integrity Survive Political Pressure? Trump called the jobs report 'rigged' and 'fake' following his firing of McEntarfer. Top economists dismissed Trump and Antoni's insinuations and reiterated that attempts to erode the independence of reporting agencies could sow distrust in markets. '[Suspending monthly jobs reports] would [be] a serious mistake in my estimation. It would only fuel critiques of a politicization of job market data and likely result in volatility across asset classes,' RSM US chief economist Joe Brusuelas told Axios. Withholding or fabricating economic data is a common practice observed in many authoritarian regimes, such as the Soviet Union during the 1980s. The Dangers Of Distrust In Economic Data University of Michigan professor Justin Wolfers described Antoni as unqualified for the position in a post on X. 'Antoni finished grad school 5 years ago at Northern Illinois with no obvious distinction, his dissertation is meh, and involved no research on labor markets or data collection, he has never published a paper, and his life's work has earned 1 citation,' Wolfers said. 'This record would be insufficient to earn a job as a junior staffer at BLS.' Also Read:Photo: Shutterstock Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Trump's BLS Pick Calls For Suspension Of Monthly Jobs Report: Data 'Needs To Be Fixed Immediately' originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Sign in to access your portfolio