NA extends two ordinances
The National Assembly on Monday passed two resolutions, extending the duration of two ordinances for an additional 120 days.
The resolutions passed by the house included, "That the National Assembly resolves to extend the Federal Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education (Amendment) Ordinance, 2024 (IX of 2024) for a further period of one hundred and twenty days with effect from 2nd April, 2025, under proviso to sub-paragraph (ii) of paragraph (a) of clause (2) of Article 89 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan."
Another resolution passed by the lower house read, "That the National Assembly resolves to extend the Income Tax (Amendment) Ordinance, 2024 (X of 2024) for a further period of one hundred and twenty days with effect from 27th April, 2025, under proviso to sub-paragraph (i) of paragraph (a) of clause (2) of Article 89 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan.
The House referred two legislative bills to the relevant standing committees for further deliberation and consideration.
The bills include the Anti-Dumping Duties (Amendment) Bill, 2025, aimed at amending the Anti-Dumping Duties Act, 2015, and the Extradition (Amendment) Bill, 2025, seeking to amend the Extradition Act, 1972.Additionally, the Societies Registration (Amendment) Ordinance, 2024 (No. XI of 2024) was laid before the House, as required under clause (2) of Article 89 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan.
Meanwhile, the lower house was informed that IT education has been introduced in 16 institutions across Pakistan, with five specialized courses, including Data Analysis, Blockchain, and Artificial Intelligence, being actively promoted.
During the session, in response to a question by Aasia Naz Tanoli, Parliamentary Secretary Farah Naz Akbar stated that these initiatives are being implemented under the National Vocational and Technical Training Commission (NAVTTC), with a dedicated budget already allocated.
She further revealed that each student enrolled in these courses receives a stipend of Rs105,000. The programme involves five universities: the National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), the National University of Modern Languages (NUML), Ghulam Ishaq Khan Institute (GIKI), the National Skills University (NSU), and NUST's School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science.
The courses are designed for students in their fifth semester, with evening classes to facilitate learning. NAVTTC closely monitors the program, which is currently in its pilot phase. If successful, it will be expanded to schools.
Responding to a question from Syed Rafiullah, Akbar mentioned that discussions regarding launching the program in Malir had taken place with the minister, and updates would be provided to the Assembly.
When questioned by Shehzada Gustasp Khan about higher education in Balochistan, she noted that the province currently lacks a public chartered federal university. However, campuses of two federally chartered universities have been established in the region. She also highlighted that in the first phase, 40 laptops were distributed in Balochistan, followed by 200 more in the second phase.
In response to a question by Shahida Rehmani, Akbar mentioned that NAVTTC has established a clear procedure for laptop distribution, including a flowchart available on its website.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
PTI's slide, from populism to political isolation
A year ago, August 5 would have plunged the Twin Cities into chaos. Roads would have been sealed and containers mounted, yet crowds would have been roaring in protest. But on August 5 this year, the anniversary of Imran Khan's arrest from Islamabad in 2023, the streets of Rawalpindi and Islamabad remained calm, undisturbed by the opposition's call for a protest. Only scattered police mobiles, prison vans and a visible security presence dotted major intersections and, that too, not to manage unrest but to watch over the conspicuous silence. This marked not just a shift in public response but symbolised a deeper collapse within the country's once-largest and loudest political force: the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI). The very day the party hoped to reignite street resistance on the second anniversary of its founding chairman's incarceration, it turned into one of the darkest day for the party as its remaining top parliamentary leaders in the Senate, National Assembly and Punjab Assembly were disqualified and de-notified in connection with the judgment of the May 9 riots' cases. Politically and geographically, the party that once claimed unmatched public support and alleged institutional blessings is now apparently confined to Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, where it still holds power. Elsewhere, PTI has largely been wiped off the mainstream political map. One example of it is its failure to mobilise people for August 5 protest, which the party supremo had desired to exert pressure on the PMLN-led government and the powerful stakeholders for his release. As the irony would have it, Imran Khan had given a final call for his release last November, which had failed too. PTI's political decay has been anything but sudden. The party, once riding high on populist slogans and support from powerful quarters, began losing ground after the events of May 9, 2023, when violent protests erupted following Imran Khan's arrest. For the first time in history, military installations were attacked, triggering what would become a decisive turning point. In the aftermath, a sweeping crackdown followed, with mass arrests and party leaders forced to switch party, abandon politics or disassociate from the party altogether. As the top-tier leaders vanished from the scene under duress, defection, court proceedings or because of being thrown in jail, the party's internal coordination shattered. Yet, despite crackdowns, the party workers continued to come out to support in big numbers until recently. However, the continuous disarray in the party and the leadership's absence when rank-and-file workers faced arrests or prosecutions started creating gap between the people and the party leadership. This repeated pattern of abandonment has not gone unnoticed within PTI's support base, which once prided itself on being ideologically driven and deeply loyal, both on social media and on the ground. However, the absence of organised resistance on the symbolic August 5, when Imran Khan urged the party to rise in protest, showcased just how far PTI has fallen from its former position of street dominance. To add insult to injury, the disqualification of opposition leaders from the Senate, National Assembly and Punjab Assembly as well as parliamentary leader further demonstrated PTI's decline inside legislative houses. With the removal of its parliamentary leadership, the party now finds itself unable to influence legislation, challenge government policy or even issue symbolic dissent within parliamentary bounds. This parliamentary vacuum has come on the heels of the Supreme Court's recent decision on reserved seats, which handed a crucial advantage to the ruling alliance. The court ruled in favour of awarding reserved seats, previously meant for PTI, to parties within the ruling coalition. As a result, the PMLN emerged as the single largest party in the National Assembly while the ruling alliance now enjoys a two-thirds majority. PTI's failure to maintain internal cohesion and external alliances has left it directionless. Instead of holding talks with the political elite, it has repeatedly said that it only wishes to hold talks with the powerful stakeholders. However, the response from the other side has so far been extremely cold. Once seen as cordial, the party's relationship with the establishment is now completely fractured. From being perceived as a product of tacit institutional support, PTI is now an example of what political isolation in Pakistan looks like. Though the party is in power in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, it is still under pressure. Its previous attempts to organise major activities beyond KP have constantly been met with pre-emptive state action like arrests, bans, and curbs on public gatherings. Last September, after holding a rally in the capital, the law enforcement officials barged into the Parliament to arrest PTI lawmakers for flouting a law on political rallies. Subsequently, the party only managed to reach the capital in November, but only to abandon the party workers and without gaining anything. Since then, it tried to flex muscles and announced that the protest movement would start soon after Eid but that never happened. Lack of clarity on future course of action, party leadership's inability to craft a post-Imran political narrative, grouping in the party and almost no control of the incumbent party chairman over its members have all contributed to its current paralysis. Currently, with Imran Khan in jail and his appeals zigzagging through the courts, the party's entire political strategy remains centered on his personality but disconnected from political realities. In contrast, the PMLN-led ruling coalition has capitalised on PTI's weaknesses. With the opposition effectively sidelined, the government has moved to consolidate power both legally and politically. With the 26th constitutional amendment, the ruling alliance changed the judicial structure and the process of appointing the top judge of the country by nominating the chief justice from among the most senior judges, rather than the most senior judge automatically assuming the position. Additionally, the court decision on reserved seats handed not just numbers but legitimacy to the alliance and rumours are that it was gearing up for another constitutional amendment. By avoiding major political controversies and projecting a narrative of stability and economic recovery as well as victory over India in the recent war, the ruling alliance is now busy crafting the image of a functioning and united government, even though governance issues persist. For now, the political arena seems to be a one-sided contest. With a crippled opposition, a solid parliamentary majority and little visible public resistance, the ruling alliance appears to have full control, at least until the next major shift. PTI's downfall is not just about arrests or disqualifications. It's about a party that lost its organisational discipline, confronted the very forces that once helped it rise only to demand the same thing again and failed to protect or rally its support base when it mattered most. From dominating national headlines to being pushed to the margins, PTI's journey over the last few years is a study in political reversal. And with no clear path forward, no functioning top-tier leadership and no signs of reconciliation with power centres, the party that once ruled from Islamabad now watches from the sidelines; increasingly limited to KP. For now, the streets are quiet, the opposition is broken and the ruling coalition reigns unchallenged.
Business Recorder
13 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Gondal appointed as AGP
ISLAMABAD: Federal government has appointed Maqbool Ahmad Gondal, a senior officer of Accounts and Audit Group as Auditor General of Pakistan (AGP) under Article 168 (1) of the Constitution. A notification has been issued in this respect. 'The president is pleased to appoint Maqbool Ahmad Gondal (PS&AS/BS 22) presently serving as controller general of accounts as AGP for a period of four years'. He is second most senior officer of audit and accounts service. Iram Anjum Khan is most senior officer. Shehzad Hasan and Syed Muhammad Ammar Naqvi are third and fourth in seniority. He will assume office upon completion of term of the incumbent Muhammad Ajmal Gondal who will complete his four years terms in September 2025. 7th NFC Award: 'Centre deducts Rs87.87bn annually without AGP certification' Finance Division appoints the AGP in the light of recommendations send by the incumbent AGP usually, sources said. The finance ministry plays a major, often decisive, role in the appointment of the AGP which may be characterised as a potential conflict of interest as the AGP is primarily going to look at the accounts and related procedures and practices of the ministry. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
16 hours ago
- Express Tribune
The chasm between law and culture
Listen to article Pakistan's progressive legal framework often collides with a deep-rooted cultural mindset, creating a jarring paradox. What the law protects, society condemns. What the law forbids, society continues to normalise. The recent killing of a young couple in Balochistan, reportedly for eloping, is a tragic reminder of this persistent conflict. These are not isolated acts of violence but symptoms of a deeper struggle over authority, identity and autonomy. Nowhere is this tension more visible than in matters of marriage. Legally, adults have the right to choose their life partners. Court marriages, which are consensual but without familial approval, are valid under the law. But culturally, particularly in tribal and conservative areas, love marriages are often perceived as acts of rebellion against family authority. This cultural aversion has little to do with legal validity and everything to do with perceived threats to collective "honour". This obsession with honour gives rise to the horrific practice of so-called honour killings. The term itself conceals the cruelty behind it. These murders are often portrayed as necessary to restore lost dignity, when in fact they are brutal punishments for asserting basic human rights. Despite legal reforms, including changes that prevent the victim's family from pardoning the killer, enforcement remains weak. Community pressure from tribal elders or jirgas often discourages families from seeking justice. In some cases, the decision to kill is collective and calculated, rather than impulsive or isolated and murderers often receive heroic reception from the communities. This happens not because the law is unclear, but because parallel systems of power and belief still dominate large parts of society. Patriarchal norms, tribal traditions and feudal loyalties often carry more weight than the Constitution. They frame personal freedom as a threat rather than a right. The legal system is undermined not only by lack of enforcement but by a culture that sees conformity as virtue and autonomy as rebellion. A similar contradiction exists in the practice of dowry. The Dowry and Bridal Gifts Act of 1976 legally restricts dowry, aiming to reduce economic exploitation and safeguard women. Yet dowry remains widespread and socially accepted. It is often seen as a sign of "generosity" or status, not as a burden or legal violation. Families go into debt to meet expectations, and women face harassment or violence if their dowry is considered inadequate. Here too, the law is present, but the culture is louder. These contradictions persist because cultural norms offer a sense of control and continuity in a society where state institutions are often weak. In many areas, especially rural ones, informal systems of justice are more accessible than formal courts. Social order is maintained not through the rule of law but through community expectations. Change threatens these systems and is therefore met with resistance. Yet cultural norms are not unchangeable. In religio-culturally conservative regions like Chitral, for example, research by scholars like Marsden shows that love marriages and elopements are more common and comparatively accepted. This variation indicates that traditional and cultural rigidity is not inevitable. Where education spreads, where justice is accessible and where dialogue takes place, attitudes begin to shift. Bridging this gap between law and culture requires more than legislation. It requires moral courage and sustained effort. Educators, religious leaders, civil society and media must all play a role in challenging outdated norms. Public awareness campaigns, strong legal enforcement and community-based dialogue are essential. Change cannot come from the top-down alone. It must emerge from within families, classrooms and neighbourhoods. The cost of inaction is too high. So long as culture continues to override law, individual rights will remain fragile, and lives will remain at risk. The future of justice and equality in Pakistan depends not only on legal reforms but on a collective willingness to question what has long been considered untouchable. This is not only a legal battle but a moral one, and it can no longer be postponed.
