Blackburn yanks support for AI moratorium
Democratic Rep. Dwight Evans said Monday he will not seek reelection 'after some discussions this weekend and thoughtful reflection,' opening up a solid-blue seat in Philadelphia.
Evans faced mounting questions about his ability to serve after suffering a stroke last year and missing months of votes. He insisted until recently he still intended to run for reelection, though several primary challengers were already starting to make moves.
'Serving the people of Philadelphia has been the honor of my life,' Evans said in a statement. 'And I remain in good health and fully capable of continuing to serve. After some discussions this weekend and thoughtful reflection, I have decided that the time is right to announce that I will not be seeking reelection in 2026.'
Evans, 71, has served in Congress since 2016. He succeeded Rep. Chaka Fattah, who resigned after being indicted on federal corruption charges, and is one of six Pennsylvanians on the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee.
His retirement announcement comes amid generational upheaval in the Democratic Party. Longtime Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) said earlier this year she wouldn't run again. The party base has looked to their leaders to mount a more vigorous response to President Donald Trump, with some in the party calling for primary challenges to senior leaders.
Evans' retirement could kick off a fierce battle between establishment Democrats and progressives for the Philadelphia-area seat, and several possible candidates are already weighing campaigns. Democratic socialists have made headway in the city, particularly at the state level, and pro-Israel groups and the liberal Working Families Party are eyeing the race, according to multiple Democrats.
'This is completely wide open,' said a high-level Philadelphia Democrat who was granted anonymity to speak frankly. 'There is not one person I can see who I would deem the front-runner.'
State Sen. Sharif Street, chair of the Pennsylvania Democratic Party, has expressed interest in running for Evans' seat. A second Democrat granted anonymity to speak freely said Street could kick off his campaign as early as Tuesday, though other Democrats said an official announcement could come later. State Rep. Morgan Cephas, who is close to the city's influential building trades unions, is eyeing the seat as well, as is progressive state Rep. Chris Rabb.
'Me and my team are strongly considering a bid,' Cephas told POLITICO Monday. 'But first and foremost I wanted to express my overwhelming gratitude to the work that Congressman Evans has done for the city of Philadelphia.'
Rabb said in a text that 'I am seriously considering running for this seat.'
State Rep. Malcolm Kenyatta, another progressive, said his supporters have 'encouraged me to consider a run.' But he said he has 'nothing to announce,' adding that 'today is about Dwight Evans' and 'honoring his legacy.'
In a sign of how hotly contested the race could become, some Democrats are already attacking Street publicly and privately before he jumps into the contest.
J.J. Balaban, a Democratic consultant who lives in Evans' district, said he opposes a potential bid by Street because in 2021 he worked with a powerful Republican to craft a proposed congressional redistricting map. His plan was not ultimately successful.
'Any good Democrat should hope it's not Sharif Street because of how he tried to sell out the Democratic delegation,' said Balaban. 'We would have fewer congressional seats if he had carried the day.'
Street did not immediately respond to a request for comment. At the time, Street defended his work with Republicans, saying 'it's our job to negotiate the best that we can.'
Street has made some recent efforts to make inroads with progressives, including by endorsing liberal Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner in his successful primary reelection campaign this year over a more moderate challenger.
The extent to which Evans does — or doesn't — get involved in helping determine his successor will also shape the race. A Democrat familiar with Evans' thinking said he is 'going to wait and see what the field will look like' before deciding whether to endorse a candidate in the primary.
'Plenty of time to make a decision,' the person added.
Rumors have swirled for months about Evans' future, and some Democrats speculated that he might step down in the middle of his term, which would have given power to the city's Democratic ward leaders to choose a nominee for a special election. But Evans said Wednesday that he 'will serve out the full term that ends Jan. 3, 2027.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Richest 20% Get an Average $6,055 Income Boost in Trump Tax Bill
(Bloomberg) — The Senate's version of President Donald Trump's proposed tax cut bill will cost the bottom 20% of taxpayers an average of $560 a year while giving an average boost of $6,055 to those at the top end. Struggling Downtowns Are Looking to Lure New Crowds Philadelphia Transit System Votes to Cut Service by 45%, Hike Fares Squeezed by Crowds, the Roads of Central Park Are Being Reimagined Sao Paulo Pushes Out Favela Residents, Drug Users to Revive Its City Center Sprawl Is Still Not the Answer That analysis from economists at the Budget Lab at Yale University bolsters Democratic critiques that the bill takes money out of the pockets of the working poor to give tax cuts to the rich. The uneven distribution of the bill's costs and benefits comes from a mix of tax and spending provisions. While the poorest taxpayers bear the brunt of cuts to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, those at the top end of the income charts would get the biggest benefit of the tax cuts, including income rate cuts and an expanded state and local tax deduction. A proposal by Republican Senator Rick Scott of Florida would cut Medicaid even further. But the Budget Lab, a nonpartisan policy research group, cites economic studies showing that a little more than half of changes to the federal-and-state-funded health insurance program fall on providers rather than enrollees. And it assumes that states will pick up part of the cost of the social safety net programs, replacing about 1% of the income that the poorest families would have lost. That proposal, if approved by the Senate during an ongoing voting session, could be added to the final bill. Senators are in the final stages of approving Trump's tax bill in a bid to get it to the president's desk by July 4. The analysis excludes the effects of tariffs, which Senate negotiators have floated as a potential way to pay for income tax cuts. The Budget Lab said the bill would be even more regressive if tariffs were included. America's Top Consumer-Sentiment Economist Is Worried How to Steal a House SNAP Cuts in Big Tax Bill Will Hit a Lot of Trump Voters Too Pistachios Are Everywhere Right Now, Not Just in Dubai Chocolate Inside Gap's Last-Ditch, Tariff-Addled Turnaround Push ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
This summer will be decisive for the economy and Wall Street
The coming months will likely see several major events, datasets, progress reports, and deals that will determine the path forward for the economy and financial markets. By the fall, the impact of President Donald Trump's tariffs and fiscal policies should be clearer, giving the Federal Reserve more confidence to act. If you followed the seasonal investing advice of 'sell in May and go away,' you may want to reconsider because the outlook for the economy and financial markets will likely be determined in the coming months. Several major events, datasets, progress reports, and deals are due this summer. By fall, the impact of President Donald Trump's tariffs and fiscal policies should be clearer, giving the Federal Reserve enough confidence to act on interest rates. Here's a look at the factors that will tip the scales: A key piece could come as soon as this week. Trump has set a July 4 deadline for Congress to pass his so-called One Big Beautiful Bill, which contains his tax cuts and spending priorities. While the House of Representatives passed one version of the legislation and the Senate advanced a separate one, the GOP's narrow majorities in both chambers make the timing of the eventual package and its exact provisions less certain. All the congressional logrolling that's needed could push the timeline past July 4, especially now that a few Republicans have announced they will not seek reelection, making them less susceptible to Trump's arm-twisting. Wall Street expects the tax cuts to juice the economy and the stock market, while the bond market will watch the bill's impact on U.S. debt. The Congressional Budget Office has estimated the Senate's version of the bill will add nearly $3.3 trillion to deficits over a decade. More fiscal sticker shock could send Treasury yields higher and add more pressure on the dollar, which is already down 10% this year, its worst first-half performance in more than 50 years. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has estimated that the U.S. will no longer be able to pay its bills by mid- to late summer, unless the debt ceiling is raised. While he has vowed that the U.S. will never default, it's up to Congress to raise the debt limit so that the Treasury Department can issue fresh bonds to service interest expenses and maturities. The Big Beautiful Bill would increase the debt ceiling by trillions of dollars. In the meantime, the Treasury Department has been using its extraordinary cash management measures to avoid default. Bessent said last week he extended his department's authority to use those extraordinary measures to July 24, in an apparent reminder for Congress to raise the debt ceiling before its typical August recess. Failure to raise the debt limit and prevent a U.S. default would spark a global financial meltdown. Trump administration officials have been saying since 'Liberation Day' in April that major trade deals are imminent. So far, the U.S. has reached agreements with the U.K. and China, while negotiations with other top trade partners continue. Meanwhile, the 90-day pause on Trump's 'reciprocal' tariffs will expire on July 9, after which they would spike back to levels that triggered an epic stock market selloff. Bessent has signaled flexibility on that deadline, saying a dozen or so trade deals could be reached by Labor Day. But over the weekend, Trump reiterated his desire to dispense with any further talks and unilaterally set a tariff rate on each country. A sudden return to high tariffs would deliver another jolt to Wall Street, which had been expecting duties to eventually settle at 10% for most countries and 30% for China—manageable levels that could largely be absorbed without too much pain. Tariffs and their impact on inflation will heavily influence the central bank as it weighs whether to trim interest rates. Pricing data so far hasn't revealed a big impact from tariffs, and a few Fed officials have said that's evidence that inflation is tame enough to justify rate cuts. But Fed Chairman Jerome Powell and other policymakers have indicated they need at least a few more months of data to be confident that inflation is indeed on the right track. If the upcoming data show that any tariff-related inflation effects are only one-offs that aren't raising consumers' inflation expectations over the longer run, then rate cuts could come in the fall. While Trump has demanded the Fed lower rates immediately, he could also make it harder for policymakers to do that. They may more reluctant to cut just to prove to markets that they are independent from political pressure. Re-escalation of tariffs could muddy the inflation picture. The naming of a 'shadow' Fed chair could even stir a revolt on the Federal Open Market Committee. Starting in July, earnings reports for the second quarter will start coming out, giving Wall Street a more fulsome view of how tariffs—and the economic uncertainty they've caused—are affecting profits as well as the outlook for profits. Because companies rushed to stock up on imports earlier in the year to get ahead of tariffs, first-quarter results didn't fully reflect higher rates. But those stockpiles are being exhausted, forcing companies to hike prices on consumers or eat tariff costs and shrink profit margins. Also factoring into earnings will be how much or how little companies plan to invest and hire in an economy that is slowing amid Trump's trade war. The White House's fiscal policies will sway earnings too, as tax cuts, the end of certain tax credits, more spending on defense, and less spending on the social safety net ripple through corporate America and consumers. A tenuous ceasefire has taken hold between Israel, Iran, and the U.S., sending oil prices lower as markets worry less about a sudden supply disruption. But Trump has said he is open to bombing Iran again if it's necessary to cripple Tehran's nuclear program. That's as conflicting reports emerge over how much Iran's capabilities have actually been damaged. Renewed fighting could set off another surge in crude prices, sapping consumers of spending power, reigniting inflation, and further complicating the outlook for Fed rate cuts and the economy. Have a great summer. This story was originally featured on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Bloomberg
14 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
SARB's Kganyago on South Africa Inflation Target, Policy
00:00 Are you a little bit less worried about inflation right now given oil prices have settled? I am not sure that one would say that oil prices have settled, but we are comfortable with the inflation trajectory. I think the central banks have done a real good job taming the great inflation of 2022. And what we didn't have figuring in our analysis was that there could be a shock and that that shock who actually come from and from policy in the form of of tariffs. But there was also a shock that comes as a result of the and the geopolitics. You said that the oil price has settled. It had been it had been all over in the past few weeks. You're right. I mean, I guess the the cease fire between Iran and Israel means that there was a little bit of comfort in the markets that we wouldn't see the spikes that we feared in those couple of days where there was a real flare up. Governor. Can you tell us what this means for a possible rate cut in July? I think that what you should worry about is what the inflation trajectory looks like. Then you will know where rates are going. I'm just one member of of that committee. I do not know. And the views that everybody will be willing in the in the committee, you go into the committee with a view and then you must be willing to be persuaded because the other committee members which have different views, we have a fairly robust, robust debate. What we have heard so far has been that inflation has been has been contained at the lower end of our our inflation target range. And this actually has given us an opportunity of what central bankers call opportunistic disinflation, that which means that you use a low inflation environment to anchor inflation expectations at that level. But government for you personally, do you think there is scope to cut next month, this month or no? Come on, Francine. Of course, you know what the answer is. If you wait until the end of the meeting this month, you will know. You will know which way the rates are going. Okay. I'm not very good at waiting, nor is the market, but we'll do that. Governor, look, the South African Reserve Bank has also made a pretty forceful argument for adopting lower inflation targets, which has been undergoing a review. Is now the right time? Well, this work has been done, Francine. When the framework was introduced, there was always an understanding that we are going to to lower the target. We did lower the target, but there was a shock and we made a big policy mistake by reverting to the old inflation target instead of explaining that we experienced a shock and that we will come back within the target in 2020. Then the National Treasury launched a macro review, and part of that macro review included a revision of the monetary policy and the inflation target. And one of the recommendations was that the inflation target should be lowered to 2 to 3%. Since then, further wink had been done between the and the Treasury and the South African Reserve Bank. Our teams had been working very hard. We are finetuning the final details and they make them make recommendations to the minister and in the governor. What is in no doubt is that our inflation target is range is wide, it is too high, it is out of line with our peers. And we could only if there is a revision to revision can only be lower. So, Governor, what are you expecting actually for that to be finalized and presented to the finance minister? Well, the work is being done by by the team. It should be it should be very soon that that is finalized. I think that it is important. We have impressed on the team there is an opportunity right now of using, as I have said, opportunistic disinflation, and that the sooner we finalize that, the better. Governor, Why? Absolutely. Make sure that you have the support of the finance minister. I mean, if you say that you're aiming for a lower target, that would also do the job. Yes, it will do the job. But these things always work because you have to mobilise to the whole of government in society around the target. And this particular minister is a big advocate of a central bank, Independence is a big advocate of prudent macro macro economic management, and it's very important that he is on board and helps us articulate that and bring society on board with respect to the way inflation. So it's more powerful. Governor, when do you expect to be away from restrictive monetary policy, given everything that's going on? Well, in May we presented as part of our statement, we presented a scenario and that scenario included what are the. Policy trajectory would look like under a lower inflation target. And its study shows that we would be able to have lower nominal rates as a result of the lowering of the target. And so there would then thus be a benefit. I think that as it stands now, the where we are with policy is broadly in line with a neutral we are fairly, fairly close. And I think that the analysts will say to you that if we reach a nominal rate of 7%, we are in neutral territory, so we are restricted, but so are many other central banks around the world. And he just reflects the fact that we have got so much uncertainty about the trajectory of inflation, given the volatility that we had. So do you also think of scenarios? It was interesting to hear the ECB actually in their strategic review going, you know, there are so many more risks that communication has to encompass. Of course, all of that uncertainty going forward. Yes, I think scenarios are useful, but they bring with them a big communication challenge because the public might look at a scenario. And if it is a scenario that they think they find attractive, they almost like, say, so why don't you do things so that that scenario plays out. But for us as policymakers, the scenario just helps us see to society, to the public that am here is our baseline. But this baseline could have risks and even the risks materialize. This is how we think the outlook for the future trajectory it would look like. And it is a very powerful communication, if appropriately used.
