DWP scrapping popular benefit with all claimants moved to something different
The Department for Work and Pensions has announced it will shut down Employment and Support Allowance by March 2026 - shifting all recipients onto a different benefit. The DWP delivered this bombshell update to Parliament ahead of the summer break. Managed migration is the term used when the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) transfers people from old-style benefits, such as Employment and Support Allowance (ESA), over to Universal Credit (UC).
This shake-up forms part of the wider Universal Credit expansion, designed to merge several existing benefits into a single payment. So, what's going to happen now, and how is it going to affect people?
Labour MP Amanda Martin, representing Portsmouth North, challenged ministers in the Commons "to ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, whether claimants with disabilities who are in receipt of the Personal Independence Payment and legacy work-related benefits will be treated as new claimants for the purposes of the proposed changes to the health element of Universal Credit when they are migrated onto Universal Credit through managed migration; and whether such claimants will see a reduction in their income as a result of these proposed changes."
Sir Stephen Timms responded: "The Department plans to complete migration of ESA claimants to UC by March 2026. As part of this ESA claimants will be migrated to the UC Health Element. To protect any claimants who have not migrated by April 2026 we intend to mirror as closely as possible the changes made in UC in the ESA rates.
"Changes to the "support component" and the two disability premia (severe and enhanced disability premium rates) will reflect changes to UC LCWRA rates for existing claimants." He continued: "Including these commensurate measures aims to give fair treatment for all customers moving onto UC from income related ESA, regardless of their point of migration."
You'll be alerted when it's time to switch to Universal Credit through a postal letter known as a migration notice. The correspondence will be unmistakably identified as a migration notice with "Universal Credit Migration notice" displayed prominently within the document, reports Birmingham Live.
The letter will specify an exact deadline for your UC transition (typically mentioned on two occasions throughout the correspondence). At the document's base, a footnote will read: "This is a migration notice issued under Regulation 44 of the Universal Credit (Transitional Provisions) Regulations 2014".
Without securing an extension to your deadline, you must submit your UC application by the date outlined in your migration notice. Failure to comply means your existing benefits will cease - the transition to UC doesn't happen automatically.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
5 benefits that could be stopped if you save too much money
How much you have in certain savings and assets can determine how much you get from these benefits, or if you're eligible for it at all Eligibility for certain DWP benefits can depend on your savings. These are referred to as means-tested benefits, which are only paid to people that have less than a specific amount of capital. Means-tested benefits and savings limits: Universal Credit - £16,000 Pension Credit - £10,000 Council Tax Support - dependent on each individual council Income-related Employment and Support Allowance - £16,000 Housing Benefit - £16,000 The exact amount you have in savings will influence how much you receive from these five benefits and whether you're eligible for payments at all. However, it's not just cash that contributes towards this limit. Experts from Money Helper explained that the DWP will examine your entire financial situation, as well as your partner's in some cases, but not your child's. This includes cash in any bank or building society accounts, regardless of whether it earns interest. National Savings & Investments savings accounts, Premium Bonds, stocks and shares, inheritance, and the value of any property you own that isn't your main home all contribute towards your savings threshold. If you are currently drawing from your pension, this pot might also be considered as savings. Certain lump-sum payments are also viewed as savings in relation to means-tested benefits. This includes redundancy pay and compensation payouts. However, some special compensations have been specifically excluded from these calculations, such as the payments made through the Infected Blood Compensation Scheme. And some items and assets are 'disregarded' by the DWP. More information can be found on the website. Disregarded savings and assets: Personal possessions like jewellery, furniture, and cars Pension pots you haven't taken money from yet Pre-paid funeral plans Life insurance policies that haven't been cashed in Insurance claims if it's being used to replace or repair something You are not allowed to deliberately reduce your savings amount simply to qualify for benefits or secure a higher rate. This practice is known as deprivation of assets and includes giving money away, transferring property ownership, or purchasing exempt items like cars. This won't include spending your savings on essentials such as food or settling debts. Should you be suspected of deliberately depleting your assets to claim benefits, the DWP will probably examine precisely when and how you disposed of your savings or assets. According to Money Helper: "The DWP will look at the evidence to decide if they consider it to be deliberate. If, at the time, you wouldn't have been able to predict needing benefits, it might not count as deprivation of assets. You might be asked to provide paperwork and receipts to back up the date, and the reasons for getting rid of savings or assets." However, if it is determined that you intentionally spent money solely to qualify for additional benefits, your application will be assessed as if you still had all of the money. This is referred to as notional capital and will impact your eligibility.
Daily Mirror
6 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Keir Starmer told to delay DWP Universal Credit cuts for new claimants
The Work and Pensions Committee led by Labour MP Debbie Abrahams warns in a new report disabled people could still be pushed into poverty as a result of the watered-down reforms Keir Starmer must delay a cut to Universal Credit for new claimants, a new report by MPs warns today. The Work and Pensions Committee says disabled people could still be pushed into poverty as a result of the watered-down reforms. Earlier this month the PM U-turned on plans to restrict eligibility for a key disability benefit — Personal Independence Payments (PIP). But there will be changes to the health element of Universal Credit for new claimants. From April 2026 all existing and new claimants with severe or terminal conditions will be protected, the MPs said. But they added other claimants assessed as having limited capability for work and work-related activity will see their awards halved — from £423.27 to £217.26 a month. While welcoming the major U-turn on PIP last month, the MPs' report said: "We remain critical, however, of the Government's failure to properly assess the impact of the cut to UC health on poverty, health and labour force participation. "For this reason, we urge it to delay the measure until it has had time to make such an assessment." Committee Chair Debbie Abrahams said: 'We welcome the concessions that the Government made to the UC and PIP Bill (now the UC Bill). But there are still issues with these welfare reforms not least with the cut in financial support that newly sick and disabled people will receive.' She added: "The Government's own analysis published in March indicates that from next April approximately 50,000 people who develop a health condition or become disabled – and those who live with them - will enter poverty by 2030 as a result of the reduction in support of the UC health premium.' 'We recommend delaying the cuts to the UC-health premium, especially given that other policies such as additional NHS capacity, or employment support, or changes in the labour market to support people to stay in work, have yet to materialise.' 'We agree in a reformed and sustainable welfare system, but we must ensure that the wellbeing of those who come into contact with it is protected. The lesson learned from last month should be that the impact of policy changes to health-related benefits must be assessed prior to policy changes being implemented to avoid potential risks to claimants.' Responding to the report, Nil Guzelgun from charity Mind, said: 'We cannot build a fair and compassionate system by stripping away support from those who need it most. Real reform must start with listening, both to the evidence and to disabled people themselves. "We urge the Government to pause these damaging plans and commit instead to a benefits system that protects people's health, dignity and independence.'
Daily Mail
7 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Nigel Farage vows Reform UK will scrap 'dystopian' online safety laws that puts a blocker on free speech
Reform has vowed to scrap the Online Safety Act because it creates a 'dystopian' world that suppresses freedom of speech. Nigel Farage 's intervention comes after it emerged that X blocked a powerful speech on grooming gangs by Tory minister Katie Lam in Parliament this year. Meanwhile, footage of arrests during asylum seeker hotel protests was also blocked 'due to local laws', according to the social media platform. Last week, the law changed to require websites to check users are over 18 before allowing them to access 'harmful' material such as pornography or suicide material. Failing to comply with the new rules could incur fines of up to £18million or 10 per cent of a firm's global turnover. Sir Keir Starmer today denied the legislation was censoring online content and said it was there to protect children. But at a Reform press conference today, Zia Yusuf, head of government efficiency for the party, said he would repeal the act, which he argued did nothing to protect children. He said the new powers were 'the sort of thing that I think [Chinese president] Xi Jinping himself would blush at the concept of', adding: 'So much of the act is massive overreach and plunges this country into a borderline dystopian state.' Arguing that the laws suppress freedom of speech, he said: 'We will repeal this Act as one of the first things a Reform government does.' Asked how he would protect children such as Molly Russell who took her own life after viewing footage promoting suicide, Mr Farage acknowledged he did not have the 'perfect answer'. He said his party had 'more access to some of the best tech brains, not just in the country but in the world' and would 'make a much better job of it'. Andy Burrows, chief executive of the Molly Rose Foundation, set up in Molly's memory, said scrapping the Act 'would not only put children at greater risk but is out of step with the mood of the public'. After a demonstration outside the Britannia Hotel in Leeds at the weekend, X users said the site blocked arrest footage. They were shown the message: 'Due to local laws, we are temporarily restricting access to this content until X estimates your age.'
