'Optimistic': Champagne Growers Hope For US Tariff Shift
Trump's steeper global tariffs, including a maximum 15 percent on EU goods, came into effect on Thursday, upending global trade.
"It's going to hurt," said Christine Sevillano, a champagne grower and head of the independent champagne makers association.
The US market accounts for nearly 10 percent of her turnover, Sevillano told AFP at her family-owned organic vineyard.
Like many growers here, she hopes that ongoing talks between the European Commission -- which negotiates trade deals on behalf of EU members -- and the US government may yet result in a better deal for her sector.
"I want to be optimistic," she said. "We sell an optimistic product, an optimistic wine."
The champagne industry sells about 10 percent of its production volume to the US market, and 14 percent of its total output value, representing 820 million euros ($955 million), according to 2024 figures provided by the Comite Champagne industry association.
Sevillano's US importers are "in a kind of limbo", she said. "They clearly hope that the Trump administration will change course."
But unless it does, "the situation will become difficult for my importers", she said.
Orders have already started to dry up over recent months, with the tariff threat compounded by US inflationary pressures weighing on consumer spending and the dollar exchange rate.
The French producers are not the only ones set to suffer from Trump's tariffs, said Maxime Toubart, Comite Champagne's co-president.
"Of course these tariffs weigh on our operations, our vineyards and our businesses," he said.
"The entire value chain will suffer," he told AFP, from small-time Champagne growers and to US end-consumers. The economic impact on the US itself "has not yet been properly studied", he said.
Ongoing EU-US negotiations, meanwhile, were "good news", he said.
France's wine and spirits association FEVS said there was a chance that the French drinks sector could yet become exempt from the blanket tariffs.
"That's our target, and precisely our message to the governments of France and the other EU members," it said.
Toubart said champagne makers want to remain "very present" in the US market that is "very important for us".
But amid US uncertainty, they will also seek to make up for lost American sales by targeting countries in southeast Asia, Latin America and Africa, said Toubart.
"There are other markets waiting to be opened up," he said. Champagne professionals expect American importers and consumers to suffer, too AFP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
2 days ago
- Int'l Business Times
Coinbase Stock Pulls Back 30% After July Peak, Analysts Split on Outlook
Coinbase (COIN) is down more than 30% from its July highs, but analysts aren't ready to declare the rally over. Mizuho Financial — once openly skeptical of the stock — just raised its price target from $217 to $267, pointing to a rebound in July trading volumes after a sluggish Q2. "While trading volumes were underwhelming this quarter, July has seen a rebound... reflecting improving market activity," – Mizuho analyst note, August 2025 The firm kept its neutral rating, noting that consumer spot trading fell 45% and transaction revenue dropped 39% last quarter. Trump's Stablecoin Law Sparked the Summer Rally Much of COIN's July surge followed President Donald Trump's signing of the GENIUS Act, the first U.S. federal law establishing a framework for stablecoins. The legislative win fueled optimism and helped Coinbase secure a spot in the S&P 500. But the momentum didn't last. After spiking mid-July, COIN reversed course and now trades well below Mizuho's revised target of $267. Citi analysts remain far more bullish, hiking their target from $270 to $505 on expectations that regulatory clarity and rising Bitcoin prices will drive long-term growth. Q2 Earnings Show Strength in Institutional Trading In Q2, Coinbase reported $1.43 billion in net income, up from $66 million last quarter and just $36 million a year ago. Trading volume hit $237 billion, up slightly from $226 billion in Q2 2024, but the bulk came from institutional clients rather than retail. Data Context: Retail Cooling, Capital on the Sidelines According to CoinGlass, ERC-20 token activity in Coinbase custody wallets has slowed, signaling weaker altcoin demand. However, stablecoin inflows into Coinbase-linked wallets remain steady, suggesting capital is parked and ready to deploy if market sentiment improves. DeFi Llama data shows that overall stablecoin market cap has held near yearly highs, indicating that cash reserves in crypto remain robust despite the pullback in speculative trading. Bottom Line: Pullback or Reset? Between Trump's stablecoin law, July's volume rebound, and strong institutional flows, Coinbase still has long-term tailwinds. The recent drop may be more of a cooldown than a collapse — but for now, COIN is clearly running in a lower gear. If you want, I can now also give you three high-CTR, SEO-optimized titles for this that will make it blog-ready for maximum clicks. That will help this piece perform well in search and social. Would you like me to prep those next?
DW
2 days ago
- DW
Will EU-India ties survive the latest Russia sanctions? – DW – 08/08/2025
Experts say Brussels' sanctions are largely symbolic, while the real threat to New Delhi comes from looming US tariffs. Ironically, the EU may still stand to gain. The year began on a high note for the European Union and India. In February, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen visited New Delhi and, alongside Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, instructed officials to resolve remaining differences and move forward on a long-delayed free trade agreement. But that momentum was disrupted in July, when India was drawn into the EU's 18th sanctions package against Russia. The move targets New Delhi's refining of discounted Russian crude and the export of those products, some of which are sold to Europe. Could this sanctions development derail a potential EU-India trade deal? Experts argue it won't, saying the US threat of imposing tariffs of up to 50% on Indian goods poses a far greater challenge than the impact of the EU's sanctions. And, paradoxically, that may work in the EU's favor. As part of efforts to cut off funding for Russia's war in Ukraine, the EU last month banned imports of refined petroleum products originating from Russian crude. This ban applies to such products coming from any third country, including India. The EU sanctioned Nayara Energy, an Indian refinery partly owned by Russian energy giant Rosneft. "For the first time, we're designating a flag registry and the biggest Rosneft refinery in India," EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas posted on X. Nayara Energy was quick to push back, calling the move hypocritical. "While many European countries continue to import Russian energy through various sources, they take a high moral ground by chastising and sanctioning an Indian asset for processing Russian crude largely used by its domestic population of 1.4 billion Indians and businesses," Nayara Energy said in a statement in late July. However, experts told DW the EU's single designation is largely symbolic and unlikely to significantly impact India's energy trade or EU-bound exports. "The EU's sanctions lacks bite and will be difficult to enforce," said Garima Mohan of the German Marshall Fund of the United States, who researches Europe-India ties. "These exports are by no means running the Indian economy." India could easily pivot by substituting its exports with fuel refined from non-Russian sources, such as Iraqi oil. Jacob Funk Kirkegaard, an economics expert at the Brussels-based Bruegel think tank, agreed. "It is definitely an escalation by the EU. But I would also say it won't hurt trade negotiations," he said. Instead, he argued the bigger pressure on India right now is coming from the United States. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video As both the EU and India seek to secure stable trade relationships amid an increasingly volatile global economy, experts say the threat of high US tariffs on Indian goods could strengthen their mutual interest in finalizing a free trade agreement. "First of all, the fact that there is no trade agreement between the US and India, then this mindless escalation by [US] President Trump," Kirkegaard said, "means India's desire to diversify away from the US and towards the EU has probably increased. "India now needs a deal with the EU a little more than when it had arguably better ties with the US," he added. Mohan arrived at a similar conclusion. "In a roundabout way, I think the shake-up in the India–US dynamic will end up benefiting the EU," she said. "Given this tariff announcement, India needs reliable and predictable economic partners, it needs investments." The EU has also taken a more measured approach during trade negotiations — particularly in the agricultural sector which employs close to 44% of India's population. If India were to provide greater access to European or US companies, there are fears it could cause job losses at home. "The EU understands that if we insist on a larger opening in the agriculture sector there will be no deal," said Kirkegaard, adding that the EU "understands India's political and economic sensitives in the agriculture sector far better than Trump." If India were to scale back purchases of Russian oil to avoid triggering punitive US tariffs, it could reduce a key Russian revenue stream for Moscow's war effort. That would align with EU and Ukrainian interests. However, an Indian diplomat who spoke with DW on the condition of anonymity warned that removing Russian oil from the global supply could lead to a spike in prices — which would in turn hurt everyone, not just Russia. Kirkegaard questioned why Trump "has not threatened China with the same, which buys more Russian oil." Experts agree that the EU's designation of Nayara Energy is unlikely to shift the war calculus for Russian President Vladimir Putin. But India's own math might change — and that could depend more on Washington that Brussels. So, while EU-India relations have faced a setback, the overall momentum toward a trade agreement remains resilient. What began as a promising year could still culminate in a breakthrough — especially if shifting geopolitical dynamics bring New Delhi and Brussels closer together.
Int'l Business Times
2 days ago
- Int'l Business Times
Trump Says Court Halt Of Tariffs Would Cause 'Great Depression'
US President Donald Trump warned Friday of cataclysmic consequences on the US economy if a court rules that his imposition of sweeping tariffs constitutes an illegal power grab. If a "Radical Left Court" strikes down the tariffs, "it would be impossible to ever recover, or pay back, these massive sums of money and honor," he wrote on his Truth Social platform. "It would be 1929 all over again, a GREAT DEPRESSION!" he said. Trump's hyperbolic statements come as a US appeals court weighs the legality of his broad use of emergency powers to enact sweeping tariffs on trading partners. A lower court ruled against Trump in May, but the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit put the ruling on hold as it considers the case. Trump on Friday touted billions of dollars in tariff revenue "pouring" into the Treasury -- paid by US importers -- and recent stock market records, as proof his levies had created "the largest amount of money, wealth creation and influence the U.S.A. has ever seen." Many economists meanwhile worry the tariffs are stoking inflation and see trade policy uncertainty as slowing investment. Since returning to the White House in January, Trump has announced a slew of new tariffs, seeking to force a reordering of global trade that he has long claimed is biased against the United States. In addition to sweeping tariffs invoked under declarations of economic emergencies, he has also instituted sectoral tariffs of between 25 percent and 50 percent on steel and other items. Those levies have generally followed government investigations and are not at issue in the pending litigation. At a July 31 hearing, members of the appeals court appeared skeptical of the Trump administration's arguments that it had broad discretion to declare national economic emergencies and invoke tariffs as a remedy. To invoke his so-called "reciprocal" tariffs on many US trade partners, Trump declared a national emergency over "large and persistent annual US goods trade deficits." Opponents to the White House policy have argued that such a reason does not qualify under the law Trump has cited for the tariffs, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. They also argue that levying blanket tariffs on imports requires the consent of Congress under the US Constitution. The case is likely to end up in the Supreme Court, where conservatives enjoy a 6-3 majority, though analysts say the outcome is uncertain.
