Josh Hawley is ruffling GOP feathers as he stakes out his ground: From the Politics Desk
In today's edition, we have a deep dive into Sen. Josh Hawley's effort to stake out ground for himself in the modern Republican Party. Plus, Adam Noboa breaks down how President Donald Trump's renewed campaign against mail voting intersects with the redistricting fight.
Sign up to receive this newsletter in your inbox every weekday here.
— Adam Wollner
Josh Hawley irks fellow Republicans as he tries to carve out a lane
By Allan Smith, Julie Tsirkin and Matt Dixon
Since he took office in 2019, Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., has sought to place himself on the front lines of orienting the Republican Party around a mix of economic populism and social conservatism to appeal to an increasingly working-class base.
But now, with Republicans in full control of Congress for the first time since he arrived in Washington, Hawley's mission is coming into conflict with members of his party, who are frustrated with his tendency to follow the beat of his own drum as he grows more critical of some of their policy aims.
Republicans, both in Congress and in the White House, are increasingly talking about Hawley's moves with the assumption that he is considering a presidential campaign, five people familiar with such discussions told NBC News.
A senior Senate aide said it appeared that Hawley was 'trying to load up policy prescriptions to lay the groundwork for a 2028 presidential bid.'
'He's aligned himself with Democrats on most fiscal issues,' the aide added. 'Frankly, it has irked a lot of his Republican colleagues.'
But Hawley's allies say no 2028 plotting is afoot.
'Josh believes we're at a critical inflection point in our history about where the party's realigning,' a person close to him said. 'He's been on the same mission, focusing on the same project since he first ran for office, believing that the Republican Party needs to become a party of working people. What he's done is consistent with that each year he's been in Congress.'
Across the aisle: Hawley had been written off by Democrats after the Jan. 6, 2021, attack, when he was seen entering the Capitol raising a fist to protesters assembled outside and later moved forward with his objection to the electoral vote count.
But this year alone, Hawley has teamed up with Sens., Gary Peters, D-Mich., on a bill to ban congressional stock trading; Cory Booker, D-N.J., on legislation to enhance child labor laws; Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., on a bill to bar artificial intelligence firms from training models on stolen, copyrighted materials; Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., on an effort to cap credit card interest rates; and Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., on legislation to further regulate pharmacy benefit managers, among other measures.
'Well, Jan. 6 remains in the back of a lot of people's minds. At the same time, on issues where we can make progress stopping corporate greed or monopolistic control over markets, there's a need for allies,' Blumenthal said in an interview. 'The iconic Jan. 6 photo of him with a fist in the air can't be erased from memory. But if he can bring Republican support to the table for ideas that will help people, sometimes working together makes sense.'
Read more →
California's long ballot count may be Trump's next target in the war over voting
By Adam Noboa
The latest salvo in President Donald Trump's campaign against mail-in voting arrived Monday, as he announced he wants to 'lead a movement' against mail ballots and advocate instead for in-person and paper ballots, which he says are 'faster, and leaves NO DOUBT, at the end of the evening, as to who WON, and who LOST, the Election.'
This push by Trump may also have the convenience of being the latest line of attack in the redistricting wars. In California, state Democrats are attempting their own mid-decade gerrymander to counter the Trump-led push by Republicans to draw more friendly districts in Texas. And California sticks out as one of the most prominent embracers of mail-in voting — and among the slowest to count them.
Overall, mail-in voting accounted for 30% of the total vote nationwide in 2024, down from its 2020 peak of 43%. However, in California, the practice made up 81% of the total vote, according to a recent report from the Election Assistance Commission.
Mail-in voting overall has proved to be a challenging process for many election administrators, with hurdles including voter and ballot verification and logistical issues like opening envelopes, keeping materials secure and, in many cases, hand-counting. Essentially, all of the processes that happen in person when someone votes at a polling place — especially checking in and verifying their registration — can pile up fast when it happens by mail.
But California has had some of the greatest difficulties sorting through mail votes quickly. Of the states with the highest share of mail-in voting in the 2024 election, California set a benchmark for slowest progress the morning after the election.
While Democrats have achieved steady success at the statewide level in recent years, California's prolonged vote counts left the nation in suspense over which party would win control of the House of Representatives for days after the 2022 and 2024 elections.
Legislation was introduced this year requiring California counties to conclude a majority of their counting process 13 days after the election. The bill passed the state Assembly with bipartisan support and is in a state Senate committee seeking funding sign-off.
Meanwhile, Trump faces high legal and political hurdles to changing mail-in laws on his own at the federal level. Without new federal laws, states have wide latitude to set their own election procedures.
But it's also happening as California state legislators convened Monday to move forward on plans for a congressional map that, if approved by voters, would target five Republicans to lose their seats in the upcoming midterms. The effort was sparked by Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom as a response to Texas Republicans' congressional redraw seeking to fortify their majority.
It may put the redistricting wars and Trump's renewed crusade on mail-in votes on a political collision course in the Golden State.
🗞️ Today's other top stories
🇺🇦 The view from Ukraine: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's team was satisfied with yesterday's meeting at the White House, believing Trump now recognizes the importance of security guarantees for any peace agreement. Read more →
🇺🇲 The view from the U.S.: Trump pledged that the U.S. would not send troops to Ukraine as part of efforts to bring the conflict to an end. As for his relationship with Russian President Vladimir Putin, Trump said, 'There's a warmth there.'
🇫🇷 The view from France: French President Emmanuel Macron said after the White House meeting that he did not believe Putin was 'very willing to get peace now' and that Russia should face additional sanctions if peace talks stall. Read more →
🇫🇮The view from Finland: Finnish President Alexander Stubb has proved pivotal in the efforts to end the war between Russia and Ukraine, taking on new importance after he bonded with Trump over their mutual love of golf. Read more →
🚓 D.C. crackdown: The Justice Department is investigating whether Washington, D.C., police manipulated data to make the crime rates appear lower. Read more →
🌃 Texas two-step: Texas Democratic state Rep. Nicole Collier spent last night in the state Capitol after refusing to sign off on a law enforcement escort to her home. A group of her colleagues plan to join her tonight ahead of the state House's plans to take up Republicans' redistricting proposal tomorrow.
↗️ Moving on up: Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey has been hired to be co-deputy director of the FBI alongside Dan Bongino. Read more →
🗳️ 2026 watch: Graham Platner, a 40-year-old Army and Marine veteran who served four combat tours in Iraq and Afghanistan, joined the growing Democratic primary field seeking to take on Republican Sen. Susan Collins in Maine. Read more →
📱Getting technical: The Democratic National Committee is looking to refresh the technology it uses to help organize voters and volunteers. Read more →
Follow live politics updates →
That's all From the Politics Desk for now. Today's newsletter was compiled by Adam Wollner and Bridget Bowman.
If you have feedback — likes or dislikes — email us at politicsnewsletter@nbcuni.com
And if you're a fan, please share with everyone and anyone. They can sign up here.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Texas House finally passes congressional redistricting map after weeks of walkouts, lock-ins and arrest warrants
The new map could secure the GOP five additional seats in Congress in next year's midterms. Democrats say they now plan to challenge the map in court. The Texas House of Representatives approved a new map for the state's congressional districts on Wednesday, cementing a legislative win for Republicans that had been put on hold for weeks when Democratic legislators fled the state to block its passage. The new map would give the GOP a chance to secure up to five additional seats in Congress in next year's midterm elections. A final vote in the state Senate, which is expected to approve the plan, is needed before the it can be signed into law. Democrats say they intend to challenge the map in court. Republicans first announced their intention to pursue redistricting outside of the usual 10-year cycle in June. But the fight over the plan didn't become a national story until earlier this month, when dozens of Democrats left the state in order to prevent the House from having enough members present to formally meet. Each absent Democrat was fined $500 a day during the roughly two weeks they were out of state. Texas's Republican governor Greg Abbott also threatened to have them removed from their seats and civil warrants were issued for their arrests. In the end, though, the Democrats opted to return home in order to 'build a strong public legislative record for the upcoming legal battle' over the maps. They argue that the new district violates both the Constitution and the Voting Rights Act. Their walkout, which was never likely to prevent the maps from passing entirely, inspired Democrats in blue states across the country to rally behind their cause, pleading to pursue their own redistricting plans to offset the GOP's gains in Texas. So far, only California has formally moved forward with that process. Democratic governor Gavin Newsom has called for a special election in November to ask voters to approve new district lines in the state. Texas Democrats returned to the House for the first time on Monday, which allowed the chamber to meet briefly before adjourning with a plan to meet again on Wednesday to consider the maps. At the end of Monday's session, the House's GOP leadership instituted a rule requiring all Democrats who had previously left the state to submit to police escort in order to be allowed to exit the Capitol. All but one, Rep. Nicole Collier of Fort Worth, consented. Collier chose instead to remain in the House chamber. She spent Tuesday night sleeping at her desk with her feet propped up on a rolling chair. Two of her colleagues, including House Minority Leader Gene Wu, joined her overnight protest Tuesday night. More Democrats did the same on Wednesday night. The House reconvened on Wednesday morning for a lengthy — and at times heated — debate over the redistricting plan. Democrats proposed a variety of amendments to the proposal, including one that would have only allowed the maps to go into effect if the federal government agreed to release all files related to disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. 'What we are doing today is unjust, it is un-Texan and it is un-American,' Democratic representative Cassandra Garcia Hernandez said before the bill's final passage. The bill was eventually passed in an 88—52 party-line vote. The issue now moves to the courts. The standards for what makes congressional maps legal or not can be complicated. The Supreme Court has ruled that gerrymandered maps drawn to give one party a political advantage are generally constitutional. However, district lines that deliberately weaken the voting power of a specific racial group are not. The fate of Texas's new map will hinge on whether the courts view it as a racial gerrymander, as Democrats claim, rather than a purely partisan one. Republicans are also looking at a number of other red states where they believe there may be opportunities to gain extra seats through redistricting, including Ohio, Missouri and Indiana. Democrats are doing the same in blue states outside of California, though their ability to put more favorable district lines in states like Illinois, Maryland and New York may be limited. Read more: Texas redistricting fight goes national as GOP, Dems prepare for more battles over future House maps The ultimate outcome of the redistricting battle, in Texas and nationwide, could play a major role in deciding which party has control of Congress after the 2026 midterms. Democrats only need to gain a small number of seats to get the majority in the House. If they do, they would effectively have veto power over any legislation Trump and the GOP want to pass. They would also have new oversight authority and the ability to launch investigations into the president's most controversial moves since he returned to office.
CBS News
19 minutes ago
- CBS News
Texas House passes GOP redistricting plan after weeks-long standoff
The Texas House of Representatives gave final passage on Wednesday to House Bill 4, a controversial Republican-backed proposal to redraw the state's congressional maps and potentially add up to five new GOP-leaning districts. Entering Wednesday, the bill needed to pass two votes in the House to advance to the Senate. Each vote passed 88-52. Before the final vote, lawmakers debated a series of amendments offered by Democrats, all of which were rejected by the Republican majority. The bill was the sole item on the agenda for the day's floor session, which began at 10 a.m. The Texas Senate, which approved a similar version of the redistricting legislation earlier this week, is scheduled to take up the House-passed bill when it convenes this Thursday at 7 p.m. If the Senate approves the House version without changes, the legislation could be sent to Gov. Greg Abbott by the end of the week. If not, the two chambers will need to reconcile differences in a conference committee. The vote came after a dramatic standoff earlier this month, when Democratic lawmakers fled the state to break quorum and block action on the redistricting bill. Their absence stalled the Legislature and effectively ended the first special session, delaying the measure for two weeks. Gov. Greg Abbott called a second special session hours after the first adjourned, and Democrats returned to the House chamber on Monday, allowing the legislation to move forward. That evening, HB 4 passed out of the House redistricting committee on a 12-8 party-line vote. To prevent another walkout, House Speaker Dustin Burrows imposed a rule requiring Democratic members to be escorted by Department of Public Safety officers if they wished to leave the Capitol. While most Democrats complied, Rep. Nicole Collier of Fort Worth refused. She was temporarily locked in the House chamber and was later allowed to go to her Capitol office. On Monday, Collier filed a petition in state court alleging she was under "illegal restraint by the government." The court has not yet ruled on the matter. On Tuesday, several other Democrats joined Collier in protest, tearing up their signed escort agreements and spending the night in the Capitol. With the passage of HB 4, Republican leaders dropped the escort requirement. The redistricting plan is expected to give Republicans a significant advantage in the 2026 midterm elections, potentially flipping up to five congressional seats.
Politico
21 minutes ago
- Politico
Gabbard to cut ODNI staff by nearly 50 percent
As part of the changes, the agency will trim down the Foreign Malign Influence Center, which collects and analyzes data on foreign influence operations seeking to undermine U.S. democracy. ODNI says that the National Intelligence Council and National Counterintelligence and Security Center already carry out this work, and describes the FMIC as having been 'used by the previous administration to justify the suppression of free speech and to censor political opposition.' The FMIC has historically worked closely with the State Department's Global Engagement Center, which was shuttered earlier this year over accusations of censorship. ODNI said the Cyber Threat Intelligence Integration Center was also deemed redundant because other offices in both the White House and the intelligence community also monitor cyber threat intelligence. And the National Intelligence University — which offers degrees to intelligence officials — will be integrated into the National Defense University. Other offices within ODNI, including the National Counterproliferation and Biosecurity Center, the External Research Council and the Strategic Futures Group, will also see a reduction in their workforce. Gabbard in a statement justified the changes as 'the start of a new era' for the nation's intelligence community. Gabbard is pushing to ultimately scale down personnel and costs across all 18 intelligence community agencies by $1.3 billion annually. 'Over the last 20 years, ODNI has become bloated and inefficient, and the intelligence community is rife with abuse of power, unauthorized leaks of classified intelligence, and politicized weaponization of intelligence,' Gabbard said, adding that she would ensure the IC and ODNI returned to its 'core mission' to 'find the truth and provide objective, unbiased, timely intelligence to the President and policymakers.' The announcement has divided intelligence leadership in Congress. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, praised Gabbard for the cuts. 'Congress created the ODNI to be a lean organization that used small staffs to coordinate across the Intelligence Community and execute specific, important tasks,' he said in a statement. 'Today's announcement is an important step towards returning ODNI to that original size, scope, and mission.' Virginia Sen. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the panel, agreed that ODNI is 'in need of thoughtful reform,' but expressed concern over Gabbard at the helm of these changes. In a statement to POLITICO, Warner said that 'given Director Gabbard's track record of politicizing intelligence — including her decision just yesterday to revoke security clearances from career national security officials — I have no confidence that she is the right person to carry out this weighty responsibility.'
