logo
The American Dream Is Far From Over

The American Dream Is Far From Over

Yahoo04-04-2025
My grandparents landed on Ellis Island in 1902 with their 1-year-old son, my father, in their arms. Twenty-seven years later, in 1929, I was born. They had fled what was taking place in Tsarist Russia, with the Cossacks and other government forces running wild, attacking, raping, and killing Jews.
It wasnt until many years later that I really appreciated the great gift they gave me by coming to a country where everyone has the freedom to pursue ones own dreams, a country whose vision is that all should be judged as individuals - judged, as Martin Luther King Jr. said, "by the content of their character."
I was in grade school and high school during the Second World War. In our first class every morning we pledged allegiance to the flag of our country. During many assemblies, we sang the National Anthem. On Saturday afternoons we watched the war unfold on the big screen in the local movie house. On Sunday evenings we crowded around the radio to hear Walter Winchell give us the latest news on the war in his fast, staccato manner. Patriotism was in the air, and we loved America.
Fast forward to 1956 when I was 27 years old. I started my own business with the phone in my dads chicken store and $2,000 borrowed from my father-in-law and a wholesaler who would sell me goods to fill the orders I got. With that and some catalogs supplied by the wholesaler, where I could rubber stamp my company name, Quill, on the cover, I started out calling on businesses across Chicago, selling office supplies.
A year and a half later my younger brother joined me, and 20 years after that our older brother joined. Then in 1998, 42 years after starting, we sold our company, Quill Corporation, to Staples. We had become one of the largest office products dealers in the country, with over 800,000 customers nationwide.
I have lived the American Dream. Some say that dream is dead today, but I beg to differ. One of the great promises of this country is that an estimated 400,000 to 500,000 new businesses were started the year I started Quill. In 2024, there were 5.5 million applications for new businesses. The population in 1956 was about 175 million and about 340 million in 2024. So, there were 10 times as many new businesses started in 2024 as compared to 1956, in a nation where the population has only doubled.
What these numbers show is that vast numbers of our citizens believe that they can fulfill their entrepreneurial aspirations, which gives lie to the claim that the American Dream is obsolete.
Some are claiming that America is inherently a racist nation, that all white men are racists. Well, this old white man must also beg to differ with this canard. Our national motto is "E Pluribus Unum," out of many, one. The Declaration of Independence puts forth the American creed "that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" - which is exactly opposite of the claim that we are an inherently racist nation.
We haven't yet fully realized that vision, but a true reading of our history shows we have come a very long way toward achieving it. The fulfillment of that vision is what we must continue to work on. That should be the mission of the younger generations.
And then, of course, there are ongoing efforts by some to break us down not only by race but also by sex, sexual orientation, and in other ways that are antithetical to American ideals. Again, this old white man must dissent. That goes against all that we stand for and all that we have been striving to achieve over these past 250 years.
Decline in Patriotism
When I was growing up and building my business, patriotism was in the air, and we loved America. Now, a 2023 Gallup poll shows that only 38% of young Americans ages 18 to 34 say they are extremely proud to be an American, while 67% of those 55 and older say they are.
Traditional patriotism has declined among younger generations, being replaced with a lot of misinformation about America and about the progress we are making toward realizing our founding vision. Some are even advocating that we change our form of government.
How did this happen? I realize that there are always some who are working to change us from being a nation based on meritocracy - in our "pursuit of happiness" - to a nation based on equal outcomes for all, an impossible dream that has failed every time it has been tried. How did we get to a place where so many other young people seem to be agreeing with them?
The culprit, I believe, is our educational system. Some of the Vietnam War protesters in the 1960s and 70s became professors, and over the years as they gained seniority, they reshaped the faculty of our institutions of higher education in their own image. Like all those throughout history who wanted to take this country in a different direction, they knew they had to erase the history, the memory, of the country and supplant it with something different.
And that is what has been happening over these past 60-plus years. The teaching of America's founding principles - the teaching of America's long history of working toward achieving that vision of the Declaration of Independence - has been downgraded, or even eliminated from, the curricula in most of our colleges and universities. And, more recently, realizing that they must start indoctrinating children at a younger age, the same has been happening at the K-12 level.
Rebirth of Civic Education
Realizing that fewer of our young people were proud to be Americans, 20 years ago I started the Jack Miller Center for Teaching Americas Founding Principles and History. We started at the university level and later expanded into the K-12 arena. We have had good success building a network of over 1,200 professors on more than 300 campuses.
Belatedly made aware of what is happening inside our schools, Americans have become angry. They are demanding that our schools teach about America, its vision, its founding principles designed to achieve that vision, and its 250-year history of progress toward achieving that vision. So, the wind is at our back in this effort.
Some states are passing laws requiring that their public universities must have a separate department to teach Americas founding principles and its history, as well as Western Civilization in general. Those departments will create their own masters and doctorate programs to further revitalize the teaching of these principles and of our history. The heads of these departments are hiring professors apart from the influence of other professors on campus who are opposed to such teaching. These departments will also reach out to K-12 teachers in their states so these teachers can better teach their students. At the Jack Miller Center, we are playing a major part in this effort.
If those who want to tear us apart by race, color, sex, and sexual orientation succeed, it will destroy us as a nation. And, yes, this old white man begs to differ on all they are doing. This is not what my grandparents came to this country for.
Many in this country fear the threat of China, North Korea, or even nuclear-equipped Russia. But I fear the threat that comes from within even more.
Now, at the age of 96, 123 years after my grandparents came to this country with my one-year-old father in their arms, as I look back on my life, I am even more grateful to them for having the courage to make the trip. And I want to preserve the gift they gave me for my children, grandchildren, and seven - so far - great-grandchildren.
Jack Miller is founder and chairman emeritus of the Jack Miller Center for Teaching America's Founding Principles & History.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Admin DHS Account Accused of Referencing Avowed White Supremacist
Trump Admin DHS Account Accused of Referencing Avowed White Supremacist

Newsweek

time4 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Trump Admin DHS Account Accused of Referencing Avowed White Supremacist

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Trump administration was accused of quoting a white supremacist who was backed by a Neo-Nazi group, as part of its social media campaign to recruit immigration enforcement agents. In a post shared to X on Monday, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) said "Which way, American man?", a quote from which appeared to reference Which Way, Western Man, a 1978 book by the avowed white supremacist William Gayley Simpson, who argued Hitler was right and Jews must be killed. The phrase has also been a part of online meme culture for years, typically stripped of its relation to the Simpson book. "This administration has made a point of further normalizing explicit extremism – from dangerous conspiracy theories and rhetoric, to the appointment of officials with deep extremist ties, to dehumanizing policies," Amy Spitalnick, CEO of the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, told Newsweek. Responding to Newsweek's question about whether the person who posted the quote understood its origin, Assistant DHS Secretary Tricia McLaughlin asked: "Where are we quoting a white supremacist?" adding, "This is so embarrassing for Newsweek." Why It Matters The post comes amid a clear shift under the Trump administration for government social media accounts to use memes, quotes and trends to share messaging on policy, particularly when it comes to immigration. Supporters have praised the administration for keeping its finger on the pulse of the digital conversation, while critics have said the posts are not befitting the status of federal government offices at best and racist dog-whistles at worst. What To Know Simpson's book is widely seen as racist and antisemitic, with the author writing that if the U.S. was to survive, then "all aliens" including Jewish, Asian and Black people would "have to be put out and kept out". In another chapter, Simpson wrote that Hitler was right in his actions leading up to WWII, and that the U.S. would need to take a similar approach. The book was published by the National Alliance, a known Neo-Nazi group which says on its website that it believes multi-racial societies cannot be healthy, and governments cannot be good if they serve more than one racial entity. The "Which way?" post, shared on the DHS X account, included an illustration of Uncle Sam at a crossroads from 1936, which referenced President Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal. The original image included Uncle Sam holding a sign which said "Prosperity", with signs pointing in different directions reading "New Deal," "Liberty," "Opportunity," "Inflation," and "Depression". Left: A Department of Homeland Security post on X, as part of an ICE recruitment campaign. Right: Federal agents patrol the halls of immigration court at the Jacob K. Javitz Federal Building on August 12,... Left: A Department of Homeland Security post on X, as part of an ICE recruitment campaign. Right: Federal agents patrol the halls of immigration court at the Jacob K. Javitz Federal Building on August 12, 2025 in New York City. More DHS/Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images DHS' version changed the words, with the sign in his hands reading "Law and Order" – a familiar phrase used by the Trump administration – along with "Opportunity," "Homeland," and "Service," pointing in one direction, and "Invasion," and "Cultural Decline" in the other. The use of the image comes after similar uses of older U.S. artwork depicting seemingly bygone eras of American life and war time messaging. Bible quotes have also begun appearing as part of social media messaging when promoting DHS' efforts in defending the homeland. What People Are Saying Amy Spitalnick, CEO of the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, told Newsweek: "At a moment of record antisemitism and broader violent hate, we know where this increasingly mainstreamed extremism leads.I'll also note that yesterday and today are the 8th anniversary of the Charlottesville violence, which was fueled by the very same white supremacist ideas." Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, a senior fellow at the American Immigration Council, on X: "To be blunt; the propagandists running @DHSgov are deliberately pushing thinly-veiled neo-Nazi material through the official communications channels of the U.S. government. Their goal is stirring outrage (to which they will express fake outrage) and signaling to their followers." Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies, on X: "It's a common meme & I'd be surprised if 1 in a million heard of the book. Book sounds loathsome, so in that respect the meme is like "This Land Is Your Land", written by a Stalinist lickspittle (w/ commie verses at the end) but now disconnected from its origin & widely accepted." What's Next DHS is continuing its social media push as part of a recruitment campaign for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), with over 100,000 people said to have applied for roles over the past few weeks. The agency was given $75 billion in funding as part of President Trump's recent tax and spending bill, with $30 billion earmarked strictly for hiring.

When Israel left Gaza, everything got worse
When Israel left Gaza, everything got worse

Boston Globe

time9 hours ago

  • Boston Globe

When Israel left Gaza, everything got worse

There is no way to know yet how this will turn out. But as Israel prepares to push still deeper into Gaza in what may be the cataclysmic final phase of its war to eliminate Hamas, it is worth looking back to reflect on another fateful, anguish-filled Israeli decision in Gaza — one that began the descent into the nightmare the Jewish state now faces. Advertisement It was exactly 20 years ago this week — Aug. 15, 2005 — that the Israeli government, led by then-prime minister Ariel Sharon, destroyed 21 Jewish communities in the Gaza Strip, evicting 9,000 Israelis and demolishing the homes where some of them had lived for decades. All of Gaza, denuded of its Jews, was then unilaterally surrendered to the Palestinian Authority. There was no quid pro quo. Israel relinquished the territory it had occupied in the 1967 Six Day War without requiring anything in return. Sharon labeled the operation 'disengagement' — a term meant to suggest that by handing Gaza to the Palestinians, Israel could finally sever its ties to the troubled territory and its population. Advertisement Sharon's deputy prime minister, Ehud Olmert — who, like his boss, had always previously been known as a hawkish defender of Israeli security — 'It will be good for us and will be good for the Palestinians,' Olmert effervesced. 'It will bring more security, greater safety, much more prosperity, and a lot of joy for all the people that live in the Middle East.' With disengagement, he foretold, 'a new morning of great hope will emerge.' He was sure that with the end of Israel's occupation of Gaza, 'the Middle East will indeed become what it was destined to be from the outset, a paradise for all the world.' That was perilously wishful thinking, as I Advertisement 'We will be on this side of the line, and the Palestinians will be on that side,' I remember one Israeli journalist earnestly telling me several months before the evacuation. 'They'll run their lives the way they see fit and we won't have to be involved.' The Ambassador Meir Shlomo, who was then the Israeli consul-general in New England, urged me to support the Gaza disengagement because of the diplomatic dividends it would pay. Israel's withdrawal was being applauded everywhere, he pointed out. The plan had the support of the George W. Bush administration and the European Union. It was being But by heading out of Gaza, Israel wasn't walking into peace. It was walking off a cliff. The unilateral withdrawal from Gaza was not interpreted by Israel's enemies as an act of magnanimity or pragmatism. It was interpreted as a surrender. Rather than a historic demonstration of Israel's desire for peace, the evacuation of those 21 communities and the departure of every Israeli soldier from Gaza were seen by the Palestinian Authority as proof that violence pays. Advertisement And so, 20 years ago this week, the IDF was sent in and But that goodwill and fraternity were not reciprocated. 'Today you leave Gaza in humiliation,' Hamas chieftain all of Palestine will be hell for you." The central error of disengagement wasn't the belief that Israel could live without Gaza. It was the belief that Gaza, left to its own devices, would choose peace over jihad. With the Israelis out, Palestinians surged into the abandoned settlements and immediately Hamas turned Gaza into a forward operating base for terrorism: It imported Iranian rockets, dug hundreds of miles of attack tunnels, and embedded its arsenals in civilian areas to ensure any Israeli response would be politically costly. The withdrawal from Gaza didn't end the conflict; it entrenched it. Advertisement What was intended as a confidence-building measure turned out to be a confidence-destroying one. A radical concession meant to enhance Israel's security instead put many more Israelis at risk. Far from encouraging moderation, disengagement encouraged Hamas to intensify its brutal extremism. In the years that followed, Hamas expanded its power and arsenal. Rocket fire into Israel became routine. An Israeli soldier, Gilad Shalit, was abducted and held by Hamas for five years. Children in Israeli towns like Sderot and Ashkelon grew up with 15-second air-raid warnings to reach shelter. All the while Hamas kept expanding its terror infrastructure, dispersing arms and fighters through its underground labyrinth. Every few years Jerusalem would respond to Hamas rocket attacks with several days or weeks of 'mowing the grass' — pinpoint bombing meant to buy a spell of relative quiet. It was never long, however, before the attacks resumed. Many Successive Israeli governments accepted this status quo, convinced that the alternative — reoccupying Gaza and destroying the Hamas regime — was too costly to contemplate. It was a judgment rooted in what Advertisement Daniel Pipes, the Middle East historian and analyst, conceptzia — so much so that they ignored Hamas's blood-curdling genocidal threats and dismissed its open preparations for a devastating blow that would overwhelm Israel's defenses. Then came Oct. 7, 2023. On that day Hamas slaughtered more than 1,200 people, most of them civilians. They burned homes, murdered entire families, raped and mutilated victims, and kidnapped more than 250 hostages. It was less a military operation than a pogrom. It was also the culmination of everything disengagement had made possible: a sovereign Hamas stronghold, armed and emboldened, able to commit mass atrocities with impunity. For all the condemnation of Israel's 'occupation' of Gaza, that occupation had in fact ended in 2005. Israel did not control Gaza's streets, neighborhoods, or governance. Yet after Israel left the territory became exponentially more dangerous, for Jews and for Palestinians. Disengagement may have removed Israeli settlers and soldiers — but it did nothing to remove the jihadists or lower their appetite for war. Now, even as Israel wages what This is not honest criticism of wartime conduct. It is the inversion of morality — the recasting of a nation fighting for its life as the villain, and of a terrorist organization dedicated to extermination as the victim. Hamas has built its entire war plan around the mass endangerment of Palestinian civilians: embedding rocket launchers and command posts in hospitals and mosques, turning schools into weapons depots, using apartment buildings as shields, and blocking civilians from fleeing battle zones. It is not a byproduct of the fighting that Gazans die in large numbers — it is Hamas's strategy. It knows that every Palestinian body pulled from the rubble will be blamed on Israel, and it exploits that certainty with cynical brazenness. At any moment, Hamas could end the war. It could release the Israeli hostages it Hamas's purpose is not just to wound Israel's reputation; it is to delegitimize Jews as moral actors altogether, to strip the Jewish state of the right to defend itself, and to normalize the corrosive idea that Israel's very existence is a provocation. Its defamations embolden Israel's enemies, sap the resolve of its friends, and distort the moral lens through which the world views the conflict. Just as Israel's pre-October 7 conceptzia blinded it to the scale of the physical threat from Gaza, too many in the democratic world are blind to the scale of the strategic threat in the information battlefield. In both arenas, illusions are dangerous — and the price of indulging them is paid in blood. The only way forward is to end Hamas's rule in Gaza once and for all — not to contain it, not to conciliate it, but to destroy it as a military, political, and ideological force. History shows that cataclysmic defeat can be the gateway to renewal: After World War II, Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan were crushed into unconditional surrender. Their regimes were dismantled, their ideologies discredited, and their societies rebuilt on democratic foundations. That transformation ultimately benefited the vanquished even more than their victors, giving ordinary Germans and Japanese decades of peace and freedom. Such a rebirth is devoutly to be wished for the Palestinians — but it will never be possible until Hamas, and the equally malign Palestinian Authority, are so utterly defeated that their war to destroy Israel is ended permanently. Only when Gaza is freed from leaders who glorify murder and annihilation can it begin to heal; only when there are Palestinian leaders who renounce the dream of eliminating the Jewish state can they begin to build a decent one of their own. And only when Israel prevails completely — militarily, morally, and politically — will both peoples have a chance to live side by side in the secure and mutually beneficial peace that has eluded them for so long. This article is adapted from the current , Jeff Jacoby's weekly newsletter. To subscribe to Arguable, visit . Jeff Jacoby can be reached at

This Frustrated Real Estate Agent's Rant About The Real Cause Of The Housing Crisis Is So Spot On
This Frustrated Real Estate Agent's Rant About The Real Cause Of The Housing Crisis Is So Spot On

Yahoo

time9 hours ago

  • Yahoo

This Frustrated Real Estate Agent's Rant About The Real Cause Of The Housing Crisis Is So Spot On

Zachary Foust is a 31-year-old real estate agent who has been working in Delaware for over eight years, but he's been going viral on TikTok for more than just selling homes. In a recent video, he shared a passionate rant about why it's so hard for young people to get on the housing ladder now, and it has people in his comments begging him to run for office. He started the video by sharing that he originally joined TikTok back in 2019 to share information about the home-buying process. "But slowly but surely, I didn't realize that I had a VIP front row seat to watching the American Dream get sifted away from the working class," he says. Zachary goes on to weave together threads showing how the wealthy and powerful have progressively made it harder and harder for average people to get ahead and own a home, from Reagan's tax cuts for the wealthy and the steady rise of private equity to the 2008 market crash and the Supreme Court's Citizens United decision that allowed the wealthy to pour more money into influencing politics than ever. He argues that all of these factors have led to "the infestation of institutional investors buying up and banking on asset inflation that is housing, that is shelter, keeping normal everyday people out of having a roof in exchange for billionaires having bigger accounts." According to the Summer 2025 Investor Pulse Report from BatchData, investors made up nearly 27% of home sales in the first quarter of this year, the highest level in the last five years. He goes on to say, "It's clear and evident that the billionaires and trillionaires on this planet are bored because they have everything that they need, yet the ego continues to devour at them and because of pride, because of ego, because of a lust for power. Not only are they trying to financially line their pockets more and more, but they're doing it to the tune of draining out the bottom of our economy, draining out the working class income, draining out the upper middle class asset opportunity." In one of the most fiery moments of his rant, he says, "I don't want to just sell homes. I want to start a change for something so that you can get in on the wealth, or we could change the system in some way, all together, promote more equality. Why am I labeled a communist if I want people to have a chance?" It's kind of a long video, but if you have 10 minutes to spare, it's really worth hearing what he has to say for yourself: @zacharyloft / Via Zachary shared with BuzzFeed that he sees real estate as so much more than just a place to live or just his career. "To me, owning a home is a bedrock of protection. It's a place that you have full ownership of with the people you love, a safe haven that's truly yours. It's also an investment that appreciates over time, a foundation of security when everything else in life might feel uncertain." And he shared that in 2022, he started to get more and more disillusioned with his career as he saw clients who'd done "everything right" yet still were unable to buy homes. "The reality hit me when I had clients earning over $100,000 with 700 credit scores, and I still had to walk them through how to prepare to buy a home because they no longer had the freedom to purchase like they once did. Meanwhile, retirees, boomers, and investors (many of whom pay cash) were still buying at a remarkable pace. The market for first-time or working-class buyers stalled, while cash and retirement purchases hardly slowed." Despite the financial challenges the average young American faces, Zachary encourages people not to give up. "Take action, even in a tough market. None of us can predict the future, but you can control your financial foundation. Keep debt low and credit high, ideally over 700. That shows you're handling money well and also positions you to save. I'd invest those savings into something that can yield 4–7% annually to grow your nest egg for a future down payment." And he says there's no shame in not being as fiercely independent as the ideal American Dream. "The best advice I've given in the past two and a half years is to ignore the stigma around living with family or friends. Living with your parents, family, or a group of friends, 'homie hacking' a mortgage together, is one of the smartest things you can do. It's awesome. Avoiding rent for a few years to save aggressively?? It can be life-changing." Finally, he says, "When I bought my first home, it meant the world to me, it was my wife and my very first nest egg, my first big step into adulthood, and my first real responsibility. That experience shaped so much of how I see homeownership today." Are you a homeowner or saving up to buy your first home? Tell us about your experiences in the housing market in the comments or via the anonymous form below: Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store