Shell's profit drops by almost a third on lower oil prices, but beats expectations
The oil major's shares were up 1.8 per cent following the announcement in which it also said it would maintain the pace of its share buyback programme at US$3.5 billion over the next three months, the 15th consecutive quarter of at least US$3 billion.
'We definitely saw macro continuing to be challenging on multiple fronts and against definitely a backdrop of geopolitical and economic uncertainty,' Shell's finance chief Sinead Gorman told reporters.
'We saw that knock-on impact on both physical trade flows as well as commodity prices and margins. Despite that, we delivered a robust set of results,' she said.
Shell said it achieved US$3.9 billion in cost cuts compared with 2022, part of a programme aimed at saving between US$5 billion and US$7 billion by the end of 2028.
It recorded cash flow from operations of US$11.9 billion in the quarter, down from US$13.5 billion a year ago.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
The buybacks together with US$2.1 billion in dividends brought shareholder distributions to 46 per cent of operating cash flow, within its 40 per cent to 50 per cent guided range.
Shell's adjusted earnings, its definition of net profit, reached US$4.264 billion in the quarter, smashing the US$3.74 billion average in an analyst poll provided by the company but down 32 per cent from a year ago.
The company had guided in a trading update that it expected earnings to be hit by weaker trading in its integrated gas division and losses at its chemicals and products operations after an outage at its US Monaca polymer plant.
Crude oil prices fell in the quarter as Opec+, made up of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and allies such as Russia, began unwinding self-imposed production cuts that had been aimed at supporting the market.
Their most recent decision calls for an oil output increase of 548,000 barrels per day in August.
Global benchmark Brent crude prices averaged around US$67 a barrel during the April-to-June quarter, compared with US$75 a barrel in the first quarter and US$85 a year earlier.
Prices spiked briefly in June on the back of the conflict between Israel and Iran.
Gorman said Shell had taken a cautious, risk-off approach to oil trading in the quarter, because it saw a disconnect between price movements and supply-demand fundamentals.
She said that after seeing muted demand for liquefied natural gas from Asia in the first half of the year, which allowed Europe to restock, LNG markets could tighten again after the summer. REUTERS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
4 minutes ago
- Business Times
AI washing: signs, symptoms and solutions for investment stakeholders
The rapid rise of artificial intelligence (AI) in finance has brought real innovation but also misleading marketing claims. Many financial services firms feel pressure to appear tech-savvy to stay competitive. Although some firms genuinely apply machine learning (ML) and AI to improve investing, others make claims that do not match reality. These firms may use buzzwords such as 'AI-driven' or 'machine learning-enabled' without truly integrating these tools into their investment processes. Consequently, clients and investors may be misled into believing they are investing in innovative, cutting-edge strategies when they are not. This phenomenon is known as 'AI washing' – the act of falsely or overly inflating claims about the use of AI in financial products or services. The CFA Institute recently published AI Washing: Signs, Symptoms and Suggested Solutions – a report that examines what AI washing is, why firms engage in it, how it affects clients and the broader development of AI, touching on the ethical, regulatory and technical measures that can help address it. It also offers guidance to asset owners on how to spot both genuine AI use and inflated claims in the marketplace. According to Nvidia's State of AI in Financial Services: 2025 Trends report, 57 per cent of respondents in a global survey of financial professionals are using or considering AI for data analytics, and generative AI usage has risen sharply to 52 per cent from 40 per cent in 2023. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up In addition, 37 per cent report AI-driven operational efficiencies, and 32 per cent believe AI offers a competitive advantage. The use of AI in trading and portfolio optimisation has increased to 38 per cent from 15 per cent, while its application in pricing, risk management and underwriting has grown to 32 per cent from 13 per cent. Barriers to AI adoption True AI in finance involves systems that process large data sets, learn patterns and make decisions – such as predicting asset prices or optimising portfolios. These efforts require serious investment in talent, technology and time. Many investment firms, however, either lack the resources or are unwilling to overhaul their existing processes to meaningfully incorporate AI. Instead, they may add small AI elements (such as using a chatbot or large language model) but advertise their strategy as 'AI-powered', which is deceptive if these tools do not play a central role. Barriers to real AI adoption in investing are high. Financial data is often messy, sparse and hard to predict. Unlike other industries where data is more abundant and easier to model, investment forecasting requires handling noisy, volatile and complex inputs. Consequently, many firms hesitate to disrupt their existing models that already perform well. AI washing is particularly dangerous because it undermines explainable AI – a movement focused on making AI systems more transparent, understandable and trustworthy – especially for non-technical users. If firms exaggerate or hide how they use AI, it becomes harder for stakeholders to assess the real value or risks of these tools. The CFA Institute report asserts that investors deserve transparency about what technologies are being used, how they work and whether they deliver value. Firms should avoid overhyping their use of AI just to attract clients or compete with rivals. Instead, they should be transparent about how they use AI, what it adds to their process and what limitations exist. Asset managers or asset owners must be able to provide sufficient detail regarding why and how they implement AI technology in their process, what specific frameworks they use, and what results or improvements they observe from using AI. This recommendation is in line with the ethical principles of transparency and duty to clients as set out in the CFA Institute Code of Ethics and Standards of Professional Conduct. Asking the right questions to spot AI washing To help stakeholders – especially asset owners and prospective clients – spot AI washing, the CFA Institute report suggests a range of questions that asset owners and prospective clients can pose to asset managers that claim to use AI. Some of these questions demand some level of technical familiarity with AI and ML, which speaks to the fact that asset owners themselves must develop some minimal competence in AI methodologies. Below is a list of pertinent questions for consideration: Can you specify what type of algorithm or combination of algorithms you are using and how it enhances the forecasting of asset returns? How does your AI-driven model outperform simpler models? Can you provide a quantitative comparison of relevant performance metrics? What data sources are you using to train your model(s), and how do these sources integrate with the rest of your process, if at all? Are you using alternative data, such as satellite imagery or sentiment analysis of earnings calls? What preprocessing and feature selection techniques are used to prepare the raw data for input into your model(s)? Do you use fundamental features, such as earnings surprise, price momentum, or other signals and indicators? Do you standardise or normalise the input features, and what techniques do you use to handle missing data, outliers and limited data sets? How do you maximise model interpretability? Is it through model choice or post-implementation communications? If the latter, can you give some concrete examples? Can you provide an example of a recent investment decision that was influenced by the model's output? How was the rationale for that decision explained to the investment team? How do you validate the robustness of the models you develop? What precautions do you take to guard against overfitting? For example, how do you tune hyperparameters in your models? How do you monitor model drift, and what mechanisms are in place to retrain the models and/or adapt to shifts in the market landscape? What governance structures are in place to ensure the responsible use of AI firmwide? Do you have an internal AI audit process, and how often are the models reviewed for compliance with generally accepted standards and protocols? If you use outsourcing for some or all of your AI technology needs, what processes are in place to ensure the quality and robustness of the services and products used in your investment process? Transparency is non-negotiable Firms selling financial products should conform to the same standards of transparency that stakeholders demand from other types of products. This idea applies to the use of AI technology as well. Unfortunately, because of AI's headline-grabbing popularity, some investment firms may rush to exaggerate their success in applying AI technologies to their investment processes. Such instances of AI washing have increasingly become the subject of heightened scrutiny from the investment community, including regulators. By understanding and learning to detect AI washing, stakeholders can help minimise and eventually eliminate this phenomenon, resulting in better investment outcomes. The writer is a senior affiliate researcher with CFA Institute and author of the report AI Washing: Signs, Symptoms and Suggested Solutions. He is currently the co-editor of The Journal of Financial Data Science, on the editorial board of The Journal of Portfolio Management and a member of the board of directors of the Financial Data Professional Institute. This content has been adapted from an article that first appeared on the CFA Institute Research & Policy Center's website.
Business Times
4 minutes ago
- Business Times
How FairPrice is deepening consumer relevance through Own Brands
Private labels and own brands now dominate supermarket shelves, appearing in almost every product category. As stubborn inflation and economic uncertainty persist, demand for such products continues to rise. House brand products are seen as cost-effective alternatives for daily essentials. Recent reports found that nine in 10 Singapore shoppers bought house brands in 2024, and private label sales accounted for 8 per cent of global fast-moving consumer goods growth between 2024 and 2025. As Singapore's largest retailer, we have seen this first-hand. Our Own Brands business, comprising FairPrice house brand products and private labels, was first established 40 years ago to provide Singaporeans with affordable daily essentials like rice and oil. As stubborn inflation and economic uncertainty continue to persist, demand for our Own Brands products continues to rise – in 2024, nearly half of all FairPrice shoppers had an Own Brands product in their basket at checkout. What consumers first perceived as cheap or low-quality options, most now see as sensible, pragmatic and value-for-money. Supermarkets have grown their portfolio of house brands and private labels by leaps and bounds in recent years – our Own Brands range comprises more than 3,500 products today. House brand and private label product ranges are moving beyond meeting necessity-driven needs, but the question for retailers is: Where do we go from here? BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Own brands offer retailers an incredible advantage in meeting rapidly evolving consumer expectations for not just value, but quality and excitement. Affordable indulgence and excitement Singapore consumers today have more adventurous and sophisticated preferences than ever before. From kunafa chocolate to ramyeon featured in the latest K-drama or hawkerpreneurs with a fresh new take on a local classic, global, regional and local trends are becoming increasingly significant drivers for diverse retail offerings. Own brands could enable retailers to more directly capitalise on this demand – the key is in expanding house brand or private label product ranges beyond necessities while still delivering on value. For example, consistently investing in launching new flavours and maintaining the affordability of our house brand chips and nuts have resulted in them being the most popular with customers in their respective categories. Retailers can also elevate their own brands by introducing affordable indulgences. This could include launching products that customers perceive as 'premium' options, like truffle chips, for example. Delivering on evolving essential needs Own brands have a history of meeting essential needs, but essentials have taken on a very different meaning for consumers today compared to 50 years ago. Now, customers want value for money, but they also want to engage with retailers that consider the health and wellness benefits of their offerings, their customers' age-based preferences or requirements, and the sustainable production of products. This is a key tenet of our Own Brands expansion strategy – providing options that address the wide and evolving variety of consumer necessities today, from low-sodium soya sauce to Omega-3 eggs, sustainably packaged vegetables and everything in between. Consistent access and value While consumers' palates continue to expand, the same cannot be said for their wallets, and with good reason. Global economic uncertainty is at an all-time high, and rising costs continue to be a top concern for everyday Singaporeans. This has also had a significant impact on retailers. Many continue to struggle with mitigating the ripple effect of increasing operating costs and not passing this on to their customers. Own brands – and their clear value-driven proposition for consumers – offer retailers a way to bridge this gap. The challenge lies in finding creative ways to maintain easy-on-the-wallet price points in today's operating environment. What we have found to be an effective solution is moving more and more upstream with our sourcing and production of our Own Brands products. This might entail acquiring a stake in a producer of pork products, investing time to understand the ins and outs of salmon farming directly from a source, or finding vertical integration synergies for products and suppliers across categories. The end goal is to keep our Own Brands prices affordable, while gaining better oversight on quality and building a resilient supply chain. A strategic lever Singapore's retail landscape is becoming increasingly complex, as is the global economic environment in which we operate. The remarkable growth of house brands and private labels in recent years underscores the critical role they play for retailers today. Own brands have proven their ability to meet consumer needs, especially in times of uncertainty. By investing in understanding fast-evolving needs and preferences, prioritising strategic sourcing, and integrating excitement and innovation into the development process, retailers can continue leveraging own brands as a powerful vehicle to navigate complexities and thrive in the years to come. The writer is the group chief executive officer of FairPrice Group
Business Times
4 minutes ago
- Business Times
Lessons from golf for the astute investor
On the surface, golf seems a world apart from financial markets. Not to stereotype, but many finance professionals enjoy a game of golf, and it's not hard to tell why. There are striking parallels that offer invaluable lessons for anyone building lasting wealth. The recent conclusion of the 153rd Open Championship, the oldest golf tournament in the world, on Jul 20 saw the final grouping consisting of world No 1 Scottie Scheffler against Li Haotong. It is a rare occurrence to see a Chinese golfer at a major tournament. Scheffler won by an impressive healthy margin, but what was more intriguing was that he went 32 holes bogey-free, demonstrating consistency and dominance under pressure. (For non-golfers, bogey-free means finishing all of those holes at par or better.) This got me looking into the compounded reward money for the last century. In 1926, the famous Bobby Jones – lawyer by trade, golfer by passion – won for the first time. As a career amateur, he wasn't entitled to any prize money, so the whopping £75 (US$364) was awarded to the runner-up. Fast forward to 2025, Scheffler took home US$3.1 million of the total US$17 million prize money, an increase of 8,500 times from a century prior (taking the US dollar exchange rate in 1926 of £1 to US$4.85). This growth seems mind-blowing and equates to a compounding growth rate of just 9.5 per cent, approximately the return of global stocks in the same period. Returning to golf with fresh eyes While I played competitively as a junior, I have had the good fortune of returning to the green with my kids reaching the age to start swinging. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Playing as an adult has brought a whole new appreciation for the mental side of the game – the risk-reward trade-offs, the need to make decisions and live with them, the pressure, the choice of equipment and so many other nuances draw parallels to evidence-based investing. Staying on course by taking appropriate amounts of risk for return In golf, you are constantly faced with choices. From tee to green, you need to pick the line, shot and trajectory, while taking into account bunkers, water, rough, wind, rain, emotions, your competitor's actions and the world around you. You could carry that water to try to get on the green in two, or lay up with a higher chance of making par. Investing presents similar choices. You could take on lots of risk for the chance of making a big short-term return, but you could also catch a bad swing and end up in a ditch. Astute investors begin by picking the right 'shot' for each of their goals. This isn't about chasing the latest market fad; it's about crafting a well-thought-out investment strategy and asset allocation that aligns with your unique goals, time horizon and risk tolerance. Do you need a conservative iron shot to lay up, or can you confidently unleash the driver for a long-term gain and take on the volatility? Understanding your personal 'course conditions' and making strategic choices before you swing is paramount to improving your probability for success, and knowing when to go for it or protect capital. Working backwards from the goal Visualisation is important in golf – and not just for the next shot. A good golfer visualises from the green and the hole, and works backwards to the optimal shot they want to play off the tee to put themselves in the best position. If I want to hit 120 yards into the green on a 350-yard hole, I should try to hit 230 yards off the tee. I don't have to take out the driver and put myself a more awkward 60 yards from the hole even if I strike it in the middle of the fairway. Scheffler's performance at the Open clearly showed he consistently made choices off the tee that set himself up for success. Investing is the same. We start with the life goal, and work backwards to how we allocate our assets today. Liabilities-driven asset allocation has long been the way institutions invest, and now with the power of access, advice, lower costs and technology to implement this method, individuals can do the same. Like golf gear, every investor needs a set of personalised strategies Golf is one of the few sports where your gear can become outdated every few months. Golfers have to comb through all the noise, find what suits them and select fourteen golf clubs, each with a distinct purpose. Similarly, to consciously build investment portfolios, we must assemble an efficient collection of strategies that complement each other. When combined, they must be suitable for our goals, and our ability to tolerate volatility and complexity. Ideally, you can do this in a cost-conscious way and with unbiased advice. It is probably fair to say most golfers spend more time thinking about and researching how to improve their set of clubs, combing through dozens of websites and consulting multiple experts and friends before making their choice. We can all apply the same discernment to how we grow and manage our hard-earned wealth. There is no undo button in golf or investing Golf can also be a uniquely unforgiving sport. In tennis, for example, if you hit a lousy shot, that particular game is far from over. Miss a two-foot putt, that shot is marked on your scorecard forever. Once you've hit a shot, you can never get it back. In investing, the past is gone forever, too. Time lost and hindsight are constant frustrations. The market does not care if you are below your cost. The market does not care if you doubled your money on that stock in the last month, or if you missed out by sitting out for the last year. You can only focus on your allocations today for your future. You are playing against yourself In golf, no one will move your ball. No one is moving the course. You are in total control of implementing your game. A good swing requires consistent practice, focus and discipline, so you can perform when the pressure is on and distractions are everywhere. Successful investing also demands disciplined execution. This means sticking to your investment plan through market ups and downs, resisting the urge to panic during downturns or chasing fleeting highs. It means regular rebalancing to maintain your asset allocation, to improve the probability of success. The true mastery in both pursuits comes from controlling your emotions, silencing the inner critic and maintaining a clear, long-term perspective. Patience, resilience and the ability to learn from every shot – good or bad – are the hallmarks of a champion, both on the course and in your financial life. So, was this more about golf teaching us about investing or investing teaching us about golf? Whichever way you see it, improving your probability of success in managing wealth or playing golf will certainly lead to greater enjoyment in life. The writer is chief executive officer and co-founder of Endowus
