An Englishman in Newport – Sting wows Isle of Wight Festival
Former The Police frontman Sting has wowed the crowds at the Isle of Wight Festival with a set of greatest hits.
Wearing a white T-shirt and tight black trousers, the 73-year-old raced straight into fan favourite Message In A Bottle which got the crowd singing along.
Half way through his one-and-a-half-hour slot, Sting said to the Newport audience: 'We are delighted to be back at the Isle of Wight festival, it's a historic festival.
'Thank you for inviting us.'
After bounding through An Englishman in New York, Walking On The Moon and Every Breath You Take, the band went off before returning for an encore of Roxanne which the crowds enthusiastically sang along to.
Sting then finished with Fragile, the only acoustic song in the set.
Other bands taking to the Main Stage on Friday included Lottery Winners, Amy Macdonald, The Corrs and Faithless ending the night while Clean Bandit headlined the Big Top.
Some 55,000 partygoers have crossed the Solent to reach Seaclose Park in Newport for the four-day event also being headlined by Stereophonics and Justin Timberlake.
John Giddings, who has run the festival since re-launching it in 2002 following the legendary events which ran from 1968 to 1970, has said he goes with 'gut feeling' when choosing the acts.
The 72-year-old told the PA news agency: 'You want to book acts that have a catalogue that's going to entertain an audience for an hour, hour and a half, and, secondly, someone who's capable of performing to an audience of 50,000 people in a field, because they need to be able to project to entertain.'
Other acts performing during the weekend include The Script, Jess Glynne, Supergrass, Example, Busted and Texas.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Verge
32 minutes ago
- The Verge
Nothing Headphone 1 leaks show quirky translucent design
While Nothing is gearing up to officially unveil its first over-ear headphones next week, leaked images and videos have given us a good idea of what they look like. The Nothing Headphone 1 sports an unusual design that appears consistently across leaks from multiple sources, featuring a squircle earcup with the company's signature transparent elements and support for what looks like a 3.5mm audio cable. Nothing announced in a video last month that it would be launching over-ear headphones in 'summer 2025,' but remained largely tight-lipped about what to expect. What little was teased — including Nothing's Tom Ridley saying the company was making 'a more interesting looking pair of headphones that say something about you,' and Adam Bates suggesting its buttons would feature distinct designs for each control function — appears to have been realized in these design leaks. Images shared by Nothing_fan_blog on Instagram show that the earcups for the Nothing Headphone 1 resemble a couple of quirky cassette tapes, and true to Bates' word, there appear to be multiple buttons to control the music. The images show the headphones in black or silver colorways, and branding for 'Nothing Headphone 1' and 'Sound by KEF' on either earcup. Videos shared on X by Arsène Lupin also show two people at a private brand event trying out the headphones with what looks like a 3.5mm wired connection. That cable could introduce improved audio performance (compared with Bluetooth) that doesn't require a battery when connected to compatible sources. It won't be long before we get official confirmation about the Headphone 1 design, specs, and price. According to comments made by Nothing CEO Carl Pei at the London SXSW conference, it's set to be announced on July 1st alongside the brand's incoming flagship phone, the Phone 3.
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Is 28 Years Later's ending bold, visionary, or absolutely outrageous?
In 28 Years Later Danny Boyle and Alex Garland return to the dystopian world they created back in 2002 with quite a splash, delivering gripping new chapter full of awe-inspiring action and touching melodrama. But there's another thing it has — a memorable its release the thing that has stood out most about the movie amongst cinephile and film agnostics alike is the way in which 28 Years Later ends. That's because final scene does more than just set the stage for 2026 follow up The Bone Temple, it shakes audiences out of their comfortable reverie after two and a half hours of mayhem and declares itself triumphantly to the world. How does it do that? You might be asking yourself. Well after leaving his secluded island home, losing his mother (Jodie Comer) and leaving the child of an infected with his father (Aaron Taylor-Johnson), 12-year-old Spike (Alfie Williams) decides to try going out on his own. The mainland may be crawling with infected but he needs the time to himself, and he's pretty sure he can kill anyone who come his way. When he is beset upon by a group of infected a group of survivors led by Jack O'Connell's Sir Jimmy Crystal come to help. He asks if his flock can step in and kill the infected that are chasing Spike and the boy agrees, so Jimmy lets his followers loose and they lay waste to those consumed by the Rage virus in quick, brutal succession. But with the type of maniacal glee that completely changes the tone of the movie we just watched. What makes it all a bit bonkers is how Jimmy and his cult — because that is what they are — are all dressed like Jimmy Savile. The group have matching blonde hair, wear gold jewellery and dress in colourful boiler suits, oh and they're all named Jimmy in some variation. It's a pretty outrageous thing to do, to have your characters idolise someone like Savile, particularly given what the public now know about him and the years of predatory sexual abuse he inflicted on children and minors without consequence. It certainly is a bold move on Boyle's part, but it shows that The Bone Temple will be just as unexpected. From a narrative perspective, it is something that could well have happened had the world ended in 2002, before Savile's abuse was revealed to the public and he was still a beloved figure of British TV. Someone like O'Connell's Jimmy, who was a child when the Rage virus broke out and watched his parents succumb to the disease, could well have turned to the only other person he knew of for guidance. How The Bone Temple might address the Savile impersonators is to be seen, but it is one way to make your film memorable. And given the way the ending has got people talking online and off, it seems to have worked. Then there's the way that the introduction of Jimmy and his cult shifts things up a gear. While the movie isn't devoid of violence or brutal action by any means the final scene is a real tonal shift from what came before. 28 Years Later is at its heart the story of a scared young boy, of a mother's love, and her son's determination to save her life in the face of overwhelming odds. 28 Years Later takes the story in some surprisingly moving and tender directions as a result, which is why it is such a stark contrast when Sir Jimmy and his crew come in. Their use of elaborate acrobatics and goofy martial arts to kill infected, as well as their unpredictable nature, feels strange in comparison to the stoicism of Spike and his family. At the very least it means that The Bone Temple has declared its intentions as something completely different to what came before it, and promises a bold new vision for the franchise from Garland and Nia DaCosta — who took over directing from Boyle for the follow up, which was filmed back-to-back with 28 Years Later. It's one of those scenes that you'll either love or hate, that you'll either think is genius or upends the movie completely. But one thing is for sure, regardless of which category you fall into, there is still one word that can be used to describe it: bold. And if you're hoping to convince viewers to stick around for the next film in the franchise then it's better to do it with style than risk falling at the last hurdle. 28 Years Later is in UK cinemas now, 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple will be released on 16 January, 2026.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
28 Years Later Was Actually Filmed Using iPhones – Danny Boyle Explains Why
28 Years Later director Danny Boyle has opened up about his decision to shoot much of the film using an iPhone camera. The horror sequel was released last week, and has already proven to be a big success with both critics and cinemagoers. Danny previously helmed the original movie 28 Days Later, shot on hand-held cameras, giving the film the effect of looking like found footage, and his new offering used similarly lo-fi techniques. In a new interview with YouTuber Matti Haapoja's How They Filmed That series, Danny explained his motivations for using iPhone cameras (although it's worth pointing out he didn't just rifle in his pocket for his phone and start shooting, these were souped-up iPhones with impressive enhancements, with some shots requiring as many as 20 at a time to film) to record 28 Years Later. '[Using iPhones] allowed us to be very light, in our footprint, in areas of the country that we wanted to suggest hadn't been touched for 28 years,' Danny said. 'Now, a crew coming in with the normal equipment level, it's going to make a big footprint. 'We used drones a lot, as well, so we could film sequences that cameras couldn't possibly [achieve] without terribly disrupting the landscape, and making it look like a herd of elephants had gone through.' Danny added that the use of multiple iPhones and drones in 'arrays' allowed 'certain visceral moments of the film' to be even more impactful, allowing viewers to 'push inside' the two-dimensional shot in front of them before being 'thrown back out again'. Similarly, he told Wired: 'Filming with iPhones allowed us to move without huge amounts of equipment. 'A lot of Northumbria [where 28 Years Later was shot] looks like it would have looked 1,000 years ago. So we were able to move quickly and lightly to areas of the countryside that we wanted to retain their lack of human imprint.' During a separate interview with IGN, he also conceded that the iPhone-quality filming felt like something of a callback to 28 Days Later's shooting techniques. 'We decided to carry it as an influence,' he explained. It's not just the use of iPhones as filming equipment that has generated conversation around 28 Years Later, though. The movie's dramatic climax has also raised plenty of eyebrows – with Danny having recently explained the meaning behind those perplexing final scenes. 28 Years Later is in cinemas now, with its sequel currently slated for release in January. Danny Boyle Is Planning A Whole 28 Years Later Trilogy – Here's Everything He's Said So Far 28 Years Later Director Danny Boyle Reveals Meaning Behind That Truly Wild Twist Ending Jodie Comer Says Watching Old Clips Of Cheryl Is Helping Her With Her New Horror Role (Yes, Really!)
