Justice Varma row: Congress seeks SC-appointed panel's report to decide its stand on impeachment proposal
The government has indicated that it plans to bring an impeachment motion against Justice Varma during the monsoon session of Parliament which is slated to begin on 21 July.
Congress sources told ThePrint that the party conveyed to the government that access to the committee's report was essential to determine its position on the proposed impeachment of Justice Varma, who is currently posted at the Allahabad High Court but has not been assigned any judicial work.
New Delhi: The Congress has asked the Centre for the report of the Supreme Court-appointed committee investigating allegations of corruption against Justice Yashwant Varma. The Union government has informed the party of its decision to initiate impeachment proceedings against the judge, sources said Friday.
On 14 March, wads of currency notes were discovered in a room at Justice Varma's official residence in New Delhi, while he was serving as a judge at the Delhi High Court. The incident sent shockwaves through judicial and political circles.
Justice Varma was subsequently repatriated to the Allahabad High Court by the Supreme Court Collegium and has rejected the allegations against him in response to probes undertaken by the Delhi High Court chief justice and the SC committee.
While the Congress has formally demanded the inquiry report of the SC committee, some of its legal brains have argued that the report of the panel could not be the sole basis to impeach the judge.
The committee, set up by former Chief Justice of India Sanjeev Khanna, comprised the chief justices of Punjab and Haryana and Himachal Pradesh, Justice Sheel Nagu and Justice GS Sandhawalia respectively, and Karnataka High court judge Justice Anu Sivaraman.
The committee submitted its report on 3 May. On 8 May, days before his retirement, Justice Khanna wrote to President Droupadi Murmu and Prime Minister Narendra Modi, enclosing a copy of the inquiry report and Justice Varma's response.
Congress sources said that the party is consulting legal experts on the need to get the government to follow the Judges (Inquiry) Act of 1968 which kicks in once a motion to remove a judge is admitted in any of the chambers of Parliament.
Under the Act, the Speaker or the Chairman, as the case may be, will constitute a three-member committee to investigate the grounds on which the removal (impeachment) has been sought. The committee consists of the Chief Justice of India (CJI) or a Supreme Court judge, the Chief Justice of one of the 25 high courts and a 'distinguished jurist'.
In a public statement Wednesday, Congress Rajya Sabha MP Vivek Tankha also questioned the unavailability of the three-member SC committee report with MPs.
'Chairman Rajya Sabha, an eminent SC lawyer, is on record saying that the three judge inquiry report has no constitutional or legal sanctity. It's conducted for the benefit of CJI & SC judges. Not a legal material for parliamentarians to move a motion! Is the government short of legal advice?' Tankha asked.
Earlier, when Dhankhar sought to make a case for the revival of the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) citing the Justice Varma episode, the Congress had indicated that it was open to the idea of changes in the judicial appointments process.
'The recent incident of recovery of cash from the residence of a judge is indeed alarming. While the Congress Party recognises that an independent judiciary is intrinsic to protection of Constitutional principles and democracy, it is also true that Judiciary must set safeguards and standards for accountability. A mechanism for judicial accountability, without compromising judicial independence, is the need of the hour,' stated a resolution adopted by the All India Congress Committee at its session in Ahmedabad in April.
(Edited by Viny Mishra)
Also read: Hidden in plain sight: The unanswered questions in the Justice Varma cash controversy
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
31 minutes ago
- Hans India
NIA Takes Over Probe into Murder of Hindu Activist Suhas Shetty in Bajpe
Mangaluru: The National Investigation Agency (NIA) has formally taken over the investigation into the brutal murder of Hindu activist Suhas Shetty, who was hacked to death in broad daylight in Bajpe town on May 1. The central agency's team reached Mangaluru earlier this week and has initiated preliminary groundwork. Mangaluru Police have officially confirmed the arrival of the NIA team, led by DSP Pawan Kumar. The team has met with City Crime Branch (CCB) officers to collect case-related documents and briefings. The Union government had transferred the case to the NIA following pressure from BJP leaders, particularly Dakshina Kannada MP Capt. Brijesh Chowta, who had written to Union Home Minister Amit Shah seeking a central agency probe. The NIA investigation may also include charge of collision of officials in aiding the murder of Suhas Shetty, which the Karnataka government was wary about. It is stated by the BJP leaders that a certain police official had checked the car of Suhas Shetty twice on the day he was murdered, the checks had been carried out twice within a span of few hours to ensure that Shetty and his co passengers in the car had no weapons. Initial investigations by the local police had pointed to the involvement of a group of eight Muslim youths, allegedly affiliated with the banned organisation Popular Front of India (PFI). The calculated nature of the attack and the possible ideological motivation behind the killing raised concerns about a broader conspiracy. The NIA is likely to revisit the evidence and re-examine the suspects in custody. It may also explore whether provisions under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) are applicable if firm links to proscribed outfits are established. There are also reports suggesting that the agency will look into possible lapses by certain local police personnel. With the NIA's entry, the case is set to widen in scope, potentially extending beyond the immediate assailants to uncover a larger network, if any, behind the murder.
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Kharge slams Centre's Gaza vote abstention at UNGA, says India's foreign policy 'in shambles'
New Delhi: A day after India abstained in the UN General Assembly (UNGA) from a vote on a draft resolution that demanded an 'immediate, unconditional and permanent' ceasefire in Gaza, Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge said that "our Foreign Policy is in shambles" and added that "PM Modi must now take a call on his EAM's repeated blunders and set some accountability." As Israel continues to bomb Gaza which has already killed more than 50,000 people and displaced millions in the already torn area, the 193-member UN General Assembly voted overwhelmingly to adopt the resolution introduced by Spain that demanded an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire. Taking to X, Congress President said, "It is now increasingly evident that our Foreign Policy is in shambles. Perhaps, PM Modi must now take a call on his EAM's repeated blunders and set some accountability. 149 countries voted for a UNGA resolution for a ceasefire in Gaza. India was only one of the 19 countries that abstained. We virtually stand isolated by this step." Reiterating the Congress' statement that condemned the brutal attacks by Hamas on the people of Israel on October 8, 2023, Kharge said, "We have consistently condemned the indiscriminate actions that included a siege of the Gaza Strip and bombings in it as 60,000 people have died and there is a widespread and horrific humanitarian crisis." Taking a jibe at Indian Foreign Policy which now stands on the crossroads as New Delhi continues to call for talks and diplomacy between Israel and Palestine while routinely skipping the votes at such crucial drafts, Kharge asked, "Have we abandoned India's consistent stand advocating for a ceasefire, peace, and dialogue in the Middle East and West Asia?" "This stance is deeply rooted in our long-standing tradition of Non-Alignment and moral diplomacy, through which India has always championed justice and peace in international conflicts", he added. "On October 19, 2023, itself, the Indian National Congress had called for an immediate ceasefire and for humanitarian assistance to the beleaguered and dispossessed people of Gaza. India cannot stand by silently or passively while the region faces horrific violence, humanitarian catastrophe, and increasing instability", he added.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Imran Khan Vs Military: How Democracy Has Become A Bedtime Story In Pakistan
Pakistan's economy is faltering, its diplomatic standing is diminishing, and its society is becoming ever more divided In Pakistan, democracy has often served as a reassuring narrative used to placate the populace, while the 'men in uniform" govern either overtly or from behind the scenes. Civilian administrations, regardless of their popularity, are allowed to function only as long as they do not threaten the vested interests of the military establishment. When they cross that line, they are removed via a well-established mechanism in which the judiciary is conveniently employed to implement the establishment's agenda. No individual embodies this complex interplay of power more than Imran Khan, whose political ascent was not in defiance of the military's covert backing but rather a result of it. Now, like his predecessor Nawaz Sharif, he finds himself deconstructed, delegitimised, and detained. Khan's political trajectory is steeped in profound irony. It required over twenty years, a massive cult following rooted in his cricketing fame following the 1992 World Cup triumph, and a populist discourse centred on reform, for him to attain Pakistan's premiership in 2018. However, this ascent was also contingent upon the endorsement of the very institution he now vehemently criticises—the Pakistan Army. For decades, the military establishment has acted as the ultimate power broker in Pakistani politics, assembling governments from a cadre of 'electables", pejoratively labelled 'lotas", and maintaining control through a blend of patronage, coercion, and calculated instability. Once acclaimed by many as the military's favoured candidate, Khan's fall from favour occurred more swiftly than most had anticipated. His efforts to re-establish civilian authority and pursue an autonomous path—be it in foreign policy, intelligence postings, or internal military matters—proved intolerable for Pakistan's generals, who are unaccustomed even to the semblance of accountability. Consequently, what ensued was not simply a political rift, but a deliberate and relentless campaign of obliteration. Since his removal from office in 2022, Khan has faced a slew of legal proceedings—an evident case of lawfare in which Pakistani courts, from the lowest levels to the Supreme Court, have become arenas for his political eradication. In a distinctly Kafkaesque twist, both Khan and his wife, Bushra Bibi, have received convictions in multiple cases, ranging from state-related corruption, such as the Toshakhana affair, to alleged violations of marriage law. These prosecutions are not driven by any genuine commitment to accountability, which in Pakistan remains glaringly selective. Rather, the legal system has been weaponised to silence dissent and dismantle the most formidable challenge to military dominance. As Khan recently stated from Adiala Jail via his X account, Field Marshal Asim Munir had targeted his wife after she refused to support him when Prime Minister Khan dismissed him as head of the influential Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) within a year of his 2019 appointment. Khan's incarceration since 2023 represents merely the most visible symptom of a more profound decay. His political party, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), has borne the full brunt of the establishment's wrath, with a transparently orchestrated effort to systematically dismantle it—particularly evident following the anti-government protests of 9 May 2023, sparked by Khan's arrest. For the first time in Pakistan's history, demonstrators directly targeted military installations, most notably in Lahore and Peshawar, where Corps headquarters were defaced. In response, the state launched an expansive crackdown, during which senior PTI leaders were forced to resign during televised appearances, and hundreds of party members and supporters—some charged under colonial-era sedition laws, others under military codes—remain imprisoned. Many now face trial in military courts, reminiscent of the country's earlier authoritarian eras. This is not merely a campaign against a single individual; it is an assault on the very concept of civilian authority. The establishment, now led by Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir, is resolute in its aim to guarantee that no civilian—whether elected or unelected—ever entertains the notion that they wield genuine power. In this struggle, the military establishment commands a wide arsenal of instruments to enforce its will. The media, once a contested yet essential sphere, has been steadily hollowed out. For over a year, Imran Khan's name was effectively censored from television broadcasts following a directive issued by PEMRA, the national media regulator. Independent journalists, including Imran Riaz, were abducted, subjected to violence, or forced into exile. Prominent social media platforms such as X (formerly Twitter) were blocked, with access only reinstated a month ago—not in the interest of democratic transparency, but to facilitate military communication during border tensions with India. This digital blackout has functioned both as a gag and a warning: dissent will neither be aired nor endured. Even more alarming is the proliferation of enforced disappearances—a tactic long refined in the conflict-affected peripheral regions of Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Today, activists, students, and journalists from major urban centres such as Lahore, Karachi, and Islamabad are disappearing in plain sight, accused of harbouring sympathies for opposition politics or threatening national security. Furthermore, the February 2024 general elections, officially lauded as a democratic undertaking, in truth reflected outcomes that were preordained. With Khan and senior party figures such as Shah Mehmood Qureshi imprisoned, and PTI barred from contesting under its electoral symbol, the military-supported Pakistan Muslim League (Nawaz) and Pakistan People's Party were once more cycled into office. In reality, the elections showcased the military's orchestration of the political landscape, amid reports of ballot tampering, vote-count discrepancies, and a prolonged internet shutdown on polling day and thereafter. The message appeared unambiguous: democracy may be performed, but never permitted to yield the unexpected. Within this system, military generals may not don political insignia or occupy parliamentary seats, yet they continue to rule through proxies, constructed narratives, and intimidation. Consequently, civilian institutions stand hollowed out—the judiciary reduced to a compliant instrument of state power, and parliament functioning as little more than a stage. In this context, political survival hinges not on popular backing, but on institutional loyalty to the General Headquarters in Rawalpindi. To refer to a 'civil-military imbalance" in Pakistan is to significantly understate the situation. There is no equilibrium; merely the illusion of choice within a system engineered to prevent genuine contestation. Imran Khan is not the first to confront this reality, as Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto was executed, Nawaz Sharif exiled, and Benazir Bhutto assassinated. What renders the current period particularly perilous is the growing normalisation of authoritarian practices under the veneer of democracy, with the Shehbaz Sharif government fulfilling its compliant role. It would be inaccurate to suggest that Pakistan's establishment pursues stability through consensus; rather, it demands submission through control. In doing so, it has dismantled the very notion of pluralistic politics within the country. The tragedy of Imran Khan, therefore, is not merely personal but emblematic of a wider national crisis where leaders are expendable, accountability is arbitrary, and the constitution remains subordinate to the khaki veto. Undoubtedly, there is a significant cost to this ongoing assault on democracy. Pakistan's economy is faltering, its diplomatic standing is diminishing, and its society is becoming ever more divided. The consequences of fear, censorship, and political manipulation extend beyond moral concerns, leading to the exodus of the limited foreign investment the country attracted, increased regional isolation, and the proliferation of extremism within the socio-religious domain. top videos View all However, it remains uncertain whether Pakistan's military leaders, along with their civilian collaborators such as the incumbent government, will ever surrender their grip on authority. Until that moment arrives, democracy in Pakistan will continue to be what it has invariably been—a mere bedtime story. The writer is an author and a columnist. His X handle is @ArunAnandLive. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views. tags : Asim Munir Imran Khan nawaz sharif Operation Sindoor pakistan Shehbaz Sharif Location : Pakistan First Published: June 14, 2025, 16:20 IST News opinion Global Watch | Imran Khan Vs Military: How Democracy Has Become A Bedtime Story In Pakistan
