logo
Operation Baam: How Baloch resistance is shifting from symbolism to strategy

Operation Baam: How Baloch resistance is shifting from symbolism to strategy

First Post18 hours ago
The Balochistan Liberation Front's operation was not symbolic or reactionary—it was surgical and strategic, demonstrating the growing maturity of the Baloch resistance against Pakistani domination, with vital support from local networks read more
The BLF has made it clear that Operation Baam is not the culmination but the opening phase of a larger transformation in its military doctrine. (Representational image/Reuters)
The Balochistan Liberation Front (BLF) has officially concluded Operation Baam, declaring it a historic success and a decisive chapter in the armed resistance against Pakistani occupation. From July 9 to the night of July 11, the operation swept across the length and breadth of Balochistan, targeting military outposts, intelligence networks, and economic infrastructure, leaving in its wake what the BLF describes as 'a shattered illusion of colonial control'.
According to BLF, Operation Baam marked the first province-wide offensive of its kind, with 84 coordinated actions carried out across multiple districts—making it the most extensive armed campaign against the occupying Pakistani state in Balochistan to date.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Operation Baam—meaning 'first light of dawn' in Balochi—was not just a military campaign but a political and national declaration. It symbolised the arrival of a new, organised phase in the Baloch liberation movement, marked by precision, coordination, and an unflinching challenge to the occupying Pakistani state.
Scale, Strategy, and Execution
According to the final statement issued by Gwahram Baloch, the BLF spokesperson, the operation comprised 84 coordinated attacks across key districts of Balochistan. These included direct assaults on Frontier Corps (FC) and Army personnel, ambushes, drone takedowns, attacks on mineral convoys, and seizures of state checkpoints.
At least 50 Pakistani Army and FC personnel were killed, and more than 51 others were wounded. In Musakhel, nine intelligence operatives linked to Military Intelligence (MI) and the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) were killed at a highway checkpoint—an act that sent shockwaves through Pakistan's intelligence community and demonstrated the BLF's operational reach.
In the Mand-Tump region alone, sustained blockades and attacks took place across Meerabad, Hothabad, Tagran, and Hairabad, including fierce strikes on military checkpoints at Balicha and Bodigdan. In Sibbi, FC and police posts were attacked, and the Red Zone MI office in Kharan came under direct fire.
The Sarmachars, the Baloch militants, launched widespread sabotage operations against state infrastructure. They established over 22 strategic blockades and dozens of surprise checkpoints across Mand, Dasht, Panjgur, Sibbi, Jahoo, and Kharan, effectively paralysing military movement.
In Washuk and Nodiz, they overran police and levy outposts, disarmed the personnel, issued stern warnings, and withdrew with control of the area.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Economic disruption was a central component: 25 vehicles, including gas tankers and mineral transport trucks, were destroyed or disabled. Financial targets and supply lines were deliberately hit to undercut both state authority and resource extraction efforts.
Province-Wide Offensive
From the Makran coast to the rugged heights of Koh-e-Sulaiman, Operation Baam unfolded with near-simultaneous assaults across a vast theatre. Fierce engagements were reported in Mand, Kolwah, Kech, Wadh, Kharan, Kalat, Quetta, Sibbi, and Naseerabad—signalling the operation's sweeping territorial span.
In Panjgur, the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) road—a critical artery of economic extraction—was blocked, while gas-carrying convoys were ambushed. Pakistani surveillance drones and quadcopters were shot down in Kolwah, Gwarkop, Jahoo, and Aashaal, effectively neutralising aerial monitoring capabilities.
In Jahoo, army encampments in Darukoch, Doleji, and Nondara came under coordinated, multi-directional attacks.
In Kalat's Kapoto, Dasht Goran, and Tok areas, five mobile towers were destroyed, severing key communication lines. In Kech district's Buleda area, Sarmachars burnt a United Bank Limited (UBL) branch to the ground and seized weapons from its security guards. Strategic road blockades, checkpoint takeovers, and attacks on police stations echoed across the region—reinforcing the BLF's presence on the ground.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
In Khuzdar's Wadh area, convoys transporting minerals were struck in direct assaults, and the Wadh Pali Mas central camp in Khuzdar came under heavy attack. Meanwhile, in urban zones like Quetta and Sibbi, government offices and Red Zone assets came under precise fire—showing the reach of the armed resistance into administrative centres.
Statement by BLF Spokesperson
In his concluding statement, Gwahram Baloch addressed not only the occupying Pakistani forces but also the Punjabi ruling elite. He declared that the occupying state can no longer maintain its writ through violence, repression, and brute force, nor deceive the Baloch nation through conspiracies, divide-and-rule tactics, or the false promises of Islamic brotherhood and parliamentary politics.
The BLF accused the Punjabi political and military establishment of perpetuating a colonial project disguised by democratic illusions. The organisation holds that the reality of Greater Punjab's domination—rooted in chauvinism and fascism—has now been fully exposed.
With a stern warning, Gwahram emphasised that Balochistan will no longer remain the 'goose that lays golden eggs' and cautioned that any attempt to continue the forced occupation of Balochistan would be met with intensified resistance and bloodshed.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
In reference to Operation Baam, the spokesperson for the BLF stated that the operation not only represents a shift in the military strategy and operational strength of the Balochistan Liberation Front but also signifies a major development in the broader Baloch national liberation movement.
The spokesperson further emphasised that through this operation, the BLF has sent a direct message to the occupying state of Pakistan that the days of its forced occupation and colonial plunder of Balochistan are numbered.
Amid the aftermath of Operation Baam, the BLF issued a sharp clarification regarding the same incident in Musakhel, where nine individuals were taken off two buses and executed. Gwahram Baloch stated they were confirmed military and intelligence operatives identified through prior intelligence, not civilians. He dismissed state and media claims that innocent Punjabis were targeted, calling them part of a broader propaganda campaign to discredit the Baloch liberation movement.
The spokesperson emphasised that during the operation, hundreds of Punjabi travellers were stopped, questioned, and allowed to proceed unharmed—reinforcing that identity-based targeting did not occur. 'This is not an apology,' he said, 'but a response to the Pakistani army's disinformation war.' The BLF warned international media to scrutinise state narratives and reaffirmed its commitment to distinguishing civilians from occupying forces.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Popular Support
Operation Baam showed more than just armed strength; it revealed an evolved national liberation strategy. This was not symbolic or reactionary—it was surgical and strategic. It showed the maturity of the Baloch resistance movement, with local support networks playing critical roles. Militants appeared with modern weaponry, used thermal scopes and snipers, carried out public addresses, and dismantled surveillance infrastructure with practiced skill.
The Pakistani state's reaction, as expected, was repressive. Mass arrests, curfews, internet shutdowns, and digital blackouts were imposed. In Quetta, attacks were reported in Hazarganji, Kirani Road, and Sona Khan—including grenade attacks and bombings on FC installations. Elsewhere, BLF fighters disabled gas tankers in Dalbandin and damaged multiple mineral-transporting convoys on the Quetta-Karachi and Quetta-Sibi highways.
Snap checks and public addresses were carried out from Wadh and Kharan to Kalat and Dasht, often in broad daylight, signalling the organisation's territorial confidence.
In areas like Dasht, Mand, and Kolwah, eyewitnesses reported that locals greeted fighters with slogans and support, even during active blockades. Videos also appeared on social media, and the organisation's media wing uploaded footage showing people enthusiastically greeting the BLF fighters.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Political Intent and National Message
The symbolic resonance of Operation Baam cannot be overstated. The name, meaning the first light of dawn, now echoes across Balochistan as a declaration of awakening.
The operation not only shattered dozens of Pakistani military installations but also dealt a blow to the narrative that the Baloch liberation struggle is fragmented or fading. Instead, it has emerged renewed, bold, and coordinated.
The BLF's ability to simultaneously target strategic assets, disrupt state control, and directly engage with local people indicates a new phase of resistance—one that cannot be silenced through conventional repression.
A Shift Toward Total Resistance
With the successful completion of Operation Baam, the BLF has demonstrated a shift from sporadic guerrilla actions to organised military offensives with national significance. It's clear message to Pakistan, and particularly to the Punjabi ruling structure, is one of defiance and inevitability.
As the Baloch nation continues to rise in resistance, Operation Baam stands as a historic marker. It represents not just retaliation, but vision—a vision of sovereignty, freedom, and dignity, carved out of fire and sacrifice and echoing across the hills, plains, and coasts of occupied Balochistan.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The BLF has made it clear that Operation Baam is not the culmination but the opening phase of a larger transformation in its military doctrine. From this point forward, even more lethal, widespread, and strategically coordinated operations will be carried out across Balochistan.
As Gwahram Baloch stated, the longer the Pakistani ruling class—including politicians, intellectuals, and supporters—delays accepting Balochistan's independence and ending the occupation, the heavier the price they will have to pay.
Deedag Mehr writes on Baloch armed organisations, with a focus on the Balochistan Liberation Front (BLF) and the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA). He can be followed on X @DeedagMehr. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Successful in settling wars': Donald Trump again claims that he stopped India, Pakistan conflict; revives old boast
'Successful in settling wars': Donald Trump again claims that he stopped India, Pakistan conflict; revives old boast

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

'Successful in settling wars': Donald Trump again claims that he stopped India, Pakistan conflict; revives old boast

Donald Trump (AP photo) US President Donald Trump on Monday once again claimed credit for stopping a possible war between India and Pakistan. He said he helped reduce tensions between the two countries by using trade talks as pressure. Trump also claimed he helped settle the long-running conflict between Rwanda and Congo. Speaking about the India-Pakistan situation, Trump said, "We've been very successful in settling wars. You have India and Pakistan. You have Rwanda and the Congo, that was going on for 30 years. India, by the way, Pakistan would have been a nuclear war within another week, the way that was going. That was going very badly, and we did that through trade. I said, 'we're not going to talk to you about trade unless you get this thing settled,' and they did, and they were both great, great leaders, and they were great. " Trump has made this claim several times before. However, the peace move actually began when Pakistan's DGMO contacted his Indian counterpart and requested a halt to all military actions -- on land, in the air, and at sea. The situation had worsened after a terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Anantnag district on April 22. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like An engineer reveals: One simple trick to get internet without a subscription Techno Mag Learn More Undo The attack in Pahalgam, carried out by Pakistan-backed terrorists, killed 26 people. The incident happened during the visit of US Vice President JD Vance to India. In response, India launched Operation Sindoor on May 7. The Indian Air Force carried out targeted strikes on nine major terror hubs inside Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. Pakistan tried to retaliate with drones and missile attacks on Indian cities, but all were intercepted by India's air defence systems. There was no damage or loss of life. As a strong warning, the Indian Air Force later struck 11 Pakistani airbases, including key ones like Nur Khan and Rahim Yar Khan.

July 15, 1985, Forty Years Ago: Black box analyses
July 15, 1985, Forty Years Ago: Black box analyses

Indian Express

time2 hours ago

  • Indian Express

July 15, 1985, Forty Years Ago: Black box analyses

Justice D N Kripal, who is heading the court of inquiry into the Kanishka crash, is expected to arrive in Bombay to decide the place and date for the much-awaited analyses of the black boxes. In all probability, the read-out of the cockpit voice recorder (CVR) will take place at the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC), where similar analyses of the two air crashes in 1976 and 1978 were carried out. Pak For N-treaty Pakistan is willing to sign a bilateral agreement with India renouncing nuclear weapons, according to a senior Pakistani official. Zain Noorani, Minister of State for Foreign Affairs, told the upper house of Parliament that Islamabad is ready 'to join with India bilaterally, or with other non-nuclear states on a regional or a global basis, in a solemn treaty to renounce nuclear weapons'. Tweaks To Schemes Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi said the 20-point programme, put in place by Indira Gandhi during the Emergency, would be suitably modified to meet the developmental needs of the poorer sections of people in the villages. He singled out the implementation of the integrated Rural Development Programme in this context and said changes had to be made in the schemes under this programme to help weaker sections. Gandhi said much had been done for the tribals in Madhya Pradesh 'but a lot remained to be done'. Assam talks The fate of the Saikia ministry could become the deciding factor for the solution of the foreigners problem in Assam. One minor hurdle was crossed in the present round when Union Home Secretary R D Pradhan cleared the element of uncertainty over the resumption of talks. They will begin within 10 days.

Pahalgam terror attack was a Pakistani plot, ordered by its political, military leaders: Report cites probe
Pahalgam terror attack was a Pakistani plot, ordered by its political, military leaders: Report cites probe

First Post

time2 hours ago

  • First Post

Pahalgam terror attack was a Pakistani plot, ordered by its political, military leaders: Report cites probe

The deadly terror attack in Pahalgam that killed 26 civilians was planned by Pakistan's intelligence agency ISI and the terror group Lashkar-e-Taiba, acting on orders from Pakistan's top political and military leadership, according to a report. read more The Pahalgam terror attack, in which Pakistan-backed and trained terrorists killed 26 civilians, was planned by Pakistan's intelligence agency ISI and the terror group Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) on orders from Pakistan's political and military leadership, The Times of India reported, citing security sources. Sources compared the plot to the 26/11 Mumbai attacks, saying it was an ISI-LeT operation involving only Pakistani terrorists. The ISI reportedly instructed Pakistan-based LeT commander Sajid Jutt to deploy foreign terrorists already operating in Jammu and Kashmir, avoiding the use of local Kashmiri militants to keep the plan secret. Only minimal local support was allowed on a 'need-to-know' basis. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD According to the report, the attack was led by Sulaiman, who is a former Pakistani special forces commando. He had trained at LeT's Muridke centre in Pakistan's Punjab before infiltrating into Jammu in 2022. Two other Pakistani terrorists were part of the team. Satellite phone records show that Sulaiman was in the Tral forest on 15 April, indicating he stayed close to the attack site at Baisaran for nearly a week before striking. Sulaiman was also involved in an attack on an Army truck in April 2023. While J&K Police initially suspected Pakistani terrorists Hashim Musa and Ali Bhai were involved, the investigation has so far confirmed only Sulaiman's role. Pakistan has long been accused of backing terrorists and using it as a tool of state policy. On 22 April, terrorists backed by Pakistan killed 26 innocent civilians in Pahalgam, sparking a strong reaction from New Delhi. India accused Pakistan of cross-border terrorism and responded by suspending the Indus Waters Treaty and expelling Pakistani diplomats. India launches Operation Sindoor In retaliation, India carried out precision strikes on nine terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. Defence Minister Rajnath Singh said nearly 100 terrorists were killed in these operations. Pakistan called a 'global exporter of terror' Experts often describe Pakistan as a 'global exporter of terror' due to its ongoing support for extremist groups. Pakistan's military and intelligence agencies provide safe havens, funding, and training to groups like Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed, which have carried out attacks in South Asia and beyond. Terrorism used as a tool by Pakistan's military These terror groups help Pakistan's military maintain influence and justify its power within the country. Pakistan uses them to spread violence and target civilians, while any Indian retaliation is used by the military to stir public fear and tighten its control. Same tactics during Kargil War Pakistan used similar tactics during the Kargil War, when its forces secretly occupied Indian positions and falsely presented the conflict as a local uprising. India's counter-offensive eventually forced Pakistan to withdraw. Long history of harbouring terrorism India, Afghanistan, Iran, and Western nations have long accused Pakistan of sheltering terrorists and using them to pursue its foreign policy goals. Incidents like the 2008 Mumbai attacks and the discovery of Osama bin Laden hiding in Pakistan have only deepened these concerns.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store