Springfield, Ohio, sues neo-Nazi group that it says led Haitian intimidation
An Ohio city that was racked with chaos and threats last year related to an influx of Haitian immigrants filed a lawsuit on Thursday against a neo-Nazi group that it alleges was at the heart of the onslaught.
The city of Springfield, Mayor Rob Rue and several others sued the Blood Tribe, its leaders Christopher Pohlhaus and Drake Berentz and seven unnamed followers in U.S. District Court in Dayton.
They accuse the group of 'engaging in, and inciting, a campaign of harassment and intimidation, motivated by ethnic and racial hatred, against those who supported Springfield's Haitian community in the face of Defendants' racist attacks.'
With legal help from the Anti-Defamation League, the plaintiffs are asking the court for a jury trial seeking to block the group from making further threats and to impose damages.
The court file did not list an attorney for the Blood Tribe. Messages were left at phone numbers listed under Pohlhaus' and Berentz's names.
Springfield, a city of roughly 60,000 west of Columbus, has seen its Haitian population grow to about 10,000 people in recent years, as Haitians have fled violence in their home country in search of stability and employment. Their growing numbers have caused friction with local residents, as schools, roads, hospitals and social programs have been taxed by the large population — and, particularly, after a child was killed in 2023 when a Haitian immigrant driver hit a school bus.
As a candidate, Republican President Donald Trump honed worldwide attention on the city, during a September presidential debate with Democratic rival Kamala Harris, when he amplified false claims that Springfield's Haitians were abducting and eating people's pets.
The complaint alleges that the Blood Tribe first coordinated a 'hit' against the city in July, calling the influx of Haitians an 'invasion' that was threatening Springfield's 'good White residents.'
'Members of the Blood Tribe heeded the call,' the filing said. 'Over the next few months, the Blood Tribe and its members and associates unleashed a torrent of hateful conduct, including acts of harassment, bomb threats, and death threats, against Springfield residents who spoke out in support of the Haitian community.'
Members of the group showed up at the city's jazz and blues festival in August, according to the court document, displaying guns, waving swastika flags and wearing matching red shirts, black pants and ski masks. They made their way to City Hall, where Drake Berentz, identified as a leader of the group, delivered a 'racist and antisemitic rant,' to which followers responded with chants of 'Seig Heil' and Nazi salutes.
Additional actions the lawsuit alleges against the group included harassing voicemails, hateful emails and social media posts demeaning the plaintiffs and their families. The complaint says that group members also used dating apps to send men looking for drugs and sex to the residents' homes late at night and publicized their personal information with the intent of getting others to join in the harassment.
The lawsuit describes actions attributed to the Blood Tribe that began before and continued after the Trump-Harris debate. It makes no direct reference to Trump's remarks, but notes that Pohlhaus 'gleefully took credit for the growing notoriety' of the false claims as they spread around the world.
Shortly after the debate, the leader of a national advocacy group for Haitians sought to invoke a private-citizen right to file criminal charges against Trump and his then-running mate JD Vance over the chaos and threats experienced by Springfield. A panel of local judges decided in October to refer the matter to the county prosecutor for further investigation, rejecting the Haitian Bridge Alliance's call to issue arrest warrants or misdemeanor summonses to both men.
The group awaits a decision on an appeal it has filed in the Ohio Supreme Court. The action alleges that Clark County Municipal Court Judges Valerie Wilt, Daniel Carey and Stephen Schumaker 'patently and unambiguously lacked jurisdiction' to meet as a group as they did when making the referral. The lawsuit is pending.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
3 hours ago
- NBC News
Trump says national security concerns in Nippon-U.S. Steel deal can be resolved
U.S. President Donald Trump said on Friday that concerns over national security risks posed by Nippon Steel's $14.9 billion bid for U.S. Steel can be resolved if the companies fulfill certain conditions that his administration has laid out, paving the way for the deal's approval. Shares of U.S. Steel rose 3.5% on the news in after-the-bell trading as investors bet the deal was close to done. Trump, in an executive order, said conditions for resolving the national security concerns would be laid out in an agreement, without providing details. 'I additionally find that the threatened impairment to the national security of the United States arising as a result of the Proposed Transaction can be adequately mitigated if the conditions set forth in section 3 of this order are met,' Trump said in the order, which was released by the White House. The companies thanked Trump in a news release, saying the agreement includes $11 billion in new investments to be made by 2028 and governance commitments including a golden share to be issued to the U.S. government. They did not detail how much control the golden share would give the U.S. Shares of U.S. Steel had dipped earlier on Friday after a Nippon Steel executive told the Japanese Nikkei newspaper that its planned takeover of U.S. Steel required 'a degree of management freedom' to go ahead after Trump earlier had said the U.S. would be in control with a golden share. The bid, first announced by Nippon Steel in December 2023, has faced opposition from the start. Both Democratic former President Joe Biden and Trump, a Republican, asserted last year that U.S. Steel should remain U.S.-owned, as they sought to woo voters ahead of the presidential election in Pennsylvania, where the company is headquartered. Biden in January, shortly before leaving office, blocked the deal on national security grounds, prompting lawsuits by the companies, which argued the national security review they received was biased. The Biden White House disputed the charge. The steel companies saw a new opportunity in the Trump administration, which began on January 20 and opened a fresh 45-day national security review into the proposed merger in April. But Trump's public comments, ranging from welcoming a simple 'investment' in U.S. Steel by the Japanese firm to floating a minority stake for Nippon Steel, spurred confusion. At a rally in Pennsylvania on May 30, Trump lauded an agreement between the companies and said Nippon Steel would make a 'great partner' for U.S. Steel. But he later told reporters the deal still lacked his final approval, leaving unresolved whether he would allow Nippon Steel to take ownership. Nippon Steel and the Trump administration asked a U.S. appeals court on June 5 for an eight-day extension of a pause in litigation to give them more time to reach a deal for the Japanese firm. The pause expires Friday, but could be extended.
NBC News
8 hours ago
- NBC News
Israel-Iran conflict splits Trump's MAGA backers
As the percussion of Israeli munitions rattled Tehran on Thursday night, President Donald Trump's MAGA movement observed a rare silence — a sign, influential Republicans say, of the divide within their own party when it comes to the prospect of a war between Israel and Iran. It took Trump, who comments publicly more often than any president in recent memory, about 10 hours to put out a statement on his Truth Social platform, in which he urged Iran to give up its nuclear weapons program. The first official U.S. assessment had been issued by the White House under Secretary of State Marco Rubio's name, and it emphasized that America was 'not involved' in the strikes. In the meantime, Charlie Kirk, the co-founder of Turning Point USA, polled his 5 million X followers on the question of whether America should 'get involved in Israel's war against Iran.' By Friday afternoon, the poll showed more than 350,000 votes, with an overwhelming proportion in the 'No' column. When Kirk read Rubio's statement on the strikes during a podcast Thursday night, Jack Posobiec, a right-wing activist popular with the MAGA audience, interjected that it was 'not a supportive statement at all.' Earlier Thursday, before the strikes, Posobiec had warned on X that a 'direct strike on Iran right now would disastrously split the Trump coalition.' And Steve Bannon, host of the 'War Room' podcast, which is influential with MAGA adherents within the administration and outside of it, steered clear of public commentary Thursday night. It all adds up to a demonstration of the quandary facing Trump as he and other elected Republicans seek safe political turf. Trump's electoral success owes in no small part to his isolationist-leaning 'America First' platform and his fierce criticism of drawn-out U.S. engagements in Iraq and Afghanistan that were launched by Republican President George W. Bush and continued by Democratic President Barack Obama. But Israel's latest action pits traditional Republican support for the Jewish state — and antipathy toward Iran — against the MAGA base's fear that the U.S. will be drawn into a new foreign war. And even within Trump's MAGA wing, there's a long-running split over American backing of Israel. Trump has always been on the pro-Israel side of the divide. 'Republicans are a pro-Israel party, and the president hasn't wavered on that,' said one longtime Trump adviser who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the political sensitivity within the MAGA movement. 'I think the challenge here is not how to move forward. The question is how to sell that to the recalcitrant base.' If Trump is able to do that, it will be despite powerful voices on the other side of the debate weighing in. Tucker Carlson, one of Trump's most influential supporters, wrote in his newsletter Friday that the U.S. should "drop Israel." "If Israel wants to wage this war, it has every right to do so. It is a sovereign country, and it can do as it pleases,' Carlson wrote, according to Jewish Insider. 'But not with America's backing.' Israel launched its attack to forestall Iran's development of a nuclear weapon and perhaps pressure Tehran into giving up that goal. Trump has been trying to construct a new version of an Obama-era nuclear deal that he shredded during his first term, and he articulated his hope Friday that Israel's campaign will help serve as a catalyst for Iran to sign a new pact. But it is not at all clear that the fighting won't have the opposite effect and spark a broader war between the two Middle Eastern powers. That's a showdown that establishment Republicans like Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., have been itching for. 'Game on,' Graham — whose hawkish worldview predates the rise of the MAGA movement — wrote on X on Thursday night as video of explosions in Tehran bounced around the world. On the other side of the spectrum, Infowars host Owen Shroyer, one of the hundreds of people pardoned by Trump in connection with the Jan. 6, 2021, assault on the U.S. Capitol, posted a video to X that framed the new conflict as an existential question for the president's base. 'America, the Trump movement, MAGA — however you want to say it, there's going to be a lot of soul-searching as these events go on, because a lot of MAGA is anti-war,' Shroyer said. 'What good is 'Make America Great Again' if we can't even be isolated from this war-torn region of the world, if we can't even be isolated from these foreign countries and these foreign conflicts that are just filled with hate?' 'We'll never be able to make America great again,' he added, 'as long as we're entangled in the Middle East.' With Trump signaling approval for how Israel conducted strikes while cajoling Iran to make a deal Friday morning, some of the president's MAGA faithful seemed to settle on a narrative that U.S. involvement is acceptable to a point: troops on the ground. On a call with reporters Friday, Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., asserted his own opposition to U.S. involvement in foreign conflicts while expressing confidence that Trump feels the same. 'It's one thing to support our ally, which we're doing, and we should do, unequivocally,' Hawley said. 'It's one thing to provide them with arms for their own self-defense, which we have done and should do. But I can't imagine a world in which we would send United States troops, in which we would be involved in any kinetic activity, as the defense people like to say, there in the region, unless it's just defending our own installations.' Israeli airstrikes on Iran are a far cry from American troops invading a nation that has been far more vulnerable to internal revolution than foreign conquest over the course of thousands of years of existence. Even the Republicans who are most aggressive when it comes to Iran talk about missiles and bombs rather than staging an incursion with American ground forces. But drawing a line on that is a middle ground that may satisfy most, if not all, Trump supporters for the moment. In the hours after the strikes, Trump allies hewed closely to the administration's sparse talking points. Alex Bruesewitz, a Republican consultant with close ties to the White House, shared Rubio's statement on X, emphasizing that the 'US WAS NOT INVOLVED IN STRIKES AGAINST IRAN.' Meanwhile, Laura Loomer, the right-wing conspiracy theorist aligned with Trump, posted several messages supportive of Trump and Israel. 'Iran,' Loomer wrote, 'must never be allowed to have a nuclear weapon.' Mehek Cooke, an attorney and pro-Trump political commentator active in the MAGA movement, said Friday that her recent visit to Israel opened her eyes to the 'devastation of Iran's Oct. 7 proxy war' there. Israel's strikes, Cooke added, 'were not just justified; they were inevitable. This matters to every American, including the MAGA movement. You can't negotiate with regimes chanting 'Death to America.'' Cooke also pointed to recent polling from Rasmussen, a right-leaning firm, that found that 57% of respondents favored U.S. military action to combat Iran's nuclear weapons program. She said she believes MAGA loyalists will 'remain united' behind Trump. 'MAGA wants peace, but we're not blind,' Cooke added. 'Yes, some in MAGA lean isolationist. But appeasement is not an option. Iran's leaders just threatened both Israel and the U.S., bringing us to a dangerous tipping point. Trump's 60-day deadline — blatantly ignored by Iran was followed by real consequences.' Still, the political perils of taking sides in the early stages of what Israel says could be a sustained campaign were underscored by the reluctance of some MAGA figures to deal with the question head-on. Asked to explain the tension within the MAGA movement, former Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., a close Trump ally, texted: 'MAGA is more concerned with the Battle for Los Angeles,' where Trump has deployed the National Guard and Marines in a standoff with Americans protesting against immigration raids, 'than the Battle for Tehran.' What the White House appears to be most concerned about, at least in terms of Trump's domestic politics, is portraying the U.S. as uninvolved in the Middle East conflict. The word that trickled out overnight from the White House, and from a phone interview Trump gave to Fox News, emphasized that U.S. military had no role in the strikes. It wasn't until Friday morning that Trump weighed in directly — and ominously. 'There has already been great death and destruction, but there is still time to make this slaughter, with the next already planned attacks being even more brutal, come to an end,' Trump wrote on Truth Social. 'Iran must make a deal, before there is nothing left, and save what was once known as the Iranian Empire. No more death, no more destruction, JUST DO IT, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE. God Bless You All!'
Metro
11 hours ago
- Metro
Lawmaker forcefully removed from Trump secretary's LA protests conference
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video A US lawmaker was forcibly dragged out of a press conference on the Los Angeles protests held by President Donald Trump's 'ICE Barbie' and handcuffed. Democratic Senator Alex Padilla interrupted Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem's update on immigration enforcement at the Federal Building in LA on Thursday by shouting, 'I have questions for the secretary!' Secret Service and FBI agents quickly surrounded Padilla, restrained him and escorted him out of the room. Padilla said, 'Hands off!' several times before he was pinned to the floor facedown in the hallway and handcuffed with his arms around his back. He later posted a video of the ordeal recorded by one of his staff members, and explained that he was just trying to provide oversight as a ranking member of the judiciary subcommittee on immigration, citizenship and border safety. 'If that's what they do to a United States Senator with a question, imagine what they can do to any American that dares to speak up,' wrote Padilla on X (formerly Twitter). 'We will hold this administration accountable.' California Governor Gavin Newsom called it 'outrageous, dictatorial, and shameful' and wrote on X that 'Trump and his shock troops are out of control'. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) stated that they believed Padilla was the person who 'lunged toward' Noem and falsely claimed that he did not identify himself. 'Mr Padilla was told repeatedly to back away and did not comply with officers' repeated commands,' wrote the department on X. The DHS concluded that agents 'acted appropriately'. Noem said she wished that Padilla had reached out before interrupting the conference in a manner that 'wasn't appropriate'. She added that she and Padilla met for 15 minutes after the incident and had a 'great' and 'productive' conversation. More Trending Tensions have been high in LA as Trump and Newsom continue to spar over protests against the president's immigration crackdown. Trump ordered thousands of National Guard troops and Marines to the city to support efforts by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to deport undocumented people. Newsom sued Trump and a judge blocked Trump's use of the National Guard in LA, but an appeals court is temporarily allowing troops to stay. Protests have spread across multiple major cities in the US. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Urgent recall of over 1,150,000 power banks for fire and explosion risk MORE: Donald Trump opens up on Elon Musk being 'strange' and what went wrong in bromance MORE: Google, Spotify and YouTube down for tens of thousands of users worldwide
