Kansas State got called out for shameless Yelp review stunt
The Wildcats found themselves in some hot water on X (formerly Twitter) on Friday when it posted a graphic bragging about its stadium — Bill Snyder Family Football Stadium — and its supposed five-star rating on Yelp. The graphics even included what seemed to be excerpts from reviews praising the game day atmosphere.
While Manhattan, Kansas, is surely a lovely place to take in a college football game, the K-State social media account quickly found itself in some hot water when sleuthy fans (and later, a community note) called it out for apparent shenanigans.
You see, there was one problem with the reviews referenced in the graphic: They all came from the same review, posted by a single individual.
Fan theorists quickly speculated that the review itself had been planted by the athletics department, with the intent of sourcing it for the graphic. While that would have been absolutely hilarious, it doesn't seem to be the case, as the user in question — Doug F. — seems to be a real individual and was posting reviews for unrelated businesses on Yelp as early as 2015.
Funnily enough, Doug F. seems to have exclusively given five-star reviews on his Yelp account.
Even if Kansas State didn't intentionally plant the review, however, it still seems to have been caught red-handed using it misleadingly.
Yet another example of the fact that there is truly nothing quite like college football.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Big Ten Reportedly Proposing 24- or 28-Team College Football Playoff Format
An essential two-team College Football Playoff was exclusive. Making it four teams in 2014 added some flavor. Giving out 12 playoff berths in 2024 made it exciting. How about getting wild and having a 28-team CFP? Well, that's what the Big Ten has in mind. Conference commissioner Tony Petitti has formed proposals that would expand the CFP to 24, if not 28, teams, ESPN reported. The format proposal would eliminate conference championship games, while granting the Big Ten and the SEC seven automatic playoff bids apiece, with the ACC and Big 12 each getting five automatic bids. There would also be two automatic bids for non-power-conference schools and two other at-large teams. In all, there would be 20 CFP games on college campuses. Last season, college football debuted the 12-team CFP, which granted four conference title winners an automatic first-round bye and had four first-round playoff games played on college campuses. Neutral-site matchups began in the quarterfinal round. The Big Ten led the way with four teams in the CFP, followed by the SEC with three. [MORE: How 2024-25 CFP Would've Looked Under Proposed Expansion Formats] As for the 2025 season, the 12-team CFP format remains intact but with some tweaks, such as the top four overall ranked teams receiving a first-round bye as opposed to the top-four ranked conference champions receiving a bye (e.g. independent Notre Dame can get a first-round bye, whereas it previously couldn't because it's not part of a power-four conference). While still being one of the top-five ranked conference champions ensures a playoff berth, it no longer locks in a first-round bye for the top-four ranked conference winners. In the wake of each of the four teams that received first-round byes in last year's CFP losing in the quarterfinal round (Oregon, Georgia, Boise State and Clemson), there has been rampant speculation throughout this offseason about altering the format again; a potential 16-team format has been a topic of discussion. Last season, Ohio State defeated Notre Dame in the national championship tilt; both teams were at-large bids. Want great stories delivered right to your inbox? Create or log in to your FOX Sports account, and follow leagues, teams and players to receive a personalized newsletter daily!
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Social media reacts to shocking Big Ten College Football Playoff idea
College Football Playoff expansion has been a talking point since the original four-team playoff debuted in 2014. The playoff just recently expanded from four to 12 teams, but it might not be done there. On Saturday, reports emerged about an idea from the Big Ten concerning expansion. And it's a pretty wild concept. According to reports, the Big Ten is pushing for a 24- to 28-team playoff. Yes, you're reading that right, there are no typos. Twenty-four to 28 teams. The 28-team playoff plan would feature seven automatic bids for the Big Ten and SEC, five automatic bids for the ACC and Big 12, two for Group of Six squads and a pair of at-large bids. The proposed idea generated plenty of feedback from college football fans, and it seems the majority has spoken. Contact/Follow us @HawkeyesWire on X (formerly Twitter) and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Iowa news, notes and opinions. Follow Zach on X: @zach_hiney This article originally appeared on Hawkeyes Wire: Social media reacts to shocking Big Ten College Football Playoff idea
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
College Football Playoff: Big Ten floats 24-plus-team formats
New college football playoff formats of 20-plus teams are being explored by leaders in the Big Ten, and perhaps the SEC too. Big Ten executives are socializing 24- and 28-team College Football Playoff brackets that feature as many as seven automatic qualifiers each for the Big Ten and SEC, five each for the Big 12 and ACC, two for the best Group of 6 programs and two at-large selections. Those briefed on the idea, most of them leading administrators in the Big Ten, spoke to Yahoo Sports under condition of anonymity about the so-called '7-7-5-5-2-2' model. Those with knowledge of the discussions caution that the concept is in the infancy stage of development and may undergo significant changes or be dismissed entirely once introduced to the full CFP group. For now, it remains a talking point within the two leagues that control decision making over the future CFP format beyond this year. [Join or create a Yahoo Fantasy Football league for the 2025 NFL season] One high-level source described it as a 'barely baked idea' and emphasized that it is in no way certain to gain approval any time soon. Big Ten commissioner Tony Petitti and SEC commissioner Greg Sankey held a preliminary call to exchange thoughts on the idea on Friday. The concept, if implemented, could trigger massive change, both in the historic nature of how regular season games are scheduled and the annual season-ending conference championship games. League title games, made more irrelevant in the expanded playoff era, may be eliminated as a requirement in scheduling the five rounds of the playoff — something administrators have openly acknowledged in the past. Specific rules of the concept are not necessarily solidified, but, presumably, the format will allow for the top four seeds to receive a first-round bye. Currently, the CFP selection committee seeds the teams based on the group's rankings. Conferences would presumably hold discretion in determining their qualifiers, a decision that likely focuses on league standings. Eliminating conference championship games — the first weekend of December — would set in motion the ability to play at least the first round of the playoffs on the second week of the month, when no NFL games are played, a savvy maneuver to avoid competing with big brother. The 12-team CFP's first round falls on the third weekend of December, in direct competition with the NFL. The addition of a fifth postseason round also opens the possibility for the first two rounds to be hosted on the campus of the higher-seeded program. Currently, only the first round is on campus before the six major bowls host the quarterfinals and semifinals. The national championship game is rotated in a bidding process. The 28-team concept is only the latest format proposed to expand the current version of the field. The Big Ten proposed last year and again earlier this spring a 16-team bracket with four automatic qualifiers for the SEC and Big Ten, two for the ACC and Big 12, one for the best among the Group of 6 and three at-large. Though it received pushback from many corners, most notably among leaders in the ACC and Big 12, SEC administrators deeply explored the model with intentions to support it before their head football coaches spoke out against the format during spring meetings in May. Those from the Big 12 and ACC, as well as SEC coaches, swung their support behind what's termed a '5+11' format, which is similar to the current CFP model with the addition of four at-large selections. The five highest-ranked conference champions each earn an automatic berth. Any future format is not necessarily a group decision among the 10 FBS commissioners and Notre Dame's athletic director that make up the CFP governing committee. As part of the CFP's new six-year extension signed last year, the nine other members granted the SEC and Big Ten control on any future format as long as those two conferences hold 'meaningful' conversation with the others. The Big Ten's proposed '4-4-2-2-1-3' model drew sharp criticism from many others, most notably Big 12 commissioner Brett Yormark who 'doubled down' during his football media days last month about his desire to avoid any pro-like format with multiple automatic qualifiers for a single league. ACC commissioner Jim Phillips spoke out against it, too, describing the format as 'predetermining' a playoff field before the season began. The leagues, as well as many in the Group of 6, threw their support behind the 5+11 format and so, too, did the SEC coaches and some of their athletic directors who pointed to the possibility of increasing the chances of qualifying more teams in a format with a bigger at-large pool. However, in the midst of the playoff debate is an internal conversation within the SEC that's now spanned more than four years: Should the league move to nine conference games from its current eight-game schedule? The Big Ten has pushed back against agreeing to any playoff format with a big at-large pool if the SEC remains at eight conference games. SEC athletic directors meet next week in Birmingham where these topics, and many more, are expected to be discussed. Any shift toward a playoff with multiple automatic spots per league may be a contributing element in the conference moving to a nine-game conference schedule. Already, the financial incentive to do so exists: ESPN and the SEC have for months now been in negotiations for additional revenue — as much as $5 million annual per school — if the conference adds a ninth game. Meanwhile, the CFP is in the midst of adjusting its selection criteria to increase the weight of a team's strength of schedule — a divisive issue among Big Ten and SEC leaders who claim that their league schedules are tougher than that of other conferences. The CFP staff proposed to commissioners an adjustment to the committee's strength of schedule ranking that gives more weight to games played, for instance, against the top 30-40 programs in the country. Secondly, a new data point, 'strength of record,' has been created that grants more weight to good wins and doesn't penalize as much a program for losses against ranked or top teams. The new selection criteria was introduced to the CFP selection committee — a group made up mostly athletic directors and former coaches — during their annual August meeting earlier this week. A deadline looms for a decision for the 2026 playoff. While this year is set at the current 12-team format, leaders must decide on the 2026 format by Dec. 1 — a deadline date that ESPN gave to CFP leaders.
