Shell heist: Second mastermind gets more than 25 years' jail for siphoning $100m of fuel
Source: Straits Times
Article Date: 08 Jul 2025
Author: Selina Lum
The authorities have seized nearly $7.7 million in assets from him, including $4.7 million in cash from a safe that was moved around various locations.
One of the two masterminds of a long-running scheme to misappropriate marine gas oil out of Shell's Pulau Bukom facility was sentenced to a jail term of 25 years and two months on July 7.
Abdul Latif Ibrahim, 67, admitted he led a group of rogue employees that siphoned $100 million worth of fuel between August 2014 and January 2018, which was then sold to local and foreign vessels.
Latif, whose salary was $3,700, received at least $7 million in illicit gains, which he spent on luxury watches, expensive cars and property.
The authorities have seized nearly $7.7 million in assets from him, including $4.7 million in cash from a safe that was moved around various locations.
He pleaded guilty to 20 charges of criminal breach of trust and 10 charges of money laundering. Another 34 charges were considered by the High Court during sentencing.
The other mastermind, Juandi Pungot, who was then 45 years old, was sentenced to 29 years' jail in 2022 for his role in the largest marine fuel heist in Singapore's history.
Juandi had pleaded guilty to 20 charges of criminal breach of trust, 10 money laundering charges and six corruption charges.
Latif and Juandi both admitted that they began misappropriating fuel in 2007, when they were working in the same team.
The stolen oil was loaded onto a bunker ship, in deals brokered through a middleman.
The two men went on to expand the criminal enterprise by recruiting other members for their team.
In early 2013, Latif left the team after a falling-out with the other syndicate members.
That year, Latif accepted Shell's offer of re-employment, and was transferred to another team.
Latif then started a new syndicate by recruiting Richard Goh Chee Keong, who planned the illegal loadings with him.
Goh then recruited Ng Chee Seng. Ng later decided to stop the criminal activities, and was replaced in May 2015 by Mohd Ibrahim K. Abdul Majid.
Latif continued his illegal operations, separate from Juandi, until their arrests in 2018.
Each illegal loading began with the brokering of a deal to sell misappropriated fuel.
The vessels that received the stolen oil included those owned by Singapore companies Sentek Marine & Trading and Sirius Marine, and Vietnamese entity Prime Shipping Corporation.
Using various methods to evade detection, the rogue employees worked together to route the gas oil from tanks onto the vessels.
They carefully planned routes in the pipelines to bypass meters, and activated pumps at the same time to mask the theft.
Where the meters could not be avoided, they temporarily tampered with them so that the illegal outflow would not be recorded.
Team members not involved in the illicit activities were encouraged to take longer breaks, and bribes were paid to bunker surveyors to not accurately report the amount of cargo loaded onto the vessels.
In early 2015, Shell began observing significant unidentified oil loss at Pulau Bukom.
After investigations, the company made a police report on Aug 1, 2017.
Between 2014 and 2018, Juandi's syndicate siphoned 203,403 tonnes of gas oil worth nearly $128 million.
Latif's group misappropriated 153,996 tonnes of gas oil, valued at about $100 million.
He spent his ill-gotten gains on a condominium unit in Braddell Road and two properties in Indonesia.
Latif bought at least three cars: a Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG S sedan, a Mercedes-Benz AMG E43M and a BMW 435I Gran Coupe M Sport.
He also invested money in a few businesses and funded the education for his two nephews in Australia.
Deputy Public Prosecutor Ben Tan proposed a sentence of 25 to 27 years' jail for Latif, arguing that his culpability was similar to that of Juandi.
Latif's lawyer, Mr Justin Ng, sought 22 years' jail, arguing that the scale of the scheme carried out by his client was significantly smaller than that carried out by Juandi.
The lawyer added that his client will be consenting to the forfeiture of his seized properties to the state.
Latif was allowed to defer the start of his sentence to Sept 30.
Goh's and Ibrahim's cases are pending.
The other rogue employees have been sentenced to jail terms ranging from one year and four months to 26½ years.
Source: The Straits Times © SPH Media Limited. Permission required for reproduction.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Singapore Law Watch
3 hours ago
- Singapore Law Watch
High Court dismisses appeal of drink driver who killed one after treating Tampines road like racetrack
High Court dismisses appeal of drink driver who killed one after treating Tampines road like racetrack Source: Straits Times Article Date: 15 Jul 2025 Author: David Sun The High Court emphasised the severity of his actions, highlighting the betrayal of public trust and the disastrous consequences of drink driving, despite his compensation. Despite severe penalties and jail time, some drivers continue to gamble with their lives and those of others, said the High Court. And in the case of Jeremiah Ng En You, 36, who killed one person and injured six others in December 2021, the heaviest punishment for him will be the lifelong burden of knowing that his irresponsible and selfish action of drink driving claimed an innocent life, it added. On July 14, the High Court published its grounds of decision for dismissing Ng's appeal against his seven-year jail sentence for dangerous driving causing death. It had made the judgment on March 19. The court noted that while he had shown remorse by making voluntary compensation of about $457,000, such efforts were outweighed by the harm caused by the accident. Ng was sentenced in October 2023 after pleading guilty to one count of drink driving and another for causing the death of a Gojek driver by driving in a dangerous manner. He will also be disqualified from driving for 12 years after his release. The district judge who sentenced him at the time had said he treated the roads 'like the Grand Prix driving circuit'. On the night of Dec 23, 2021, Ng had dinner with his brother and two friends at his office in Tampines Street 93, and drank four cans of beer. When they left at about 11pm, Ng got behind the wheel of his brother's car, while the brother sat in the front passenger seat. He sped along Tampines Avenue 1 at around 11.10pm, travelling at between 157kmh and 169kmh, even though the speed limit there is 60kmh. As he approached the junction of Tampines Avenue 1 and Tampines Avenue 10, he slowed down to between 122kmh and 130kmh, but lost control of the vehicle as he was about to turn left. Instead, the car went straight, smashing through the centre divider along Tampines Avenue 10 and crashing into the side of a car driven by a Gojek driver who had two passengers at the time. The private-hire car then struck the right side of a second car and the front of a third car. A motorcycle was passing between the Gojek car and the second car at the time, and the motorcyclist was crushed between both vehicles. The second car also hit the right side of a nearby taxi. Officers who arrived at the scene shortly after found Ng reeking of alcohol. They arrested him after he failed a breathalyser test. The 59-year-old Gojek driver was pronounced dead at 12.01am the next day after he was taken to Changi General Hospital. Six others, including the two passengers in the Gojek car, were injured. The motorcyclist who was crushed between the two cars had the most significant injuries, including traumatic brain injury and fractures that left him with long-term disabilities. In its grounds of decision for dismissing Ng's appeal against his sentence, the High Court said this was considered one of the most serious cases of dangerous driving while under the influence of drink. It said: 'It is plainly foolish and hazardous to drive in this manner on any occasion. Our public roads are not a racetrack.' The High Court added that this warranted the maximum jail term of 10 years, which was reduced by 30 per cent on the basis that Ng pleaded guilty. It said that while it was honourable and remorseful of Ng to make voluntary compensation of around $457,000, this was outweighed by the death, injuries and property damage caused. Hence, it could not find sufficient mitigating reasons to reduce the sentence. For dangerous driving causing death, an offender can be jailed for between two and eight years as a first-time offender. If the offender is a serious offender, he can be jailed for between one year and two years more. The penalties for drink driving for a first-time offender is a jail term of up to 12 months, a fine of between $2,000 and $10,000, or both. Offenders may also face driving bans. The High Court said: 'In a country where order and general public safety define daily life, the decision to drive under the influence stands out not just as a reckless act, but as a dangerous betrayal of public trust. 'Drink driving is not just about broken laws or a mere lapse in judgment; it is about preventable tragedies and an act of seeming convenience with potentially disastrous consequences.' Source: The Straits Times © SPH Media Limited. Permission required for reproduction. Ng En You Jeremiah (alias Huang Enyou) v Public Prosecutor [2025] SGHC 135 Print
Business Times
4 hours ago
- Business Times
Tariff free or not, US cars could find less takers in Vietnam's roads
[HO CHI MINH CITY] Tariff-free or not, American sport utility vehicles (SUVs) face a tough road in Vietnam where nearly half of all auto sales go to SUVs, as buyers are likely to still favour leaner, fuel-efficient Japanese and Korean models over the bulky and gas-guzzling US rides. In addition, electric vehicle (EV) manufacturers such as home-grown firm VinFast and some Chinese players are gaining an upper hand in Vietnam, bolstered by recent domestic policies that will restrict fossil fuel-powered vehicles in major urban traffic routes in the coming years. So while US President Donald Trump may tout the SUV as a 'wonderful addition' to US exports to Vietnam, following a bilateral trade pact struck earlier this month, road realities suggest it may do little to drive demand for these large-engine vehicles shipped from halfway around the world. Koketso Tsoai, automobiles analyst at BMI, said: 'US brands would still face limits to their market share due to persistent non-tariff barriers, weaker after-sales networks, consumer concerns about maintenance, and the strong presence of local and Chinese brands in the entry and mid-range SUV segments.' The large engine vehicle that 'does so well in the US', as Trump noted on his Truth Social post announcing the trade deal with Hanoi on Jul 2, has little traction in Vietnam, where drivers often navigate dense traffic and narrow streets ill-suited for bulky SUVs. 'American SUVs are often oversized for Vietnam's roads and infrastructure, which are not built to accommodate vehicles of that size,' said Nguyen Phuc Lam, chief executive at Sencar Mobility, a car-sharing service provider in Vietnam. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 8.30 am Asean Business Business insights centering on South-east Asia's fast-growing economies. Sign Up Sign Up 'For EV brands like Tesla, the limited charging infrastructure remains a major obstacle,' he added. Who rules the road? Based on a report by Asian Automotive Analysis, Vietnam's total auto sales surpassed 450,000 units last year, marking an 18.8 per cent increase from the previous year. SUVs accounted for 46 per cent of the total. Vietnam's total car sales lag behind regional peers such as Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand, and its streets are still dominated by motorbikes rather than cars. As at end-2024, the country had 77 million registered motorcycles – roughly 11 for every one of the country's 6.8 million registered cars, according to the Vietnam Register. Motorbikes make up more than 90 per cent of all registered vehicles in Vietnam. PHOTO: AFP Yet the country is becoming increasingly attractive to global automakers wanting to expand, thanks to a growing middle class, low car ownership rates and recent curbs on gasoline-powered motorbikes. Nguyen Quoc Binh, administrator of an online community for Vietnamese car lovers with nearly 1.6 million members in its Facebook group, noted that some of the largest models favoured by Vietnamese drivers include Japan's Toyota Land Cruiser and Lexus LX600, both well-suited to local road conditions. 'American SUVs are often too bulky and fuel-slurping. Even though a few are not overly expensive, people are generally not that interested in them,' Binh stated. Furthermore, he noted that US-made cars entering Vietnam still face a multi-layered cost structure, including special consumption taxes and logistics fees. Even with import tariffs fully scrapped, retail prices would only fall by about 15 to 20 per cent; this is unlikely a game-changer for car buyers willing to splurge on niche, premium models. Customising to local market preferences is key, Binh said, pointing to several Ford pickup models with smaller engines that are assembled in Vietnam and priced competitively against some Japanese rivals. 'Their smaller models are well-built and continuously updated to match local consumer preferences, which is why Ford achieved quite impressive sales,' he said. Backed by its local factory, which has been operating for nearly three decades, Ford is currently the only US car manufacturer to have secured a significant market share in Vietnam, selling more than 42,000 units in 2024. However, its sales still trail behind domestic manufacturer VinFast, South Korea's Hyundai and Japan's Toyota. Binh believes that certain mid-range Ford models produced in the US with engine capacities below 3,000 cc could benefit from the tax cut from 50 per cent to zero as several dealers have indicated they are ready to import these vehicles to offer more competitive options to customers. But such small additions are unlikely to significantly shift the automotive landscape in Vietnam. Overall, US brands struggle to compete in the compact car segment, dominated by Toyota and Hyundai, and in the EV market, where VinFast holds a clear advantage, said Chris Liu, senior automotive analyst at global technology advisory group Omdia. Fight against pollution As part of a sweeping initiative to combat worsening air pollution, Prime Minister Pham Minh Chinh has ordered Hanoi to ban all fossil fuel-powered motorbikes and mopeds from Hanoi's downtown Ring Road 1 – an inner urban beltway – starting Jul 1 next year. The restriction will expand in 2028 to include private gasoline-powered cars within both Ring Roads 1 and 2. Meanwhile, Ho Chi Minh City is also considering similar restrictions in areas facing high pollution. Such policies are expected to benefit VinFast, which currently holds a leading position in Vietnam's EV and motorbike market. The VF3, a mini electric SUV produced by VinFast, was Vietnam's top-selling car model in the first half of 2025, with sales exceeding 23,000 units. PHOTO: VINFAST Lacking economies of scale Aside from Ford, US carmakers are also unlikely to establish local production facilities in Vietnam to compete more effectively, as limited sales volumes do not justify such investments in the short term. More established automotive hubs in Asean can also serve as re-export centres to Vietnam without incurring import duties, making local production even less attractive. 'Vietnam's market is fragmented; even top models sell only 10,000-15,000 units per year,' said Akshay Prasad, principal of automotive practice in South-east Asia at global management consulting firm Arthur D Little. 'Setting up facilities, whether for fully knocked-down or semi-knockdown vehicles, requires US$50-100 million investment, (which is) hard to justify without regional scale.' The most notable failure was the withdrawal of General Motors' Chevrolet from Vietnam in 2018, when it transferred local operations to VinFast. It later exited other South-east Asian markets as well, largely due to poor sales and unprofitable operations. A media statement regarding the US carmaker's exit from Indonesia in 2020 offered insight into its rationale: to 'focus on markets where there is a clear pathway to sustainable profitability'. In addition, US brands such as Ford also already source from neighbouring Thailand to enjoy duty-free access to Vietnam under the Asean Trade in Goods Agreement. European Union-origin cars are also benefiting from phased tariff cuts to zero by 2030, thanks to the EU-Vietnam Free Trade Agreement (EVFTA). 'In terms of building export-oriented plants, the (previous) lack of a US-Vietnam free trade agreement makes the country less competitive than Korea or Mexico,' Omdia's Liu noted. 'However, auto parts stand out as a bright spot, with Vietnam becoming a credible hub for labour-intensive component making,' he added.
Straits Times
11 hours ago
- Straits Times
Masters of wit caught in a storm of change
Life's Like This! by Straits Times senior executive artist Lee Chee Chew and The House Of Lim by then Straits Times artist Cheah Sin Ann were among the comics published in The Sunday Times on Nov 20, 1994. Their take on life is different – sharper, more biting. Through artful strokes, cartoonists illuminate, entertain and provoke, often leaving a lasting impression after the ink dries or the screen fades. Their licence to wield humour like a knife for social or political commentary has earned them fans and critics. Senior executive artist Lee Chee Chew, 58 , knows this well. His long-running strip, Chew On It! , which began as Life's Like This! in 1991, has chronicled everyday idiosyncrasies for three decades. 'I'm partial to doodling about things that I find exasperating, for example, littering and people who cycle on pedestrian walkways,' he says. A cartoon on job loss (top left) caused by artificial intelligence from senior executive artist Lee Chee Chew. PHOTO: ST FILE But poking fun, even at mundane issues, has never been an easy business. Mr Lee recalls a 1994 cartoon satirising a television advertisement that claimed better colour quality than a rival's. His comic character quipped: 'If I can already see their more vibrant colour difference in my set here, why should I still go and buy theirs?' The TV company didn't find it funny. Cartoons have been a part of Singapore's media landscape since the late 19th century. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore HSA intensifies crackdown on vapes; young suspected Kpod peddlers nabbed in Bishan, Yishun Singapore Man charged over distributing nearly 3 tonnes of vapes in one day in Bishan, Ubi Avenue 3 Singapore Public healthcare institutions to record all Kpod cases, confiscate vapes: MOH, HSA Singapore Man allegedly attacks woman with knife at Kallang Wave Mall, to be charged with attempted murder Singapore Singapore boosts support for Timor-Leste as it prepares to join Asean Singapore UN aviation and maritime agencies pledge to collaborate to boost safety, tackle challenges Singapore High Court dismisses appeal of drink driver who killed one after treating Tampines road like racetrack Singapore 18 years' jail for woman who hacked adoptive father to death after tussle over Sengkang flat One of the earliest known satirical publications, The Straits Produce, was published in 1868 and modelled on Britain's Punch magazine. Printed by the Straits Times Press, it skewered colonial society and politics, but ceased publication in the 1930s. The Straits Times itself started featuring cartoons and caricatures in the 1930s, when the paper was under editor George William Seabridge. During his editorship from 1928 to 1942, Seabridge also increased the number of pages and introduced photographs, creating a visually more appealing product. From around 1953, special pages in the Sunday edition of The Straits Times were devoted to syndicated comics . These early strips included The Cisco Kid, 'your Wild West favourite', the adventures of Tarzan, the misadventures of Blondie and her husband Dagwood, and Peanuts featuring Snoopy and Charlie Brown. Over time, these comics adapted to the changing world. Blondie, for instance, evolved from a carefree flapper girl to a middle-class housewife who started a catering business. In the 1990s and early 2000s, syndicated strips like Calvin And Hobbes, Garfield, and Baby Blues struck a chord with readers. Writer and researcher C.T. Lim, 53, who has studied the history of cartooning in Singapore, notes that when the paper had more space, it tended to run serialised adventure comic strips like Tarzan. When space shrunk, gag-oriented strips such as Garfield became the norm. Alongside syndicated cartoons, editorial cartoons by the paper's artists began to appear in the late 1950s, often taking sharp aim at political or social issues. In an opinion piece in 2015 for The Straits Times, American journalist Tom Plate spoke about the editorial cartoonist's 'crazy mind that could twist a lance into your brain to make a point that you knew in your heart was true'. As he explained in the article headlined 'Cartoonists – the 'mad men' of journalism': 'At their lampooning best, which is when they are at their meanest, they hardly ever show any mercy – only respect for the truth... even if it is the truth as they see it.' Political humour After the Japanese Occupation in 1945, local cartoonists picked up their pens to push for political change and challenge colonial authority. Researcher Mr Lim describes the late 1950s as The Straits Times' most vibrant era for political cartooning, driven by intense public debate over decolonisation and independence. This climate encouraged cartoons that critiqued political leaders and social issues. A key figure then was cartoonist Tan Huay Peng, known for his sharp social commentary. Mr Lim highlights a May 2, 1959, cartoon by Mr Tan that used boxing imagery to represent the fierce election campaigning that year. A cartoon on May 2, 1959, by Mr Tan Huay Peng on the fierce election campaigning that year. PHOTO: ST FILE In an online article 'The history of comics and cartoons in Singapore and Malaysia', Mr Lim notes that the British in colonial Singapore allowed and encouraged a certain amount of freedom of speech that was part of the Western democratic tradition. 'They wanted to ensure those who inherit their colonies were English-educated and friendly to their economic and strategic interests,' he writes. But from 1961, when Singapore was self-governing but not yet independent, political cartoons became rare. Mr Lim attributes this to three factors: the tense political climate; a view among senior leaders from the People's Action Party that The Straits Times was too critical of it, despite the paper's favourable stance towards the party ; and the nature of political cartoons being satirical. 'For the PAP, politics was not a matter of a game or a sport as portrayed in political cartoons. It was a matter of life and death, especially during the volatile political climate of that period,' says Mr Lim. Discussions to bring back political humour resumed in the late 1970s, with group editor Peter H.L. Lim viewing political satire as a sign of Singapore's growing political maturity, Mr C.T. Lim says in another article, 'Singapore political cartooning', for the Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science. An example was a series of cartoons on the lighter side of the 1979 by-elections by Straits Times cartoonist Shamsuddin H. Akib titled 'Sham's election smile' . In one strip, an old woman tells a child how she wishes every day were campaigning day so that strangers would come and see her and make her feel important. Former Straits Times cartoonist Shamsuddin H. Akib's work on Feb 6, 1979. PHOTO: ST FILE However, in 1981, the unexpected victory of opposition candidate J.B. Jeyaretnam in the Anson by-election led to criticism of The Straits Times' election coverage. Political cartoonists again had to retreat, says Mr C.T. Lim. By the 1990s, there was a gradual loosening of editorial boundaries. Mr C.T. Lim observes that more space for editorial cartoons returned when Mr Goh Chok Tong became prime minister in 1990. Indeed, in 1991, The Straits Times hired six Filipino artists, three of them political cartoonists. Their target was often everyday issues and international affairs, which they depicted in cartoons and op-ed illustrations. Cartoonist Miel joined The Straits Times in 1992 and one of his first cartoons was on the changeover of prime ministers within two months in Japan, drawn as an origami. It won him an in-house annual award. 'We were allowed to have our opinion, but there was a discussion and we would work towards a consensus,' he says about how editorial cartoons were developed. 'There was no outright 'no you cannot do it' but we would work towards what could be easily digested.' Retired cartoonist Miel's origami on the changeover of Japan's prime ministers was published on July 7, 1994. PHOTO: ST FILE Mr Miel, 61, who retired from the paper in 2025, adds: 'The role that we played was to make it easy for people to understand the changes taking place, the policies.' Senior executive artist Manuel A. Francisco, 55, who joined the paper in 2007, says restrictions often 'force you to think out of the box and to be more creative'. 'It has been easier to do economic and social issues, but for political and religious issues, we have to be careful,' he says. As to how he comes up with the visuals, he says that symbolic images pop up in his head as he reads a story he has to illustrate . For instance, going through an article about corruption, an alligator in a suit came to mind. In an environment where political cartooning had boundaries, comic strips like 'The House Of Lim' offered another form of commentary. The daily strip by Cheah Sin Ann ran for eight years straddling the 1980s and 1990s. It featured a relatable Singaporean family spanning three generations and its appeal lay not just in the familiar characters but also how he would build up a situation only to end with an unexpected punchline. A report on June 15, 1991, on a book containing The House Of Lim comics. PHOTO: ST FILE Heyday over? The rise of digital media has led to declining newspaper revenues globally, resulting in fewer opportunities for editorial cartoonists and the disappearance of many syndicated comic strips from print. According to a 2012 study by The Herb Block Foundation, the number of full-time editorial cartoonists in American newspapers dropped from about 2,000 at the start of the 20th century to over 250 by 2000, and to fewer than 20 in locally owned outlets by 2023. American cartoonist Rob Tornoe, writing in Editor & Publisher magazine, noted that in 2022, Australia's two major media companies – News Corp Australia and Nine Entertainment – axed all comic strips from their publications. McClatchy, a US media group, dropped editorial cartoons in 2021, citing changing reader preferences. Cartoonist Lee says cartoons lose some of their impact on a smartphone screen compared with the large canvas of a printed newspaper page. He adds that the proliferation of digital content – from webtoons to manga – creates fierce competition for attention. 'There are so many things grabbing every reader's attention on their devices,' he says. Artificial intelligence (AI) has entered the creative space with its ability to generate images. But artists remain sceptical of its ability to match human insights or wit. Straits Times art editor Lee Hup Kheng, 62, says AI can imitate visual styles and churn out cartoon-like images and animations, but falls short of crafting original, personal cartoons that capture an artist's voice, humour and life experiences. 'In editorial cartooning, the real magic comes from raw feelings like anger, frustration, happiness – real human emotions that machines just don't have,' he says. 'A fellow cartoonist once told me, 'AI lacks soul'. That's the case. For now.'
